both that enron and arthur andersen hit information from the defense in order to win. one of them worked for the clinton foundation, it is so ironic that you can't believe it. one of them fought the freedom of information act requests. what is mueller thinking? the first four lawyers who brings in her democrats and they are all headhunters, people who are out to get scalps and they are not giving up their jobs in order to come into the government, they are going to get somebody. i don't think they are going to get trump, but i guarantee you they will find someone to did something wrong. they are expanding with their looking at. the original question was was there collusion between the trump campaign and the russians? comey himself in open testimony had no evidence after six or seven months. say that they are sleepwalking, what do you mean? guest: they are not looking at what mueller is doing. he's bringing in professional democrats who are headhunters who i think have severareally dangerous reputations. second, comey is the person who appointed patrick fitzgerald as sp

arthur andersen died in 1918. his son took over the families that stayed here cherishing every generation. initially, they were making small iron implements. they were started to make the likes. when he came aboard he helped diversify their output. he talked the stockholders into producing cannons. produce approximately 40 locomotives. by 1860, there were the largest ironworks in the southern state. richman was the industrial hub of the southern states and that is one of the reasons why the federal government relocated their capital. when the civil war actually they offer tolly buy out right. they saw him as a capable switchedn it largely and to wartime cannery anything that the southern railroads needed to keep the war for going. for one case, you had a lot of skilled workers being drafted into the confederate army. other problem was as the union of the routest were quickly dwindling. they lost a good source of 10 and copper. creditor's ability to ship its products out was affected by advances in the union army.

don't know about him at home, he oversaw the enron task force and led the prosecution of the arthur andersennting firm. he also was a donator to hillary clinton's political campaign, he was highly criticized from the new york observer newspaper. guess who owned the observer at the time? kushner. and now this guy has been hired by mueller. >> there is a lot of shady business. >> julie: i like how you say that with an accent. i agree. >> the president said that he did believe that mueller was an honorable man. he is not completely throwing mueller under the bus, i do think it is a little shady that with comey saying he wanted to leak this information so he could get the special prosecutor and then he knew all along it was going to be his best pal. >> julie: do you see any issue with mueller and his involvement with james comey and his investigation? >> i have never seen such effusive praise for people on both sides of the aisle about anyone in washington. to suddenly suggest that robert mueller is compromised is a talking point that people are trying to use. >> julie: thank you very much, appr

he oversaw the enron task was, led the prosecution of the arthur andersen accounting firm he was completely ruined in the press for legal issues. by the way also donated to hillary clinton political campaign. but i'm not dumb. he was highly criticized for his legal conduct by guess what paper? the new york observer newspaper. guess who owns the observer at the time? jared kushner. i mean how can he actually fairly judge the trump campaign? >> yes you would not want these guys on your jury. but they can force a firing of mueller but it would be bad optics. to the point of optics, this team that mueller put together -- that is bad optics as well. already, half the country is extremely suspicious of this. the other half has already decided he is guilty and is just a sentencing hearing. but the first of if the country is not going to divide if muller does not tread carefully and try to do this fairly and come across as doing it fairly. >> christopher bedford, thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. >> in new york getting a sideshow they were not expecting when protesters disrupted a cont

you guys prosecuted arthur andersen, remember arthur andersen, the accounting tirm that controversially prosecud. it was reversed, i believe, put a lot of people out of work. do you think that was a smart movement as a business reporter i would like to know what he thinks about white collar crime? how far is too far? should he be putting companies out of business. neil: do you think he's going to be raked over the coals, like any cabinet fight, they're going to drag it out and rely on the two acts of the republican senators. >> i think democrats will fight over everything here. this guy should get passed. i would like to wherein he stands on white collars. i think one of the problematic things about the justice department, fbi and justice department under obama is how they went after corporate america and basically tried to torch up companies, okay? bush administration did, after enron put enron out of business, they were out of business already but put out of business arthur andersen, accounting firm on weak stuff. neil: went after tyco. >> that was way over the top. that was the manha