ido in advance of triggering article 50? publish the plan and i think it is not for me to set out a period of time, we will ensure that parliament has an opportunity to look at these issues. we have, of course, to factor into this timetable the question of the supreme court judgment, we timetable the question of the supreme courtjudgment, we do not yet know what that will be. if they find in favour of the government, that leads us to one course of action, if they find against the government, there will be a need to respond to thatjudgment. is if your intention to ensure that parliament has a vote on the final deal when it is being negotiated? parliament will have every opportunity to vote through the repeal bill on the various aspects of the relationship that they will be having with the european union. that was not quite the question. when the final deal is negotiated, is it your intention to ensure parliament has a chance to vote on that deal, yes or no? villa it is my intention to make sure parliament has ample opportunit

thedon't intend to extend article 50 process. i take it from that that it is the government's firm intention to have left the eu by april 2019. , we should take that to me in the repeal act will have all that to come into in april.2019, direct applicability of law and ec j rulings will know prime minister may: -- will pertain in u.k. cords. prime minister may:as you know, -- there is ater may: two-year protest for the discussion of withdrawal in the future relationship to be undertaken. through, aske us you indicated, through march 2019. i fully expect us to operate on the timetable that has been set .ut in the treaty that's a matter for the negotiations. but i fully expect this -- that may be the case [indiscernible] prime minister may: if i may answer that specific point. place at the point at which we leave the eu. at that point -- >> it will deftly do that. that is theer may: intention. they repeal bill will come into effect, at which point we leave the european union. but at that point, eu law will be brought into domestic l

you might be sensible to push scrutiny of the triggering of article 50 or proposed triggering of article 50 and any accompanying government documents after the spring recess and then we went to meetings right at the beginning and one towards the end of the summer session. >> that may very well be sensible, chairman. i suggest perhaps we will be able to talk about possible dates. the committee by the view as to when -- it will be quite busy in the run-up to the end of march. >> yes. so i don't think it's going to be realistic or practical for either of us. i think that would be a more sensible arrangement. you indicated before and that you'd want or two remarks come introductory marks you wanted to make your why don't you make those now? >> thank you much of it. i just want to make a few remarks i hope will be helpful to the committee but before i do that i would just like to take a moment to reflect on the reporting his acumen from berlin yesterday and we have seen very vivid images on our newspaper and television at the think they shocked us all. i wanted to express our condolences. i'm

it isn't a question of it being an exclusively a cia article or exclusively an nga article one we try to do is put them together so we draw on geospatial intelligence. their tremendous capabilities in graphics and imagery. we drawn at james -- attaches and the nsa for intelligence which we try to fuse together into one product so we sort of don't try to do that anymore because it is kind of a statistically tough thing to do and i am not sure it has a lot of merit. >> thank you very much for coming today. i happen to be a part of the nixon administration. can you give us an overview of how the baby fits into the overall schedule for the day. pdb fits into the overall schedule for the day. when i see press shots today it looks like president obama has more people there every morning. how does it work? >> eight varies depending on the president's travel schedule and commitments but the typical time for a briefing is 10:00 but as i said in his case we do not go in and brief the articles because he has already read them so we use that time which he and his advisers ascribe a lot of importa

>> when you say which issues were formed under article 50? >> it's possible that our partners could find themselves in the same trap the government has found itself in with action being taken, the ability to conclude majority, there's actually an agreement that would be so extensive that it will be out of the scope of article 50 and we could find our seven with ourselves with a 27 on the the council and in the same position that way now. >> if i understand the question correctly you are saying that there may be, at the end of this process, some matters that are ratified by individual as well is by the parliament. that is something we are aware of and something we will be negotiating. >> you say you're confident you know what the issues are. >> i think work is still going in great detail on this, but i think one of the questions is a matter of legal discussion and that is the question of any trade arrangement with the european union and the extent. >> would that be published as part of the formal negotiation to the european council as to what

i don't think that is appropriate for the triggering of article 50. suggested that there will be legal discussions on this, this will be a matter on which the lawyers will be discussing at that point. i don't think it would be for us to assert. but the lawyers have already had a disagreeable habit, along with the judges, of upsetting the timetable of your own government in the move to notification in the supreme court. what judgments in the move to notification in the supreme court. whatjudgments will you be making about what is achievable under the article 50 negotiations, and will you be reviewing that as you go through the process? first of all, i would point out that the timetable i set out was by the end of march next year. yes, the supreme court has the come forward with its judgment on the case that was taken before it on the government's appeal. but i expect to be able to trigger to go 50 by the end of march next year. so it hasn't in any sense blown the timetable of course. but it will be confirmed that it is your intention to cover as many a

the article didn't say affiliates. the article didn't say -- wait a second. the article said the rnc was hacked. don't be defensive with me that i'm -- >> it's not -- >> i'm refuting the specific fact that was made in the article to create this entire firestorm. the specific fact as we have been told by the fbi repeatedly, including two days ago when we checked back with them about this issue, repeated the fact that the rnc was not hacked. you tell me where this story is at. why would the press run with something that wasn't true? >> let me ask you though about the cia's assessment. i understand you want a specific denial about the rnc. the cia made this assessment. donald trump so ignored the assessment. do you not believe russia was involved? do you not believe anything that russia was attempting to infiltrate the u.s. election system in any way, shape or form? >> here is what i'm saying. number one, you don't have a single source -- i've given you a source specifically, me, who runs the rnc to say that the rnc was not hacked. you tell me who the specific s

that is the for negotiating her strategy before trickling the article 50.are joined now from london for more on the story. benefits, how surprising is it that the prime minister agreed to publisher plans? how did we get here? reporter: it is somewhat surprising, but what has theened is that you have government of theresa may saying , buts not going to give the media and the country are clamoring for details yo. you have the labour party who has won a right to have a debate on this brexit strategy and are demanding the government publishes what they call a pretty detailed plan, a pretty detailed negotiating plan. if they do get details on this, then they will continue pressing and parliament the government for details of this. the countermove of the government's surprisingly night was indeed to say, ok, do that, but in turn, we're going to add an amendment of our own and that is when you vote, you vote to agree that the government will trigger article 50. it is the beginning of the now 18 months apparently negotiating plan with e.u. at the end of march, by t

the article is based on a lie that the rnc was hacked. so the entire premise of the article is false. the sources are unnamed. the report was inconclusive. listen, i don't want anyone hacked, okay. but the point is that we need to find out more facts about this situation, and then we can make intelligent decision later and you and i can have a more intelligent conversation about what to do about it. >> all right. >> reince priebus, we have to leave it there because of time. >> you bet. >> until we meet again. thanks for coming on. >> you bet. >>> when we come back, 12 members of congress have seen the full cia assessment. we will hear from the top democrat on the house intelligence committee, one of the 12, adam shchiff of california. >>> before we go to break, we have one final election result from 2016 to report. louisiana held its senate runoff election yesterday to replace david vitor. republicans will hold on to the seat. john kennedy, no relation to the kennedy family, defeated foster campbell with nearly 61% of the vote. with that,

what is listed here as article the third and article the fourth are what later became what we know as the first amendment to the constitution, and that includes most of the rights that a lot of people are familiar with. and if you look closely at the markings here -- and there are a lot of markings here, a lot of ink spilled in the senate over these clauses, the most ink was spilled on the clauses that have to do with the free exercise and establishment of religion. after the bill of rights was sent to the states for ratification, many states did ratify, and this document here is the ratification from the state of virginia, which was the 11th out of the then 14 states to ratify. that brought the amendments up to the constitutional railway required brailway -- required bar of three-quarters to ratify. this document was signed on december 15th, 1791. and that is the date we now celebrate as bill of rights day, and sinceit is the 225th annive of this document we are celebrating at the national archives. one of the best known rights in the bill of right is the right to petition your gover

ask for the articles in the bylaws. i said i'm not going to do the job. i don't want that job and they said humor me. so they called and they said the that the lawyer said i should read it. so they were unexceptional but i get these articles and they are written by these people that i described in the 1840s. the reads like the declaration of independence, which i happen to love. and i remember i was in my study and claremont. that's right. this place is old. i've been here once but i have forgotten. they showed me the statute and i remember what it was. i said wow. you had a big part in the civil war. why don't i know that? if you are any good at your job, you would know at least to tell me that. so i see that and i think to myself maybe it will solve the problem, because people that are smart and know their disciplines better than you know they can't really work for you because you are brilliant, you know. and anyway, to be in charge of anything, churchill said this beautiful thing. he said in a saying that the bolshevism cannot succeed in this effect on

and he has done scholarly articles and the american -- articles in lead the journal of american history -- articles in the journal of american history. bookll speak about his "was america founded as a christian nation?" rereleaseds recently . it an author called remarkably useful guide of navigating the arguments of america's christian origin. at the conclusion of this talk he will to a question answer session. there is a mike in the gallery if you want to ask a question. to the stage, repeat the question, and he will answer it. it is my pleasure to bring him to you tonight -- to bring dr. -- dr. fea tonight. please join me in welcoming dr. john fea. [applause] is greatthank you, it to be here in danville at center college. i have never been to this part of kentucky before pre-at i have never flown into lexington before. i've been to louisville if you times, but this part i have not visited. it is great to be here. i'm glad that c-span is here. and the topic i want to talk with you about tonight is a topic that is at the crooks of some of the things i do -- at crux of what i do. book ha

a lot of control over whether they should be allowed on social media and one example, there's an article that circulated claiming the pope endorsed donald trump which of course he did not and that was shared by hundreds of thousands. >> host: when it comes to looking at the sites you cited one example. is this a partisan thing or equal opportunity when it comes to people putting this type of information out there? >> guest: everybody likes to share and read news because it is sort of the human thing and it's true there are fake news sites but i would be perpetuating my own fake news if i didn't preteninvited to attend heavily towards the right. studies done by those feeds demonstrated the conservative pages tend to have more false or untrue information on them and you even look at some of the reporting on this. when you talk to those that are undertaking a fake news sites they said they tried to put together the sites about hillar clinton, bernie sanders, and itt is this in particular that provides the kind of traffic foc that allows th goes to big prof. >> host: we have a listing of som

a lot of folks are actually fooled by your, you know, by your articles. and as you know, you've talked about that, how they've been passed along as real by supporters of various candidates. isn't that part of the point, to kind of make people -- >> sure. >> you're hoping to make people look stupid by passing them on, but you're also spreading false information. >> um, i do it -- i mean, i like trying to -- i do it to try to educate people. i see certain things wrong in society that i don't like -- >> how are you educating people? >> -- in different targets -- uh, within my stories, i'll have links to all the different facts that the purpose of the story -- i'll pick a purpose to write about, and then within that story, i'll have links to everything to back up the different purpose behind the story. >> you are making money by having your stories passed around as much as possible? so there is an incentive -- i mean, this is not -- you're not doing this as a sort of sociological experiment or just, you know, i mean, you're making money off of the spread of m

so as we move swiftly towards the trigger of article 50 i wa nt towards the trigger of article 50 i wantt also to make sure her new year's resolution includes a commitment to build better relations with our european partners so we get the best deal for the people of this country. notjust a brexit that benefits big business and bankers, and at the moment, it is clear that on the international stage the prime minister and britain are becoming increasingly isolated. if we are to build a successful britain after brexit, it is more vital than ever that our relationship with our european partners remains strong, cordial and respectful. it is also clear, mr speaker, through my own discussions with european leaders that they're becoming increasingly frustrated by her shambolic government and the contradictory approach to brexit negotiations. the mixed messages from her front bench only adds to the confusion. this government fails to speak for the whole country. instead, we hear a babble of voices speaking for themselves and their vested interests. for instance, mr speaker, last week we were told

so who will actually negotiate article 50 withdrawal? will be conducted at a numberof cull it will be conducted at a number of levels. i will have a will to play in relation to discussions with the european leaders. the secretary of state for exiting the european union will have a key role to play in negotiations, but obviously, there will be a lot of technical negotiations and discussions taking place at official level. so who will actually negotiate the uk's new trade relationship with the eu? that will be part of... insofar as it is part of the negotiations, it will be those who are negotiating who will be part of that. but they will bring in the expertise in relation to the trade aspects. willie trade minister have a special role in that, doctor liam fox? as we unfold the way in which that trade negotiation will ta ke which that trade negotiation will take place, obviously we will bring in expertise, both official and ministers as appropriate from the department of international trade. many governments have a single trade negotiator,

that was not the worst article. >> what was the worst? nancy reagan: that was the worst in washington, maybe. [laughter] but before i got to washington, -- see, there was an article and this is part of my problem, i think. there was an article in los angeles by a woman whose name i have forgotten which may be freudian. it was a four-part serial. interviewed me but she interviewed a lot of other people who threatened to sue her. and this came to washington before i ever got to washington. so they had this preconceived idea of me. i was at i mean it was terrible. safire came along later. carl: when the press began sometimes over-inflating your sense of protecting the president and trying to make more out of it than it was, you gave a particular speech, i remember, to editors, and you used humor. you had talked about all of the things that people accused you of doing and you managed to shoot it all down. ms. reagan: yes, i remember that. i remember i was so nervous, i couldn't sleep the night before, and i had three cups of coffee. now i nev

their mandate is to deal with article 50, how britain leaves. is a separate article. with no arrangements. the tone of your voice does not necessarily mean it is wrong. if i was british i would not think it was a good idea. why would it possibly be a good idea? my point is, framing an option in pantomime terms does not make it better or worse, it just says how you feel about it. no... and you think this would be good for britain? this is not the same situation. we are not a member of the wto yet. since 1995, you are right, we gave up an ownership of the wto to participate via the eu but are any of you seriously claiming that the united kingdom would be kept out of the wto asa member? probably not, i agree. wait... all the complexities, think of greenland taking three years to leave the eu. think of canada... for example... when norway decided not to join it took eight months. for example... norway was not a member of the eu. you left the eu. you decided to quit, 0k, so you should not expect those people who you turn your back to them, to be nice to you. you cannot ask

it is intellectual, yet idiot, the most useful single article. he says, at least 40% of the governing elites worldwide are people that are really good at taking tests and writing essays, which gets them into elite colleges where they take classes from professors who are really good at taking tests and writing essays and so when they take tests an write essays, they get really good grades so the professor places them with a judge, newsroom or bureaucracy so they can continue to take tests and write essays. the only problem with these people is they don't know anything. they could write a brilliant essay on how to change a tire. if you showed up and said, my car has a flat, they would not know how to change the tire. this was the best explanation of what i have been dealing with. it explains 80% of the state department. these are very, very arrow diet people that are idiots. they are intellectuals but idiots. one of the great thing about trumpism. he is not a finance sear. trump is a builder. if you build a building, it has to stand up, it is a ver

on facebook, it was hard to miss fake news articles like this one we are looking now about the pontiff endorsing donald trump or an fbi agent killing himself and his wife because he was suspected in the clinton's e-mail leak. it was created by a 40-year-old who lives with his wife. he makes fake news in his own time at his house. >> we did a series of stories on ebola where several residence contacted ebola they got about 6 million pages. >> that's huge. you must get a kick out of that. it is addictive. >> do you feel like you are stopping cold turkey or how do you feel? >> i do. i am good with that and i think it is kind of disappointing that it took president-elect trump for actual news outlets to focus on this sort of phenomenon. >> you said disappointing, did you vote? >> of course. >> who did you vote for? >> hillary. >> fbi agent inspected female league found dead, read that one. the murder behind the killing is still investigated and brown is liked in the community. >> is any of that true? >> not a single thing. >> three days before the election, half a million people saw this p

just posting dozens and dozens of articles every day. just seeing what stuck. turned out to be content supporting donald trump and attacking hillary clinton. >> it just seems like quite the coincidence that it's coming from here and is it really that organic? or is it in their best interest to make it look organic? >> it seems that are various different types of fake news that the teenagers and very young adults are working with. one type is pure copy and paste. there are certain fake news websites in the united states which they will just copy the article from and paste it on to their websites verbatim. that is a pure copy and paste operation. they do also take articles from the mainstream media and just inflate their own untruths. they got inspiration from elsewhere. it seems that they saw a certain fake news website in the u.s. and thought they could make a quick buck by doing so. these kids have really got to where they are or certainly the particular teenager that said they spent last weekend with. he got to where he is now by process of trial and error an

what is listed as article the third an article the fourth are what later became as we know the first amendment. that includes most of the rights that a lot of the blog from anywhere. markings,osely at the a lot of ink spilled in the , thee over these clauses most inkless spilled on the clauses that have to do with the free exercise and establishment of religion. after the bill of rights was sent to the states for ratification, many states did ratified. this document is the ratification from the state of 11th out which was the of the 14 states to ratify. upt brought the amendments to the constitutionally required -- threef the states quarters of the states to ratify. the bill of rights became part of our constitution. it was signed on december 15, 1791. that is the date we celebrate as bill of rights day. birthday that we are celebrating this year. rights in best-known the bill of rights is the right to petition their government for directed grievances. this afternoon, this is a great example of that happening. typical method by which people to petition the 18thnment for most of the a

one and article two allocation of responsibility is not just about what's constitutional.i think it reflects the value and that is we shouldn't order people into harms way to risk their lives unless there is a political consensus that the mission is worth it. anyone that volunteers for the service knows it is good to be difficult and will not be able to change that but if we are going to order people into the war zone it is a combat and order them to risk their lives they may see things happen to colleagues that could affect them for the rest of their lives. there should at least be a national political consensus that the mission is worth it and where the constitution sets that up is the president makes a proposal but then th the peoples body booths and says the mission is worth it and soak now that we have that vote and we've educated the public about what is at stake and said the mission is worth it, it is fair to ask the 2 million active-duty guard and reserve folks like the chief petty officer and folks like -- it is fair to ask them to risk their lives in a mission li

eement of article >> when you say what issues will fall under the agreement of article 50 -- it's entirelyossible that our partners could find themselves in the same trap the found itself in, action being taken. conclude an ity to agreement under article 50, a actually majority, is an agreement which would require domestic ratification and in the council, in other words, the extent of the article 50 agreement could be so extensive that it would be outside of the scope of article within domestic law and order in other countries and we could find ourselves with 27 and the position thee same government is in now. has there been any examination that possibility? the question tand correctly, i mean, you're saying maybe at the end of this process, there may be some matters of mixed confidence that need to be ratified by individual national parmts as well as by the rest of the process? >> yes. >> that's something that we're well aware the question of and that those who will be negotiating are aware of. >> are you confident that you those issues are or do you have a date of when you xpect to have

in article 50, triggered, and for very good reason. they want to give certainty and reassurance to people but this could be dealt with at an early stage -- >> the statement in which colleagues do so. a fantastic -- 6 months since the brexit referendum. tomorrow the government will become the first administration in the uk to publish its plans in detail, they are to be welcomed. she wants to have a respect agenda. will you commit with the first minister to incorporate priorities of the government in the uk negotiating position. .. have been used in the covenants of conflict in yemen. when was the prime minister told and when will the u.k. join our european partners and starting a more ethical foreign policy on both sides of arabia in yemen? >> a minister. >> thank you, mr. speaker. the right honorable gentleman later this afternoon this is not an issue discussed as european council. he did focus on the issues i mentioned in a statement. he talks about climate security and political parties. maintaining their security is a matter of indi

a second warning will come up for anyone sharing the article. it is examining ways to hit fake news publishers where it hurts the most. in their wallet. >> the talk -- the clock is ticking to get health insurance. is the final beta sign-up through healthcare.gov. now, hundreds of toys are on their way to children in need. marine corps came to abc 7 to pick up hundreds of toys donated by you, your neighbors to the toys for tots campaign. the toys will be distributed to children all across the area this weekend. >> that is no way to drive your car. the winter blast is hammering folks out west. it was enough to turn the roads icy during rush hour. further east, cleveland. never a stranger to bad weather and they got it. the high temperature there today is 16 degrees. ball me. >> will most got to 16 degrees but without any snow. the middle of december and it's not even winter yet. at 5:22 a.m. so i will call you to issue a happy winter. >> i know you will. degrees in washington, one below in pittsburgh. they are based on the air temperature and the

it took the magazine five months to take the article off its website. rolling stone also faces a 25 million dollar lawsuit from phi kappa psi the fraternity where the woman in the article claimed her assault took place. that case is scheduled to go to trial late next year. now to the trump transition.. president-elect donald trump is expected to make more cabinet pick he's stepping his search for a secretary of state. former utah governor and ambassador to china, jon huntsman, has been added to the list of possible candiates. meanwhile, trump continues to indicate he might be open to changing his position on climate change. he met yesterday with former vice president and climate change activist al gore, who described the meeting as productive. and there's word that trump's daughter, ivanka, they plan to move to this area from new york city. and - donald trump hasn't even moved in yet. but already - someone is thinking about the next election. vice president joe biden - says it isn't ruling out a run in 20-20. he told reporters he's not committing one wa

if we go to article 50 in march. personally i think that's the right thing to do.e need to move forward. the only way is to get on and trigger. if we do that we have to know what the activists are, what the the agenda is and the process for negotiations. and we have to preorganise some of that with the european union negotiators. so we need to know our own position, and then we need to prepare the ground to actually embark on the negotiation. >> the first thing is to establish what is on the table for the various negotiations, so for the article 50, the divorce, if you like. what is it that we cap negotiate in that process, and what will need to wait for a subsequent negotiation about our future rilsship, or could -- relationship or could we do the two together. which there are advantages in doing. >> presuming behind the screams departments are scrambling to make sure their pet issue is at the top of the agenda. >> true, different departments are bringing forward proposals on what need to happen in their centre. that has to be arbitrated. >> presumably by the depa

i don't believe article 7 is on the agenda today >> okay. so here we go good day anastasia i reside at the residential end of 24th street neighborhood commercial strip and i'm concerned about how the article 7 will impact our mcd the new ncd control for many districts have a category labeled urban design guidelines underbuilding and standards and a reference column labeled general commerce destroy table 3 is the summarized column subject to urban design guidelines now my question is subject to urban design guidelines does that mean that existing urban design guidelines found in the commerce industry clause is of the general plan or what governs the ncd or use the new urban design guidelines that is are in the process of being written outreach for article 7 revision has been not adequate or done with a view to truly informing the neighborhoods what is supposed to happen not district and month neighbors a kwunlt unaware of what is done the changes are substantive and planning department staff has not allowed time for the neighborhood staff and

it officially sets sail at the end of march when we'll trigger article 50.g to take has been, well, a bit like today, pretty murky. so, we've come to bristol to find out what businesses here want to know about the potential perils and potential opportunities that lie ahead. for firms like this manufacturer of aerospace components, initial anxiety has given way to just getting on with it. in fact the company has just spent £a00,000 on this new machine. i was very pro—remain as a business person because i didn't want the uncertainty that brexit is still potentially going to create. but people have decided on what they want to happen. let's roll up our sleeves and move forward. in fact the economy has not really dimmed at all since the vote, and here at the uk's largest independent financial adviser, investor confidence has been looking up. and the other is that people have certainty that actually, the day after the brexit vote, the world hasn't fallen to pieces. but hang on a moment, remember, we are still in the european union, and there is a gap to be bridge

i don't believe article 7 is on the agenda today >> okay. so here we go good day anastasia i reside at the residential end of 24th street neighborhood commercial strip and i'm concerned about how the article 7 will impact our mcd the new ncd control for many districts have a category labeled urban design guidelines underbuilding and standards and a reference column labeled general commerce destroy table 3 is the summarized column subject to urban design guidelines now my question is subject to urban design guidelines does that mean that existing urban design guidelines found in the commerce industry clause is of the general plan or what governs the ncd or use the new urban design guidelines that is are in the process of being written outreach for article 7 revision has been not adequate or done with a view to truly informing the neighborhoods what is supposed to happen not district and month neighbors a kwunlt unaware of what is done the changes are substantive and planning department staff has not allowed time for the neighborhood staff and

no one at the foundation, there is no boss that can overrule an article or commission an article or deleteomething. it has to come from the bottom up. there are different layers. those people are just volunteers. there are 1200 administrators. those are also volunteers. there is no overruling wikipedia editor. >> that is the filter bubble problem. >> this is what people have been talking about in other areas. we think of the internet that sort of encourages diversity of opinion. i can read cogent arguments from people on the other side. i can pretty much read endless amounts of content about anything. we pretty much just find stuff that we agree with. so, during the conversation about misinformation, fake news during the election, one of the ideas people talked about was a filter bubble. you see an article on facebook that conference biases. if you are a hillary clinton supporter, you see donald trump just shot somebody on fifth avenue and you are likely more to share that and that kind of perpetuates this misinformation. wikipedia has kind of the same problem which is you have these group

he expanded his article into an even longer article for the atlantic monthly and also a forthcoming book. both were published in may of 1927 while appeals were pending casee sacco and vanzetti before the supreme judicial court of massachusetts. his critics were outraged that he had published a book with appeals pending before massachusetts' highest court. one of the critics included the racist reactionary and anti-somatic supreme court justice james reynolds. in may of 1927, justice mcreynolds wrote the editor and i was sure of the atlantic monthly, the purpose of the writers seems plain enough and harmonizes with what he has done another times. his defense was tepid at best. he wrote back, with many a professor's activities i havee. he is hotheaded, temperate, radical and instincts but upright and able and courageous. i went through his article with great care. mcreynolds was not qualified. think yourck, i must estimate of the writer of the article is very much too high and this misleads you. other performances by him indicate what lies in the back of his head. mcreynolds and frankfurte

our next guest isn't thrilled with the article completely.y gist and sleep medicine doctor, the right person to talk to about this. i am curious, do the numbers jive with what you see on a regular basis, dr. winter, that frankly a lot of us have insomnia, real insomnia? >> absolutely. i think at some point in our lives we're all going to be touched by it some point or another. i think numbers are spot on. >> this is a tough time, we're all not sleeping enough. what do you think is the number one mistake when it comes to getting good sleep? >> i think a lot of it has to do with schedule. a lot of people are trying to get more sleep than what their bodies need. i think the article touches on light as an important topic. if somebody has difficulty sleeping, turning on a television or tablet and having that light shining in your face can sometimes work against your ability to fall back asleep later in the evening or in the morning. >> one of the things the article suggests, we have been joking about it in teases, viewers have likely heard it, you

article i, section 8 of the constitution gives the power to declare war. this proposed amendment would say that if congress did declare war, it could not go into effect until after that war resolution had been voted on in a national referendum. that was definitely an attempt to try to get the people's voice in there. although they did get a lot of support for this here, they didn't have enough support to actually get that into the constitution. over here we have another perennial issue related to amending. the balanced budget amendment is one that has been introduced repeatedly in congress. probably for the last 40 years or so, it has been a regular event. we include this video here of ronald reagan's 1988 state of the union address. in it he talks about and advocates for the passage of a balance budget amendment. president reagan: this is the conference report. 1053 pages report, weighing 14 pounds. [laughter] president reagan: let us do now what so many states due to hold down spending, and what 32 state legislatures have asked us to do. that is, heed th

welcome to the show. >> thanks. >> trevor: this article is really powerful.title mean. >> there was a lot moment during the inauguration, and young jay-z on the stage doing "my president was black" and it was a beautiful, joyce moment and i wanted to conjure that and make it a little-- like this thing had actually ended. and it kind of all sort of fit together. >> trevor: this is a piece where you spent-- it seems like you spent a lot of time with the president writing this piece. >> we did. i was sort of surprised he spent that much time with me, actually, because, you know, the fact that i had been, you know, critical of him. you've always been critical of the president with regards to how he addresses black audiences versus he addresses a white audience about african americans. >> right. >> trevor: what was your biggest criminal, criticism of that? >> well, it was two things. i felt like the president, in one respect, you know, wanted to be, as he said, the president of all people, but in other respects, wanted to, you know, get, you know, the sort of blac

as we get further into this, once we've served the article 50 letter, one of the virtues of the article 50 process is it sets its own way. it's difficult to see it being revoked. we don't intend to revoke it. it may not be revocable, i don't know. but so that's the -- that's the route we're going now. and i expect at least at that point people's calculation will change from people's calculatio would change from how do we change their minds to how do we best do this? >> very helpful. i'm anxious, because i'm -- >> yes. >> proceed to close for form and then we'll go and vote and then -- >> of course, one last question. >> very, very quickly. >> is it within the remit of the british government to think about, for example, reducing corporation tax, changing the regulatory tools that are within its control in order to make britain an even more attractive destination for investment, if the european commission and the council seem intent on trying to punish us? >> can you explain that in more detail? >> well, i'm not -- i'm not sure i do want to explain, because in fairness -- >> the simple po

britain first, to coin a phrase, and we can all predict that article 50 will indeed be invoked by march, beginning the formal process of leaving the european union. but where will brexit, and indeed the eu, be by the end of 2017? with political change in france and italy, and possibly in germany too. what do we think is going to happen? i think 2017 will be much more difficult than this artificial period we've been living through prior to the triggering of article 50. all kinds of things have been read into what has happened since the referendum. "the uk economy has been better than expected." we haven't triggered this thing yet. and so far, the focus has been on the british position. what is theresa may's plan? again, completely artificial. in 2017, we are going to get real, because we will hear the european union position as well. and when that becomes clear, i think the dynamic of the internal politics of the conservative party, the position of other mps in the house of commons, scotland, will become 100 times more complicated than the position at the end of 2016. so i think brexit i