without pain there is no way a machine really feel can really understand what feelings artificial intelligence committee commotions and show proper responses but does affect the humans present. the robots human like movements create a stronger bond between human and machine. they see a real problem there i think that we should always be aware computers are our slaves and draw to. do what we tell them to them but they shouldn't freak emotions because that can be misleading for the use of. an obligation which will never the people or the promotes a companion for them for their private life just machines and they should be treated the machines. that's a tough statement sure i can agree that 1st and foremost robots are machines but to consider them slaves they do do the work that we ourselves cannot or would rather not do there's plenty of examples for that. social and service robots are already on the job and they can be more or less humanoid often they wheel around in the service and entertainment sectors a bank in japan has them greeting customers at airports they can provide information in many differen

without pain there is no way a machine really feel you can really understand what feelings artificial intelligence committee commotions and show proper responses that does affect the humans present . the robots human like movements create a stronger bond between human and machine. we see a real problem there i think that we should always be aware computers. and robots. will do what we tell them to them when they shouldn't think emotions because that can be misleading for the use of more common application which will never the people the promotes companion. for their private life just machines and they should be treated the machines. that's a tough statement sure i can agree that 1st and foremost robots are machines but to consider them slaves they do do the work that we ourselves cannot or would rather not do best plenty of examples for that. social and service robots are already on the job and they can be more or less humanoid often they wheel around in the service and entertainment sectors a bank in japan has them greeting customers and airports they can provide information in many different languages and

. >> your committee hosted a hearing on artificial intelligence. wanted to ask you, as it is becoming more prevalent, how do you think the u.s. approach to stem education has to evolve? >> we are just beginning to crack the ice and look into the area. we have looked at research. i do not to us to sit around and think. we have to be ready for that innovation. we have to make sure the workforce is ready. while we are doing focusing on other things, that is our future. that is our workforce future. him him him >> is it important to the u.s. quote unquote beat china? rep. johnson: it is important we keep pace and sometimes lead. we are not in resting the same amount of time or money to keep pace with them. that is a concern i have. we cannot dream we can keep up with investments. we have to invest in the research and the education. >> i wanted to follow up. last night, automation was a key issue. an entrepreneur has been proposing a universal basic income. what do you think of those proposals? rep. johnson: that is an idea we need to entertain. we are

. >> madam chair your committee recently hosted a hearing on artificial intelligence. as that has become more prevalent how has the us approach to stem education needs to evolve quick. >> it is getting to be more important than ever. we are just beginning to look into that area. we have had some hearings with the research that we need to do. and then to sit around and think artificial intelligence will just appear but we have to be ready for that innovation and we have to make sure the workforce is ready. and that's critical. while we focus on many other things, that is our workforce readiness future. >>host: is it important the us quote unquote beat china with a ai? >> and important that we keep pace but we are not investing the same amount of time or money in the research to keep up with china. that is a concern that i have. we cannot assume we cannot keep up. we have to invest in the research and the education. >> at the democratic debate automation was a key issue one candidate andrew yang is proposing a universal basic income to address the changes of work that ai

i am the cochair of a task force on artificial intelligence on the financial services committee.f the things we are looking people toer means for be able to authenticate themselves online as a specific human being. this is going to be crucial for any payment transaction, processing, or any participation in any sort of digital contract. david: we heard a lot of the issues, potential problems with libra. at the same time, we heard from mr. zuckerberg more than once, we don't have much choice because the chinese are already going there. we will be left behind. does he have a point? bill: he absolutely does. the space the chinese are moving into our digital currencies. offering central banks citizens the ability to transact in those currencies purely electronically. this is something that is not unique to china. china is going aggressively into this, but christine lagarde, the incoming head of the european central bank, has been giving speeches that she thinks central banks should start considering issuing digital currency. the ranking member of the relevant subcommittee and i wrote

both pain there is no way a machine really feel can really understand what feelings artificial intelligence committeeommotions and show proper responses but does affect the humans present. the robots human like movements create a stronger bond between human and machine. they see a real problem there i think we should always be aware computers. and robots. will do what we tell them to them but they shouldn't freak and motions because that can be misleading for the use of more of an obligation which will never the people of the promotes a companion. for their private life robots are just machines and they should be treated the machines. that's a tough statement sure i can agree that 1st and foremost robots are machines but to consider them slaves they do do the work that we ourselves cannot or would rather not do best plenty of examples for that. social and service robots are already on the job and they can be more or less humanoid often they wheel around in the service and entertainment sectors a bank in japan has them greeting customers at airports they can provide information in many different langu

. >> madam chair, your committee recently hosted a hearing on artificial intelligence and i wanted to ask you, as artificial intelligence is becoming more probably, how do you think the u.s. approach distance education needs to evolve? >> guest: it's getting to be more important than ever. artificial intelligence, we are just beginning to crack the ice and looked into the area. we've had some hearings to look at the type of research we need to do. i do not want to sit around and think that artificial intelligence is going to disappear. we've got to be ready for that innovation and we've got to make sure the workforce is ready. and it's critical. and while we're doing a lot of focuses on many other things, that is our future. that's our workforce readiness future. >> host: is it important that the u.s. quote-unquote the china when it comes to ai? >> guest: it's important that we keep pace, and hopefully sometime we will lead. but we're not investing the same amount of time nor money into research to keep up with china. that is a concern that i have. we cannot dream or assume that we ca

committee, killed the pan he he'll. >> the president of the heritage foundation was appoint todd the artificial intelligence ethics boardservative views and they dissolved the panel. the question is will this happen in facebook's panel too. paul: i agree with zuckerberg on this, i don't think you should be policing political speech on facebook. kyle, what do you think? >> i completely agree. trying to fact check that kind of stuff, remember a certain president said if you like your health care coverage, you can keep your health care coverage. that was ruled to be true right before it was ruled to be false. paul: by politifact. >> that's right. this is a difficult thing he's being asked to do. think back. as far as political rhetoric goes, thomas jefferson and john adams called each other pretty nasty things but here we are. >> i think mark zuckerberg's speech was very important. he came out against censorship. we have to understand, there are a lot of people on the left who think some conservative ideas are morally unacceptable and should be suppressed. that's what's happening on campuses for the last four or five years

committee, government or military service preparing you to lead in the 21st century is central to the university's mission. some of you may feel very comfortable conversing about cyber or artificial intelligence robotics or data. today's conversation is not just about products you can purchase. and you should already know that you are personal data can be a threat. your dna, your search preferences, social posts can be used for great purposes but also they can be used to manipulate with revenue. today's conversation is about the future that you will live and work in and we are here to explore the future of warfare. your phone is a powerful communication tool and a potential method of tracking and exploiting you. artificial intelligence is changing our lives and impacts future jobs and transportation and politics. the robotics revolutionized the industry and more combined with ai big data and instant communications, robotics as a 21st century change agent perhaps like none other in history you can't be on the technological sidelines as leaders whether you were a schoolteacher or platoon leader you can express today but in this panel and your job. that is what today is about, the imperative to

committee on cybersecurity that russian information warfare campaigns in 2018 and 2020 will adapt and look more american, and it will look less russian. in addition, new technology, including the use of artificial intelligence and deep fake recordings that seem real are actually doctored or entirely fabricated, will add an additional layer of complexity and make it easier for us to thwart these operations. as then-acting director of national intelligence dan coates testified to the senate intelligence committee in late january, adversaries and strategic competitors will probably attempt to use deep fake or similar machine learning technologies to create convincing but false image, audio, and digital files to augment influence campaigns directed against the united states and our allies and partners. despite these assessments by our senior national security officials and our intelligence community and voluminous evidence of the special counsel's indictments and reports, additional indictments to the department of justice and bipartisan reports from the senate intelligence committee, the president appears unwilling or unable to recognize the urgency of this national security threat or the need to immediately i