french computer scientist left in 2013 he says the algorithms that spell you cheap 6 asaad g.p.s. at best they use d. printing and grizzle which is not usually interdictions that can process millions of user sessions we'll see which videos are going to be the most likely to keep people the names of all. the key to me is a watch time it's the product of hits to 2 sticks and average running times together at what the time uses spend on you tube the longer uses stay on the website the better for you tube that's the company run more ads which then add up to lots of money. the videos that have proven most effective out those with polarizing and extreme. recommendation algorithms play that part. it's like a vicious circle you just watch one because you're all your curious and then here goes and we recommend it again and again jules rule the world homosexuality is a. disease and refugees rape women and steal jobs wired theories like these are hugely popular on you tube because an algorithm gives them greater exposure but why exactly are we so receptive to videos like these why do we clic

privacy harms aren't huge their death by a 1000 cuts the spin from silicon valley's that their own asaad when it comes to how we control our long privacy policies are very confusing and if you make it long and spell out all the details then you're probably going to reduce the percent of people who read it however take a closer look at the design of the buttons in the pups that when they click and it's clear that the tech companies have the upper hand in the dot a better design is power and every single design decision makes a certain reality more or less likely and what tech companies and psychologists and other people have known for years is that defaults are notoriously sticky and so if you design the interface so that all the defaults are set to maximize exposure then you're going to get a lot more data in the aggregate than you would if you said all the defaults to privacy protective because people don't go in and change them so until we fundamentally change the incentives we're still going to see companies manipulating the design of these buttons and these technologies to ensure tha

up in the can feel quite a bill for free so head for home to let little more than you can buy a sub asaad could even altman sad when the new clean me brother sad could have been just the thought of so with. location part of. the law had best start unlike marja. idea flow out on the food it was less were a couple of the best so you know how on earth you had the menu for the concert will that mean then for the bottom is that this author should be don't need there will also be a just when can i clear the head of a should also obviously this for laughing go in the. stock when. and money can tell you how the flea. all michaela kitty and conan mary lou leave me . when they hire a kid with the flu with a cute haiku actually saw an inspiring and quite model for a look at a high school kid a. 5th. mother hyla come live in in the make one fact leave me alone 1000000 a bit. of me sorry talum i look for the that ninja had to feel what her little loser. i thought so for her no. it's a little sunlit hell of moon for what i like in a lot origin but when her lawyer told me the canadian but her last album

privacy harms aren't huge their death by a 1000 cuts the spin from silicon valley's that their own asaad when it comes to how we control our daughter long privacy policies are very confusing and if you make it long and spell out all the details then you're probably going to reduce the percent of people who read it however take a closer look at the design of the buttons and the pups that when they click and it's clear that the tech companies have the upper hand in the dot a better design is power and every single design decision makes a certain reality more or less likely and what tech companies and psychologists and other people have known for years is that defaults are notoriously sticky and so if you design the interface so that all the defaults are set to maximize exposure then you're going to get a lot more data in the aggregate than you would if you said all the defaults to privacy protective because people don't go in and change them so until we fundamentally change the incentives we're still going to see companies manipulating the design of these buttons and these technologies to

privacy harms aren't huge their death by a 1000 cuts the spin from silicon valley is that their own asaad when it comes to how we control our long privacy policies are very confusing and if you make it long and spell out all the details then you're probably going to reduce the percent of people who read it however take a closer look at the design of the buttons in the pups that when they click and it's clear that the tech companies have the upper hand in the dot a bad design is power and every single design decision makes a certain reality more or less likely and what tech companies and psychologists and other people have known for years is that defaults are notoriously sticky and so if you design the interface so that all the defaults are set to maximize exposure then you're going to get a lot more data in the aggregate than you would if you said all the defaults to privacy protective because people don't go in and change them so until we fundamentally change the incentives we're still going to see companies manipulating the design of these buttons and these technologies to ensure that y