i'm ashley lindsay, as corey mentioned, and i'm available to answer any questions that you may have. >> hi, ashley. i will ask the same question i asked on the previous case nearby this, in the brief i didn't see any details in terms of planning department analysis. can you explain what occurred in your analysis that granted the impact on the street. >> we wanted to determine if the proposed wireless facility is in line with the compatibility standards. there were two this pole triggered because it's planning-protected and zoning-protected. it's located on a street with excellent quality of street views. and we needed to determine if it impaired any views of landmarks or parks. within a 300-foot radius of the pole, there are no landmarks or park spaces in which the proposed facility would impair views. the facility would be in an rh3 zoning district. and the residential structures and buildings range from through to three stories and subject pole itself is 36 feet with the antenna being at 26 foot, 1 inch. we determined that it would be compatible and consistent with the height in thi