. >> askew? >> don't go for those words, bill. they are there for me to go for. >> just say reject. you reect jed -- you rejected it. >> i was a healthy kid as a result, but now i still like vegetables. i never have gotten pleasure out of candy. it makes me hate this study, and it makes me hate my mom. >> here is why -- when i look at candy i think of the beauty that is america. i am just practicing for the 5:00 slot. it reminds me of the -- because you know what is amazing about america, variety. there are over 25 million kinds of candy. do you know how many types of fruit there are sf 12. -- there are? 12. and vegetables there are only five vegetables. if you go to the candy aisle, that is america. every single kind of candy -- you can't possibly eat them all at the same time. there are just so many. >> i would rather be in communist russia and wait in line for one green bean. you earn it. you earn it. americans just get everything. >> i looked it up. this are 18 well known fruits. >> i dated half of them. >> you didn't really date them. you lubed them. >> i don't even know what t

blair would be on trial in london for example or in the hague or wherever so it's very much seen as askew there's your mischaracterizations your answer all right i gave him or let me first clearly for the first fairness and then we'll discuss that here because i just would like to maybe go on a little bit further with what are jim had to say here it seems to me now a bit mate when nato decides it wants three or use military force against a country it uses the international criminal court to is a political tool we now it's really turning into last year in service of warfare what do you think about that. well. if you mean. the because of the fact that tony blair and george bush weren't voted for war crimes. you know by extension we shouldn't because of the fear of whether or not these people are in the know it's the case that the crimes warrants such as such as . if verdict being put on their head and with a very very strong very very strong statement to the rest of the players in the world but if you do follow such vicious and such horrible crimes against your people but you won't be given

. >> reporter: jan askew got a call from her husband. >> i asked him how he was doing. he said he was okay but that the boat had sunk. they had to jump off the boat and take life jackets and that some people had made it to shore and some had not. >> reporter: survivors were taken to a local clinic and then to hotels. all are in good condition with only minor injuries. those still in the water are enduring 20 knot winds and six foot swells making survival difficult. >> whether or not they had life jackets on when they went into the water, if they had any kind of survival gear, if they could float on something or if they could stay together as a group, that would increase their chances of survival. >> reporter: later this morning, mexican officials and the u.s. coast guard will determine whether they will continue looking for possible survivors or if it is time to call off the search. >> the accident occurred early sunday morning but one mexican navy officer says it could be possible that the missing are still alive. >>> the secret service is now involved in investigating

what i would be on trial in london for example or in the hague or wherever so it's very much seen as askew there is your mischaracterizations here as there are right i don't know more let me respond here and let me first say on this and then we'll discuss that here because i just like by to maybe go a little bit further with what jim had to say here it seems to me now that meet when nato decides it wants to use military force against a country it uses the international criminal court to is a political tool we now it's really turning into last year in service of warfare what do you think about that. well. i'm not sure i follow entirely if you mean. the because of the fact that tony blair and george bush went and voted for war crimes. by extension get there shouldn't because i thought feel that whether or not these people are in both of them it's the case that the crimes of warrants such as such as. if verdict being put upon them and it's a very very strong very very strong statement to the rest. of us in the world that if you do follow such vicious and such horrible crimes against your peop

. >> this man was living in the same san diego nabd askew nan nan. zblin credibly intelligent. very articulate. traveled in circles that were very influential. >> i met him at parties. andrew led the perfect life of an american gigolo. his benefactors were very conservative businessmen and many republicans. >> people that he always had around him were people of position or had a great deal of money. if you had position or money, then andrew wanted to be your friend. >> all of a sudden, his last benefactor ends the relationship. you're andrew looking in the mirror and saying my god, my american gigolo life has come to the end of the road. my exlover has rejected me. >> no one is aware how much of an impact the rejx and loss of income have on cunanan. but he is about to act on a terrifying impulse. after flying to minneapolis, cunanan tries to contact jeffrey trail, a 28-year-old navy officer formerly stagsed in san diego. when trail refuses to see him, cue nan than then tracks down exboyfriend david madison and the two are spotted together in a minneapolis nightclub. >> they wer

. >> reporter: yesterday jan askew was happy her husband was okay. >> how horrible it must have been for them out in the dark in the waters, lost, really realizing what happened. initially i don't think i understood. >> he thought he was going to drown. i don't know what they were both hanging on to what, he said he had been in the water felt like 20 hours. >> reporter: amy's 49-year-old son warren is good pals with russ and another of the missing, sean chat tuck. travel plans are currently on hold. >> until they find out about these two friends out there they are looking for them. he said maybe they are in the boat that sank. >> there is somebody right there. >> reporter: and still the calls and e-mails come in. >> that's his daughter. >> reporter: what's it say? >> she wants to know if we are going to do a celebration for him if he is coming back. >> reporter: there will certainly be one but it will certainly be bittersweet. in the meantime, there's getting the men's blood pressure pills, cash, credit cards and everything else that currently resides with the boat at the bottom of t

the tanks 50-pound late was slightly askew. it's usually secure bolts were missing. shards of glass, their remains for taking water samples were scattered across the concrete floor. this was early february of 2005 and the state of the art water purification plant in suburban new jersey. the victim was a well liked 43-years-old hydro chemist. she was the mother of three, the wife of a banker, had a ph.d. in chemistry from n.y.u. and worked at the valley water commission planned for 12 years. in 2000 for the plant underwent a $70 million upgrade during which chlorine treatment system was replaced by an autozone system. at the same time promoted to senior chemist. a job was to maintain water quality standards set by the epa and to oversee the new ozone generator is which would suffer from the cracks and other problems. a colleague recalled during the plant's re-dedication, it was in such a fabulous mood but other people around her were not. an autopsy showed it had been forcibly subdued but she was still alive when she fell or was pushed into the tank. there was no way

and it's not just his manifesto that seems completely askew, but his defense lawyer after he appearedcame out and said breivik himself expected to be tortured when he was picked up, even shot by police rather than arrested. that was his skewed view of how everything would go once he came into police custody and that was something he knew was going to happen. >> so disturbing. thanks, nic, for your great reporting. >>> joining us now to discuss this further, cnn national security contributor, fran townsend, who's a member of the external advisory boards for both the cia and the department of homeland security. also with us former cia and fbi analyst philip mudd, a senior global adviser now. all right, phil, let me start with you. when you hear nic robertson's reporting on this 1500-page manifesto, his plans for attack, what does that tell you about the suspect? >> i think it tells me a couple of things. first, we have a lot of people in this country and the same kinds of people in europe who have extremist political ideology but who themselves suffer from a mental problem that leads th

. >> let me in askew, why aren't these stories that are well-known? when we think of blacks in new york we think of the african burial ground where slaves are buried. we don't hear these kinds of stories. why? >> that it was a question you had asked as well. one of the things that really interested me was in my family, among my family and their friends, there is a real desire to keep the stories alive, to commemorate, to write newspaper articles, to give celebratory dinners every year, to commemorate with monuments and so forth. and to me there was a cut-off. there seemed to be a cutoff cut off at the turn of -- at the turn of the 20th century at a point when every generation of where new and somehow in the beginning of the 20th century that really kind of stop. there was this kind of forward-looking moment and a desire to leave the 19th century behind. the 19th century was old-fashioned. it was parochial. it had seen slavery and really hard times, so i think in the harlem renaissance there was this desire to almost clean the slate, to clear and to lo

we as americans crave liberty and we askew tyranny to any degree. every single time we authorize deficit spending, we fuel the unfettered expansion of the federal government and all of its power. we commit ourselves and our posterity to a future that will include working more and more hours and days and weeks and even months just to pay their federal tax bills every single year. that's time that they won't get back. that's time that we won't get back. that erodes our individual liberty. it also erodes our liberty when the same regulatory structure that exists today grows bigger and bigger every year because we're borrowing now more than $1.5 trillion every single year. not because of some aberrational condition, some unusual development that requires an unusual expenditure of borrowed money but just to cover our basic day-to-day operations. this is what fuels the perpetual expansion of government. and when government expands perpetually, our individual liberty is diminished severely unfortunately and to a corresponding degree. this is unacceptable.