i know assemblyman amiano and others have legislation that has been introduced or are planning to. but could you give us a the public more specifics about how this legislation may help us get back to that 30%? also, there was an option of san francisco buying back parcels if funding comes from local, state, or federal sources. >> one we can do this is to get additional tax dollars. basically, we are able to spend the city share. under a development scenario, you also get state share of tax increments. what we want to do is go back and make changes to the ifp law to allow us to find affordable housing to get some of the state share back into the project. the argument we are making for the state is but for that it is tough for us to get the affordable housing levels we would like at 30%. the port has been successful doing that for per se 70. oo -- for pier 70. they made the argument that pier 70 is a tough place to develop, land that was given to the city by the state. it was successful. there is president of the city level to capture some of that increment back for this project. cha