on the advice of counsel, i, again, assert my right to remain silent. on the advice of counsel, i assert my right to remain siin silent. >> if the attorneys general for new jersey, new york and united states were all to agree to clothe mr. wildstein with immunity, i think you'd find yourselves in a far different position with respect to information he can provide. >> that was david wildstein pleading the fifth when he was called before the new jersey legislative committee that was investigating the shutdown of those bridge lanes. at the end there, you also heard his lawyer saying that in if mr. wildstein could be cloaked in immunity, mr. wildstein might have some very interesting information to provide. well, this time last week, because all news in this story breaks late in the day on a friday, this time last week, we were reporting that david wildstein had been cut off by the port authority in terms of his legal defense in this matter. even though he was employed at the port authority while he engineered the bridge shutdown, the port authority said he

he's asserting -- he's not saying he has evidence but he's asserting as a fact that when briget kellysent that e-mail, she was communicating an order from the administration. if there's any evidence of that, that's an order from on high. >> mr. johnson, what was your reaction to the bombshell? >> the legislative select committee run by john wisniski will have something else to look at. the people of fort lee and the people of that region and who traverse that bridge every day, the working people, want to know the truth. that is why we have the select committee. i'm glad that this has come out and the select committee can use it as part of their tools to get to the bottom of this. >> to what you're pointing out, it seemed a little fishy -- remember in that press conference he was like i'm very hands on, we're like a family but have i these rogue people in my office. as a former press secretary, to not tell your boss a horrible story is coming, that doesn't sound right. what evidence do we think wildstein has? >> in terms of evidence, i don't know. my observations of him beside being so

president lincoln did make some bold assertions insult the congressional approval retrospectively. >> i was living in new york on september 11 i was scared about what happened and i wanted to make sure things would be protected in the united states but i also realize realized its importance are we going to maintain a constitutional government and i heard arguments being made for actions like surveillance, torture, complete presidential force which isn't what the constitution provides for and the presiden president d with these actions and people defended would say when kim took unilateral action himself. that is true in recognizing the limits on its power he recognized the rule of law when he took unilateral actions including suspending habeas corpus between philadelphia and washington, ordering a blockade of the south. i'm asking the congress to take action to decide what you want. you recognize that some people argue that lincoln was acting based on prerogative to set aside the law or there is a book called constitutional dictatorship where the president can just do what he or she w

we kept trying to assert inappropriateness as the other side asserted appropriateness and the evidence that those before us ever had was pictures that we would bring and try to show our case. what happened on december 11th, is that two members of your board who know this spot had firsthand understanding of this space and not relying on the pictures and indicated very clearly that it was inappropriate. and so, thank you for that and please continue to uphold that. i may run out of time but i do want to say on the issue of affordable housing, i can't say. okay. >> thank you. my name is elizabeth zit erin. i'm a lawyer and lived on mission street for longer than ha architecture -- has been live. i have been in that area for 34 years. mr. fung you asked a question about the requested step down and mediation to hill street, nothing was done on that score. there was no step down, no mediation, none discussed none proposed from this developer. i never practice law in this area but a few things about this process is clear to me. you made a decision in december. the next hearing was for the pur

it's really a free speech issue for the twenty first century i would i would i would assert that the internet is the information commons of this generation much like public libraries and therefore it should be considered a utility should be considered a common carrier it should no individual corporation for the purpose of profit i mean they can deliver it to you and say you may have certain amounts of it. to be able to say oh you're looking at that website we're going to charge you more for that i don't get it if it doesn't pass the smell it's all of the technical mumbo jumbo that you i have no idea what you're talking about in terms of brass tacks yes i agree with you i'm sure that the internet is basically a common error for everyone nobody should have an advantage this war is getting access to information over anyone else but even here's the thing about the internet thus far the reason why we considered our information commons today is because it's been so vastly unregulated i mean this has been a great read through by international treaties this has been agreed to it's been our c

aren't as a result the real consequence of stand your ground shoot first laws is that you have to assert that you are afraid of a black person to get a jury to agree with you which it seems they almost always will to get away with murder if the tables were turned a black man who shoots and kills a white teenager after a heated argument over loud music that person would almost be certain to be charged with murder it's a sad reality in america today and michael but escaped a murder conviction because of it so is white fear of blackness really enough justification for pulling the trip. and taking a life and stand your ground shoot first laws allowing murder by culture let's rumble. joining me for that i saw a little rumble are horace cooper attorney and senior fellow of the national center for public policy research and kevin martin member of the project twenty one black leadership network thank you both for joining me murder by culture you guys heard my rant kevin you were you were making faces there and you don't think that white people are afraid of black people and that a law that says

madeiro does not. >> you have been for a more assertive pro-democracy stand.e syria you wish the u.s. more involved. do you think the obama administration should be more ingai engaged actively? >> i don't think we have a lot of leverage in either place. i think we can marginally raise the cost of massacres. i think we have influence on the opposition. i remember everybody hearing that i was an american wanting me to sign their orange ribbons. i think most part we are by standers. >> david, a lot of people think about putin and obama versus putin. andt that does seem to be the kind of -- there is a feelingt that there is something new about the way in which putin is whether on syria or on these issues, whether on gay rights, there is something going on, a kind of assertion of russia, of putin and authority. you have the big piece in the new yorker. kbhaut do you think? >> i think putin came to office when there were hundreds of thousands of people on the street asserting not just gay rights but human rights and democratic impulses and all the rest. this was not

we just heard from brian there i just want to be more assertive and i use that word very carefully there but the it would make people do worry that the japanese will feel assertive enough to take on what they believe would be a threat from china and the united states has no choice but to back it up going back to the scenario of august one thousand fourteen. there are parallels sort of alliance dynamics that we see in the station now with the way it was operating in one nine hundred fourteen you can read it more than one way it seems to me part of the problem in one nine hundred forty was. both sides being uncertain whether the alarm systems would actually operate and therefore creating the illusion particular on the german side that it might be possible to stage a localized more without relating into general conflict what's important in the present situation is that the united states does seem to have made it clear at the time of joe biden's visit to beijing and tokyo last autumn that the united states would if you its security treaty with your promise applying to the disputed islands in

the bill says that you can assert a -- if you are facing coercion by the government, you can assert a religious liberty right against that government coercion. >> would you be on the side of that store owner that put that sign up? would you be okay with that sign? >> no, i would not support putting up a sign like that. but what i think is wise and what i think should be illegal, what i think the government should coerce somebody to do are two different things. and the bill would say that if you feel there's a conflict between a government policy and your sincere religious belief, you can assert that as a defense against that, but the burden rests on you to demonstrate, a, that it's based on a religious belief, that the religious belief is sincere, and that there is a substantial burden placed upon you. once you've -- only once you've satisfied that burden, which is a high one, does the burden shift to the government and then they have to demonstrate a compelling government -- if they can demonstrate a compelling government, then they can override. >> a person can just choose to discri

. >> on advice of my council i assert my right to be silent.ouncil i again assert my right to remain silent. on the advice of council, i assert my right to remain silent. >> after repeatedly invoking the advice of his counsel and the fifth amendment his lawyer said at the end of the hearing that if his client was given immunity, he would be happy to talk. legally it's not at all clear whether you are allowed to do that before a committee hearing like this after a subpoena, the new jersey legislature held david wildstein in contempt for refusing to testify against them they held them on contempt charges the deputy chief of staff and bridget kelly have invoked their rights to refuse to hand over documents to the bridge gate investigation. the investigative committee this week voted to try one more time to compel them to hand over those documents, if mr. steppian and miss kelly continue to refuse, then they too honestly will be moving toward contempt charges just like david wildstein. in their case, it is an open question whether they will plead t

do you agree with secretary of state's assertion -- kerry's assertion that the climate change is perhapsf mass destruction 567892% say yes, 48% say no. i think that's where the country is on this type of stuff. >> what do you think? >> on kerry's assertion? >> and the country's reaction to it? >> that's one of the reasons the secretary of state has to speak out about these things. they have to let the publics around the world know about the science and the immediate threat that we're facing from the warming of the earth. >> fair enough. i want to thank you both for being here. t the debate will continue on here. >> i'm dan jones. >> i'm newt gingrich. erin burnett "out front" starts erin burnett "out front" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >>> next breaking news out of k kiev tonight. we have exclusive footage. facebook pays a jaw dropping $19 billion for an app. is it worth it. ted nugent calls the president a subhuman mongrel. let's go "out front." >>> good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett. breaking news. military forces and ukraine on the move ready to defend

wildstein's lawyer's other assertions. my question back to you, michael, nobody said he knew about it beforehand. this use of the word prior is totally extraneous. he is not denying he knew about it during the actual events, and that's what the lawyer for mr. wildstein is saying his client is going to testify. >> right. >> so why is he putting out a statement that doesn't deny the bombshell that wildstein just dropped? >> well, the key word there is "it." what is it? is it the lane closures? >> but he said i don't know anything about it. >> right. >> anything about it until afterwards. >> right. that's -- that's -- that's true. he did say that, and he may have some political trouble explaining that. >> i think he'll have trouble in the witness chair with that one. what about sitting in the witness chair saying i knew about it afterwards. now it comes out i didn't know about it beforehand. this thing went on for five days. by the way, you and i wondered, i know you did because i did, how can the governor mistake fighting fo

the constant reminders of just how assertive he was with the u.s. congress in terms of sandy aid. do you think -- what do you think -- has the ball moved in any direction after the town hall today? >> i think, you know, politics is performance art. so christie is going back to what's always worked for him, that brash bullying type persona that he thinks is popular in jersey and maybe popular beyond. but no matter how brash, bold, daring he may be in these town hall forums, the bottom line for him is going to be what comes out of these two investigations that are happening. there's a legislative committee, which is trying to get information out of its top aides who are resisting, and maybe even more important there is a u.s. attorney digging. and i've been saying this for weeks, i'll keep saying this. i think he may be in more jeopardy instead of the bridge lane closures from looking into some of these real estate deals and whether he used sandy recovery money or his administration to bully mayors and other people to support big development deals that were conducted to law firms th

and creates potentially a more dangerous situation in venezuela. >> nick, you've been for a more assertivelace like syria. do you think the obama administration should be more engaged actively in venezuela, in ukraine? >> you know, i think we don't have a lot of leverage in either place. in -- i think we can marginally raise the cost of massacres in ukraine, but only marginally. i think we do have influence on the opposition. in the orange revolution i remember everybody hearing i was an american wanting know sign their orange ribbons. all that is pretty modest. i think for the most part we're going to be bystanders in both places. >> david, a lot of people focus on this and think about putin and think about obama versus putin. and certainly there does seem to be the kind of -- there is a feeling that there is something new about the way in which putin is, you know, whether on syria, whether on these issues, whether on, you know, gay right, there's something going on in a kind of an assertion of russia, of putin, of his authority. you're just back from there. you have this big piece in the

however, companies have been challenging this assertion. is the that if that case, that they will now challenge that assertion, it seems to me to call for not just voluntary efforts, but to create a standard and consequences of that standard that can give americans the best security they can hope for. i hope to work with the committee and the ftc in that regard. >> thank you, senator. one last comment. i know we have other questions, but we have a second panel. make one i will comment, and then if anyone's got a burning question. then we will go to the second panel. senator tester's comment, trying to get a notion of the obligation to disclose when you have been breached, i think sorting that through

the ears of vitali klitschko. >> melinda, do you think this could be a test case in germany's more assertive foreign-policy stance? >> it is looking that way. it looks very much like germany defines that stance with regard to ukraine as playing a mediating role both with the ukrainian government, but also with russia, which he know has been a strong supporter of the ukrainian government. and in fact ties to russia very much at the heart of the controversy in ukraine. the foreign minister has very good relations with russia. he is beauty as a friend of russia. he has -- he is viewed as a friend of russia. however, he made a visit to moscow where mr. putin kept him waiting for a number of hours, did not promise to meet with him at all initially. it may be difficult to get that new and bolts going with regard to russia. >> melinda crane reporting for us. thank you so much. staying in germany, a scandal involving claims of leaked information and child pornography in the cabinet. >> prime minister resigned for allegedly tipping off other top all editions about a criminal investigation involving c

that china would help him if he is too assertive. they spent an hour together.s a very significant time that the chinese will certainly be noticing. much of it was apparently about ethics and moral issues and how to develop moral leadership. that is something the dalai lama often talks about with leaders but they also talked about the tibet issue and they apparently agreed that they want to push for constructive dialogue between the dalai lama and the chinese. and actually in the last few hours the americans have appointed a new state department official a well-known professor from harvard would is going to be taking over that portfolio and this is not just empty talk. >> robert barnett, thanks for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> there is more bad news for california farmers, already dealing with a drought. the system that sends water to farms in the heart of the state is running dry. that means the central valley project will send no irrigation to farms this year. last year the farmers received just 20% of their normal allowance. california's governor decl

christie's office sent out an e-mail asserting that governor christie had no involvement or knowledge or understanding of the real motives behind david wildstein's scheme to close lanes from the gorge washington bridge. they also took time to outline the events from wildstein's past, like suing over a school board election when wildstein was a teenager or being accused of deceptive behavior by a high school social studies teacher. so what should governor christie tell his constituents and should it be another swipe at wildstein? joining me now is rudy giuliani. mr. mayor, good to see you. >> good to see you, jake. >> i'm learning that the governor's office is also going to be fighting back against "the new york times," which first reported on david wildstein's letter on friday and a story that had to be corrected, the christie team is pushing out today's editor column which says that "the times" should have flagged that they made a change to the story. they are also including a whole bunch of attacks on "the new york times" for how the story was misreported. they originally said that

. >> i assert my right to remain silent. >> reporter: now makes this claim in a letter written by his attorney. "evidence exists as well tying mr. christie to having knowledge of the lane closures during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the governor stated publicly." but the lawyer does not describe the evidence and does not say that wildstein even possesses it. governor christie still maintains this position -- >> i had no knowledge of this, of the planning, the execution or anything about it, and that i first found out about it after it was over. >> reporter: christie's office released a statement, saying in part, "mr. wildstein's lawyer confirms what the governor has said all along, he had absolutely no prior knowledge of the lane closures before they happened." the wildstein letter also goes at christie's personal credibility. "mr. wildstein contests the accuracy of various statements that the governor made about him and he can prove the inaccuracy of some." the main focus of the three-page letter argues that wildstein's former employer, the port authority,

asserting our values and interests in the world at large.to quote again, to quote the speech here, after two world wars, the global balance of powers has changed drastically. the nations of europe will only have a history of their own in keeping with the traditions if they proceed together." this is almost 30 years ago. since then the world has changed dramatically. the opposing blocks of the cold war no longer exist. globalization and digitalization determine our way of life. how we do business and how we work in a way that we never imagined before. this does not detract in any way from the validity of the argument. on the contrary it is actually gaining in strength and importance. translated today, the words mean we in europe, germany, britain, all of us in this age of digitalization of the 21st century will only still have history if we stand together and remain together. and as european nations, always live up to two basic principals in all directions, responsibility and solidarity. ladies and gentlemen, more than 7 billion people live o

so all the amenities think that this could be a test case in germany's more assertive up policy foreign policy stance what isn't looking that way and it looks very much like germany defines that stands in regard to ukraine as playing a mediating role both of these to be the ukraine government that also means that the rock show which as you know has been a strong supporter of the ukraine government and in fact a knotted ties to russia very much at the heart of the controversy in the ukraine. foreign minister mr steinmeier he has good relations with russia he's viewed as a friend depression he said that he believes the new impulse is needed in germany's ties with russia however he has just made a visit to moscow where m is to put it kept you waiting for a number of hours didn't promise to meet with him at all initially so it may be difficult to get that new impulse going in regard to russia. chief political correspondent linda creed reporting for us. linda thank you so much. staying in germany a scandal involving claims of leaked information in town has reached all the way that government

the first two cases in the first seventy years of the history of america where the court really asserted they're there supremacy over the over the legislative and executive branches now virtually every decision is asserting judicial supremacy there is not a king or a queen in europe who has that kind of power no so have we not and particularly since these guys have become so activist rather than sturdy decisis rather than just saying we're going to we're going to go with the stablish law salish president have we not moved into a rena in the last decade or so where america has become a constitutional monarchy rather than a divider well it is if you look there is no check and balance with be on the supreme court where the monarch is there is simply our monarchs they're there for life now we've we're now we're getting the point we say we really can't watch what they do we really can't watch their conduct inside of a courtroom when we get to that point we have lost control not only of the judicial process but of that very important arm that supposed to keep this democracy combined together a

right now, no smoking gun, no evidence to back up that assertion.st go ahead and talk about impeachment. there was an editorial in one of the major newspapers in new jersey, the "star ledger" on friday, once this letter from david wildstein, the former associate of governor christie was on the port authority, was forced to resign. there was -- there was no -- there was this editorial suggesting if, in fact, when wildstein seemed to be implying were true, then the governor should think about either resigning or being impeached, if you will. but i thi but i think it's very, very premature. let's see what happens. there are multiple investigations. the most important one by a u.s. attorney in new jersey, paul fishman. let see what they come up with. if they come up with direct evidence that he's a liar, that's another story. but right now they don't have it. >> and wolf, very briefly here, what do we expect to hear from christie when he goes on a radio show later today? >> it's the first time since then, nearly two-hour news conference we're going to h

it's simply religious liberty and the person asserting it would have to prove a lot before you would win your case and you would have to prove a substantial burden on your religious freedom. >> that's a key point, what you just said. look, i'm going to quote quickly from the christian post that did a pretty good legislative analysis of this. there's a religious freedom restoration act in arizona that was first passed in 1999. no business people have used it. no one has denied business services to anybody. so your point that this doesn't necessarily trigger discrimination is a very important point. it's such an important point that i don't think you need to change this religious freedom restoration act which wasn't used in the first place. >> but it needs to be changed because of people like elaine of elaine's photographer fee. we all know the case well. 50 photographers were lined up to photograph a same sex wedding. one lady said i can't because of my religious convictions, i can't photograph it, sorry. i'll do other photographs but i can't do the wedding. we didn't tolerate one per

on the advice of counsel, i again, assert my right to remain silent. on the advice of counsel, i assert my right to remain silent. >> right up to the time when david wildstein took the job at the port authority that was invented for him by governor chris christie, david wildstein operated under the pseudonym wally edge, not because carlos danger was already taken but because walter edge was a former governor of new jersey who had a hand in the creation of the port authority in 1921. wally edge was the name that david wildstein used on his new jersey political blog that became required reading in new jersey politics. it was at that blog that david wildstein hired our own steve kornacki for what became steve's first political reporting job. as steve has told us, no one actually knew who wally edge was, and steve didn't know who wally edge was until wally edge hired steve to work at that political blog. there is absolutely nothing wrong about running an anonymous political blog, but there is nothing about it that would qualify anyone for a professional po

we have to say he is soon or asserted those powers because after all congress was not here. there the president is charged with drawing ever meant. there is no congress. the cabinet in those days were very, very smart. you had five men, two of them are really not a cabinet members the general and the attorney general. the attorney general was not the chief law-enforcement officer. he was simply a legal adviser to the president. he had no law enforcement powers pardon? >> a follow-up. usurping the power of congress by violating the level of -- letter of along? >> you know, this makes for in this discussion. should president obama have allowed congress to shut down the government's

i have made these next assertions previously, but i will make them again today. looking back at my half a century intelligence, i have not exerted a time where we have been beset by more crises and threats around the globe. my list is long. it includes the storage and diversification of terrorism, loosely connected and globally dispersed, to include here at home example slide by the boston marathon bombing. the sectarian war in syria. its attraction is a globally -- a growing center of extremism and a potential threat to the homeland. let me briefly expand on this point. the strength of the insurgency in syria is now estimated toween 75,000 or 80,000, up 110,000 to 100 15,000 insurgents who are organized into more than 1500 groups of widely-varying political leanings. three total about 36,000 insurgents. complicating this further are the 7500 or so foreign fighters from some 50 countries who have gravitated to syria. among them are a small group of al qaeda veterans. and there are many other crises and threats around the globe to include the spillover of the syri

wildstein's lawyer's other assertion. my question back to you, michael, nobody said he knew about it beforehand. this use of the word prior is totally ex-train use. he is not denying he knew about it during the actual events, and that's what the lawyer for mr. wildstein is saying his client is going to testify. >> right. >> so why is he putting out a statement that doesn't deny the bombshell that wildstein just dropped? >> well, the key word there is "it." what is it? is it the lane closures? >> but he said i don't know anything about it. >> right. >> anything about it until afterwards. >> right. that's -- that's -- that's true. he did say that, and he may have some political trouble explaining that. >> i think he'll have trouble in the witness chair with that one. what about sitting in the witness chair saying i knew about it afterwards. now it comes out i didn't know about it beforehand. this thing went on for five days. by the way, you and i wondered, i know you did because i did, how can the governor mistake running f

this is just an assertion. it's no evidence whatsoever. the e pails were evidence of a lie. >> so what "the new york times" printed in the letter from his attorney, that is only going to these e-mails that were previously turned over? you don't think there's anything else out there that he is holding back? >> it's just evidence exists. it's just a vague broad statement, and there's not the slightest clue who has the evidence, what the evidence is. so i think "the new york times" went way too far with it. >> here's something interesting. i'm going to go from your latest column here in which you ask if the allegations from david wildstein's lawyer are a smoking gun or him blowing smoke. >> right. it's definitely not a smoking gun. what they need is somebody saying that christie was involved in either the planning or knew of it during and cheered it on. if wildstein simply said hey, there's a big traffic jam in ft. lee and christie's going to say i was in the middle of a campaign, i was doing a million things. i don't recall that. but they're

assertion of interest and power. but, president putin made it clear, hasn't he, he means to intervene if this gets further out of hand. what other prospects in your judgment? >> well what fears is 2004 repete, whe when thi stiewj nostooge, now the president of ukraine. fact is that all those demonstrations took place, and a new leader came into power, that intimidated i think probay frightened foot in, he saw the -- computer up, he sa putin, he es not' that to happen again. he does not top get that out of hand. does not want to get that out of hand, i doubt ifiaciac put troops in street without some kind of discussion with putin. putin is trying -- show strength, from government perspective but not let it get out of hand whe governmt is challenged in terms of its future. neil: european union holding an energy meeting on the possibility of imposingan shins tomorrow. -- sanctions tomorrown this, sound very peculiar to me it is hard to impose sanions that would only affect a corrupt leader, not the people who are demons

his son's case is a part of the wrongful death suit, but the district can assert immunity by using a public duty doctrine and have the case dismissed. it's what they need to have change. >> because what happened here could happen to anyone. >> reporter: right now mills, the iii, his son is still speaking with the group right now. family, friends, and the community. meanwhile the deputy mayor for public safety responded today in an e-mail to this press conference earlier today as he said the investigation, that they would continue and that they are trying to identify any gaps in services and policies to improve with the fire and ems department. phs and the mills family, they are not saying that's good enough as they want people to be fired and they do want district laws to change. back to you. >> and you do not have to be a family member to be fired up about this one, thank you, surae. >>> whether it is the chill in maryland winning on the home turf in d.c. and the judge follows the jury's recommendation in virginia. tonight's news where you live begins in alexandria where a former sh

they want to assert their power in the united states. >> the president is helping them along.going to be interesting to watch as well. the idea that this guy at volkswagen, doesn't he understand brand issues? i mean volkswagen with the brands, its success globally and in this country, which still remains the richest consumer market in e world, you know, come on. calm down, fella. >> yeah. i don't pretend to know how the euroan mind set works. i don't have to tell you, lou, this is a company that is additionally pro-union. they let the unions come in. they gave them access. what really frustrates me the st is thatat the people have spoken and the left and the europe socialist mentally we are seeing creep into our country and occupy our white house will not let people to their own devices, make their own choices. they underestimate how savvy people are. the generous benefits packages are already there, salaries are already there, why do we need you? it's not a compelling deal for us. >> volkswagen is enjoying a mint ssccess. these workers in tennessee and there are plants all ar

.> the assertiveness claim assertiveness is not necessarily valued when it comes to women, is it?this. ready are organizations for women to mean then? to lean in question mark sometimes assertiveness can be looked at differently between men and women. >> thanks. we will leave it there but we will see you in "the asia edge" later on. how asian women lead. that is the question today. thank's for joining us this morning. a detective thriller set in northern china has won the golden era word at the berlin film festival. it's a story of a former policeman turned private detective in a series of killings. the movie also picked the best actor award. all right. that is it from us for today. we have a lot more on the move. . . >> the morning, everybody. i am rishaad salamat and this is "on the move." disappointment in japan as shares are falling in tokyo. the lending force of china, a record amount of new creditors. steering away from bangkok, we look at the tourism strain on growth today. singapore about to kickoff the first trading day of the week. japan --

here, i assert bill nye is equating observational science with historical science. i also say it's not a mystery when you understand the difference. >> people with these deeply held religious beliefs, they embrace literal interpretation of the bible. at the same time, they accept aspirin, antibiotic drugs and airplane. this is a mystery. >> i suggest it's not a mystery. what i'm talking about antibiotic, aspirins, smoke detector, jet planes that's observational science slope. i'm an australian. when you talking about creation and thousands of years of the age of earth, that's by historical science. when bill nye is talking about aspirin and smoke detectors, great job of that. that's bill nye observational science guy. when he's talking about evolution a million year, that's bill nye historical science guy. i challenge the evolutionist to admit the belief aspect of their particular world view. at the creation museum, we also teach people the difference between belief and what one can actually observe and experiment with the present. i believe we're teaching people to

assertion of interest and power. but, president putin made it clear, hasn't he, he means to intervene if this gets further out of hand. what other prospects in your judgment? >> well what fears is 2004 repete, where when this stiewj nostooge, now the president of ukraine. fact is that all those demonstrations took place, and a new leader came into power, that intimidated i think probably frightened foot in, he saw the -- computer up, he sa putin, he does not' that to happen again. he does not top get that out of hand. does not want to get that out of hand, i doubt ifiaciac put troops in street without some kind of discussion with putin. putin is trying -- show strength, from government perspective but not let it get out of hand where government is challenged in terms of its future. neil: european union holding an energy meeting on the possibility of imposing san shins tomorrow. -- sanctions tomorrow in this, sound very peculiar to me it is hard to impose sanctions that would only affect a corrupt leader, not the peop

. >> reporter: he asserted he didn't learn the back story that it was political retribution until the knew nothing about this. even then i was told this was a traffic study. >> reporter: just as christie was getting positive national attention hosting the superbowl. >> reporter: beautiful conditions at squaw valley. big blue skies. these are blue bird conditions. the storm brought 10 inches of snow to squaw valley. a couple inches in the sierras. more snow on the way this week. a break tuesday, another storm coming wednesday into thursday and a big storm something later next weekend. we will watch that for the sierra and the bay area. there could be a lot of rain if that storm comes in just the right way. live at sfo still wet tarmac out there, but the storm pulling out for tonight, we are looking at clearing conditions and a break for monday and tuesday. clouds left over for tonight. as we get into tomorrow morning, it could help dense fog into the morning commute. visibility could be lower. sunshine and scattered clouds, there will be showers over the ocean. a dry day monday. tuesda

just like it wasn't an asserted defense in the zimmerman case.that doesn't mean that our stand your ground law didn't have some affect. i don't think the lack of clarity as a result of stand your ground. i think it is the facts that arose in those cases that the jury wasn't able to reach a verdict on beyond a reasonable doubt. again, we tilt every advantage to the accused. one of those is that all jurors have to agree if someone is to be convicted. here, they didn't, on that charge. again, michael dunn is going to spend the rest of his life in jail. >> but not at this point for killing jordan davis. we could go on and talk about it. >> for his conduct that evening. >> thank you so much. i have to end it there. representative matt gaetz and ahmad, thank you for joining me. >>> cyberstalkers have struck again. this time against the group kickstarter. what can you do to protect yourself? [announcer] word is getting out. purina dog chow light & healthy is a deliciously tender and crunchy kibble blend. with 20% fewer calories than purina dog chow. isn