the agreement to relocate asylum se? cuz arriving irregularly to rwanda is essentially the case. shirking its responsibilities under the refugee convention to paper, taking a style up. it is very likely to be unlawful, and basically represents the case shifting and exporting bear responsibility on to rolanda 6000 kilometers out of sight and out of mind. and in terms of its effectiveness, we know from the australia case that it wasn't effective, it was a failed or short attention regime, which actually sold by crossing increase. when the policy was 1st implemented. natalie, you heard the emily there say that essentially was a failed policy in australia. i want to ask you about this because there are a lot of people that are comparing this britain rewan to deal to the australian offshore processing system from the research that you have undertaken. did that actually work? has it worked and did the huge cost at the end justify the means? astronomy is oh, sure, detention system has been severely criticized for being cruel to

this has shaped how we approach migration and asylum.a already provides refuge for almost 130,000 refugees from many countries including neighbors like burgundy as well as afghanistan and migrants from libya -- neighbors like rudy -- neighbors like burundi. >> boris johnson says the scheme should act as a deterrent for people considering crossing the channel. whatever the case, he has accepted that will be legal challenges. in many eyes, it is a clear breach of the 1993 refugee agreement. many from johnson's own party have called the idea unworkable. >> the government looks -- needs to look at taking more routes, for example creating a humanitarian visa system so that they don't have to put their money and lives in the hands of other countries. there are many other sides to this issue. >> it is far from clear how much the scheme will cost. many have expressed amazement at the choice of rwanda. last year, britain and itself called for independent investigations into allegations of extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, and forced disa

has an obligation to ensure access to its territory for people seeking asylum and access to an asylum procedure with due process expelling. asylum seekers who arrived by boat or by lori, irregularly, and expelling them to rwanda is just shirking its responsibilities under the refugee convention under international law. and it really needs to be ensuring that it is opening its borders, not closing them to individuals that are seeking protection. i'm going to bring in the voice of journalism lights and mikaela wrong. she has decided that the announcement of this new asylum seeking process in the u. k. is connected to politics. you may not agree here, maria, but have a listen and then bounce off the back with your thoughts. his mckaden this strikes me is a really cynical deal, and i imagine has been prompted by the fear that the conservatives are not going to do that well on the may 5 elections. and so being seen to be tough on immigration is always good caught play a, it's possibly not a legal agreements and certainly not a moral one. and that's prompted for me by the awareness that we'

the $3127.00 asylum se has to be housed offshore. it cost destroy and tax pay is an average of $1000000000.00 per year. and in some years, 1500000000 dollars. my, how much has the anti migrant and anti refugee sent him had grown in the okay, the last few years and why is this happening now? and yeah, i think it's really important to think about how we got here. and i think is the short term in the longer term picture. and we need to look at both of those things . so if we look at what happens is the conservatives have come into power. they've really honed in on anti immigration and anti asylum sentiment. so a very good example of this is during high, if the pandemic could he patel her british home secretary was essentially whipping up hysteria about people crossing the channel. so whilst we were being told that our common humanity was all that really my ad in the context of the global health crisis, the government were dehumanizing and also mistreating many of these people. and i think one of the things to say about this in relation

an asylum claim.country without an asylum claim. that would be illegal.— that would be illegal. ok. i think we 'ust that would be illegal. ok. i think we just need _ that would be illegal. ok. i think we just need to _ that would be illegal. ok. i think we just need to clarify _ that would be illegal. ok. i think we just need to clarify exactly... | we just need to clarify exactly... the way it's been covered is that anyone who comes here will potentially be sent to rwanda if they come here illegally before their asylum claim has been made. i don't think that's... it's all very confusing. i'm not quite sure it's quite as straightforward as that. there's been a lot of concern about whether this will go ahead. the point is here... if i should just bring in matthew, the archbishop making a very unusually political intervention, and he's quoted saying this is subcontracting our responsibility. this is a very big decision for him to weigh in like this. ~ �* , this. indeed. ithink it's the famous this. inde

for asylum under u.s.hereas many of those who are turned away, including russians who are flaying this and conflict -- i have spoken with dozens of russians here in tijuana who protested the war against ukraine, have been brutally required -- repressed by the regime, fled the same issue and are turned away from ports of entry and are waiting here in tijuana. they would all if i for asylum under u.s. law but are being turned away under the title 42 policy. two things are happening. one, certain nationalities are being allowed to even access you miniature protection in the united states while others are being turned away and then once in the united states, whether or not they gain asylum is really a political question rather than a legal one. amy: the home basically secretary was warned in cuba come as a cuban refugee in the united states. i wanted to ask you about the fact you have ukrainians given shelter and indoor facilities while patients and central americans and others have had to sleep on the streets

for asylum. you can't just say no, you don't get asylum because you are an illegal alien. but the provision of that treaty says that only applies if the person has come directly from the country where they were being persecuted. which is to say something like a ukrainian going into poland. what we are seeing on our border is almost everyone who claims to be an asylum seeker has passed through multiple other countries where they could have and should have applied for asylum but did not. they are looking -- they are economic migrants in effect. if you passed through three, four, eight, 12 different countries before you get to the u.s. border, you are no longer really an asylum seeker. under our current policies, they still get to apply for asylum, but the administration previous to this one, the trump administration, did put in regulations to require people to apply at other countries before they got here. and those regulations have all been canceled by this administration. this administration is n

congress passed asylum along time ago. we said this would never happen again and what we have said is violate international law. it is not that we did not allow everyone to apply for asylum, it was a certain group. it was a mismanagement problem and it became a political tool. when the biden administration took over, -- many people had multiple attempts, which made the numbers look larger. many of these people -- host: alan war is president of the lawyers association. we will talk more about title 42. we would love to hear from you. lines to colin, republicans, that is (202) 748-8001. democrats, that is (202) 748-8000. and independents, your number is (202) 748-8002. you mentioned the backlog of cases to be gone through of people who are already in our country, but let me read you the comments of alejandra mayorkas about title 42. he said once title 42 is no longer in place, dhs will process people at the border pursuant to title eight. we have put in place a comprehensive whole of government strategy to manage a possible

asylum in the u.s..hat is the kind of work we do. host: how hard is that asylum process for someone who shows up on the border? how much does that require given the folks on the side of it? guest: it is an extremely challenging process. there are numerous players of vetting and security checks. the law is quite complicated and quite restrictive in terms of who actually qualifies for asylum. the attorneys in our clinics spent hours developing stories with clients who could not explain how the violence they fled fits within the asylum definition. with together volumes of supporting evidence. if all of that is put together effectively, then we have a chance at gaining permanent protection. host: what determines whether somebody who shows up at the border gets a student attorney, a public defender, or nobody speaking for them? guest: that is a great question. in the immigration system, because it is a civil system, there is no right to government funded counsel. the only options are organizations like my cli

so there have been many asylum seekers forced to wait at the border to enter.saw this situation with sofia and her family. it's very good news that sofia was allowed in, but we need a policy that allows all asylum seekers at the border to be able to enter. our law requires no less. and i think your viewers need to understand how unprecedented it is to close the border to asylum seekers. it was certainly good news when president biden said title 42 would be terminated and -- you know, that is a good thing, and although many are concerned -- you know, there might be problems admitting people, the communities along the border and service providers are really ready to welcome and assist so the entry of all asylum seekers can be done in seamless way and with dignity, the way we saw it finally with advocacy of blaine bookie, my colleague, that sofia and her children were allowed to enter. >> obviously needs to be equity and equality with all the different types coming into the country when title 42 is expiring. honduras and haiti, are some getting fast track in, some

you have those seeking asylum, you have the economic - asylum, you have the economic migrants — asylumtintes— smugglers. are there any details in the times about how you break down those _ the times about how you break down those groups and tackle the problem? it's those groups and tackle the problem? it's pretty— those groups and tackle the problem? it's pretty scant on detail which is part of— it's pretty scant on detail which is part of the — it's pretty scant on detail which is part of the problem. ministers talk about— part of the problem. ministers talk about illegal migrants. people are claiming _ about illegal migrants. people are claiming asylum. if they take itiegai— claiming asylum. if they take illegal routes, that's not a criminat— illegal routes, that's not a criminal act if they are claiming asytunr — criminal act if they are claiming asylum. the refugee council says 60% of people _ asylum. the refugee council says 60% of people who claim asylum are granted — of people who claim asylum are granted it. really important to make that distinction.— that distinction. everyone

if you are granted asylum in the uk, the asylum seeke stay want up.n the uk, the asylum seeke stay in nt up. if you are granted asylum in the uk, the asylum seeke stay in the stay and has a right to stay in the uk cross of people a day are trying to cross the english channel on small of people a day are trying to cross the english channel on s sums of having paid extortionate sums of money to people who will take them if you were advising the either. if you were advising the claims should do to try to process claims in a fair, should do to try to process claims ir theiir, should do to try to process claims ir the government is really about crossing the channel concerned about crossing the channel and worried about lives, then what it should do and what people are saying they should do is open application centres in france, where claims can be considered while they wait in france. then at least they will not have to do these journeys to get here. that is the humane way to get here. that is the humane way to do it. but this isjust a deterrent and whethe

asylum seekers andj to refugee asylum seekers and no harm — to refugee asylum seekers and no harm toe _ to refugee asylum seekers and no harm to people smugglers. | no harm to people smugglers. the hone. _ no harm to people smugglers. the hope. to— no harm to people smugglers. the hope, to stop _ no harm to people smugglers. the hope, to stop the - no harm to people smugglers. the hope, to stop the small. the hope, to stop the small boats the ambition for potentially thousands of people to be packed on planes to rwanda, the reality, the government could see a challenge in the courts seeking to scuttle it before the programme even begins. a former british national who joined the islamic state group in syria has been found guilty in the united states of hostage taking and conspiracy related to the murders of four americans in syria. el shafee elsheikh was part of an is militant cell dubbed �*the beatles' by hostages because of their british accents. a warning — you may find some of this report by nomia iqbal distressing. nearly a decade later, el shafee elsheikh will finally pay for hi

in the guardian, the headline on the front page, rwanda asylum seekers plan branded inhumane. asylum is what i have been including _ inhumane. yes, that is what i have been including in _ inhumane. yes, that is what i have been including in my _ inhumane. yes, that is what i have been including in my reports, - been including in my reports, labour, the lib dems, the scottish national party, we have had outcries, we have had amnesty international, associations representing human rights. an absolutely... all kinds of adjectives and scathing comments, the urge to rethink this, it's in and wrong. 0ne the urge to rethink this, it's in and wrong. one of the other interesting things, tobias ellwood, the conservative chair of the defence select committee, actually accusing borisjohnson of using it as a massive distraction from becoming the first prime minister to becoming the first prime minister to be found guilty of a criminal charge while in office. i think there is amount of the population and boaters who will wonder why this was brought up who will wonder why this was brought up now, an

asylum in france than at the uk.h on the list of eu countries, although we are no longer in the eu, but geographically we are 11th on the list of countries that receive asylum seekers, so it is a myth that greece and hungary take a more asylum seekers than we do and now because of the situation in ukraine, we are seeing lots of other countries taking more. poland took in 2 million people in the last month. we get about 30,000 people crossing the channel and of that 30,000, 98% of them, and this is from the home office's own data, the one that claim asylum and of those, over 75%, one that claim asylum and of those, over75%, if one that claim asylum and of those, over 75%, if you factor in appeals too, go on to be deemed to be refugees. so that shows that one, they were fleeing persecution and two they were genuine refugees. but overall, we should look at the general picture around the world. it is a cruel thing and it breaches our obligations under international law. people are entitled to claim asylum here, but very

asylum is for -- what you see mostly as people are coming here for economic reasons, not asylum or being oppressed. you have an amount of that, but the majority of the numbers are coming here for other reasons, especially when you see so many of them are adult males or the criminal part is kids being used as pawns by the cartels to bring families that are not really families together and then they recycle the kids and sneak them back and bring them through again. host: from john in new jersey, independent line. caller: i would like to touch base on the $1.2 trillion that we are going to spend on the infrastructure. every penny of that money is countable. this equals 1000 billion dollars and we do not have people to fill any jobs right now. i hope they are out there trying to get high school graduates to become associated with a trade because we need wages for these people, so i hope all that money is accountable. why are we allowing china to buy in our country? guest: i appreciate that. i did not support the package because a lot of it was not what you would actually call infrastructure,

record numbers of asylum seekers arriving across record numbers of asylum—seekers arriving across theesigned to show the government getting serious with the problem of people traffickers exploiting desperate migrants. this innovative approach, driven by our shared humanitarian impulse and made possible by brexit freedoms, will provide safe and legal routes for asylum, while disrupting the business model of the gangs. among the key measures announced, that the royal navy will take operational control of the channel crossing response but the centrepiece of the response is to deal with rwanda. if it happens, this is where the first of those flown to kigali will be housed — currently a private hostel. is it reserved for people coming from britain? i is it reserved for people coming from britain? today's guided tour also included a meeting with a yemeni refugee who has successfully made his home in the country. the weather is really great the whole year, no change! yeah, i think this is most of the things that i like, how is the process with the government, how is everything like easy and

we are building an asylum system that has been dismantled.e providing alternative pathways to seek relief under the laws of the united states. >> o'donnell: i want to ask you about u.s. cybersecurity. what targets is russia considering in terms of a cyberattack? >> what we focus upon, of course, is our critical infrastructure, because that is where the damage can be inflicted and really impact our day-to-day lives. >> o'donnell: banking? >> banking. our energy system. >> o'donnell: have they attempted an attack? >> they have not attacked our critical infrastructure in retaliation to the sanctions we've imposed arising from the russia-ukraine crisis. but we are on alert, and we are on alert together. >> o'donnell: are you confident that america could defend against any russian cyberattack? >> we are preparing for an attack. we are poised to respond to any attack, should it materialize. >> o'donnell: well, secretary mayorkas, thank you for your time. we appreciate it. >> thank you, norah. >> o'donnell: and we want to turn now to a cbs news inve

the asylum reception — country illegally. the asylum reception centre _ country illegally.le concerns from local people that this is not the appropriate place to put such a reception — appropriate place to put such a reception centre. would my writable friend _ reception centre. would my writable friend meet with me to discuss the decision— friend meet with me to discuss the decision and see what could be done? -- right— decision and see what could be done? —— right honourable friend. i want to thank him because he has been in dialogue with ministers on this issue. i would dialogue with ministers on this issue. iwould be dialogue with ministers on this issue. i would be very happy to meet with him and he does understand the principle on this so i'm very happy to discuss this further. the principle on this so i'm very happy to discuss this further.— to discuss this further. the home secretary asserts _ to discuss this further. the home secretary asserts that _ to discuss this further. the home secretary asserts that labour - secretary asserts that labour members do not under

bo farley says these are not asylum seekers, asylum started in greece, italy, spain and france and the to rwanda. keep your thoughts coming into me because this will be one of the big stories that we follow today. you can do that we follow today. you can do that on twitter. reports from russian state media say the most important ship in russia's black sea fleet, the moskva missile cruiser, has been badly damaged after ammunition on board blew up causing a fire. the moskva is the flagship of the fleet. quoting the russian defence ministry, interfax said the crew had all been evacuated and the cause of the fire was being investigated. earlier, a ukrainian official said the ship had been hit by two missiles, but this has not been confirmed. lieutenant colonel daniel davis, is a senior fellow at the foreign policy think tank defense priorities. here's his perspective. well it has to be very serious that they evacuated crew areas. there is a crew contingent of about 500 on one of those kinds of missile cruisers. so it had to be something very, very serious. and that's not something you do v

canterbury, the most senior cleric in the anglican church, condemns plans by the uk government to send asylumrs to rwanda. the comments come on easter sunday. this is the scene live in st peter's square in vatican city — where pope francis has been celebrating easter sunday mass. hello and welcome to bbc news. russia has urged the last ukrainian forces defending the besieged port of mariupol to surrender in order to save their lives — with the deadline just one hour away. the city has been under siege for weeks. moscow says its troops have cleared resistance from the entire city, apart from a sprawling steelworks. ukraine says its naval units are preparing for a russian landing operation in the area. in a late—night address, president zelensky accused russia of deliberately trying to destroy mariupol — and everyone in it. mr zelensky warned that eliminating ukrainian fighters in the city would put an end to peace talks. meanwhile, explosions have again been heard in the capital, kyiv, and in the western city of lviv. air raid sirens have been going off across much of the country overnight. th

is _ sending asylum—seekers to rwanda which is a _ sending asylum—seekers to rwanda which is a tradea trade in human cargo. bearing in mind that in fact the archbishop hadn't two and 25 of the bishops— archbishop hadn't two and 25 of the bishops are legislators themselves was a _ bishops are legislators themselves was a place in the house of lords. they— was a place in the house of lords. they have — was a place in the house of lords. they have a — was a place in the house of lords. they have a vote on the policies that actually govern this country. it is that actually govern this country. it is quite — that actually govern this country. it is quite right that they should intervene — it is quite right that they should intervene when something comes up like this, _ intervene when something comes up like this, and they disagree was vehemently. we like this, and they disagree was vehemently-— like this, and they disagree was vehementl . ~ ., vehemently. we will debate about whether they _ vehemently. we will debate about whether they should _ vehemently. we will debate about whether the

that safety you are supposed to apply for asylum there-— asylum there.what international law says - asylum there. that is not what international law says at - asylum there. that is not what international law says at all. . asylum there. that is not what international law says at all. it j international law says at all. it does allow you to claim asylum in a place that you can get two or a place that you can get two or a place where you've got family ties or cultural ties. the uk is a safe haven. we are talking about sending people to render because it is a safe haven. the uk is a safe haven. —— are sending people to rwanda. we aren't taking enough when we look at the global story. d0 aren't taking enough when we look at the global story-— the global story. do you think this may become _ the global story. do you think this may become law? _ the global story. do you think this may become law? are _ the global story. do you think this may become law? are the - the global story. do you think this may become law? are the legal . may become law? are the legal

rivera, who runs the migrant shelter, was already building an expansion to eventually house 1,200 asylum seekers. >> some of them have been waiting a year and a half for a permit just to come to the border here because they want to apply, do it legally. >> reporter: seeking asylum in the u.s. is a legal right, but with ports of entry not processing most asylum seekers due to title 42, some say they have no option but to cross illegally to try to make their claim. norah. >> manny bojorquez on the border, thank you. to talk more about the crisis, homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas joins us for an exclusive interview. mr. secretary, thank you so much. when title 42 is lifted, it could mean up to 18,000 more migrants every day. this will become an even bigger crisis. how is the department preparing

people should be able to claim asylum. there is no reason we should be releasing people pending their deportation or asylum proceedings. has this administration decided to hold people in custody pending that deportation or asylum proceedings we would not be in this situation. that is why am talking about open border policy. his policies that create the problems we are seeing today. host: 25 years of doing this. can you recall a border encounter that most impacted or frustrated you? guest: i can. early on in my career -- unfortunately i have had to witness several deaths on the border. it happens. we see the criminal cartels will literally leave people behind if they cannot keep up. early in my career we got a 911 call of an individual in the mountains just west of el centro california. we responded to that area. unfortunately the person had already -- was basically unresponsive. i watch the person take their last breath. she was a 24-year-old young women. the group of illegal border crossers left her behind to die in the d

that will do real- harm to asylum seekers and no harm to people _ harm to asylum seekers and no harmtop the small boats. the ambition — potentially for tens of thousands of people to be packed onto planes to rwanda. the reality — a government expecting a challenge in the courts seeking to scupper this proposal before it begins. mark easton, bbc news, rwanda. so will this policy stop people from making that treacherous journey across the channel? more than 28,000 people crossed the channel in small boats last year, and this year already looks set to exceed that number. back in 2020, some 8,500 people made thejourney. 0ur correspondentjessica parker has been speaking to some of those who are planning to cross the channel and sent this report from dunkirk. a makeshift village in northern france, sandwiched between woods and railway tracks. men collect firewood, children play games. the long wait for a better life than this. mrjohnson said the scheme would be uncapped... it was literally news to these men that some who reach england could be sent to rwanda. shafi, who tells me he fled af

>> well, asylum law is complicated. and, you know, trying to prove that someone has a claim requires, you know, them to show specific elements, but everyone has the right to due process of law. everyone should have the opportunity to speak to an attorney understand what their legal options are, without access to counsel someone wouldn't understand what our processes are. so i think that, know, we need to implement a system that provides that due process and that access to counsel to people who don't know what their options are to see what relieves are potentially available to them and go from there. >> there is tremendous yearning for a system that both parties can agree on. however, i think there's so much political incentive for both of them to disagree, that we may not soon see one. jessica riley, appreciate your perspective and time. thanks for joining us. >> thanks so much. bye-bye. >>> all right. we are following breaking news this morning. sacramento police confirmed to cnn multiple people shot in a shooting in d

this has shipped how we approach migration and asylum. wonder already provide the future for almost 130000 if you use from multiple countries, including neighbors like the d, r a, c, and d is there as for goodness and migrants. if a created from libya, despite the u. k. words about ruined is often for his johnson says the scheme should act as a deterrents to people thinking of crossing the channel. whatever the case is accepted, there will be legal challenges. in many ways, it's a clear breach of the 1951 united nations refugee convention. beyond that opposition politicians and some conservatives from johnson's a party. of course, the whole idea, immoral, unworkable, and a huge waste of money needs to create more safe routes. it needs to be looking at creating a she needs a system, for example, where people can claim, assign them in a country such as in an embassy and so that they don't have to put their money and their lives in the hands of people. there are many of the options to this to this issue, and then people having to use people

we seek asylum there rather than here in the uk. ~ ., seek asylum there rather than here in the uk. ~statement from the home _ in the uk. we have had the statement from the home office _ in the uk. we have had the statement from the home office and _ in the uk. we have had the statement from the home office and presumablyj from the home office and presumably the government will not think it is in its interest to kind of confront the archbishop over this but backbenchers are often either afraid or encouraged to do it by downing street. it is not our response bertie but you go and say this because you are free to say this. is there any sign of that happening or is of a body keeping well clear? elevate the home office's response has been pretty much the same response they have issued all along. they believe this policy will break the sort of business model of smuggling gangs. they have also stressed that they believe the uk has a proud history of welcoming refugees to safe and legal roots but as you say, certainly, some mps have been waiting and saying they don't believe this is the plac

record numbers of asylum seekers arriving across the channel in small boats.ow the government getting serious with the problem of people traffickers. this innovative approach, driven by our shared humanitarian impulse and made possible by brexit freedoms, will provide safe and legal routes for asylum, while disrupting the business model of the gangs. but the centrepiece of the response is the deal with rwanda. if it happens, this is where the first of those flown to kigali will be housed — currently a private hostel. is it reserved for people coming from britain? that is right. today's guided tour also included a meeting with a yemeni refugee who has successfully made his home in the country. the weather is really great the whole year, no change! yeah, i think this is most of the things that i like. many, though, have profound concerns about the practicality, the cost, and the humanity of this deal — the british government sending off traumatised asylum seekers halfway around the world to rebuild their lives in a country they've never been to. rwanda is still

, to seek asylum there rather than in the uk, can stand up to the judgment of god.e policies can't carry the weight of our responsibilities as a country founded by christian values so some pretty strong words there from him and just to recap, these are all in response to that policy announced this week to essentially send some asylum seekers, particularly those arriving via channel crossings on boats or lorries to rwanda to seek asylum there rather than here in the uk. ~ ., ., ., asylum there rather than here in the uk. we have had that same from the home office — uk. we have had that same from the home office and _ uk. we have had that same from the home office and presumably - uk. we have had that same from the home office and presumably the - home office and presumably the government won't think it is in its interest to kind of confront the archbishop over this but backbenchers are often either encouraged to do it by downing street. it is not are responsible to bid you go and say this because you're free to say it. is sign of that happening letters of the body ca

later in his easter sermon he says the government asylum policy cannot stand up to the judgment of godded on christian values and also it is opposite to the nature of god who he says to cut response ability for our failures. it is all in response to a recently announced uk government policy to send asylum seekers who have arrived to the uk via for example boats crossing the channel are lorries making that crossing to rwanda to have their asylum claims process there as opposed to in the uk. many people, even politicians will probably see should the church be doing politics? what reaction has been from the home office? the home office have responded quite robust with the claims he has made and said there are a number of safe and legal routes for people who want to seek asylum in the uk like existing resettlement schemes and also said the uk has a proud history of welcoming refugees in need and said their plans and their views would disrupt the business model of people smugglers particularly involving people wanting to cross the channel into the uk. the archbishop himself has acknowledged

my “ourney as an asylum — country first of all.try first of all. my journey as i an asylum seeker is very similar to the people who we see now coming whether it is across the channel, from ayr, from ukraine, afghanistan or syria. as one of those asylum seekers who came from afghanistan, flame because my life was at risk, i have written about myjourney in my memoir and also about the contribution and the values that the refugees bring to the host countries. i was born in 1983 during the conflict. the current situation has reminded me of the tanks rolling in and the rocket flying in, we were hiding in basements of the first five years. we were then fled to afghanistan —— pakistan that the conditions were terrible. we suffered from tuberculosis which nearly killed me. in the 90s i spent another seven to eight years with family hiding in sellers in afghanistan where most of education happened because the bombs were still flying around. aged 15, my parents decided to send me away because my life is at risk and because my life is at risk

seeking asylum as a human right.man should be forced to remain in danger in mexico while waing for the asylum claims. mpp must end now. amy: well, for more, we're joined in washington, d.c., by aaron reichlin-melnick, senior policy counsel at the american immigration council. at yesterday's rally outside the supreme court and tweeting the supreme court oral arguments yesterday. can you lay out what is at the center of the supreme court hearing and when can we expect a ruling? >> yesterday supreme court hearing was largely about whether or not the biden administration has the authority to end the remain in mexico program at all. this is very different than in the daca case two years ago where the trumpet administration unsuccessfully tried to end the program. everyone agreed the trumpet administration could end the program if it went through the right protocols for doing so, but here texas has gone further. they got a court order say not only did the biden administration go about it in the wrong way in ending the prog

pm johnson: this approach will provide safe and legal routes for asylum while disrupting the business of the gangs. >> the u.s., a police officer fatally shooting a black man as he lay facedown the ground. we start ukraine, where it has been 50 days since russia's invasion. in a moment, we will look at the latestn the ground, but first, this interview. our correspondent clive mie sat down with volodymyr zelenskyy in kyiv. he said countries who continue to bite russian oil are earning money in other people's blood and erred -- and urged western countries to send more military aid. >> pleasure to meet you. good to see you. for the integrity of the war, vladimira zelenskyy has called this building home. help difficult has it been for you to be here without your family? pres. zelenskyy: it is my job. it is difficult without family to be anywhere. clive: his wife and children are at an undisclosed location. at the start of the war, they walked around in the darkness here, afraid of russian shelling. pres. zelensy: our country is going through the darkness. clive: as we enter it what is lab

they pursued asylum elsewhere. it? ., ., ., , there. it is not looking like a lot, isit? ., ., ., ,,, ., is it? no, and that is because of the capacity _ is it? no, and that is because of the capacity of— is it? no, and that is because of the capacity of the _ is it? no, and that is because of the capacity of the facility, i is it? no, and that is because of the capacity of the facility, 100, j the capacity of the facility, 100, may be stretching to 300. last year we had 30,000 people which the uk via small boat which suggests the probability of people being sent to rwanda is a small and of course that raises the question of whether it is going to change, the decision—making of asylum seekers in calais who are thinking about making the trip. find thinking about making the trip. and that is what a lot of people who are criticising this scheme are saying today, they are saying this is not going to act as a deterrent, it will change the way that asylum seekers and particularly human traffickers operate. do you agree? p

this has shipped how we approach migration and asylum. one day already provided a huge for almost $130000.00 if you use from multiple countries, including neighbors like the city and rooney is as a forgiveness done. and my grants, if acquitted from libya, despite the words about ruined. as often, maurice johnson says the scheme should act as a deterrent to people thinking of crossing the channel. whatever the case is accepted, there will be legal challenges. in many ways, it's a clear breach of the 1951 united nations refugee convention. beyond that, opposition politicians and some conservatives from johnson's, i party have called the whole idea a moral unworkable, and a huge waste of money. this government needs to create more safe routes. it needs to be looking at creating action on time. you need the system, for example, where people can claim, assigned them in a country, such as in an embassy and so that they don't have to put their money and their lives in the hands of people from others. there are many other options to this to this

>> well, let's first talk about asylum cases.those people are going to have their cases rejected by the immigration judge. so why are we letting 100 people in, 100% of them, when we should be only saying bienvenidos to 10 or 15%. the system has been to be more efficient. the way the administration with all due respect, and we've given them ideas, is not the way to handle the border situation. >> give me one idea right now that you think is easy to implement to ease this problem and make asylum seekers feel heard. >> first of all, we've got to give them the due process. so what we do is we have those immigration judges at the border and give them their day in court at that particular place. instead, what do we do with immigration judges? we send them to new york, chicago, miami. we need to have more immigration judges at the border. it took me two years, chuck, to get eight immigration judges in laredo where we have thousands of people that come in. we've got to be more efficient and more effective. title 42 is a public health iss

the government has announced plans to send some asylum seekers to rwanda.ossing the english channel in small boats will be flown 4,000 miles on a one way ticket to africa, to be processed and resettled. the prime minister says the government has to break the business model of what he called �*vile people smugglers'. but opposition politicians here have called the plans �*unworkable�* and �*despicable�*. 0ur political correspondent jonathan blake reports. arriving this morning, migrants rescued trying to cross the english channel, a dangerousjourney for thousands each year, a problem with the government has so far failed to tackle. the solution, ministers believe, lies 4000 miles away. the home secretary priti patel visiting rwanda, where the government wants to send many of those arriving on small boats. the scheme would see mostly single men sent to the central african country where they could attempt to claim asylum to live and work. the prime minister in kent today said the plan was part of the uk taking back control of immigration.— immigration. this in

they have argued that their approach of sending some asylum seekers to rwanda to seek asylum there andsiness model of smuggling gangs, particularly involving channel migrant crossings. they've also argued that the uk has a proud history of providing sanctuary to people fleeing persecution through what they describe a safe and legal routes to existing resettlement schemes but certainly, this response from the home office has come in light of a pretty scathing attack, as you say, from justin welby the archbishop of canterbury who has said the scheme cannot stand up to the judgment of god but has also criticised it, saying that it does not carry the weight of our responsibility as a country founded on christian values well. h, country founded on christian values well. ,., , ._ , well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are auoin well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are going to _ well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are going to have _ well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are going to have a _ well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are going to have a debate, - well. ok, so, tuesday is where we are going to h