here's athina jones. >> well, don, simply put, the buffett law would impose a minimum effective tax rateple making a million dollars or more. it takes its name from billionaire warren buffett who says his secretary pays a higher rate of taxes than he sdchlt buffett doesn't think that's fair and neither does the white house, so this a big thing they're pushing this year. if this goes into effect, and that's a big if, there are millions of americans who pay more. this will go into effect for 50 or 60,000, and the white house pointed to 77,000 house holds that in 2009 paid less than 30% of their income in taxes. we're looking at thousands of people being affected and not millions. the joint committee on taxation has studied how much revenue this would actually bring in if affected. they estimate it would bring in just $5.1 billion next year and $47 billion over the next ten years. if you look at those figures, that represents just a tiny, tiny fraction of the deficits we expect to see in the coming years. on the budgetary side it wouldn't have much impact. on the political side, the obama w