athletea is one that is established in 1998. the gap bought them a couple years ago and formed them into new stores. now they are a formula retail but in san francisco they were not. a store that is the most comparable here and has the most compelling argument, the appellant's argument is black flees which has been mentioned here before. blacks flees by brooks brothers and they have come in for a store. there was no letter of determination no written letter on this item but they did go through a conditional use process because their name was black flees by brooks brothers and they did have more stores, there are more than 11 brooks brothers stores and they fell the products within those stores. i don't think it is quite comparable to this case. i went and looked at their website side by side and compared the merchandise. i understand their argument about the array argument, they are both selling the same array, they are not the same array with 50 percent of more of stock merchandise from a single distributing bearing the marking