atraction, he fired her because he felt she was attraction to his fidelity to his wife. >> neil: get ready for new fees to fly in the new year. from southwest airlines. you miss a flight and don't cancel your discount ticket, you're going to pay up. overweight bags get ready to lighten up your wallet more. if you're overweight get ready to be killed. just-- (laughter) southwest says it nds the money. what about letting us keep them. >> it's so ridiculous and makes me so-- the airlines fees are like tattoos, never ever go ay they just go up, up, up, up. >> neil: that depends where the tattoos are. i do. >> and american airlines is-- >> sorry. >> that was really. >> that was sassy. >> and quit while you're he ahead on this. >> neil: i meant nothing and what ben might have been inferring, go ahead. >> and where was i. >> neil: you find it offensive. >> i find it offensive. >> neil: the fees not the tattoos. >> mine says mom on it. >> right here, mom. >> show it to me. >> neil: the industry makes a lot of money and charles payne you pointed out last week, the industry makes a ton of mone

it should have been like a coming atraction for michigan, looking at what he did at gateway.nd people say, well, mike, how did this guy get in there? i mean, this is a state that voted for obama ten points over romney. and i think honestly, i think people didn't take 2010 serious enough. and i think a lot of people were -- i think a lot of the base was depressed because at least the perception of what president obama was doing in that first year or two, he was trying to get along, he was trying to be a good guy. and it's like -- >> no public option. no universal health care. that's what the country wanted. >> right. >> but there was a perception there wasn't a good enough fight -- >> and putting a guy from goldman sachs, larry summers, in charge of our economic policy. >> what's the plan? you have a history in terms of being able to battle these kinds of issues. do you have a plan to fight back in michigan? because they're going to go to other states and try to push the same legislation, which is all about stripping the democratic infrastructure, going right to the money, to

and it doesn't say anything in the article, but it certainly attacks the emotions or atracts the emotions of individuals. so, yes, i am not satisfied that they would be not interfere with -- through their clarification -- and through their clarification could change the intent. even if they don't, we have taken care of our problem here. mr. kerry: but, mr. president, it is important in this kind of debate as we make a judgment as senators that we base our judgment on facts and on the reality. the senator has suggested that he is opposed to this treaty because an outside group could impose their will on the united states of america. what he has just acknowledged is, it can't do that because it would require the advice and consent of the senate. but, secondly, is the no senator aware that senator ar risch askd the justice department whether or not the court interpreted the effect of a nonself-execute bein--nonself-executing declaran this treaty, the court said, the united states ratified the international covenant on the express understanding that it was not self-executing. and so it did no