, well and with atroshenko , it is clear, people there are simply offended that the legally elected headas removed by the decision of an incomprehensible court, for them, is it, is it really, is such a terikov really good, or is it some peculiarity of the people of kharkiv that i remember, went to bow in the end to that, heh heh it surprised many other residents, they thought, well, kernos is such a character, specific, here, but such a funeral was very typical for him, eh, or is this some peculiarity of the city, which, which loves its power in any case, or is it true, is it true that now in these very difficult conditions, the city government is showing some kind of sacrifice and dedication, well, look ... the fact that the people of kharkiv love their city, that's all clear, i won't say anything here with pathos , but given the general all-ukrainian trend and kharkiv here as well let's say such an avant-garde of this. after all, it is trust in local authorities in general, it is in territorial communities, not in district centers, not in regional, let's say, formations, but in particu