party opposite, who have been caught bang to rights issuing dodgy crime statistics, or to the authoritative and independent british crime survey, which suggests that violent crime has fallen by 41% in the last 10 years? >> i think that we all have a duty in the debate about law and order to give out all the facts that are relevant. to misrepresent facts that have come from the police and the british crime survey is not to allow us to have a fair debate in this country. the police have said that the use of the figure of 71% by the opposition is "extremely misleading," and the bbc home affairs editor has said, "the story is of falling and then stable violence for over a decade." i think that there is a duty on everybody to report the facts accurately. >> mr. david cameron. >> thank you, mr. speaker. can i join the prime minister in paying tribute to corporal liam riley and lance corporal graham shaw, who were killed in helmand on monday? they were both very brave men. everyone should be proud of their service and we should all honor their memory. is it not becoming clear from the chilcot inqu

to the party opposite who have been caught bantu rights issuing crime statistics or to the authoritative and independent british crime survey that suggested that violent crime has fallen by 41 percent in the last 10 years? >> mr. speaker, i think we have a duty in the debate of law and order to give out all the facts are relevant to this. and to misrepresent the facts that come from the police and british crime survey is not allowed to have a fair debate in this country. mr. speaker, of the police have said that the use of the figure of 71 percent by the opposition is extremely misleading, and the bbc has said the story is of one of falling and in stable files. i think there is a duty on everyone's part to report the facts accurately. >> david cameron? >> thank you, mr. speaker. and i joined a prime minister in paying tribute to corporal lee o'reilly and lance corporal graham scholl who were killed in helmand on monday. they were both very brave man. everyone should be proud of their service and we should all honor their memory. isn't it becoming clear from the chilcot inquiry that the g

they were battle hardened, authoritative, and tough-minded. women are thought to be ill- qualified for litigation because it required sharp logic and a shrewd and negotiation. -- and shrewd negotiation. the supreme court to the levinia she could not be admitted to the state bar, the practice of law was unfit for a female character. to expose women to the brutal repulses and obscene events of court room life would shock womanhood and relax a public sense of decency. they were refused admission. the illinois supreme court said that as a married woman, her contracts were not binding. and contracts were the essence of the attorney-client relationship. the supreme court of the united states agreed with the illinois court. justice bradley, in a concurring opinion for the supreme court cited the natural differences -- they could not be admitted. even clarence darrow, one of the most famous champions of unpopular causes amassed a group of women lawyers and said, you cannot be shining lights of tomorrow because you are too kind. you can never be corpor

there existed a hard core of authoritatively-established doctrine which was made obligatory on all scholars and teachers. it was expected that each new accretion of knowledge would be consistent with the single system of truth anchored in christian dog dogma. as scholars and teachers gradually became more interested in science and began to question some of the fundamental precepts of religious doctrine, the conflict between scientific inquiry and religious authority grew intense. when galileo published his telescopic observations, for example, he was listed as a suspect in the secret books of the inquisition, threatened with torture, compelled publicly to disavow his views and ultimately imprisoned for the rest of his life. throughout the 17th century, university life remained largely bounded by the medieval curriculum. real freedom of thought was neither practiced, nor professed. as one statement put the point, the teacher is not to permit any novel opinion to be taught, nor to teach anything contrary to prevalent opinion. this was the general attitude in america as well as in europe, and

he moves right back towards you because i am authoritative and i'm confident and i won't let you get upper hand. >> bill: look like a complete idiot. >> now had the power but he held his own. >> bill: all right. tonya reiman, everybody. pinheads and patriots up next mel gibson. that's a powerful guy. back in a i he copd which makes it hard to breathe. but now that i'm breathing better with advair... i can enjoy the zoo witmy grandkids. (announcer) for people with copd including chronic onchitis, emphysema, or both, great news. advair helps significantly improve lung function. while nothing can reverse copd, advair is different from most other medications because it contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator working together to help you breathe better. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be use more than twice a day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneumonia. advair may increase your risk of osteoporosis and some eye problems. tell your doorf you have a heart condition or high blood prsure bef

he moves right back towards you because i am authoritative and i'm confident and i won't let you getthe upper hand. >> bill: look like a complete idiot. >> now had the power but he held his own. >> bill: all right. tonya reiman, everybody. pinheads and patriots up next mel gibson. that's a powerful guy. back in a bill: time for pinheads and patriots. in oklahoma a tough law on child predators proposed giving jurors the death penalty option in certain cases. news coverage is see if ing us. >> you don't give a child rapist when you are in prison in the of america. bill o'reilly's reaction to the suspended sentence for rape last year was shared by many in and outside of oklahoma. bill: the oklahoma state rep going after the predators is a patriot. we appreciate the mention on the local news. on the pinhead front ladies and gentlemen, mel gibson. >> do you think the public will perceive you any differently after all that has been in the news about you? >> what are you referring to specifically? >> referring to the drinking problems. referring to what has been call the anti-semitic rant.

first, the working group will reach out to the force to authoritatively understand their views and attitudes about the impact of repeal. i expect that the same sharp divisions that characterize the debate over these issues outside of the military will quickly say to find their way into the process, particularly as it pertains to what are the true views and attitudes of our troops and their families. i am determined to carry out this process in a way that establishes objective and reliable information on this question, with minimal influence by the policy or political debate. it is essential that we accomplish this in order to have the best possible analysis and information to guide the policy choices before the department and the congress. second, the working group will undertake a thorough examination of all changes to the department regulations and policies that may have to be made. these include potential revisions to policies on benefits, base housing, fraternization and misconduct, separations and discharges, and many others. we will enter this examination with no preconceived views, bu

the science is in, and people need to know what the science case is from a authoritative sources. the purpose of the book was really to present, it's sure, you can read it on the plane, put it in your pocket, and get the full story. that the science case is in but there are serious impacts already occurring, that they're a big logical impacts impact that their serious humanitarian impact. is a humanitarian crisis as well as an environmental crisis. that the security authorities from the cia to the pentagon have this very high on the agenda. that these are issues that we must address and we must address them now. and any other part of the book which is really important if they get through that park, is there really are solutions. and that is what we are all about. that's the we're working on here in washington every single day. we know what the solutions are. they are available now. we need to put them in place, and we need the help actually across america to do it. so in end it is a call to action. we want people across the country to participate with us. we want them to feel that

first, the working group will reach out to the force, to authoritatively understand their views and attitudesepeal. i expect that the same sharp divisions that characterize the debate over these issues outside of the military will quickly seek to find their way into this process, particularly as it pertains to what are the true views and attitudes of our troops and their families. i am determined to carry out this process in a way that establishes objective and reliable information on this question, with minimal influence by the policy or political debate. it is essential that we accomplish this in order to have the best possible analysis and information to guide the policy choices before the department and the congress. second, the working group will undertake a thorough examination of all the changes to the department's regulations and policies that may have to be made. these include potential revisions to policies on benefits, base housing, fraterization and misconduct, spra separations and others. we will enter the examination with no preconceived views, but a recognition that this will r

first the working group will reach out to the force, authoritatively understand their views and attitudesexpect the same shortstop divisions that characterize the debate over these issues outside of the military will quickly seek to find their way into this process, particularly as it pertains to what are the true views and attitudes of our troops and their families. i am determined to carry out this process in a way that establishes objective and reliable information on this question with minimal influence by the policy or political debate. it is essential that we accomplish this in order to have the best possible analysis and information to guide the policy choices before the department and the congress. sec the working group will undertake a thorough examination of all the changes to the department's regulations and policies that may have to be made. these include potential revisions to policies on benefits, base housing, frat earnization and misconduct, separations and discharges, and many others. we will enter this examination with no preconceived views but a recognition that this wi

. >> professor cole, i think a significant deficiency of your otherwise authoritative work is the absenceany discussion of the current and historic impact of run-away athletic programs on the university's fundamental mission. only this month the perversion of the intercoalollegiate progr at bingham university and was part of the shakeup of the administration there. thank you. >> is that a statement or a question? >> you can interpret it -- >> well, by the way, the book having to do with commercialization of the university does talk about athletics. i don't really talk about athletics in the book. i do find it somewhat frightening that the ivy league schools have 20% of their incoming classes -- 20% of their incoming classes being recruited athletes. little people know that and notre dame is about 4 marine layer -- 4%. i don't think that it undermines the research initiatives of the university. and certainly in the discovery of new ideas. i think it has much more idea of the creeping -- you know, i don't know what it is. professionalization of sports, whatever. it has affected the ivy leag

agenda of congress and the regulators and then it is our responsibility but if you don't have an authoritativestitution supported by the data doing that then the problem i think you have is the next time it will be something different, it won't be a housing bubble and subprime mortgages, it will be something we are not even thinking about and it will come up, the regulators will talk about it, i'm sure the said debate internally the housing bubbly and ensure that the occ and everybody did but it never broke off because there was no one charged with saying this is a serious systemic risk or should be considered at this juncture. so that's my two bits. dr. engle and then mr. horne. >> i was just going to say i think an independent nif would be very effective but it think it could also be effected if it is within a systematic regulator housed within a regulator because the system eckert regulator had exactly the same target. and the same goals that both of freest and therefore it would give more of a tool for understanding which data serious need to be examined, which institutions can be explored

they were battle hard, shrewd, authoritative and tough-minded. women were thought to be ill qualified for adversarial litigation because it required sharp logic and shrewd negotiations not to mention the exposure to the unjust and immoral. now in 1875 there was constant supreme court told she could not be admitted to the state bar, the chief justice said the practice of law was unfit for the female character to expos women to the brutal khmer pulsipher and obscene agents of court life. [laughter] he said would shock men's reference for womanhood and relax the public's sense of decency. in a similar case myra brad will of chicago who studied law with her husband applied to the illinois bar in 1869 and was refused admission in the illinois supreme court said as a married woman her contracts were not binding and contracts with the essence of the attorney-client relationship so of course she couldn't practice law and the supreme court of the united states agreed with the illinois court. justice bradley in a concurring opinion for the supreme court ci

first, the working group will reach out to the force, to authoritatively understand their views and attitudes about the impact of repeal. i expect that the same sharp division that characterized the debate over these issues outside of the military will quickly find their way into this process, particularly as it pertains to what are the true views and attitudes of our troops and their families. i am determined to carry out this process in a way that establishes objectives and reliable information on this question with minimal influence by the policy or political debate. it is essential that we accomplish this in order to have the best possible analysis and information to guide the policy choices before the department and the congress. . . the policy choices before the department and the congress. second, the working group will undertake a thorough examination of all the changes to the department's regulations and policies that may have to be made. these include potential revisions to policies on benefits, base housing, fraternization and misconduct, separations and discharges, and many others

counterparties were, but what's important to recognize is the fed under the lawsç of the land had authorite fed regulators coming in and consuming the bank. or stopping all lending to the people who absolutely need the lending. i'm talking about small businesses that have 50 jobs and small businesses that need a line of credit and on down the line. and i'mi] telling you it's almo unanimous. it isn't totally, but it's almost unanimous with the community bankers in kentucky. >> i have heard the same thing. and i think that in many cases i'm sure those concerns are justified. i think you are exactly right to emphasize. i think you need to keep this message very clear to those supervisors and examiners. they need to make sure they are not making this problem worse. it's very difficult as it is. >> they are both federal and state examiners, now. the state examiners are scared to death that they are not going to be as tough as the fed regulators. >> i think all the examiners, this is what happens in a recession like this, all of them are scared. they are looking over their shoulder. they are wor

they were battle hardened, authoritative, and tough-minded.ht to be ill- qualified for litigation because it required sharp logic and a shrewd and negotiation. -- and shrewd negotiation. the supreme court to the levinia she could not be admitted to the state bar, the practice of law was unfit for a female character. to expose women to the brutal repulses and obscene events of court room life would shock womanhood and relax a public sense of decency. they were refused admission. the illinois supreme court said that as a married woman, her contracts were not binding. and contracts were the essence of the attorney-client relationship. the supreme court of the united states agreed with the illinois court. justice bradley, in a concurring opinion for the supreme court cited the natural differences -- they could not be admitted. even clarence darrow, one of the most famous champions of unpopular causes amassed a group of women lawyers and said, you cannot be shining lights of tomorrow because you are too kind. you can never be corporation lawyers be

. >> is that authoritative, the way you are announcing his name? way he has -- it has been pronounced toomey. -- pronounced to me. >> what do most americans think about the stimulus on this one year anniversary. t"ihe has seemed a little frustrated in comments he has made, including today, about depictions of the stimulus package. >> i have not talked to him recently about that. jake, i know that -- i would describe it the way that i described it yesterday. it is understandable, the frustration that the american people feel about the direction of their economy based on what we have gone frothrough since december of 2007 in losing 1 million jobs and when the past decade where there was virtually no job growth. in many cases, people working harder and bringing home less. we are at 9% unemployment. 9.7% unemployment. the president is frustrated with where this economy is as well. that is not to mention housing, the financial system, there are a whole host of other events that we encountered at the beginning of our ministration. >> yes, but what does h