the aviation industry organization of the ministry of defense announced the start of the construction of the second simorgh aircraft and said that this means the launch of the production line for this aircraft. it is being issued. simer is a light transport aircraft that was unveiled in 401 and made its first flight in 4002 , and now its makers are in the ministry of defense is waiting for the issuance of the certificates of the civil aviation organization. an airplane with the capacity to carry 6 tons of cargo or 50 military passengers for airdrop rescue operations or transporting the injured up to a distance of 2,500 km with a speed of 450 km per hour and a flight duration of three and a half hours. our products are flying in the sky today and the main thing we have to do today is to produce. in the shadow of the production of student companies that are with us in the supply chain are and will remain stable. our industry will be stable. the market needs will be met and we will design better products for a better future, god willing . they started the production phase of the main str

aviation industry for 20 years, not at boeing. in defense, all the faa has to do is look at what it has done successfully with organizations like the airlines and others. and apply those same standards and rules to boeing. with regards to your other question, i have always been a strong advocate of government agencies like the faa drawing on the resources of the national academies. when new technology enters the field, let's say ai for example, because that is the one that is the new technology du jour right now. i have been an advocate of national academies down the street with members you can draw upon to advise. people who know a lot more about the subjects than any of us. some organizations do it more than others but i think that is a resource that faa and nasa don't use enough in my opinion. >> national academy i have just one good news, dr. duluth. faa has gone to national academy and it has created a committee of experts for risk analysis of transport aircraft. that month i had the privilege of being a member. i think it has been great because faa has reached out to nuclear power industry for the communication of experts. ba

aviation industry for 30 your, not at you're absolutely correct. in a sense, all the faa has to do is look at what it's done successfully with organizations like the airlines and others and apply those same standards ineg and the same rules to boeing. so they adopt -- it's not a blank sheet of paper is what i'm saying. they've got something they're drawing. question, i've been a strong advocate of national agencies drawing on the resources of the national academies. new technology enters a field, ai for example, because that's the one that's the technology du jour right now. i've always been an advocate that you have these national galleries right down the street right here with members that you can draw upon to basically go in and advise and give -- people that know a lot more about these subjects than any of us. and i don't -- some organizations do it more than others, but i think that's a resource that faa and nasa and other agencies don't use enough in my opinion. >> the national academy, i have just one good news, dr. de luis. faa has gone to national academy, and national academy has created community of experts for risk and analysis of tran