the jury describes the picture of bibi ayesha as one of those. immediately recognized as a triumph for the journalism. thank you very much for coming thanks for having me it's a pleasure for me to share well first of all i read that when somebody told you the e.u. won the world press photo were you report you say you're joking it is a. true work well why couldn't you but you're not going to win well you know as you sit in your all previously that i've won eight will place awards before never in a million years would i ever have thought i would have won the overall prize and at the same time because of all the controversy there for surrounding the photograph i thought that the jury would be there with it would be too much of a risk to give it the first prize i will use as you mention good control received as far as i remember this picture this very picture appeared on the front page of time magazine and the headline read what happens if we leave afghanistan that right now so actually your picture was used in a propaganda campaign to sell the the o

ayesha gadhafi said they're in direct talks. we've seen no concrete proof of that and the government certainly wants to put across that they're trying to resolve the situation. i don't know if we have sound there, but i would like to play a little bit about what moammar gadhafi said just recently at the square, so let's take a listen -- >> translator: people of libya, might exceed your houses and offices, your families, all of them will be fair military targets. the same way you turned our offices, our headquarters, our house, our children, you turn them to legitimate military targets. we will treat you the same. eye for ear, ear for an ear, a drop for a drop. a family for a family. a house for a house. a headquarter for a headquarter. if we decided, we are able to move to europe like locusts, like bees. >> reporter: well, brooke, certainly a typical kind of angry rant there from moammar gadhafi, but significant because he's directly threatening european homes and civilians because of the nato campaign. brooke? >> very angry, an

ayesha rothko is a reporter with reuters. mike sore hand is a reporter with "greenwire" and a member of for national press club award. maria reese seo is washington bureau chief with the fort worth star-telegram and now you can give them a round of applause, please. [applause] before march 11 earthquake and ensuing tsunami triggered disaster at the fukushima daiichi nuclear plant in northern japan, it seemed as if the prospects were looking bright for revival of the nuclear industry in the united states. in fact at a time of deep political and philosophical divide in washington, a rare bipartisan consensus had developed but there was a need to re-examine whether it was time to build new nuclear plants in our country. some politicians like the idea because nuclear unlike coal and natural gas gives off known greenhouse gas emissions in producing electricity and could help address concerns about local warming. some believe it could help lessen the nation dependent on foreign oil also helping to create thousands of jobs. other be