it will all be explained to you in a nice letter greg bader has for you. by mid september we should know where we stand. we'll lose them 12-3 tonight. we'll be back on friday at home. >>> can you believe tomorrow marks a year from the day we thought could it really be an earthquake. well now, 364 days later we're still trying to fix the damage. downtown was damaged and caused serious damage to the monument in washington, d.c. so where were you when it happened? let us know on facebook. >>> when a friend mentioned seeing photos on a scandalous dating web site, he logged on to the facebook page, and we'll tell you more about that story coming up next and how those end up on facebook and if it ends up in a ad we're paying for it. >>> we are actually going to head out east to baltimore and see why this mom and pop shop have low grocery store prices when others are jacked up. here's why with a look at our weather. >> when we come back we're going to talk about this coastal system and how it could impact maryland. >>> 250 million photos are updated each day to f

the area were shot spotter has located has the ability to receive information directly from shots bader. >>pam: san francisco police are defending their decision not to search a vehicle that was found to have cash and weapons inside. dan kerman shows you what was in the vehicle and why police did not find weapons for three weeks. >> this is what police found 20 service a vehicle of a man. what they found was extensive. >> the man had been living in his car. he is now in jail on a variety of weapons charges. it turns out this is not the first time police discovered weapons in his vehicle. >> on june 30th we originally contacted him near robert lake. >> three weeks earlier on june 30th, he was detained in golden gate park for smoking. when he gave police the ok to search his vehicle, they found a loaded 12 gauge shotgun and a 22 caliber rifle. the other weapons were not discovered at the time. >> when he was detained at the first time it was for mental health evaluation. it was not a criminal charge. >> the chief defended officers staying at the time he made threatening statements against

bader was no different. it's always impressive what machido is able to do but i was more impressed by the guts and determination by rua tonight. >> curt: how do you see it? >> brian: i agree with dana white. machido is the guy. he did win a round against jon jones and the way he has come back after losing the tite to jon jones he is the most interesting matchup for dan henderson or jon jones. now it doesn't take anything away from the "shogun-"brandon vera fight. i agree with randy, it was an amazing performance by both guys. but i think for the fans and what is going to sell better, what is going to be the bigger pay-per-view it's lyoto machido versus the winner dan henderson-jon jones in my opinion. >> curt: that fight, henderson-jones is september 1. ufc 151. by the way, dan henderson will be live with the guys on fuel during the post-game show. he will talk about what he saw tonight. and probably, i'm guessing, somewhere along the way talk about the jon jones fight. all right, we know that is in the futu

supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg vocalized her descent to the ruling from the bench and in 2009 president obama signed the lilly ledbetter fair pay in restoration act. his first official bill signed as president. this is just over an hour. >> thank you. thank you very much. thank you folks. i have to tell you right off, i've got a little hearing problem with my ears. i flew about, over 12,000 miles in march and got it ruptured blood vessel in what my ears so i don't hear very well. but everybody says i'm talking okay. i still have a southern drawl. i didn't get rid of it. "the new york times" stated early on in my battle that i the southern drawl, but she has a good story. and i knew, and the reason that i remain having a good story, i'm not anyone special. this belongs to everyone in this room. it touches every family across this nation. there's not any of you exempt. if it's not you yourself, if someone in your family, your sister, maybe your mother or whatever, but it's ruining this country that women are so mistreated in their pay and their benefits. and it's like what the p

bader was no different. it's always impressive what machido is able to do but i was more impressed by the guts and determination by rua tonight. >> curt: how do you see it? >> brian: i agree with dana white. machido is the guy. he did win a round against jon jones and the way he has come back after losing the tite to jon jones he is the most interesting matchup for dan hende or jon jones. now it doesn't take anything away from the "shogun-"brandon vera fight. i agree with randy, it was an amazing performance by both guys. but i think for the fans and what is going to sell better, what is going to be the bigger pay-per-view it's lyoto machido versus the winner dan henderson-jon jones in my opinion. >> curt: that fight, henderson-jones is september 1. ufc 151. by the way, dan henderson will be live with the guys on fuel during the post-game show. he will talk about what he saw tonight. and probably, i'm guessing, somewhere along the way talk about the jon jones fight. all right, we know that is in the future.

sdplee it was this day in 1993 when ruth bader ginsberg became justice ginsberg.e first justice appointed to the high court by a democrat, ready for this, in more than a quarter century. since then she's been a reliable member of the court's more liberal, now minority. >>> on the and i have waves just has us wondering how nasty these spots will get. "national review" reviewer, and karen fin i didn't know, and "usa today" washington bureau chief susan page. susan, i'm going to start with you. you and i have probably done it longer than our friends here. >> hey did! >> as far as observers and watchers. is it as bad -- do we always say this? >> it's worse. my ninth campaign. it's more ads, tougher ads earlier. over the olympics, there used to be a kind of theory it was too jarring to have attack ads. that clearly is yesterday's news. the toughest attacks we have seen have come during the olympics, so one can only -- >> and the toughe ads are the ones that didn't even run. karen, it's interesting, the rep party has really jumped on this, and i think the obama campaign

it is less certain heading into 2012 the election because ruth bader ginsburg is the oldest member of the quarter. she's 78. she's in good health, full of energy. has often said that her idol, louis brandeis served until he was 82 and it sounded like a good member. just tiscali have come a 70 sixers vote, justice kennedy, 75 years old. once you get in the upper 70s, it's not always your choice when you leave the court. so i would say it is less clear to the next justice would leave. also, politics plays a big part. ruth ginsburg is going to be a lot more likely to consider leaving if barack obama is president dennis mitt romney's president by the same token, justice scalia and justice kennedy would be much more likely to leave under a romney presidency than under an obama presidency. >> is there such thing as the roberts court? >> absolutely, absolutely. the story of the supreme court is the story of american politics in a nutshell because to me the biggest development of the last 20 years has been the evolution of the republican party. moderate republicans dominated the united states

they cosigned a letter saying that ruth bader ginsburg should rekuz herself from any decision relating to abortion because she had something with the now organization for women. so this is a long time alliance that ryan has had and actually, mitt romney himself you know, they're going to vote tomorrow on the human life amendment being part of the republican platform and mitt romney has in the past said he supports that. so what's really confusing is that romney and ryan are now disclaiming any association with the akin remarks, when really it's not so much an inconsistency, but an inconvenien inconvenience. >> thank you for joining us. i want to bring in karen finney. with us from washington. karen, given the chorus of disapproval from republicans out to mitch mcconnell, calling on him to reconsider his run, even sean hannity suggesting an impact on down ballot races, does his candidacy survive much further? >> he actually sent out a tweet that he is staying in the race and that the good people who voted for him deserve to stay in. >> he's inviting people to continue donations to him.

bader was no different. it's always impressive what machido is able to do but i was more impressed by the guts and determination by rua tonight. >> curt: how do you see it? >> brian: i agree with dana white. machido is the guy. he did win a round against jon jones and the way he has come back after losing the tite to jon jones he is the most interesting matchup for dan henderson or jon jones. now it doesn't take anything away from the "shogun-"brandon vera fight. i agree with randy, it was an amazing performance by both guys. but i think for the fans and what is going to sell better, what is going to be the bigger pay-per-view it's lyoto machido versus the winner dan henderson-jon jones in my opinion. >> curt: that fight, henderson-jones is september 1. ufc 151. by the way, dan henderson will be live with the guys on fuel during the post-game show. he will talk about what he saw tonight. and probably, i'm guessing, somewhere along the way talk about the jon jones fight. all right, we know that is in the futu

. >> ruth bader ginsburg participates in the discussion comparing the court systems and constitutions in north america with those in the middle east. this is about an hour 20 minutes. >> good evening and welcome to our panel. to love you, welcome on this auspicious day what we have an august panel of supreme court justices, members of parliament, and professors of law. will give each of our panelists and opportunity to say a few words and make a few observations and we encourage them to interact with one another in a conversational style, posing questions back and forth. then we'll take questions and answers back and forth with the audience as well. many of the programs have been dealing with the rule of law, is best when the rule of law is in direct contravention of the rule of power, as we have been hearing in the news. it is appropriate that we take a look and constitutional law as it is in the north american continent and in israel and sewer these folks today have to say about what lessons could be learned and how we can apply what we have to help the other countries in the emergi

supreme court justice, ruth bader ginsburg. this is an hour and a half. [inaudible conversations] >> good afternoon, my name is michael traison. welcome to our discussion on constitutional law in north america and the middle east grid to all of you, welcome on this very auspicious day when we haven't addressed the panel of supreme court justices andembero members of thisations, program. we will say a few words and then get observations and encourage them to interact with onen another in a conversationalal sy style.le posing questions back and forths and then we will take questionsh and answers back and forth withl the audience as well. 3:3 we are working on a schedule to finish at 330, and i think that will work out fine.e at many of the programs we have attended here at this 2012 aba o meeting y in these times win the rule of law is in direct contravention of the rule of power as we have been hearing on the news, even as recently as today. i think it's very appropriate that we take a look at constitutional law as it is in the north american continence an

supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg. this is an hour and a half. >> good afternoon. my name is michael trace, and welcome to our panel today. on comparative constitutional law. north america and the middle east. to all of you, welcome on this very auspicious day when we have an august pane of supreme court justice, members of parliament, former attorney general and professors of law. our format today will be that we'll give each of our panelists an opportunity if they wish to say a few words and make a few observations, and then we have encouraged them to enter act with one another in a conversational style, posing questions and back and forth, and then we will take questions and answer back and forth with the audience as well. we're working on a schedule to finish at 3:30, and i think that will all work out fine. many of the programs we have attended here at this 2012aba annual meeting have been dealing with the question of the rule of law, especially in these times win the rule of law is in direct contravention of the rule of power as we have been hearing on the ne

i spent hours council and mothers who was furious their bader debate could daughters the trail needed a kind of sali couldn't give. let her get local anesthesia in a letter feel the pain so she knows never to do it again. the daughter's head lay on my shoulder as i sat on their bed wiping tears of relief, regret or both whispering comfort, giving a solution, channeling rage, sharing life. i wanted to keep this pregnancy if only i learned that it is in the if only that the reality of abortion regards it's there in the vast expanse and experience. if only is the theme of a thousand variations. if only i wasn't 14. if only i was married. if only my husband had a job, if only i had a job, if only i wasn't 42, if only i wasn't 15. if only, if only. but the women that came to choice found a kind of redemption at the clinic facilitated by counselors and staff who didn't the value but supported them. redemption in the form of rescue from an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy and everything that they meant. redemption in the form of signification, and utilization and acceptance. so understand du

i mean, stephen breyer and ruth bader begins, but both nominated by -- ginsburg, both nominated by bill clinton, both in the mainstream of centrist, democratic thought were confirmed within weeks by huge margins. and so if a president chooses to play down the middle, i thought or my observation told me, confirmation was going to be a piece of cake. well, that stopped happening in the last two nominations. we had sonia sotomayor with a wonderful personal story and a person of high achievement, 17 years as a federal judge, i think more federal judicial experience i believe than just about anybody else ever nominated to the supreme court. and, you know, what happened in her confirmation hearing? of course, she was confirmed, you know, so at the end of the day it was a happy story for her, but all that garbage about one speech she had made and the wise latino remark kind of wren. ed out of contact out of what had been a speech that was very thoughtful and heart felt, not a sound bite. opposition research that turns up something like that and dominated her confirmation process, and just the