jim: what a nice save by champ bailey. phil: it was an excellent job by bailey. he is all over desean jackson. donovan mcnabb, just hops up right in place and when he stands tall, which he did there, he puts it on the money. again champ bailey, we saw it earlier. came underneath, got an interception. jim: bailey is in the middle of the field. he had made that diving play over on the near sideline and just a little groggy and not able to get all the way back across to the other sideline. they're forcing philadelphia to punt here. phil: i tell you, the philadelphia eagles, they don't think anybody can cover desean jackson. well, champ bailey is doing a lot of one-on-one. he touches it. oh, boy, he lands hard right on his face. look at the turf. his right hip hits the ground but he's walking off now. brent celek was the star in the first half of this game for the eagles. champ bailey, kyle orton -- jim: they've been the stars of the second half. phil: absolutely. jim: rocca. a 51-yard punt. smith collard at the 33 and a flag. white in on the hit. referee: personal f

guys, the support guys. >> and head coach stansbury might ask for a medical redshirt behind elgin bailey. up top. a good three shooter and honeycutt game out. well, they hit the three and go to the left side ucla is going to have a lang day. >> marcus: you're karnac the magnificent. just read my mind. can't play good defense and force them into a tough shot and not block out and secure the defensive rebound if you're ucla jarvis. >> steve: the steal. a lazy pass by keefe, and anderson picks up his second personal foul. >> marcus: now phil turner at 6'3" plays power forward, and last year he's got incredible -- that time great defense, but it's been a reign of three-pointers by mississippi state to have ucla down early. mark, we have teams on both coasts that are interested. but milos only wants to play for dallas. milos really wants to play for brussels. milos only wants to play for shanghai. buenos aires... frankfort... paris... milos really wants to play for rome. [ crashing glass ] how's your japanese? we know why you fly. we're american airlines. jarvis. >> steve: bulldogs lead bruin

. >> steve: that's why it's so important to get riek back because elgin bailey will be given likely a medical redshirt this year and they are also missing tony beckham and shaunessy smith because of injuries. >> marcus: the ncaa has to make decisions. they can just sit on it, sit on it for the entire season and put off a decision for as long as -- as long as they please which i think is so unfair for the program of mississippi state and for renardo sidney jarvis. >> steve: dragovic. he is now 0 for 9. 0 for 9 is nikola dragovic. rebound tyler honeycutt. >> marcus: you know, that possession right there, honeycutt is bringing the basketball and trying to create something on his own and what's going to make him a special ballplayer for ucla once he gets his timing and his conditioning in order jarvis. >> steve: next saturday, east meets west in a powerful s.e.c. pac-10 doubleheader. first the women hit the court as two teams with national title dreams around then the men take center court when number 9 tennessee looks to shut down c usc. the action tips off at 2:30 eastern and 11:30 paci

bailey due to thermal expansion and basically as water and everything else gets warmer, we are likely to see it expand and we will see that sea level rise over the next 100 years. if we look at the total span half a foot to 2-foot of rise. that is definite problem is not the 20 feet that we have heard from al gore that has been shown very, very widely where we see florida disappear. this tract of florida or san francisco area or indeed, holland or new york or bangladesh or shanghai or beijing. we have to be realistic about saying what is going to happen, 1 foot is definitely a problem but we need to put it in context. let's take a look. over the last 150 years sea level rose about 1 foot. yet did we worry? did we notice? asking a very old person has lived through the 20 century, and ask her what happened during the 20 century. she's likely to talk about the two world wars, the emancipation of women, maybe the i.t. revolution. but it's very, very unlikely she will say the sea levels rose. because we fixed them. it's important point to say it's not a say that we wouldn't rather not have

we're running into now is the people reviewing those documents are myself and my investigator, scott bailey, and we're in the process of getting another accountant. we tried to enlist the help of the governmental accounting office, perhaps the hands -- the inspector general, and we're reaching out to other states. we got an estimate for the forensic review of these hard drive and servers. the targeted estimate that we got back was approximately $3.5 million. just for a targeted review of disinformation. the forensic people have to go in and determine what is privileged and what is not, and we have to have lawyers involved. we know that all runs up the bill pretty well. that is what we're dealing with. that is what we're dealing with. to the extent that any of y if any of you can help with those agencies in your jurisdiction to provide manpower or federal assistance, what ever we need to do to effectuate that. we have asked our state government for funding, and we will see how that turns out. i wanted to let you know that it is an issue for us. we are in the process of hopping around on one

. >> norman bailey. you mention argentina. my question is, and i fully support this commission and its extreme import. my question is, why do the members of the commission believe that what they are suggesting or something similar is more likely to happen than the way the situations they usually dealt with by countries which is either through inflating away the debt or by defaulting, which is what argentina did and as a result, it went on for several years, very high economic growth. and if it had saved that money instead of wasting it, it would've been able to pay off the debt and it would now be back in functioning normally. >> i think we need cash back we need to modify our metaphors and show some examples of courage. i just want to say a word on behalf of the irish government, which is actually taken fairly dramatic steps to cut its budget deficit in the last couple of days. does someone want to take the gentleman's question, default or inflation and alternative? >> first, i think the commission has a lead in the political

i am a true democrat but i am very disappointed -- i know kay bailey hutcheson and the other gop havenged the constitutional right of this health along -- of this health bill. the what i'm ashamed of with my party is that they have discriminated against other groups. discrimination in its definition as favoring one group over another. senator nelson and the center of floor have -- and on and on have taken things for their own people and left others. that is just discrimination. host: thanks for calling in, julie. about 15 minutes left, your favorite political health -- political story. it does not have to be health care. later this morning, we want to give you a heads up about a special hour about what you read in 2009, in particular, your top non-fiction book of 2009. that will be at 9:00 a.m. eastern this morning. we will spend an hour talking about your favorite nonfiction books of 2009. michigan, next, look is a republican caller, good morning and welcome. caller: good morning america is mr. year. basically, i'm just calling about the american economy. in michigan, we are facing a

. >> norman bailey. you mentioned argentina. my question is -- and i fully support the goals of this commission and it is extremely important. i question is why do the members of the commission believe what they are suggesting is more likely to happen than the with the situations are usually dealt with by countries, which is either through inflating the way the debt or by defaulting, which is what argentina did, and as a result it went on for several years at very high economic growth and if it had saved that money instead of wasting it would have been able to pay off the debt and might now be functioning normally. >> we need to modify our metaphors and show example of coverage. i want to say a word on behalf of the irish government, which has taken dramatic steps on their budget deficit. does someone want to take the question? the fault or inflation and alternative? >> i think the commission has a belief in the political system. we -- it may be broken right now but we have a believe if the american people are fully reform, that

the ranking member kay bailey hutcheson is not here today. -- the ranking member kay bailey hutchisonre today. we will go to you mr. genachowski and see what happens from there. we have lots of questions. you need to go after your first thing. we would love to have some of your folks come back in. then we have another terrific panel behind that. my approach to this is not to start out controversially. i am so put off by the concept of promiscuity and lasciviousness. i am the grandfather of more than five grandchildren. i care about that. i found out this is the first amendment committee. we have to work carefully. i am determined that we will eventually get to this. i want to talk about the commission. the committee will talk about the committee in other sessions. i am delighted to see you. the fact that you have been appointed is a testament to the president and his interest in the best people. john holden was ready to retire but he could not stay away from the opportunity to do the office of science and technology. here he is now at ostb. television is a powerful force in children's

i am a true democrat but i am very disappointed -- i know kay bailey hutcheson and the other gop have challenged the constitutional right of this health along -- of this health bill. the what i'm ashamed of with my party is that they have discriminated against other groups. discrimination in its definition as favoring one group over another. senator nelson and the center of floor have -- and on and on have taken things for their own people and left others. that is just discrimination. host: thanks for calling in, julie. about 15 minutes left, your favorite political health -- political story. it does not have to be health care. later this morning, we want to give you a heads up about a special hour about what you read in 2009, in particular, your top non-fiction book of 2009. that will be at 9:00 a.m. eastern this morning. we will spend an hour talking about your favorite nonfiction books of 2009. michigan, next, look is a republican caller, good morning and welcome. caller: good morning america is mr. year. basically, i'm just calling about the american economy. in michigan, we are f

president barack obama will defeat the purpose of closing guantanamo if he continues to employ baileys lawest policies of the past. joe in philadelphia for caller: how you doing? host: joe, what do you think will be accomplished by moving them from guantanamo bay? caller: nothing because - i know most of the war veterans like i am, are vietnam veterans and we're well aware of whoa is seriously a terrorist. if they where you say really a terrorist they wouldn't have been taken a live. the public has been dupeded as something that was left over for "tuz i believe that if people will just pay attention to meaningless. host: thanks for your call. next up is dave in chicago on our line for independents. good morning dave. caller: hi. i think it shows in your newspaper that your reading that they're concernqd about how to house united states citizens of terrorist. guantanamo has been away to get around the geneva convention the last hundred years. host: dave, the town, thompson illinois. how far is that from chicago? caller: think about 100 miles west of chicago. host: and say they go ahead

we're running into now is the people reviewing those documents are myself and my investigator, scott bailey, and we're in the process of getting another accountant. we tried to enlist the help of the governmental accounting office, perhaps the hands -- the inspector general, and we're reaching out to other states. we got an estimate for the forensic review of these hard drive and servers. the targeted estimate that we got back was approximately $3.5 million. just for a targeted review of disinformation. the forensic people have to go in and determine what is privileged and what is not, and we have to have lawyers involved. we know that all runs up the bill pretty well. that is what we're dealing with. to the extent that any of you are able to help with those agencies that are in your jurisdiction, to either provide manpower or financial assistance from the federal government, what ever we need to do to try and get back to wait that, we have asked our state government for funding and we will see how that turns out. but i wanted to let you know that if it's an issue for us. we're in the proce

kaye bailey?ink the hyde amendment has been the law of our country since 1977 and it has been very bipartisan in its support. today i think we have the first time that the hyde amendment is really going to be watered down and no longer existent at all. i think that the house clearly voted in a bipartisan way to protect the hyde amendment. the fact that we would not have subsidized abortions in this country because so many people feel so strongly about it and i am in absolute support of the hyde amendment and i believe watering it down should defeat this bill. i think the rest of the things that we are learning about this bill that were in the original underlying bill should also be recommended for the rejection of it. and that is all much the tax cuts that are going to start just in two weeks and the bill does not become implemented for four years. so you're asking people to pay taxes for four years, higher premiums on their insurance policies if they're covered, higher prescription drug costs and

. >> norman bailey, world politics. mr. holtz-eakin mention argentina. my question is, and support the goals of the commission and it is extremely important. my question is why do the matters of the commission believe that what they are suggesting is something similar is more likely to happen in the way the situations are usually dealt with by countries which is either through and fleeting away the dead or by defaulting which is what argentina did and as a result that when on for several years at very high economic growth and if they had saved the money instead of wasting it would have been able to pay off the debt and would now be back in functioning normally. >> i think we need to modify crem metaphors and show some examples. i want to say a word on behalf of the average government which is actually taken fairly dramatic steps to cut the budget deficit. does someone want to take the gentleman's question? is a default or inflation an alternative? >> first of all i think the commission has a belief in the political system. it may be broken right now but

the ranking member, kay bailey hutchison, is not here today.mes, we will go right to you, mr. genachowski, and then we will see what happens from there. we have a lot of questions. you need to go after your first thing and we would love to have some of your folks that you're talking to come back again. and that we have another terrific panel behind that. my approach to this, frankly, is not to start out controversy away. i did that last year. i am so put off by the whole concept of promiscuity and lasciviousness and all of these things. it bothers a grandfather of five. i care about that. i found out that this is very much a first amendment committee, and so we have to work carefully, but i am determined that we will eventually get to this. now one atop basically about the committee, the commission, and we will talk about the committee another session. but be at ease. i am absolutely delighted to see. i explained it to people that just the fact that you had been appointed is a testament to the president and his interest in the best people -- li

guest: well, senator kay bailey hutchison, republican from texas, made an argument and this could be one of the votes we see later today that the bill is unconstitutional for essentially the reason the caller said, because the bill treats states differently, and therefore she is making the case and violates equal protection clause under the constitution that deals with, neb. treated one way for medicaid expansion and another state treated another way. that it runs afoul of the equal protection clause. one of the things, there is likely to be up to five votes on these types of points of order. potentially all raising constitutional issues. it does seem as though some of the john ensign said on the floor yesterday that he would hold of this bill is enacted, someone would file a lawsuit or someone could bring a court challenge against the individual mandate. but it does seem like republicans are potentially -- no one has done this because the bill has not been passed yet and there are no signs specifically doing this, but it would stand to reason there is at least a reasonable chance th

we're running into now is the people reviewing those documents are myself and my investigator, scott baileye in the process of getting another accountant. we tried to enlist the help of the governmental accounting office, perhaps the hands -- the inspector general, and we're reaching out to other states. we got an estimate for the forensic review of these hard drive and servers. the targeted estimate that we got back was approximately $3.5 million. just for a targeted review of disinformation. the forensic people have to go in and determine what is privileged and what is not, and we have to have lawyers involved. we know that all runs up the bill pretty well. that is what we're dealing with. to the extent that any of you are able to help with those agencies that are in your jurisdiction, to either provide manpower or financial assistance from the federal government, what ever we need to do to try and get back to wait that, we have asked our state government for funding and we will see how that turns out. but i wanted to let you know that if it's an issue for us. we're in the process of hopp

in texas, john cornyn and kay bailey hutchinson. in utah, robert bennett and orrin hatch. in wyoming, john bo rah sew and michael enby. please remember these names. these are people who have stole health care for this country -- who have staaled health care in this country. they watched as day after day, month after month, people get sick and even die because they have no health coverage. i assure each and every one of you that have done anything to obstruct health care, people will remember. maybe not the people who die, but the people who loved them. the people whose names i read at our website, namesofthedead.com. these are people who are gone but the names, the list grows every single day until we solve this problem. then in the end, when we do solve this problem, and it's inevitable, every other industrial country in the entire world has health insurance for everyone, when we do join the ranks of those countries, people are going to remember who made that happen and show kindness and love to them. people are going to remember who blocked it and they'll show undying ha

guest: senator kay bailey hutchison made this point that we will see later today that the bill is unconstitutional for essentially the reason that the caller said because the bill treats states differently. therefore, she's making the case that it violates the equal protection caused -- equal protection clause under the constitution. that nebraska will be treated one way with medicaid expansion, and another state a different way, that that runs afoul of the people protection clause. there is likely to be five votes on these types of orders, potentially all of them raising constitutional issues. it does seem as though senator ensign said on the floor yesterday that somebody would file a lawsuit, that somebody would bring a court challenge, challenging specifically the individual mandate. but it does seem like republicans are -- no one has done this yet because the bill has not passed yet, and there is no sign of any specific group doing this. but it would stand to reason that there is a reasonable chance that someone could file a lawsuit challenging this, and republicans seem to be laying the groun

in the 1922 case bailey v. drexel furniture, the supreme court ruled that congress could not impose a tax to penalize congress. the utilization at that time of child labor. it could also not -- it could not also regulate under the commerce clause. although the court's interpretation of the power breadth has changed since that time, it has not repudiated the fundamental principle that congress cannot use a tax to regulate conduct that is otherwise indisputably beyond its regulatory power. of course, these constitutional impediments can be avoided if congress is willing to raise corporate and/or income taxes enough to fully fund a national -- new national health system. absent this politically dangerous and, therefore, unlikely scenario, advocates of universal health coverage must accept congress's power. like that of any other branches has its limits. these limits apply regardless of how important the issue may be and neither congress nor the president can take constitutional shortcuts. the genius of our system

guest: 1 by senator kay bailey hutchison of texas, republican, the other is bernie sanders, independent from vermont. sanders would call for single payer. that will fail. hutcheson amendment i believe this tax related. i am sure they will fail. most have a 60 vote threshold. yesterday democrats put their rift over the real importation of prescription drugs to rest. it was interesting, normally you have a democratic amendment or a republican alternative, but here you have democratic and -- amendment by byron dorgan for rea importation of prescription drugs, it did not get 60 votes. then an alternative by a democrat, frank lautenberg of new jersey, also did not get 60 votes. democrats will work. the passage of byron dorgan and then it could blow up some of the financing and health care bill because the deal the pharmaceutical industry made what max baucus and president obama to fund the reform and bring down costs. the democrats were kind of fighting among themselves. looks like it was put to rest. another and a long line of republican attempts to have the build yanked back -- yanked back

to acknowledge the role that the gentlelady from alaska has played, senator murkowski, senator kay bailey hutchison, senator snowe and senator collins. we, the women of the senate, have worked on a bipartisan basis for years, making sure we were included in the protocols at n.i.h., increasing funding for important research areas to find that cure, to race for that cure, and at the same time to be able to have mammogram standards. what the gentlelady from alaska's amendment does -- and, by the way, she's murkowski. i'm mikulski. we sound alike and the amendments might sound alike, but, boy, are they different. murkowski offers information. i think that's important. that's a threshold thing. you have to have information to make an informed decision. but it does not guarantee universal access to these services. and, of course, it does not -- and it does not eliminate the high payments and deductibles. so, her amendment is flawed. my amendment is terrific. my amendment offers key preventive services, including an annual women's health screening that would go to a comprehensive assessment, inc

senator murkowski, senator kay bailey hutchinson, senator snowe and senator collins. the women of the senate have worked on a bipartisan basis for years making sure we were included in the protocol said and i each increasing funding for an important research areas to find that tour, to race for the tour and at the same time to be able to have a mammogram standards. with the gentle lady from alaska's's amendment does, and by the way she is murkowski, i am mikulski. we soundalike and the amendments might sound like, but boy are they different. murkowski offers information. i think that's important. that is a threshold thing. you have to have information to make an informed decision. but it does not guarantee universal access to these services, and course it does not susan g. komen did does not eliminate the high payments and deductibles. so her amendment is fault. my amendment is terrific to read my amendment offers key preventive services including the annual women's health screening that would go to a comprehensive assessment including the danger to women and heart di

bacchus, senator sanders, also for the republicans john cornyn, senator grassley, kay bailey hutchinson and mike johanns. all about it. now live senate coverage here on c-span2. the presiding officer: the senate will come to order. under the previous order, the senate will resume consideration of h.r. 3590, which the clerk will now report. the clerk: number 175, h.r. 3590, and act to amend the internal revenue code of 1986 to modify the first-time home buyers kret in the case of the armed forces and other employees and for other purposes. the presiding officer: under the previous order, the time until 12:30 shall be equally divided and controlled between the two leaders or their designees. mr. durbin: mr. president? the presiding officer: the assistant democratic leader. mr. durbin: mr. president, we are continuing to run time postcloture on the managers' amendment. following any leader remarks, the time until 12:30 p.m. are divided between the two leaders or designees. senator reid asked me to serve as his designee on the democratic side. at 12:30 p.m. we will alternate one-hour blocks

to acknowledge the role that the gentlelady from alaska has played, senator murkowski, senator kay bailey hutchison, senator snowe and senator collins. we, the women of the senate, have worked on a bipartisan basis for years, making sure we were included in the protocols at n.i.h., increasing funding for important research areas to find that cure, to race for that cure, and at the same time to be able to have mammogram standards. what the gentlelady from alaska's amendment does -- and, by the way, she's murkowski. i'm mikulski. we sound alike and the amendments might sound alike, but, boy, are they different. murkowski offers information. i think that's important. that's a threshold thing. you have to have information to make an informed decision. but it does not guarantee universal access to these services. and, of course, it does not -- and it does not eliminate the high payments and deductibles. so, her amendment is flawed. my amendment is terrific. my amendment offers key preventive services, including an annual women's health screening that would go to a comprehensive assessment, inc