three cases that you thought the warren court ought to be remembered for a top of his list was baker vs. carr. the one-person one-vote decision. a second case he mentioned was the brown vs. board of education, the desegregation case, and then the third and was in gideon vs. wainwright, the case that required if one could not afford a lawyer that one be appointed counsel in the on the cases. this is not to be a lecture on the warren court but if one tried to summon up, i think one would have to say that the warren court was not especially concerned with technical doctrine. i mean, i think if you could summit of the warren court wanted to do the right thing, and get it right and saw the problem basically move on. and is fundamental themes seem to have been a fairness and equality. those were two ideas that i think helped explain warren court opinions. now, that was 196940 years ago. your member how vocal critics of the warren court were. if you thought the court was i've been in 1969, think about the turf that has now been constitutionalized by the supreme court since the war in court, since 19