of management or disparage unions as i am saying there has to be something in the mix to the baking analogy, it happens every where, boeing went to a right-to-work state to add jobs, same in lexus condering it. they seek out the right-to-work states, for a reason. >> of course, they do. by the way, i did the same thing, if there is no need to be buburdens with a union, why do . neil: to give workers a fair break and air pay. >>, oh, no. neil: hear me. i am doingy fair and planned thing, they would or argue that management would rather stick workers to the wall, you say -- >> in is not late 1800s or early 1900s, when an. neil: there are still twinkies made from late 1800s on storeshelves today but i digress. >> i understand. unions provide no real purpose today. because employees have fair salaries, they have good medical, dental, benefits, they are treated very well. manager have learned tt employees are productive if they are treated well. this -- there is though need for a third party to step in between a gevance between a manager and a employee. >> there is a growing kassem they mention,

it was interesting justice sotomayor she suggested she used an analogy with baking you have salt that's natural in butter that's natural in other ingredients so you can make cookies and you can patent your way of making cookies but the ingredients that go in cannot be patented and chief justice roberts he talked about a baseball bat and how you could you know basically construct a baseball bat from a tree but the tree itself and the parts of it are not patentable and those are question is analogies. and i thought they were great analogies it was also interesting how they chose such so you know traditionally gender biased but so. the question raised was let's say you had a plant in the amazon and it turned out that a leaf of a plant was very valuable for medicine and maybe even for treating breast cancer so let's say someone goes through the whole amazon jungle and searches and finds this particular leaf if you just eat that leaf and it leaves cancer or treats cancer would that be a patent a belief in the answer was no but perhaps if you were to concentrate the leaf or somehow extract a

it was interesting justice sotomayor she suggested she used an analogy with baking you have salt that's natural in butter that's natural in other ingredients so you can make cookies and you can patent your way of making cookies but the ingredients that go in cannot be patented and chief justice roberts he talked about a baseball bat and how you could you know basically construct a baseball bat from a tree but the tree itself and the parts of it are not patentable and those are question is originality. and i thought they were great analogies it was also interesting how they chose such such you know traditionally gender biased but so. the question raised was let's say you had a plant in the amazon and it turned out that a leaf of a plant was very valuable for medicine and maybe even for treating breast cancer so let's say someone goes through the whole amazon jungle and searches and finds this particular leaf if you just eat that leaf and it leaves cancer or treats cancer would that be a patent a belief in the answer was no but perhaps if you were to concentrate the leaf or somehow extrac