look no further than moscow and baku. almost everyone has been pushed out of moscow and baku that were operated with field-based organizations. donor organizations without field offices are less vulnerable to pressure because they don't have local offices to shut down. the second obvious disadvantage i see that the field-based model is really inefficient. overhead costs including salaries, rent, and expatriate participation with field offices can reach up to 70%. while overhead of an independent grant making organization like the national endowment for democracy is 16%. 70% versus 16%. when pressed on why we need an in-country presence and not free countries, organizations with field offices will argue their presence will enable them to seize opportunities when there's great political space. if political change comes to a place for uzbekistan where it has ruled for two decades without a wisp of democratization, with an authoritarian leader only tarnishes credentials. if it occurs in a place like uzbekistan is refuses to w

look no further than moscow and baku.s disadvantage i see that the field-based model is really inefficient. overhead costs including salaries, rent, and expatriate participation with field offices can reach up to 70%. while everhead of an independent grant making organization like the national endowment for democracy is 16%. 70% versus 16%. when pressed on why we need an in-country presence and not free countries, organizations with field offices will argue their presence will enable them to seize opportunities when there's great political space. if political change comes to a place for uzbekistan where it has ruled for two decades without a wisp of democratization, with an authoritarian leader only tarnishes credentials. if it occurs in a place like uzbekistan is refuses to work in an organization. having relationship with a civil society like this not in field offices puts organizations in the best position to take advantage of newly open space. i want to give you examples so you know -- i want to point to a couple exam

spokeswoman for the agency's watchdog says they were found on baku tapes.gent see thought the easily were completely lo lost when lois lerner's hard computer crashed. >> officials it will hope heavy rains will bring a little bit of relief from the drought. they say every drop counts. >> del, that's especially true in one small community near fresno. as jennifer london found out, many wells have already run dry. >> these people are out of water. they are out of water. they just recently went out of water. >> if water is life, the small community of east porterville, california, is dying. turn on the tap in j. c. coates' bathroom. >> you don't want to look in there? >> across the street, in jane topia's kitchen? >> we don't have water for washing clothes, dishes or bathing. >> when we first reported this story in early september, 1300 people, nearly 20% of the town's population, had no running water. >> how are you living like this? is this any way to live? >> no. it's not. but what are you going to do? >> now, a bad situation has gotten worse. close to 4,000

general treptacoby has requested 30 additional personnel be identified and trained in order to provide baku capability to our existing 30-person ebola medical support team. this request is currently being sourced and we expect these 30 personnel will come from each of the services. i want to stress that this is not being driven by an anticipation of additional need. it is not a second team, per se, but it's rather an effort to establish additional cadre, an additional cadre of personnel given the same treatment as -- training as the group we trained last month, training that focuses on helping them train civilian medical officials on the proper use of proper medical equipment. this group will begin their training in san antonio around november 17th. with that, we will take questions. >> thanks. for the purpose of television here, it would helpful if you did have a brief station on what you have announced today. >> your paper statement and what the pentagon has decided to do with regard to these troops and why. >> sure. commander in chief has authorized secretary of defense chuck hagel to de

almost everyone has been pushed out of moscow and baku that were operated with field-based organizations. donor organizations without field offices are less vulnerable to pressure because they don't have local offices to shut down. the second obvious disadvantage i see that the field-based model is really inefficient. overhead costs including salaries, rent, and expatriate participation with field offices can reach up to 70%. while overhead of an independent grant making organization like the national endowment for democracy is 16%. 70% versus 16%. when pressed on why they need an in-country presence and not free countries, organizations with field offices will argue their presence will enable them to seize opportunities when there's great political space. if political change comes to a place like uzbekistan where islam has ruled for two decades without a whiff of democratization, with an -- having a field office will make no difference. if anything, implementing programs with clearly authoritarian leader only tarnishes an organization's credentials. if a democratic awakening occurs in a