films, he wants to somehow understand them deeper, i really love balabanovo’s films, i really want because the feeling is that one film is not something... that’s the answer to your question about the soviet union: balabanov was a very free person, and this is not a soviet person, and the period of his creative growing up and maturity there fell, fortunately, at a time when he could already afford it. he was not a person, well , they often say about writers, he writes one book all his life in a good sense of the word, yes, that he is cultivating some topic that worries him, which he feels, understands, which... he had the most intense and mutually comfortable dialogue with the reader, he loved it. cinema is undeniable, yes, but cinema is different, and therefore you can love it, as they say, from different sides, and he did it, it was all very organic, naturally, it was not some kind of , say, calculation, here i am now i’ll shoot this, and then i’ll shoot this, and then i’ll shoot this, he’s in the first half of his creative life from creative excess , as they say, please tell me,