in this particular case, there were concerns that this man, balawi, might be not what he claimed. there was even a direct warning that he might be leading them into an ambush. but there are reasons the cia was able to look at these warnings and say that this is just infighting among jordanians, and they were able to disregard it and not take it seriously. >> warner: but then, right before he comes to this cia outpost, didn't the american, the cia agent who was closest to the operation, send a warning back to the station chief, saying something is really bad here? >> and it's part of the reconstruction of what went wrong. there were not only warnings from the jordanians, but some of the americans had concerns and suspicions, too. so, there was a back and forth between the americans at khost, the base where they were all staying, and also a back and forth to washington. "how do we handle this man? do we trust him or not?" it was quite a robust argument. in the end, the imperative was to meet the person, and so the cautions were just disregarded. >> warner: now, they could've stopped