so, _ doctors to die were from bame background. so, my— doctors to die were from bame background.estion is, how seriously _ background. so, my first question is, how seriously was _ background. so, my first question is, how seriously was this - background. so, my first question is, how seriously was this issue i is, how seriously was this issue taken _ is, how seriously was this issue taken at — is, how seriously was this issue taken at the _ is, how seriously was this issue taken at the cabinet _ is, how seriously was this issue taken at the cabinet office, - is, how seriously was this issue taken at the cabinet office, if. taken at the cabinet office, if there — taken at the cabinet office, if there was— taken at the cabinet office, if there was indeed _ taken at the cabinet office, if there was indeed awareness. taken at the cabinet office, if. there was indeed awareness of taken at the cabinet office, if- there was indeed awareness of this issue _ there was indeed awareness of this issue during — there was indeed awareness of this issue during the _ there was indeed awareness

ihla death rates among bame health workers? ., , , ., , workers?ers? no the issue was the previous day — workers? no the issue was the previous day we _ workers? no the issue was the previous day we had _ workers? no the issue was the previous day we had received l previous day we had received preliminary information about disproportionate proportions of different ethnic minorities in hospitals and outcome and they were not quite sure exactly what was happening and why they were seeing is it. and they had gone away to undertake more work urgently to try understand whether it was a difference in admission to hospital, a different path way people were following or whether it was related to preexisting illness. it was a piece of work we had seen the afternoon before, and it was due to be updated with the information as to what was causing it. so we could give proper information as to what might be done. 50 give proper information as to what might be done-— might be done. so it was a very secific might be done. so it was a very specific set _ might be

as i mentioned in china, alibaba's alipay and wechat's wechat pay bame dominant in retail payments. in the u.s. and across the globe, apple and google traffic glow -- a growing number of payments through their digital wallet. starting in late 2021, the cfpb began to study these payment platforms including the big tech firms. we issued orders to many of the major players operating in the u.s., and last month at the federal reserve bank of philadelphia we released our analysis of tap to pay teachers, describing the regulations imposed by apple and google. we spent considerable time evaluating the complex data handling practices a privacy protocols at these firms. these firm's regulations are often long and filled with legase. we often click right through them. to make things even more confusing they sometimes refer people to other policieso understand what data is being ingested, how it is beingsed, and wt, if any, rights a person may have. and while there gulations are convoluted, there are clear takeaways for us. first, these firms collect a significant amount of data about the cons

people only, sort of bame people only, etcetera.ully sued for discriminating against a straight white people straight white man and people are getting of it. are finally getting sick of it. and the america first and this is the america first legal, an activist legal, which is an activist group miller, group run by stephen miller, former trump adviser. and they're saying basically had they're saying we basically had enough and it's barely enough of this and it's barely legal. legal, but not legal. it is legal, but it's not legal. it is legal, but it's not legal. phrase. but legal. the wrong phrase. but it may legal. the wrong phrase. but it ma'it's not legal in america. >> it's not legal in america. i mean, the people are leading mean, the people who are leading the are saying that the case here are saying that this violates federal law. i don't you can discriminate don't think you can discriminate by when to by skin colour when it comes to employment it? employment in america. can it? can you? >> i don't think that's been tested cor

people only, sort of bame people only, etcetera.ully sued for discriminating against a straight white people straight white man and people are getting of it. are finally getting sick of it. and the america first and this is the america first legal, an activist legal, which is an activist group miller, group run by stephen miller, former trump adviser. and they're saying basically had they're saying we basically had enough and it's barely enough of this and it's barely legal. legal, but not legal. it is legal, but it's not legal. it is legal, but it's not legal. phrase. but legal. the wrong phrase. but it may legal. the wrong phrase. but it ma'it's not legal in america. >> it's not legal in america. i mean, the people are leading mean, the people who are leading the are saying that the case here are saying that this violates federal law. i don't you can discriminate don't think you can discriminate by when to by skin colour when it comes to employment it? employment in america. can it? can you? >> i don't think that's been tested cor

it bame for the germans even to leave their bases france without facing aerial attack doenitz essentiallygan to privately admit that his forces had been defeated by this juncture. i want to turn to a few takeaways now in our final. first, a question we have to ask and one i'm not going to answer it. it'll for your discussions on friday is this key question of whether germany could ever won the battle of the atlantic. two star of great britain. germany needed. the germans concluded they would need to sink 700,000 tons of shipping a month between 50 and 100 average sized convoy vessels. they only achieved that once. only one month of the entire war. november 1942. and at that juncture, war was already going against the germans. almost every front, as wwe've seen now, i want to provide some arguments about why the allies won the axis lost here. one of the key factors was obviously strategy and leadership the germans lacked the number of they needed to overwhelm the british at the start of the war, in part because of choices made by the german navy in the interwar period, particularly by admi

there and bame one of the faces of the forest. eventually, they also a 45 foot pole tower on the other side of the gorge. and the purpose of that was to help triangulate the fires that way they could get tthem faster that tower unfortunately, does not exist. it was built out of wood,ut at the time it was useful, accessible to visitors to the park even at this time when the rangers were manni the top, there were always vitors. welcome, come up and talk to them. so was not off limits and right away they became landmarks of the forest just like they are today. so life in the camps was pretty easy compared to, you know, life during the depression at home, as i mentioned before, they were standing in line for soup kitchens or the unemplnt office here. they had steady js, didn' have to worry about where their next meal coming from. they also had spending in their pockets in addition to all of that, the camps provided voluntary educational classes. so you could take normal, such as in practical english typewriting. you could learn new ho

. >> logic, sweden has by >> by this logic, sweden has by this logic, two cds and a 10% bame populationthey >> by this logic, why would they have wanted down? why have wanted to lock down? why would to destroy the would they wanted to destroy the economy? well, possibly because of at number 10 where of a culture at number 10 where they got a kick out of telling people what to do. >> didn't. seriously, the >> they didn't. seriously, the data ferguson data professor neil ferguson and professor john data professor neil ferguson and professorjohn edmonds, data professor neil ferguson and professor john edmonds, who were pushing for it and they were wrong. >> modelling that's been >> the modelling that's been done very credible and it's done is very credible and it's very authoritative. had we locked down earlier, would locked down earlier, we would have have . have we would have. >> we would. it's that's true. it's we would have in it's we would have been in lockdown for days. lockdown for 35 days. >> not 69. >> not 69. >> true. well, look, it's >> it's true. well, look, it's all the show i