things to sort out, not least this divorce bill which rears its ugly head, there are little numbers bandiedto 80 million and some say we do not owe anything and various other shenanigans. then something else comes up. shenanigans. then something else comes up. are we shenanigans. then something else comes up. are we or are we shenanigans. then something else comes up. are we or are we not going to stay in the free trade agreement, then this other idea which is in the sunday telegraph about free movement for the irish citizens in and out of britain. you just think, the border will be... ? all sides say this is a priority for them but there doesn't seem priority for them but there doesn't seem to be any concrete way forward on that at this stage. david miliband... on that at this stage. david miliband. .. can ijust on that at this stage. david miliband... can ijust inject on that at this stage. david miliband. .. can ijust inject from the telegraph the most relevant thing apart from what penny with sex is in the next ten days when the bosses back, she is back. we have the publication which wi

powell worrying is it that we are seeing it now being bandied about from both sides? worrying. it is extraordinary from president trump, who is on holidays, a little more relaxed than the confines of washington. undoubtedly he is again responding to what he feels is a major threat from us intelligence and merging overthe major threat from us intelligence and merging over the warheads that north korea has. he is talking like dedicated himself to some extent. he is almost reducing himself down to the level of north korea's leadership and it is extraordinary for a us president talking such language of fire and fury and i don't think it helps, well, it certainly doesn't, help the situation at all. you say extraordinary, yet we are used to the extraordinary. this is going further. it is going further. the question is what happens next. everybody is getting extremely nervous 110w. everybody is getting extremely nervous now. cool heads prevail. the level of rhetoric going on? normally you would expect a diplomatic solution to be the first port of call but in this case presid

this has been bandied about quite a bit. number ten has said it‘s all rubbish. better. not the same as saying it‘s not true. this first came out with the 1922 committee, then her saying she cried election night, people putting words in her mouth sort of, saying she has decided not to stay another two yea rs. decided not to stay another two years. i suspect this is wishful thinking on some people‘s behalf. i‘m sure she has no idea how long she‘s going to be in number ten. she will be hoping it will be a full term. with a tiny majority quite unlikely, i would‘ve thought. term. with a tiny majority quite unlikely, iwould've thought. some say the conference will be make or break with her big speech, will she apologise for went wrong, some people say. i agree with daisy. there is a sort of damocles hanging over her head right now and it all comes down to whether people feel she handles things well or not. you are quite right to link the two stories because they are most definitely linked. her weakness and the labour party movement. let me link another one. the front

so, we can bandy around the figures, but the bottom line is the constituent assembly is now in place,racterise you as a voice in the opposition, you have to decide what to do now. is it your belief that the opposition on the streets, the mass protests, the attempt to topple the government by the street, must that continue? yes. and, first of all, stephen, i don't think they got 8 million. and that's very clear also for the fraudulent scheme that they have planned. not even chavez in his best moments got 8 million votes. and maduro, for sure, he's in his worst popular moment. i don't even think he got 10%—12%, that's not even 2 million votes. it's a shameful scheme and sham that they're trying to portray. yes, i do believe that the resistance should stay in the streets, day by day, fighting for their rights. they've done a greatjob so far, even though it is so sad to see the murder, 130—140 people so far in four months. yeah, well, let me stop you there. you put that fact in. it's a very important fact. the circumstances of some of those deaths are still unclear. but we know that more

and because the reputation of the english is actually we bandy back on the english friends where. very much. all right cass we're going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking with cast panel and former football hooligan turned author more about the nature and the. beautiful game. so. you know. there's been up as well i must. be. opening up a bit. in the. us we will give you the scoop this is. going to. going to. love them cut. them up like i love. me give each. and then a lot of that i didn't ask to come out i skid but i'm a look the same as art when i was up the money into the magazine but. leaving money unless mom was on. to say. that there was a place of the long. haul that was to be made by. other people more dull films like those on. our. list that. make this manufacture consent to stick to the public well. when the running closest to protect themselves. in the final merry go round be the one percent. we can all middle of the room sick. delete the real news. i. now we're back with cast panel and author of numerous books on football hooliganism

in terms of women within it, the number you hear bandied about is 15% to 20%. but they're not necessarily the ones you're going to see in charlottesville. >> sreenivasan: let's talk also about the network effects here. how do these women congregate online? how do they meet each other? how do they get recruited? >> i think it is a deeply, deeply inside the internet in a way that can take a while if you're an outsider to find, to see the patterns of connection. they will say that there are meet-ups happening in real life that, you know, women are organizing in ways you can't see, but i do think fundamentally most of this is happening on these various internet platforms. >> sreenivasan: is there a moment that they see coming? i mean, do they see their influence increasing? >> they will say that they do. they would say that the moment is now, that we're seeing it. they don't necessarily see donald trump as alt-right. when i met and interviewed her, she pointed blank said, he's not one of our guys." but he's got the coattails that they felt they needed to be pulled

i think the number bandied around by everybody is 4000 troops.eporter: that seems to be taking a page from the defense secretary playbook. victory estate tillerson also wanted this comment to be advising and offering assistance to the afghani forces. that is the plan. it is actually not all that much of a change from the current policy. it is, however, a big change from the campaign trail when candidate trump came out and said we should get out of there. we spent way too much money. even if some of his more recent comments were supported by steve bannon, who has now left the white house. it seems like the forces within the cabinet have prevailed and won in terms of what the president to take this kind of policy. tracy: remind us what the current situation is actually like in afghanistan. reporter: is not a good situation right now. the defense secretary himself said we are not winning the war in afghanistan. the current government controls only about 60% of the country. there's a lot of insurgents. as the president noted, there's a problem with i

of the issue i think are in question and certainly the arbuckle doesn't want to be seen as having bandy you flags but i guess the you know the wider question is whether it's legitimate despite the referendum campaign having gone one way or the other for people still to be making this point in public and i would say absolutely people have every right and if they still believe in what that flag symbolizes then why not you know why not use that i've been event which is most famous for growing. and what do you think just to mention that earlier on in the problems going back a while we had one of the conductors start your barenboim he basically interrupted proceedings to make what was perceived as being a political speech calling for european unity so it seems that. politics. has made itself present the problems is that acceptable or not i think it's a shame i think it's also probably inevitable because the manner of being pursued is a very divisive breck's it is a needlessly divisive press and i say that as somebody who campaigned for and voted for leaving the european union but i do think

vonnie: you bandy about the term trade war.s some truth that there would at least be a race to the bottom in terms of trading. do you see that happening between the u.s. and china? >> no. the u.s. and china are pretty much joins together at the hip economically. china needs the u.s.. vonnie: it has been pivoting away. i'm talking about fundamentally. there have been hiccups, bumps in the road. there's not going to be a trade war. there's not going to be a military war because of these -- that would dislodge the communist party's power in china. something that is anathema to them. vonnie: president trump has just signed the russia sanctions bill. he has added a statement saying the administration will carry out the law with reservations about its impact and the constitutionality of some provisions. is that legislation constitutional? >> the courts will decide that. i think the congress did the right thing. both to keep trump from doing the wrong thing and because russia has been a bad actor. vonnie: is this the right way to puni

annawe ask you about what was describing, this hybrid plan da bandied about on capitol hill.it that republicans are facing reality and that is the only way forward in order to permit temporary fixes as well? scott: a lot of the retaliation is determined by the reconciliation rules. one of the preventions is that you're not allowed to increase the deficit beyond the 10 year budget window that they are living under. that really guides what they can do within this budget process. so what they're trying to balance is a few different things. one is to try to get as much economic growth out of this package as possible. deliver as much middle class tax relief as possible, but do that in a way that does not increase the deficit that only within this first 10 years but in the 10 years beyond. those are a lot of needles the bread all at once. it's a big challenge to get from here to there because they have to come up with the revenues to offset any of the tax cuts that they do. wanted toy they sunset somebody the tax cuts like individual tax cuts, but keep the ones like the corporate r

>> who knows, there are big paychecks bandied around for movies and promotions and all those type ofbably it's a market he hasn't fully tapped and this will be a platform to raise his profile even more. mark: all we're talking about is mcgregor. let's talk about mayweather. if he wins he gets the magic 50 if you believe it's a fight at all. he's got a lot to lose, hasn't he? if he loses, he pockets over $100 million but does that totally dilute his credibility and what he's achieved in the prior 49 fights? >> i think it would be devastating to floyd if he would lose this fight to a ufc fighter. but i do think, by the way, the number will probably be north somewhere of $225 million for floyd mayweather given the split. but i do think should he win and cement his legacy, he's told me and many others this is it, this is the last fight no matter what. i don't know if i always believe that because i've been around boxing too long to know guys like to come back when all of a sudden someone holds another $225 million in front of them should that happen in a couple years. but the fact is tha

in the run-up to the war, it is bandied about because washington warns us against secession and disunity. andrew jackson's entire federal address -- entire farewell address is basically a rumination on washington's wisdom in the farewell address, saying when washington wrote that, we didn't know the constitution would work. we know it works now. daniel webster and other folks are arguing both sides of it. uses a risk from the farewell address as part of his core 1860 stop speech justifying the newly formed republican party against attacks. it is a national party, and a party of progress, which i think is sometimes lost. during the civil war, the confederates tried to play washington as one of their own, too. they say washington was a southerner and a plantation owner and a slave owner and a when ofrgo one of us, course, washington's entire political life after the revolution was focusing on national unity. in the run-upbate to the civil war on whether the farewell address should be bought. his executors put it up for sale, and jefferson davis in the future president of the confederacy, t

aboutumber being bandied is 4000 troops to assist the government. >> if you were to assess the , he is goals of this tea trying to move away to a broader policy. is that a fair take away? >> i inc. that is right. he says that and he says we shouldn't want this from washington, we should see what is on the ground. he made it clear he wants no open-ended commitment with dollars or timelines. it is a complicated situation. there is 16 years of having some presence there and it has proven very challenging and a difficult situation. president trump remarked on that. .> thank you very much we are joined here now by jeremy. is aade the point that it path when you have trouble domestically to focus on something abroad. and matters for afghanistan it matters in a broader context. he seems to have republican support and he needs the support from his party. >> you could see this as a circle of the wagons with charlottesville and impeachment started to come back into the consciousness in the last week or so. ,e appears to be getting that should those proceedings come down and that would obviously

in part, andrea, because there are so few names who are being bandied about as actual possibilities tos communications director. if you think about it, back to the transition, jason miller, the republican operative, was supposed to be communications director. he dropped out. fell to sean spicer. then it went to michael dub key, who resigned and then back to spicer and briefly to anthony scaramucci. and so it's been a tumultuous position, to say the least. and stephen miller has stepped up as someone, i'm told, internally, who could have that -- those possibilities be part of his portfolio. but he wouldn't be in a sense taking that job just to take that job. he would take on the responsibility. >> and jennifer, we've seen a big change now as john kelly has taken over as you have reported. but, again, the president is still his own communications director. >> right. although costa is right. they really do like the idea of stephen miller leading communications. several administration officials told me over the weekend that nobody knows what the president thinks better than stephen miller.

into the word all humans which i don't think most americans have heard of before but it's now being bandied around. >> guest: is a moisturizer. >> host: but now there are lawsuits in court trying to say donald trump is making money illegally from the presidency by i don't know if it's just for an entities like governments in saudi arabia and others taking up rooms and renting his hotels as part of an ill-gotten gain. do you think there's anything to that end is that illegal? >> guest: it may well be. it's been interesting timing with the release of the book because just as the book came out from actually the book tv through the day the book came out, the news came that they launched this lawsuit alleging a violation of the constitution on those grounds and then 190 lawmakers in congress filed a lawsuit of their own and that one is significant because what it says is the president cannot do this without the permission of congress. there already was a lawsuit had been filed by a dc restaurant and group of restaurant workers making this allegation but the significance of congress people flaili

and that's the question that's basically bandied about washington all the time now. >> jack, i got 15id richard nixon say when he placed the medal around your neck? >> he said are you nervous, son. i said no, sir. he said, well, i am. >> wow. see, that's jack for you. every conversation with him is like there. we can do an hour. >> why am i even here. >> i have the same question. i'm going to do what any prominent competent anchor would do, say nothing of prominent, say nothing of prominent. i'm going to go to a break with our thanks to sam stein and colonel jack jacobs. gent, a great conversation tonight. thank you for that, jack. that was very special. coming up, what's the ceiling? what's the floor? numerically, politically for the trump base? steve kornacki? our studio tonight will break down the latest polling numbers we have into us when "the 11th hour"" continues. welcome back to our broadcast. president trump's approval rating is down in the latest poll from quinnipiac university, but the number remains fairly close to where it was days after the inauguration. here to explain

there is one name bandied about, a guy name the selston. he is a famous speaker. there was an anarchist famous at the time a italian who had come to the united states who had followers in the united states. reremained very coy even in his last days. he was deported from the united states, actually questioned in boston harbor before he left not far from here. and the bureau of investigation asked him questions, if he knew anything. he just remained very coy and just denied moony's guilt when he was deported. there were a couple of books that came out -- this is another image of the parade to give -- as we think about the whodunit question tlp trp there were a couple of books out in the 19 sixth and richard frost and they advanced the german sabotage theory. the germans had hoped to kret an explosion and the water front in san francisco. blowup some munitions these kind of things. this was part of a broader plot by the germans to create this disorder in the united states. so that's another theory. that's a very attractive hypothesize for some folks. and there's a bo

one name was bandied about, a guy by the name of selst selston eckland who was a san francisco anarchist. he would later blow up a church in the 1920s, so there was a theory that he was responsible, but it was squashed as well. there was an anarchist famous at the time who was an italian who came to the united states and had all kind of followers in the united states. he remained coy in his last dates. he was deported from the united states and questioned in boston harbor not far from here before he left, and the bureau of investigations asked him all kind of questions and if he knew anything and he remained coy and denied mooney's guilt when he was deported. there were a couple of books that came out -- and this is another image just of the parade to -- as we kind of think about the who-done-it question. there were a couple of books that came out in the 1960s, one by richard frost, another by curt gentry, and they both advanced the kind of german sabotage theory. in other words that the germans during war hoped actually to create an explosion, you know, on the waterfront in san francisc

and that's the question that's basically bandied about washington all the time now. >> jack, i got 15econds. what did richard nixon say when he playsed the the medal around your neck. >> he said are you nervous, son. i said no, sir. he said well, i am. >> that's jack for you. every conversation with him is like there. we can do an hour. >> why am i even here. >> i have the same question. i'm going to do what any prominent competent anchor would do, say nothing of prominent, i'm going to go to a break with our thanks to sam stein and colonel jack jacobs. a great conversation tonight. thank you for that, jack. that was very special. coming up, what's the ceiling? what's the floor? numerical numerically, politically for the trump base? steve kornacki? our studio here tonight will break down the latest polling numbers we have into us when the 11n hour continues. it natural, causing a lack of sharpness, or even trouble with recall. thankfully, the breakthrough in prevagen helps your brain and actually improves memory. the secret is an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in cl

there was one name bandied about, a guy by the name of selston england, he will later blow up a church in the 1920s. there was a theory maybe he might have been responsible, but that's been sort of squashed as well. there was an anarchist who was very famous at the time by the name of luigi galiani who was an italian and had come to the united states and had all kinds of followers in the united states. he remained very coy, each in his last days. he was deported from the united states, actually questioned in boston harbor before he left not far from here and the bureau of investigation asked him all kinds of questions, if he knew anything and he just remained very coy and just dee noid mooney's guilt when he was deported. there were a couple of books that came out and this is another image just of the parade as we kind of think about the two done it question. there were a couple of books that came out in the 1960s, one by richard frost, another by kurt gentry and they both advanced the german sabotage theory. in other words, that the germans during war, right, had hoped actually to cre

needs to be a distinction between a preemptory military option, which was being kicked around, b bandiedround at one point, as contrasted with a reaction, particularly if the north koreans do something kinetic. that is, if that missile had or particularly on our base, we'd be in a much different place. i think then you know, you get into the options for reaction. and there are potential options. i would guess our implicit red line, and i don't know, but i'm just guessing is that if there were kinetic damage done by a north korean missile, i think that would be at least implicitly our red line. of course, the problem as mr. bannon observed is we don't know what their red line is. whether they would just react in kind or pause or an all-out cataclysmic attack against the south. that's what makes this such a difficult problem. i sense that president trump is beginning to realize this after you know, the campaign rhetoric. it's not unlike what he said about afghanistan. i think by the way, we came out in the right place there. i think the right path now, despite, you know, this rubicon being

there is a substance in cannabis, thc, which gets bandied around when people talk about skunk, whichn, a guy who is a hereditary peer, he is running a counterintuitive campaign because his son sadly killed himself after taking what he called skunk. he wa nts to taking what he called skunk. he wants to legalise cannabis, which seems strange for someone whose son killed himself as a result of the drug. he wants to legalise it to regulate the market and he said skunk is the problem, not traditional herbal cannabis that is causing problems. fascinating. it is on the iplayer. thank you. at 9pm tonight there will be a special programme. radio 1‘s newsbeat — debating the future of britain‘s laws and attitudes to cannabis. presented by tina daheley it will be shown live on the bbc news channel as well as on bbc radio one. the former conservative chancellor, george osborne, has called on the prime minister to commit to building a high speed rail line across the north of england. the government says it‘s investing billions of pounds across the north of england. mr osborne, who spearheaded the

wednesday morning, chief economist and cofounder of moody's economy.com, mark bandy discusses the debtl effect on wall street. kelly wagner talks about the future of the children's health insurance program. ian murray with the competitive enterprise institute reveals their report. be sure to watch c-span "washington journal" live in 77 wednesday morning. join the discussion. >> they recently visited capital hill to see what they are reading. >> i'm into books that are faith-based. one of the books i read, a friend of mine wrote, it's called from the belly of the spare to the mountain mountaintop. it's a study of the book of the bible. what's interesting about this author, his son was my pastor years ago, but his son was a b130 pilot and crashed in the whole crew died. this is about how this particular pastor has lived and dealt with the trials of life, including losing a son. it's really a good book. it's an in-depth study of that particular book of the bible, but most times and probably throughout the summer, i'm a real big history buff. there is a book called the sacred fire which is

said there is self preservati preservation a lot of these guys have to run next year, they're all bandied getting some tax cuts done whether or not it happens, the odds are shrinking >> what do you think happens to stocks if there is some realization that it won't happen this year? >> right now earnings estimates are not including it so, from that perspective, maybe it won't have much of an impact. but we're in the ninth year of this expansion in order to continue this expansion you need some tax relief and some stimulus kick. and it just -- we're at a late stage to the economy do you put into extra innings because of tax reform? yes, if we don't, people will be worried. we're tightening in this moderate economy we need an offset. >> we are also right in the middle of this, what's happening now. we know about news cycles. you heard jeffersonen feld ta jd talking. i don't know, is trump going somewhere in the next three years? i don't know i don't know how this works itself out how there's some healing with this i wouldn't write him off completely here just because of this >> no, kevin, wh

through so i'm looking for a better fourth quarter for the dollar, thinking that you know, we've been bandyingith the north koreans for awhile we saw the geopolitical risk seems to be very sharp, very intense, very short lived. we already saw yesterday the korean stock market begin to recover. further recovery today i would look for the dollar to recover a little bit here but in the big picture i think that september will be a heavy month for the dollar, better the recovery in fourth quarter >> heavy month in terms of downside risk to the dollar. so where would you see the vix what's a key level of concern for you? >> i think what's important right now is where we are in the big picture. this is one of the reasons why i'm reluctant to give up a strategic bullish view on the dollar i think what's happening this year for various reasons, the dollar's correcting, to the downside, a rally that began in the middle of 2014 we held yesterday that 50% retracement in both the euro, which is on 121.60, and the 50% of the dollar index, if those levels hold i think that could be the beginning of a base fo