he is the second time i remind myself of baranka , who should monitor these matches for their honestyor fireplay. baranka, who is on a serious salary in the upl, this is also a problem because he was silent, then someone said that journalists, someone there, i don’t know, i don’t know who said that ingulets played uh, the confidant is messing up everything, he immediately turned on uh , the head of the committee right away, here, too, he came out, uh, with suspicions that the match is not very fair, well, andriy pavlenko from him. the only thing that is very not often we could rarely even hear that he talks about some matches in the context of contractual ones, now andriy pavlenko even spoke about the fact that the match has a certain implication, this is also nice that if it is actually proven if it is well, this fact will be facts and not just words, then when they bring this case to the end, baranka will at least do something for how many years, 5-6 years, he can be here more well, i am alexander the gray-haired suffered alexander, this is a video from this work-baranka so eh all n

well, plus, we have baranka, don't forget that she is already a committee or ethics and heads barankalready for a long time, how many seasons have it been, and again, now one of the richest people in italy has moved , nothing happened. now one of them , unfortunately, did not receive the lamb. such a match, well i will frankly like ingulets because i looked at the lineup and thought well, such a lineup is very experimental, there are many newcomers, young players, but even without a foundation, shakhtar won with great difficulty. well, you see . you can have different attitudes to the decision serhii ivanovich, what about the lineup itself? i think it's a reaction for the defeat of the movement and that is why he rejuvenated the squad so much and the debutant was in this match and a plus in principle well, to a large extent there the semi-reserve squad came out because the basis of the movement gave way and that's exactly this one young blood had to compete in the donetsk miner. well, to a large extent in the first half, ingulets definitely looked the worst. he had his moments and som

well, plus, we have baranka, don't forget that there is already a committee or ethics headed by barankaw many seasons of years and again, now one of the richest people in italy, after he came, nothing happened. now, one of them in the morning. unfortunately, he got ingulets because yesterday serhii ivanovich the collection visited the city of lviv, where they played with shakhtar, too, such a match, well, i frankly liked ingulets because i i looked at the lineup and thought well, such a lineup is very experimental, there are many newcomers, young players, but even the business basics shakhtar won with great difficulty . well, you see. you can have different attitudes to serhii ivanovich's decision regarding the lineup itself. i think that this is a reaction to the defeat of the movement and that's why he yes, he rejuvenated the team and the debutant was at this match, which is a plus in principle. well, to a large extent , the semi-prize winning team came out because the basis of the movement gave way, and it was precisely this young blood that had to compete in to the donetsk miner wel