charles barkley was asked on pti if the lakers team could be a dynasty. >> i said last year, the nextve years, other than kobe bryant, everybody else is relatively young and you can get them guys off the street to go with kobe and gasol and bynum and odom. so this team could be dangerous the next two years for the nba. >> and of course, when game three is over, this is where you want to be, "espnews." we hear from kobe bryant, dwight howard and the coaches after the game is done. live press conferences right here on "espnews." >> terrell owens continues to headline all things bills these days. reported to buffalo's minicamp. by his count he dropped a lot of passes today. >> drops are part of the game. i'm a professional, and you should go in the game, every game prepared, and there are drops, and that's just part of it. but i'm pretty sure i would assess my performance and say i could have played better. but that wasn't the case. >> there's no pressure on me at all. i know what i'm capable of. i'm very thankful and gracious for the opportunity, and i'm going to embrace it i feel good.

the large mutual-fund institutions, fidelity, barkley, vote with management close to 90% of the time. the reason they do is they get assets from management, the corporate pension funds, they get tremendous fees for that and as a result of that they are not going to vote against management, they're not going to -- management team will take the funds away from them and place them with another asset manager so those votes become problematic. we need legislation that says when the mutual-fund vote, on behalf of the investors in that fund, they have to make that vote based on the best interest of those investors, not their best interest as a mutual-fund. a prime example, a few years ago, phenomenal, almost $2 million in payouts to an executive meeting pfizer. the management team, 2 senior people flew to california. $14 million in fees managing pfizer assets, they voted straight down the line for pfizer. that is what goes on. >> i appreciate that advice and that information and i am looking to play a role, those are precisely the kinds of issues i want to deal with. thank you very much. i y

their investors, whose money they are managing as opposed to voting their own interests and fidelity, barkley, all men is a tremendous amount of money for these large companies with tremendous these. that is not disclosed and isham time and time again the vote that way so i certainly encourage say on pay, do something about the mutual-fund voting, elimination of broker votes that the sec has said they are going to do. i think we need to get to the majority voting in the right for shareholders to also remove directors when they have not gotten the job done. thank you mr. chairman. >> nefcom month professor murphy from the university of southern california. >> thank you chairman frank. we are here today in large part because we are angry that merrill lynch and aig paid huge bonuses after the bailout funds. our anger coupled with their suspicions that the culture is the root cause of the ongoing financial crisis has led to an effective prohibition on cash bonuses for tire percipience and is leading us today towards more sweeping regulation of compensation in financial services firms. i agree the