so what barnardos is saying is that the technology is fantastic.egulation around keeping children safe online, we do off—line, in playgrounds which are safe we do off—line, in playgrounds which a re safe by we do off—line, in playgrounds which are safe by design. so she had that experience online be safe? if we don't do it now than in 30 years' time where some of our futurologist that we have interviewed a sane, well, much of what we think is going to drive communication in the future hasn't even been invented yet. so we clearly can't regulate for that. what we can do, though, is really bring back the online harm paper, and the government has done some great work on select committees with the help of charities like barnardos. what we need to do, regardless of what parties in power in the next couple of months, this is unarguably something that needs to be put into legislation. you need to update for the online world. how on earth, though, does a government think about regulating for, know, holograms or chip inside a wrist, when that is not out ther

earlier, my colleague geeta guru murphy spoke to barnardo's director of policy and communications, sagarnteresting about this survey was it really indicates, on the 30th anniversary of both the internet and the children's act, the pace of change around children and young people has been enormous, so we've got 9% of adults and 13% of children saying that they don't believe in 30 years hence we will be using written communication at all, actually, so there is only 13% and 9% who think that we will still be relying on written communication. there is much more focus, now, on holograms. so, 30% of children think that we will be using holograms. 40% believe there will be body implants. i'm wearing wearable technology today. it's not a huge leap of the imagination to think that that could become a reality. what sort of body implants are you talking about? well, they did not specify what. it was just this, the next iteration of this is likely to be noticeable. now, that carries dangers, of course, as well. now, we know that the internet has had huge opportunities for children. it has changed the

a report for the club by the charity barnardos found young black players were subjected to abhorrenton a regular basis in the 19805 and ‘905. that investigation was triggered after former youth team players launched legal claims against the club in 2017. two of those players have now given interviews for the first time. they want to remain anonymous so their words are being read by young actors. a warning some of the language you're about to hear is raci5t and incredibly offensive. i remember the first time i met him. he said, "here's your £3, you little coon." he said how big my lips were. how big my nose wa5. that was my first encounter. i was12. i was shocked and i was like, i didn't know how to react. i mean, who would at that age? for me it was coon, nig—nog, black bustard. i didn't even know all those words. and for the people running the club to be instigating racism like it was cool to say those sort of things, that was... yeah, that was crazy to me. the chelsea sides of the 19805 and ‘905 featured talented black players. at senior level, there's no suggestion of abuse that y

chelsea reissued the statement that they released at the time of the barnardo's report on racism at thegise, they say, to all players who experienced this deeply shocking behaviour. we are doing, and will continue to do, everything we can to ensure that those boys, girls, men and women who play for this club and, indeed, anyone who works for a wealthy club will never have to endure the terrible experiences which these young players suffered. in a busy political week, we spoke to the former conservative minister margo james. she was one of 21 mps who voted against the government by backing a plan to delay brexit beyond the 31st of october and was chucked out of the conservative party as a result. here's what she had to say... why are you sure that you are right and borisjohnson‘s strategy of wanting to leave no deal on the table, while trying to get a deal, is wrong? i think if he was serious about... i mean, ifeel that his negotiating position of being so hard—line about a, october 31st and b, get rid of the backstop — i feel that that is a hopeless position to take and that if he was s