versus barnett. so i'm just going to sashay over the hearing here. and we will public chance to chat a little bit and get the story from those who lived it. and there is a reason for this order here, good bite is to barnett, we have been saying that in this wonderful presentation of proceeded. this from a practical perspective, we talked about jehovah's witnesses, was that part of your mom and brothers world or was that something that their parents heard of? >> originally, and my mom side of the family, they were methodists, and on my grandpa side was catholic. so this came about from their parents. and they started reading it, my grandfather would go into the literally came home, and i would say guess what i learned today and he got really intrigued by what he felt was really the truth. so it got down that way. >> at what point, did your mother ever mention when she got the word as of how they might react to the pledge of allegiance that was prevalent in all public schools? >> she really, you know,

west virginia versus barnett. i'm going to go over to this chair here and we'll have a chance to chat a little bit and get the story from those who lived it. there's a reason for this order here. gobitas to barnett, we've been seeing that on this wonderful presentation that preceded this. from a practical perspective, about jehovah's witness, was that part of your mom and brother's world or was that something that their parents were part of? >> originally, my mom's side of the family was methodist, my grand mother's side, and my grandfather's side was catholic. this came about from their parents and when they started reading, my grandfather would sneak in the room and look at the literature, guess what i learned today, and he got very intrigued by what he felt was really the truth. it got handed down that way. >> at what point did your mother ever mention when she got the word as to how they might react to the pledge of allegiance that was prevalent in all public schools? >> well, she really was mentioning how con

west virginia state board of education versus barnett. it's a mouthful and those case names represent two very distinct but symone are closely related legal processes. basically two trials that were separated in time by about three years, 36 months they presided over by arguably the most powerful and perhaps influential court on the world stage. and they resulted in one of the most influential legal precedents for their free exercise of conscience in modern times but aside from all of its legal significance, it really was about to families. -- from gobitas two barnett it represented the story of four children. three girls, and one boy. there were other plaintiffs in the case, but you might say these children served as a postcard children. so it is most compelling aspect this was really a story about children. so when did it all began? well, as it was so i presented just previous to this part, there were similarities with what happened in the gobitas and barnett families. we heard about that recently. and the events leading up, much like t

i just can't sleep tonight knowing that what has happened nationally and then a week later ralph barnett, the segregation white supremacist governor of mississippi is coming to princeton to give a speech. you see this personal versus professional conflict happening and really get a chance to look

. >> reporter: on sunday the barnett family realized that their home and winery was in the path of the glass fire. they quickly decided they needed to leave, but then they came back to try and save what they worked for 37 years. >> there were times like this could go south very quickly. >> reporter: jonathan cline remembers gripping a 2 inch hose and fighting a fire that was so close to burning down the family business in the hills of st. helena. coastline and his wife were married here. >> came right over here and went down the vines. >> reporter: his mother-in-law fiona and her husband built barnett vineyards in the '80s from the ground up. >> it looks so normal and you peek over the edge and see what started moving toward the vine my goodness, it's getting really close. >> reporter: panic set in. pipes started melting, electricity cut. the saving grace, the pool in the backyard. >> we dropped the pumps in there and with 500 feet between myself, joe and johnny, between the three of us we ran it out to the vineyard that was on fire coming up. >> reporter: the barnett's extended family

barnett looked at the interaction, he said i haven't changed my mind. i think that's why the department of justice is so upset with the flynn prosecution. senator blackburn. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. comey, we thank you for coming and appreciate havingng your time. you know, this is our day number three hearing. we've talked with rod rosenstein and we've also had the opportunity to talk with sally yates. in her testimony she did say she thought you went rogue on the situation. that is of concern for us, and one of the reasons we wanted to hear from you today. and i will tell you this, as i talked to tennesseans, one of the things they are trying to figure out is quite simply this. somebody cooked up this plot. they came up with this. and then somebody gave the order to carry this out. and somebody did the dirty work. but then when you talk to rosenstein and sally yates, basically you say you didn't know anything about any of this. and you did not know any of this was going on. so, why don't you tell us who came up with this plot? >> what plot are

as carrie said and professor barnett said, it's -- it is the book youd in right now and couldn't havet a better time so thank you. >> thanks for those kind words jan and for blushing it and randy for blurbing it and carrie for writing you book. couldn't have written the kavanaugh chapter so ease live without that to draw on. a a half or dozen or so weapons we can draw from the sweep of our political confirmations that are as applicable in the current situation as that's ever are. politics has always been part of the process. you can't remove it, as randy discussed. confirmation fights now are driven by political philosophy or judicial philosophy, rather, that's a little different than the way that politics has played a role in the past and modern confirmations are different because the political culture is different. modern life, even if the rhetoric is just as dem googlic -- demagogic, modern porlarization works differently. hearings have been kabuki theater. he come out against public confirmation herrings for supreme court nominees. think they overall for public discourse add more

is missionhat produce president stephen barnett.ing up, big banks hoping financing will give the green environment a little used along with their bottom lines. this is bloomberg. ♪ vonnie: this is bloomberg markets. i'm vonnie quinn. alongside amanda lang. leading european banks are going on and offensive in the market for sustainable financing. deutsche bank announced it would provide financing for 200 billion euros in green assets as demand for green bonds rushes up. a series focused on the development in green finance, we are taking a look at how big banks are financing the shift to cleaner rows. joining us is jill ward. it is a catch-22 situation, because banks announced these programs and people are going to fit their issuance to the green label. how do we ensure that everybody is acting in good faith? jill: thanks for having me. i think it is a really interesting story at the moment, especially in europe. a ton ofe seeing is issuance from corporate's and sovereigns. billion about $55 issued in september alone. and just a huge

. >> here with more on tomorrow night's debate is robert barnett. he's participated in debate prep for every democratic candidate since 1976. he's going to tell us what will happen tomorrow night. what is at stake when it's the last debate of a cycle? >> dana, nice to be with you. thank you. this could be the last chance for president trump to turn things around the one believes the polls and i do. joe biden is in good shape. not to be complacent in any sense. i think this is the last time you'll see 100 million people tuning in, focusing on what these candidates have to say and who they are. so it's a big night. it's a very big night, particularly for president trump. >> dana: what do you think about the new format with the mute button in place for the two-minute opening statements per subject? >> i think given what happened in the first debate, it's an improvement. i personally would have gone further if it were up to me. i would have gone back to the process where it's two minutes, two minutes and a one minute rebuttal and sur rebuttal with simil

liz: fbi agent william barnett said he threatened to quit the mueller probe in the russian probe to getthe probes and he say in the flynn case felt like a placeholder case, keep the flynn case open and maybe this was the insurance policy peter strzok talked about in order to go after trump. >> that is very interesting that you mention that, that is one theory, the insurance policy discussion was on -- august 15, the flynn case the subfile is open the very next day and that was the discussion the insurance policy discussion was in mccabe's office with mccabe, peter strzok, and lisa page in the next day is officially open and keep in mind also, nothing happens, this is consistent with the idea that in the insurance policy and the agent that you talked about, barnett said nobody was telling me too do anything, by the way there was no reason to open the subfile, if you look at the opening document does not say we suspect him of something it says he has ties to russia, that is not a crime, that's an interesting thing but here's something also people are not talking about, which is forget abo

there will be no statement of an agenda. >> robert barnett words of wisdom.leasure. savannah guthrie is hosting the live town hall with president trump in miami at 8:00 p.m. eastern. i'll see you back here tomorrow at 3:00 p.m. eastern. what is that, an adjustable spanner? good choice, steve. okay, don't forget you're not assisting him. you hired him. if you have nowhere to sit, you have too many. who else reads books about submarines? my dad. yeah. oh, those are -- progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. look at that. but we are hoping things will pick up by q3. yeah...uh... boss: doug? sorry about that. umm...what...its...um... boss: you alright? [sigh] [ding] never settle with power e*trade. it has powerful, easy-to-use tools to help you find opportunities, 24/7 support when you need answers plus some of the lowest options and futures contract prices around. don't get mad. get e*trade and start trading today. don't get mad. he calls on the nation's antop health experts.s, work

his mother-in-law and her husband built barnett wine vineyards in the 1980s from the ground up.he family, extended family and friends all helped save the winery. >> johnny saw some flames coming out over there and all of a sudden we realized, oh, my goodness, it's getting close. it's fortunate we still have a winery and a house. we have a lot of people to thank for that. >> barnett says she hopes she can rebuild a small portion of her business that was burned in seven months. >>> and people aren't the only victims of the recent wildfires. animals are as well. now an international fund for animal welfare and other groups rescued around 600 animals from the north complex fire burning this butte county. cats, dogs, horses, chickens, goats, even coy fish. in some instances owners have only moments to escape and really couldn't rangel wrangle their pets in time. >> there's a unique bond people have with their animals, and i have just always found that it's very important for us to protect that bond. so when a disaster strikes and that bond is somehow -- it could be shaken a bit, it's

. >> reporter: meantime, winery owner fiona barnett sharing her story of survival during the worst of the glass fire. >> it was very close to burning down the winery. >> reporter: this winery sits at the very top of spring mountain road in st. helena. two weeks ago resources were stretched thin so employees here jumped into action to save the property. watch how close the fire got to these vineyards. but friends, family, and employees grabbed hoses and made a stand. >> we weren't trying to fight the fire as if to extinguish it but just keep it off the property. >> reporter: by some miracle, it worked, some grapevines burned as well as an observation deck but most of the property survived. >> the adrenaline is gone now, but at the time it was pumping and we were running in every direction. but we feel very blessed that we're standing here right now. >> reporter: dozens of other wineries suffered damage, but some like barnett were lucky. >> my heart goes out to everybody that has suffered all their losses. >> reporter: in the napa valley, cornell barnard, abc7 news. >>> san jose officia

that article came out of a conference, randy barnett's book. i can't remember what it was, but i suspect it was before the election. it's not that i wrote it in january 2017. >> president trump was saying this in 2015, 2016, that's two years, it didn't take you that long to write the article. my question is simply were you aware of president trump's opposition to the affordable care act during that time? >>> senator klobuchar i have no idea and i suspect that if the article was published in january that i wrote it sometimes before the presidency shall election. and again, i want to stress i have no an imus to or agenda to the in order ford, your suggestion that this was an open letter to president trump, it was not. >> okay. in the 2017 university of minnesota law school journal one of the things you said is there is a risk that a faction will constrict courts into helping them win battles they have already lost fair and square. is that something you wrote in that article? >>> i did. i was responding to an argument made by randy barnett in a bo

that article came out of a conference for randy barnett's book. i can't remember when it was but i suspend it was before the election. >> but president trump has been saying this in 2015, in 2016, and that's two years. it didn't take you that long to write the article. so my question is simply, were you aware of president trump's opposition to the affordable care act during that time. >> senator klobuchar, i have no idea, and i suspect that if the article was published in january, that i wrote it sometime before the presidential election. and again, i want to stress i have no animus to or agenda for the affordable care act. so to the extent you're suggesting this was like an open letter to president trump, it was not. >> okay. in the 2017 university of minnesota law school journal that we just discussed, one of the things you said is, there is a risk that a faction can run away with the legislative process but there is also a risk that a faction will conscript courts into helping them win battles they have already lost fair and square. that's some

. >> john barnette is preparing the boat for the crab season.thanksgiving, christmas, the holidays, crabs, we open before any other spot in the state. >> this may be a cap to this season. a delay to the start of the season due to concern about endangered whales. there's new rules that allow the california department of fish and wildlife to close or term fishing. >> steve johns says the new rules came when the environmental nonprofit filed a lawsuit. >> the who wills are! to healthy oceans. they spread nutrients around the ocean. offset climate change. he says analysis is done with aerial surveys to sigh where the whales are. >> trying to find out, municipal mizeing the impact. >> in may a devastating fire destroyed a shed where 31 stored their gear. hits loss is they 00 ,000 dollars. haiku only afford to buy a portion of the crab trans he had. >> if it dayed for a long time. there's no income. by need the income. if they don't open on time this is a good reason. by don't want to tang will a whale. >> the state will make a decision by the middle

barnett becomes just the 5th woman appointed to the supreme court the 1st ever mother of school children to take that role as bt and pro-abortion communities have voiced concerns of the views of the devout catholic but her colleagues claim she would be a sympathetic and impartial judge however a presidential candidate for the socialist equality party joke is sure to be appointment is a blow for democratic right and we really want to has to understand the ramming through of this nomination in the context of crumbs electoral strategy because he certainly sees the supreme court as a critical element of his efforts to undermine the results of the election to maintain power whatever happens in the popular vote the democrats are really terrified of the development of a real popular movement begins from since we're a season they're really covering up the far reaching significance of what the president of the united states is doing in threatening the process of the world itself the real question is the development of mass popular opposition not only to trump but to the ruling class policy that y

outlined the possible path forward and when i read the book for the first time so professor randy barnett scooped me on those words that's how he described it as the indispensable guide and then also waiting the judicial confirmation and network book about the recent fight of justice kavanaugh. so that conversation about the news of the day or the week or the month and justice ginsburg and on the upcoming part of the nomination with incredible experts so i will start with teethree who is head of the center for constitutional all studies because in june we stood in front of the supreme court waiting for the interns to the opinions in our hands and then we go for those before we break the news to be quick and a student sometimes even get the signature dry wet in their that he has written a terrific book is it is supreme disorder. and is something i think now more than ever so take us through what made you decide to write this book and the world has changed. >> the publisher had to pay it was in the back of my mind that something like this could happen and there is something a little odd and

and brother bill barnett, the longtime pastor, who passed away after spending weeks in the hospital fighting. he's remembered for being an advocate for the community, leaving behind his wife and three sons. irving mcfaill was the president of a historically black university. he was outspoken to make sure that students were adhering to the cdc guidelines. he was 71 years old. may they rest in peace and may their memories be a blessing. >>> and now we come to the special feature of our program, the appearance of our mystery celebrity. i would tell you our guest voice is so well-known, i'm going to answer the first few questions. >> would i be likely to recognize this person's voice on the radio? >> i would think you might, yes. >> is our guest famous for traveling? >> i'm

robert barnett is a debate prep expert. 4 years ago, you helped mike pence.yed mike pence in your prep with tim cane. i know you are not involved in this election for either party. how did you get ready to play mike pence in 2016? what did you do? >> i had the opportunity over 10 cycles to play the republican opponent. i prepare a detailed briefing book on every issue i can think of and the attacks and rebuttals. i don't imitate them. i just imitate a few words and positions. >> bill: you didn't try to assume his personality then? >> no. i am not an actor. i think i assumed his positions and those that he espoused. >> bill: you have done debate prep for democrats since 1976. with dukakis and lieberman and barack obama and tim cain. do you think at the vice-presidential level given the times in which we are in 2020, this means more tonight or no? >> i think it's very consequential because of the president's illness. people will take a much closer look at mike pence. over the years vice-presidential debates generally have not made a difference. the first one th

this play at all and concern you and all that hunter biden may have been a conduit to and rich joe barnette family? >> absolutely, the lack of attention that it is getting nationally, that's concerning because you know if it was trump doing this, it would be blood and water. >> go ahead, alex. >> is equally disturbing this morning, national public radio said the story was a distraction and notot t dedicating any timeo agree >> laura: a reason that npr gave for not coming to hunter biden story saying we don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories. we don't want to waste the listeners and readers times on the stories that are pure distraction. how many people out there think a media outlets, again, regardless who's in the white house, should regard stories about our adversaries funneling money to family members of a city president. it's not a story, how many think that's the way a media organization shouldth react? >> nobody. >> final question, i want to ask very quickly. who won the debate lest i do think? show of hands, biden. 1, 2. it donald trump? okay. majority t

in terms of more general issues and philosophy, i read her article that was a critique of randy barnett's book on our republic. is thoughtful, careful, everything else. is thoughtful, careful, everything else. point she said randy is not an originalist, which i'm sure he did not appreciate that. judges who never thought about their philosophy until they got to the supreme court, we have been getting a lot better about appointing judges who have thought about their philosophy. and if anybody who has thought about it clearly, she has. for six years, she and i lectured back to back at blackstone program. she would always let your own original is him and interpretation. she's got it down cold. i will turn it over. you were mentioning before about separation of powers cases . name thatcase, the escapes me -- both parties appealed. she was skeptical. and they ended up dismissing. she got the supplemental brief as to whether they reached the dollar threshold, and it turns out the court ended up determining that they did not and that the district court judge -- >> in one of the cases i refer to t

tell us about ida b wells barnett. she was a black journalist. alice paul would not allow her to march with the group. ellen: yes. ida b wells, a really wonderful person. she was born in memphis around her parents were certainly 1862 slaves. , she might have been born just before slavery was abolished, as was the case with so many of these families of former slaves. they were determined that their children would get education. she became a teacher and then a journalist. she took it upon herself to begin a campaign to expose the epidemic of violence and lynching going on all over the south. she was inspired to do this because both friends of hers werese friends of hers lynched in memphis. she begins to investigate this. she goes all over the south and finds out that the charges are -- the charges that leads to them being lynched is really a among whitesentment southerners for the fact that this generation of black people is beginning to leave behind and the burden of slavery they are beginning to make gains, especially economically. the friends of

. >> reporter: dozens of other wineries suffered damage, but some like barnett were lucky. >> my heart goes out to everybody that has suffered all their losses. >> reporter: in the napa valley -- >> that was cornell barnard reporting. now, pg&e is warning of possible public safety power shutoffs on wednesday and thursday in the bay area. winds are expected to pick up those days, increase the risk for a wildfire. the utilit says it will have a better idea of the cities and counties that could be impacted by the end of tuesday. >>> don't forget you can always check the weather conditions where you live on our free abc7 news app. >>> some election news now. danville city officials say they do not believe ballots were stolen or tampered with after a collection box was found unsecured after it was serviced. the box is located at a park and ride lot near sycamore valley road and camino ramon. it had been worked on earlier today but was not properly closed and locked. the lid was left open for about an hour this afternoon. a city spokesperson says there is no evidence anyone's ballot went mis

here's errol barnett. >> what they are doing say hoax with the ballots. >> reporter: for 3 1/2 yearsident, donald trump has made tens of thousands of claims. >> mexico is going to pay for the wall. don't are about it. the tax cut. ours is the biggest ever passed. >> reporter: glenn kessler, "the washington post" fact-checker, has been trying to keep track of all of them. >> politicians speak in code words, and they use phrases to mislead people. >> reporter: but kessler says no one does it more than donald trump. it's not even close. >> basically broken the fact-checker meters. >> reporter: kessler's meter of mistruths a scale of pinocchios ridging from 1 to 4. >> previously, most politicians would get four pinocchios, our worst rating. maybe 15 to 20% of the time. but president trump gets four pinocchios 65% of the time. >> i better say think otherwise they'll give you a pinocchio. >> reporter: his work with salvatore rizzo and meg kelly has been acknowledged by the president and is used across the media landscape to assess the president's truthfulness. >> "the washington post" brea

. >> dana: bob barnett, great to see you. they're playing our song here. see you open "the five." bill hemmer, that is my signal that i'm out of here. >> bill: it tolls for thee. thanks, dana. >> dana: thanks, bill. >> bill: all right. i'm bill hemmer. the debate over covid relief playing out in washington. president trump and joe biden get ready for the final debate. we're 13 days from the election. the final show down happens in nashville, tennessee. house speaker nancy pelosi and stueven mnuchin speaking at this hour. the last we heard, there's a ways to go in getting a deal that could help millions of americans. also today two senior administration officials telling fox news the fbi is in possession of a laptopthat belonged to hunter biden. how will that topic come up in tomorrow's debate? mark meadows standing by. he will join me. we have the latest on hunter biden and first back to john roberts. there's a lot of optimism about the potential of the white house and nancy pelosi to reach the frame work for a new coronavirus relief bill. getting relief out to the people that are

liz: november, november they wanted to shut the flynn case, who is keeping it open, william barnett, the flynn case open as a placeholder to keep going after trump, what do you think happened. >> is a circumstantial case but some are pretty darn damning, there are so many actions that were completely in bad faith by the fbi when it comes to general flynn, i don't know general flynn is an agent -- angel or a saint or a sinner or all points in between, it does not matter, the conduct of the fbi is outrageous in choosing to keep the case open, doing an ambush interview, avoiding white house counsel, avoiding the attorney general has comey did to sally yates is spent, and heavy discovery violation during the case, start to finish everything about the case raises red flags about the use of investigator resources to go after somebody connected to the trump administration. liz: at one point james comey testified, we did take advantage of the chaos and the incoming trump administration, one of the former assistants actually quoted james comey saying were just going to do this, screw it. here

i just can't sleep tonight knowing that what has happened nationally and then a week later ralph barnettthe segregation white supremacist governor of mississippi is coming to princeton to give a speech. you see this personal versus professional conflict happening and really get a chance to look at these college presidents and see how human they are and how these decisions were quite complicated, that remains a treat. writing this book i try to also do the human aspect justice to it. >> i like that you say that because one of the things that you end with is the conclusion that maybe we should be seeing college presidents as elected officials in a way. that economy you are talking about needing to influence policy, needed to be the face of something but also somebody in private conflict and beliefs, that's a constant tug of war our elected officials also have to deal with. i thought was a little bit provocative. we live in a world we think of the university for better or worse the life of the mind but your book is telling us about the case. why do you think that looking at college presiden

was maybe a couple of paragraphs, maybe one paragraph at the end because it was a comment on randy barnett's book and a lot of his book dealt with the nfib versus sebelius as an example. i was responding to that. and the sentence that you read me about it is illegitimate for a court to twist language in pursuit of a policy goal, that is what i think. that's what i was selling senator sasse. i don't think it is the job of courts to pursue policy goals that the text that you enact doesn't support. >> so to be clear, you're specifically accusing the chief justice or you're chastising might be the better word the chief justice of distorting the statute and of upholding it when it should have been struck down. >> no. i'm not -- i was not. i said i was not chastising. all i was doing was expressing some -- i mean, as i said several times, it is how the chief justice himself characterized it, not the most natural reading of that language and -- >> if i may, your honor, i don't think the chief justice would agree with that characterization. he didn't describe his own opinion as in the plausible. >>

. >> another question coming from one of our viewers very barnett and what is a sacred place to present people from voting in two different states in the same election. >> there are a couple of safeguards and one of them is eric which is electric or electronic registration center and at some awful so we call it eric but eric is a consortium of states that compares the voter registration list with your department a model motor or the death list in a wide variety of other data sets to compare one set of registrations from one state to another and that has been around now for a number of years and i don't know the exact number of the latest count but we have more than half of the states are members of eric so that's one way of identifying if people are exactly registered in two states and then they can follow up on it. i will say that is a minimal number of people who are in fact registered in two states and even fewer number that may potentially vote in two different states which is illegal to vote in two different states in the same election for say in a presidential election. there are

it was a comment on randy barnett's book. a lot of that book dealt with nfib versus p24 as an example. i was responding to that. the sentence that you read me about it's illegitimate for a court to twist language and personable policy goal, that is what i think three that's what i was telling senator sasse. i don't get is the job of the court to pursue policy goals that the text that you and act doesn't support. >> to be clear you are specifically accusing the chief justice or you are chastising might be a better word the chief justice of distorting the statute. and of upholding it when it should have been struck down. >> no, i was not. i said i was not chastising. all i was doing was expressin expressing -- as i've said several times, how the chief justice himself eric tri-state. it's not the most natural reading of that language. >> if i might, your honor, i don't think the chief justice would agree with our character -- characterization. >> he said less natural. i thought it was implausible. >> not unsound. >> senator coon

west virginia versus barnett in 1943 which ruled that students can't be forced to say the pledge of allegiance at public schools and that's the only case having to do with freedom of speech for hours. >> by the way they determined the pledge of allegiance keys in 1943 in the middle of a war they stood up for students right not to say the pledge of allegiance. that was a very strong case. in our case, the judges, also split but it was a seven to two split and we won. it was a very resentment victory for student rights. in our case is the first time that the court said that students in public schools are persons under the constitution and that they were endowed with their first amendment rights. so that has been the role now for the past almost exactly 50 years and it has really empowered student voices. and our case the majority opinion was written by -- and he rallied in his opinion all of the arguments supporting free speech in a democracy and it's a really wonderful decision. if you have the opportunity please look that up and read a for its decision in tinker, the moye, because it's a very

. >> a another question coming from one of our viewers f larry barnett and i'll give this one to tammy. what is a safeguard in place to prevent people from voting in different states in the same election? >> there are a couple of safeguards. one of them is eric which is the electronic legislation registration center and eric is a proportion that compares the voter registration lists with the motor vehicle list with the social security death list and a wide variety of other state sets to compare one set of registrations from one place and that has been around for a numbereg of years. i don't know the exact number or the latest count that we have more than half the states are members so that's one way of identifying if people are registered intoif different states. then they can follow up on it. there are a number of people who are registered in two states and your numbers may potentially -- it's illegal to vote in two different states for an election in a presidential election so there are mechanisms in place where we continue to encourage states to join the eric consortium so we cannot

but as i say it will be missing from portugal's team to barnett because he has tested positive for coronavirusd cases in scotland to camp, so it shows that renaldo certainly did the first footballer in recent weeks to have tested positive on the eve of scotland's game against israel last week three scotla nd game against israel last week three scotland players had to withdraw from the squad after they tested positive. israel also had a couple of positive cases in their camp, we see instances in rugby union as well. the sharks rugby team more than 20 players and staff in their camp testing positive. they had to forfeit theirfinal camp testing positive. they had to forfeit their final match of the season. so we are seeing cases more and more in sport, affecting matches and more in sport, affecting matches and effecting squads but fair to say that renaldo is one of the most famous footballers in the world is the most high—profile case that we've seen in the last few weeks in sport. aaron ramsey pulled out of the well squad because of an unspecified injury. the 29—year—old public absences another

was maybe a couple paragraphs, maybe one paragraph at the end because it was a comment on robert barnett's book and a lot of his book dealt with the nfb versus sebelius, for example, so i was responding to that. and the sentence you read about it's illegitimate for a court to twist language in pursuit of a policy goal, i don't think it is the job of courts to pursue policy goals that the text you enact doesn't support. >> so to be clear, you're specifically accusing the chief justice, or you're chastising, might be a better word, the chief justice of distorting the statute and of upholding it when it should have been struck down. >> no, i was not. i said i was not chastising. all i was doing was expressing some -- well, and as i've said several times, it's how the chief justice himself characterized it. it's not the most natural reading of that language, and all i was doing was -- >> if i might, your honor, i don't think the chief justice would agree with that characterization. he didn't describe his own opinion as not plausible. >> he said less natural. i thought it was implausible -- >>

she is a book review of one critic of the audible care act, randy barnett and characterized arguments a perfectly unremarkable and obviously true comment about chief justice roberts opinion in 2012 in which he engaged in some very creative lawyering to salvage the individual mandate constitutionality. she's never weighed in on that and the questions that are coming up on november 10th are so complicated and different from the case from 2012, it's impossible to know what justice barrett would do or wouldn't do and i think basically i assume that what's happening is the democrats believe that health care is a winning political issue and are trying to exploit that in the context of her hearing, but there's no substance at all to the claim. in fact, it's abjectly false. >> shannon: yeah, i mean, people maybe forget their formal care act has been to the supreme court a number of times in a number of very narrow questions. this is going to be another bite potentially at that apple. i will be covering the case that we will see and we will see if there is a justice barrett seated at that time

william barnett, the former fbi agent said they were keeping it open, the flynn case open as kind offter trump. what do you think happened? >> it is a circumstantial case right now but sometimes circumstances are pretty darn damning. look, there were so many actions that were completely in bad faith by the fbi when it comes to general flynn. i don't know if general flynn is an angel or a saint or sinner, all points in between. it doesn't really matter. the conduct of the fbi is truly outrageous, keeping the case open, doing an ambush interview, avoiding white house counsel and avoiding the attorney general that comey did to sally yates' expense and even having discovery violations during the case. start to finish, everything about the case raises the red flags about the use of investigative resources to go after somebody connected to the trump administration. elizabeth: yeah. at one point james comey testified, you know, we did take advantage of the chaos of the incoming trump administration. one of his former assistants actually quoted james comey saying you know what? we're going t

as part of our partnership with "usa today," erroll barnett spokes to studens trying to balance safety he's at columbia university in new york city. good morning to you. >> reporter: hey there. good morning. you're right, tony, the coronavirus is impacting colleges and universities differently. here at columbia university in manhattan, it only has 12 cases. so it counts itself as lucky. in smaller towns and cities, it is a different story. despite administrators pleading with students to follow the guidelines and stay socially distant, hot spots with popping up on campuses nationwide. this is exactly what colleges and universities don't want to see. potential super-spreading events, crowded parties at illinois state to packed party boats near indiana university. that school in bloomington has roughly 33,000 undergraduates, about a quarter of them participating in greek life. since mid-august, about 800 greek life students have tested positive for covid. >> i believe that the houses that are still partying don't really truly understand the severity of the situation. >> reporter: maggie

northern ireland businesses in northern ireland will receive exactly the same support on the basis of barnettl, and i hope you will understand my disappointment that wolverhampton has been lumped into a tier two situation, despite what we are. my fantastic pubs and restau ra nts are. my fantastic pubs and restaurants have done everything asked of them are now because they are in tiertwo, asked of them are now because they are in tier two, they face no financial support at all and a devastating effect on their viability. can he urgently look into it? i am gratefulto my honourable friend but actually the job support scheme is precisely available to pubs, restaurants and businesses in her constituency that are facing, that are not able to trade, they may be open but not able to trade as they normally would. up to merseyside with sir george howard. thank you, mr speaker. the prime minister is aware that if we are to tackle these horrendous rises in covid—19 in liverpool city region, we need a much more effective track, trace and isolate system. but we haven't got one yet. will he accept my sugges

barnett's 302 and linked messages between the agents that show how it all happened.ll, i mean, we have jim comey on tape when he is sitting on stage with nicole wallace from msnbc and she says how is it possible that your agents were at the white house and a he says oh, we couldn't have gotten away with it in an organized administration, so i just sent over some agents of over there and made sure that he was joc jocular and didn't havea lawyer with him. >> they had multiple meetings to plan how to keep him, quote, relaxed and unguarded. there are apparently two memos of mccabe's phone call with general flynn, one that is probably closer to the truth where they said can we send a couple agents by to talk to you because they had just withi been the white house the day before, another where mccabe went on this long explanation of what he supposedly said, most of which is not true at all. they wanted him you alone. they wanted him relaxed and unguarded. they reported back he clearly saw them as allies, that he believed he was talking to friends, that he was forth coming

it was a comment on mandy barnett's book, a lot of his book dealt with the case as an example.as responding to that. the sentence you read me about its illegitimate for a court to twist language and for suitable policy goals, that is what i think -- i don't think it is the job of the courts to pursue policy goals that the text does not support. sen. coons: you are accusing the chief justice or chastising the chief justice of distorting the upholding it when it should have been struck down. judge barrett: no, i was not chastising. all i was doing was expressing -- as i have said several times, it's how the chief justice himself characterized it. not the most natural reading of that language. sen. coons: i don't think the chief justice would agree with that characterization. he didn't describe his own opinion is not plausible. judge barrett: he said less natural. --hought it was on plausible not plausible. sen. coons: but it was not unsound? judge barrett: i did not criticize or chastise the chief justice. it is true that chief justice roberts and justice scalia to different appr

the uk government who introduced that grantand uk government who introduced that grant and provided barnettment recognises that the pandemic has caused extreme disruption to the economy. that is why we have put in one of the most generous support packages in the world, with £190 billion.|j generous support packages in the world, with £190 billion. i will recognise the amount of support to businesses in my community. hospitality businesses are really going to struggle with the champion cu rfew. going to struggle with the champion curfew. can we look again at what we might be able to do for businesses that will struggle under those circumstances? there has been disruption to businesses affected by tier 2. that is why the chancellor has cut vat from 20% to 5% and extended that to the 31st of march, where he has introduced a 12 month business rates holiday. over the last few days businesses across birmingham from book—keepers to bars and pubs have had to close as lancashire has entered tier 3 restrictions. whilst those businesses are welcoming the support provided by the extension of furlough a

and northern ireland administrations if they decide to do something similar, bringing guaranteed barnettoposed plan will cause damage to the united kingdom economy. the first deviation came two weeks later when the chancellor announced his sink or swim job support scheme. design fa u lts swim job support scheme. design faults in that scheme are already leading to substantial and unnecessary job losses. the leading to substantial and unnecessaryjob losses. the second deviation came as a belated response to the imposition of localised restrictions and as last friday on television with further measures announced yesterday. yet leicester for example has been under localised restrictions for 100 days. the chancellor told us to learn our new limits as we go. well his handling of this economic crisis is testing patients to its limits, especially the patience of his jobs are threatened. there are many critical questions this government must answer, here are just three. questions this government must answer, here arejust three. first, why were local areas only be provided with support protest tra

federalist society member randy barnett had a 16-page legal memo against the law which became a source of talking points during debate and laid the framework for subsequent court challenges. is it any wonder that so many of us across the nation are terrified of judge barrett's confirmation, what it could mean for the health of our citizens? i was interested to hear a colleague on this floor, a republican colleague say these are scare tactics. these are scare tactics to say that the court might strike down health care. these are scare tactics. does that colleague not believe the president of the united states when he said he will nominate someone who will strike down the a.c.a. and its health care bill of rights? it's not a scare tactic to say the individual who chose the nominee said he intended to strike down roe v. wade and to pick somebody who would strike down the affordable care act. now, the affordable care act in my home state has meant 400,000 people gained access to medicaid -- under the expansion of medicaid. and one of the ironies is the largest percentage beneficiaries are

restrictions or they are close and dirty three, so businesses can plan on that in regards to the barnettthe expansion of that job tier 2 measures, such as the expansion of thatjob support scheme and the business grants will make a massive difference to the people in my constituency who have been under tier 2. 0n the point of business grants, campaign urge the chancellor to make sure that the money is available to councils as soon as possible so that there is businesses who it as soon as possible. he is right to champion his situation for his constituency‘s local businesses. ican his constituency‘s local businesses. i can assure him that we will work as quickly as possible to provide that guidance. the grant value will be calculated on the business premises scaled by the rate of value. added to that will be a 5% discretionary top up and the authorities can use that to their discretion fun as they see fit for their local area. the chancellor's winter economic plan has not even lasted the autumn. his tinkering with the system demonstrates he has been behind the curve all along. it has sowed

least £2.4 billion in additional funding asa least £2.4 billion in additional funding as a result of barnett this issue? and can he confirm that treating victims with dignity and respect will always be at the heart of everything this government does in response to this crime? ican i can certainly confirm what my right honourable friend says about treating victims with dignity and respect and she is right to take pride in what this government has donein country that is leading the campaign against modern slavery.” country that is leading the campaign against modern slavery. i entered parliament this morning and checked in using the contact tracing app and when i return to fife on the train tomorrow i will need to manually switch to the scottish cup as it doesn't happen automatically, producing a second wave of infections across the uk, so test and trace is more critical. given the prime minister macro possible for a four nations approach, can i ask what engagement has taken place on this, as it is critical, particularly in border communities? iam very particularly in border communities? i am