yes, that is a very good comparison to baron ungern. it seems very appropriate to me, because many people now see and understand that putinism is no longer some kind of deviation, that is , behavior that does not correspond to the general. standard of democracy, not some late soviet union with conformist democracy. everyone can clearly see that the pathos of the conservative revolution has now been added to all this. putin is entering a kind of mystical phase of his rule, raising a heavy degree of opposition to the west. it's already another level of it. in this sense of the word. yes, it's something like baron ungern or national-more. i also see the features of early fascism, a mixture of tsarism and fascism in the early phase, before it finally took shape. in this sense of the word, i would say that for putin , if it does not sound terrible, there is no other path than the path to the great war, which burns everything. what's next, we look at it, we, of course, see less. how is the russian federation going to get out of this political

yes, this is a very good comparison with baron ungern, it seems very appropriate to me, because many people now see and understand that putinism is no longer some kind of deviation, that is , behavior that does not meet the general standard of democracy, not some late the soviet union with the conformist democracy everyone can clearly see that the pathos of the conservative revolution has now been added to all this. putin is entering a kind of mystical phase of his rule, raising a heavy degree of opposition to the west. this is another level of it. in this sense, the words: yes, it is something similar to baron ungern or the national bolsheviks, as my colleague volodymyr pastukhov writes, are absolutely correct. i also see signs of wounds. fascism, a mixture of tsarism and fascism in the early phase, before it finally took shape. in this sense of the word, i would say, it is really, if terrible, for putin no... it sounded: there is no other way but the way to a great war that burns everything. the further we look at it, the less we see, of course. in general, how is the russian feder

yes, it is something like that. to baron ungern or to the national bolsheviks, as my colleague volodymyrwrites, absolutely correct, me too i see the features of early fascism, a mixture of tsarism and fascism in the early phase, before it finally took shape. in this sense of the word, i would say that for putin, if it doesn't sound terrible, there is no other path than the path to the great war, which burns everything. what's next? we look at it, we, of course, see less. in general, how is the russian federation going to get out of this political tension, which it has been dragged into for the past 10 years. hryhoriy yavlinskyi's quiet growling with the cry: "give a truce at any price" or some kind of anti-war game , it's hard to say who. in boris nadezhdin, this is a weak squeal of mice from under the plinth, compared to the colossal inertia that has already arisen. only during the war, but also in several previous years. it is obvious that this movement started in 2020 precisely, in its new phase, when the constitution was changed. even then it was clear that everything was moving towa

the exit we see, well, that he somehow does not know , a civilization proposal, this is roman baron-ungernon sternberg, that is, the only thing that china is not ready to actively support him in this matter, then... then putin on reconciled himself, threw the mantle of this crazy daurian baron over his shoulders, so that, we understand, he has a mobilized russian nation, he has an armed one, he has preparations for a new smersh and a long, bloody war against ukraine, but that’s it has to be moving somewhere too, or is he just going to carry out all his cannibalistic plans he's been voicing to carlson or something? something more yes, that is a very good comparison to baron ungern. it seems to me very appropriate, because many people now see and understand that putinism is now - this is no longer some kind of deviation, that is , behavior that does not meet the general standard of democracy, not some late soviet union with conformist democracy. everyone can clearly see that conservative pathos has now been added to all this. putin's government, raising a heavy degree of opposition to the we

in this sense of the word, yes, it is something similar to baron ungern or to national bolsheviks, asy colleague volodymyr pastukhov writes, is absolutely correct. i also see features of early fascism, a mixture of tsarism and fascism in the early phase. before it took shape finally, in this sense of the word, i would say, for putin really, if it didn't sound terrible, there is no other way, except the way to the great war, which burns everything that follows, we look at it, we , of course, we see less how rev is going to get out of this political tension, which it has been led into for the past 10 years, grigory's quiet rumbling yavlinsky with a shout... give a truce at any price, or some kind of game in the anti-war mood, it's hard to even say who, boris nadezhdin - this is a weak squeak of mice from under the plinth, compared to the colossal inertia that has already arose not only during the war, but also in several previous years. it is obvious that this movement started in 2020 precisely, in its new phase, when the constitution was changed. even then it was clear. that everything