baroness jenny jones have strongly backed the legal challenge and has personal experience of the issueople like me and you do not have to have committed a crime, not even be arrested to be on that database. that suggests to me that it is an extremely flawed way of trying to keep track of people, and once you are in it and once that information is on there, you have to request that it should come off, which is what i did finally. but you have to know that it is on there. if you don't know it's on that you can't get it removed because you can't make the request. and that means that it would be lots of false positives on the system. so for me this is a very foolish move, and what is even worse is that it is so inaccurate that on previous trials it has been 2% accurate, that means 98% inaccurate. the policejudgement at times is very poor, and i can sort of see why they think this might bea sort of see why they think this might be a good thing to do but actually it is disastrous, and the sooner actually it is disastrous, and the sooner they listen to people who are saying "you've got to, if

that was baroness jones finishing jeff's report, and jeff, facial recognition is really controversialad with it. yes, i mean theirargument is that this isn't anything new. police officers have always had the usual suspects in the back of their mind, they're looking out for them on the street. what is different here is the speed and scale. so this is no longer about a police officer looking out for a few people in a hundred, this is cameras scanning hundreds and thousands of faces and comparing them instantly to databases of thousands of people. and that is what has campaigners worried. you mentioned the usual suspects, which implies police are only using previous suspects' images. but where do they get their facial data from? this is the other controversial bit — a lot of police forces are using the police national database. this is a stash of millions of images police have accumulated over the years. there are controversies over how they have accumulated it, whether that database should still exist, and controversies about who is on it, some of these are people who have been arrested

that was baroness jones finishing the report.l going ahead. their argument is that it is not new. police officers have always had the usual suspect in the back of their mind. the speed and scale is different. it is not about the police officer looking out for a few people in a hundred it has a camera scanning thousands of faces and comparing them instantly to a database. that comparing them instantly to a data base. that has comparing them instantly to a database. that has got campaigners worried. you mentioned the usual suspects which implies police are only scanning previous suspects' images but where do they get the facial data from? this is the other controversial bit. a lot of forces are using the police national database, millions are using the police national data base, millions of are using the police national database, millions of images police have accumulated over the years. there are controversies over how they have accumulated it and whether they have accumulated it and whether the database should exist and also who

that was baroness jones finishing jeff's report, and jeff, facial recognition is really controversialument is that this isn't anything new. police officers have always had the usual suspects in the back of their mind, they're looking out for them on the street. what is different here is the speed and scale. so this is no longer about a police officer looking out for a few people in a hundred, this is cameras scanning hundreds and thousands of faces and comparing them instantly to databases of thousands of people. and that is what has campaigners worried. you mentioned the usual suspects, which implies police are only using previous suspects' images. but where do they get their facial data from? this is the other controversial bit — a lot of police forces are using the police national data base. this is a stash of millions of images police have accumulated over the years. there are controversies over how they have accumulated it, whether that database should still exist, and controversies about who is on it, some of these are people who have been arrested but cleared of any offence. an

that was baroness jones finishing jeff's report, and jeff, facial recognition is really controversial it. yes, i mean theirargument is that this isn't anything new. police officers have always had the usual suspects in the back of their mind, they're looking out for them on the street. what is different here is the speed and scale. so this is no longer about a police officer looking out for a few people in a hundred, this is cameras scanning hundreds and thousands of faces and comparing them insta ntly to data bases of thousands of people. and that is what has campaigners worried. you mentioned the usual suspects, which implies police are only using previous suspects' images. but where do they get their facial data from? this is the other controversial bit — a lot of police forces are using the police national database. this is a stash of millions of images police have accumulated over the years. there are controversies over how they have accumulated it, whether that database should still exist, and controversies about who is on it, some of these are people who have been arrested but

that was baroness jones finishing jeff's report, and jeff, facial recognition is really controversialspeed and scale. so this is no longer about a police officer looking out for a few people in a hundred, this is cameras scanning hundreds and thousands of faces and comparing them insta ntly to data bases of thousands of people. and that is what has campaigners worried. you mentioned the usual suspects, which implies police are only using previous suspects' images. but where do they get their facial data from? this is the other controversial bit — a lot of police forces are using the police national database. this is a stash of millions of images police have accumulated over the years. there are controversies over how they have accumulated it, whether that database should still exist, and controversies about who is on it, some of these are people who have been arrested but cleared of any offence. another problem we hear about with artificial intelligence is the problem of bias in the training data, where a lot of ai is trained on white men, and so it's not as good at recognising the mo