justice barrett? justice barrett: just to pick up on the very end of your colloquy with justice kagan, was it wrong that you weren't joined under rule 19 as a necessary party in this suit given what you're saying about this is practically impairing or impeding your interest? mr. thompson: that -- that would be our position, your honor, that we have an interest and it's being impaired and that we should have been named. justice roberts: thank you, counsel. mr. thompson: thank you. justice roberts: ms. theodore. ms. theodore: thank you, mr. chief justice, and may it please the court: from rule 24's inception through today, a single principle has guided interpretation of the adequacy pron. when a proposed intervenor's interest is identical to one that's already represented in the case, we presume that the existing representative is adequate, and that common-sense presumption holds particular force when the existing representative is a state official charged ethically and legally with defending state inte

mississippi asked the court to take up the case and after justice barrett was confirmed to the court, mississippi asked the court go even further and explicitly overturn roe. host: has the court ruled on any of the abortion cases it has heard? >> it has ruled on that texas case about whether abortion is a constitutional right's. whether this texas law, there was a way to challenge that and block it before it went into effect. the court dealt with that on an emergency basis and they essentially said there is not a way you can challenge that law. there was another kentucky case that was even more of the procedural question regarding whether the attorney general could take over the state's defense of its abortion law. host: could the justices decide to completely overturn roe v. wade? >> if all they do is uphold the mississippi law, at a minimum they're going to cut the basis of road which said up until the point of fetal viability, states can't restrict abortion or place an undue burden on abortion. there's really no way they can uphold the mississippi law without undercutting the basis

barrett did that. i want to thank the committee and ranking member comer for bringing this measure to the floor and allowing us to honor our fallen heroes. i urge passage of the legislation and i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman reserves the balance of her time. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. mrs. maloney: mr. speaker, if the gentlewoman has no further speakers, i'm prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman reserves the balance of her time. the gentlewoman from south carolina is recognized. ms. mace: thank you, mr. speaker. i urge my colleagues to support this bill honoring easley, south carolina, native and american hero private first class austin. i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman yields back the balance of her time. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. mrs. maloney: mr. speaker, i urge passage of mrs. maloney: i urge passage of h.r. 91 and yield back my time. the speaker pro

so you need to get one of the justices like justice barrett to flip her view from the conference and that's on my plate. that's why i think there's a lot of doom and gloom going on right now after looking at this draft opinion, and yes it's possible that things can change but it's really quite unfortunate -- >> i want to go back to another supreme court hearing, we all remember that senator susan collins staked her vote to confirm justice kavanaugh on her belief that justice kavanaugh would uphold roe v. wade. her belief was based on what he had to say in his confirmation hearing, let's listen to that. >> have your views on whether roe was settled precedent, or could be overturned? and has your views changed since you were in the bush white house with. >> senator isa said that it settled as a president of the supreme court entitled to respect under-principles of stare decisis. one of the important things to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirms many times over the past 45 years, as you know. and most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in plant parenthood

if it does stand, we sign on from justices alito, thomas, gorsuch and cavanaugh and barrett. the right to an abortion would fall to each state. so a team of which have automatic twig trigger laws. in some states, there are no exceptions for rape or incest. meaning women will by law be able to carry it to term nor pay parental leave or universal healthcare. according to 2019 data, six in ten women who have abortions are already mothers. of all the abortions performed, 43% occur in the first six weeks. 92% in the first 13 weeks, i e, first trimester. for those that seek it later, they are more likely to be poor, young or have serious health complication. they would be required by the government to carry to term without guaranteed support from that very government. key are monitoring the reaction outside the supreme court along with voters. we are hearing from lawmakers. does this change to codify roe into law? most senate democrats want it. will some republicans now too? here is senator lisa murcowski who says her confidence in the court has been quote rocked. >> if it goes in

justices gorsuch, kavanaugh, and barrett testified under oath with the judiciary committee, that supreme courts should stand a bedrock principle known as stare decisis, when you they -- but they clearly arrived with the agenda to overturn roe. former president trump bears responsibility for damaging our confirmation process in the public -- and the public faith of the supreme court as an impartial arbiter of our nation's laws. senate republicans deliberately stole the seat that president obama elected merrick garland to fill. senate republicans then turned around and rushed the confirmation of justice amy barrett after the death of ruth bader ginsburg even though voting began in the 2021 elections. a recent poll of "the washington post" and abs showed that -- abc showed that 70% of americans say that the supreme court should uphold roe. now more than ever it's essential for the senate to pass the women's health protection act. the legislation would protect the right to abortion, free from medically unnecessary restrictions, and create a statutory right for providers to provide and patien

here is what one of them told us outside justice amy coney barrett's house.. >> the fact she is an adoptive mother is her inability to see what it is like to carry a pregnancy to term. >> so joe, there you have it. she didn't carry a pregnancy to term according to that lady, except the fact she carried five to term, joe. is that the perfect microcosm of so many arguments on the left, not just based in reality, but completely false and a lie. >> joey: yeah, that is the ecosystem some folks live in. that person believed what she said was fact, she wasn't intentionally telling a lie. abortion, as we talked about in this country, divided. yet you have a media portraying us as 75% pro-choice and 25% pro-life in terms of coverage where it is 3-1 pro choice voices getting a say over pro-life voices. within the national media community, who cover politics exist in two cities, new york and washington, those places is ecosystem where it is liberal. if you poll newsrooms in those places, i imagine the 75/25 pro-life to pro-choice split is true, the fish bowl, we are a r

justice barrett: a paid action? mr. katskee: i'm saying it isn't, and yet it still poses an establishment clause problem of coercion. justice barrett: because it would be government speech? mr. katskee: no. justice barrett: but where is the state action? i see it is coercion, you can have coercion from all kinds of private sources. where is the state action there? mr. katskee: there should not need to be state action for an establishment clause violation, what would be where -- be rare. here, of course, there is a state action, not only because he is a public employee performing his duties in a place in time where only he can and in a way students expect that that to be, it also the district conferred authority on him, which everyone knows. think the real point is not only does it not need to be, not necessarily have to be functioning as a government employee at the time of the speech for teresa establishment clause concerns, but it also raises all sorts of other concerns that under pickering the school district has to

parts of the opinion caters to justice amy coney barrett.on cases in the past. that, combined with a lot of other factors, many of which i'm not at liberty to discuss, contributed to our being convinced that it is, in fact, an authentic draft opinion of the supreme court. that, you know, of course with the caveat that the process isn't over, and it could change. >> senior legal affairs reporter at "politico," josh gerstein, thank you very much for your reporting this morning. our thanks to former u.s. attorney barbara mcquaid, as well. >>> coming up, the first test of donald trump's influence over this year's republican primaries. we'll take a look at what's at stake today in ohio. >>> plus, a snag in efforts to evacuate hundreds of civilians trapped inside that steel plant in the ukrainian city of mariupol. we'll have an update on the new attempts to get them to safety this morning. we'll be right back. biden: we have a crisis: the price at the pump. our prices are rising because of putin's actions. we need to double down on our commitment

he really controlled almost everything once justice barrett took the seat, that shifted the balance to the right and now this is somebody other than john roberts for the case. maybe cavanagh, neil gorsuch, and to that extent, the chief justice prefers a bit of an incremental approach to the law. the idea that you might not go all the way to overturn roe in this case might be something you might do, but if there are five justices, we want to go further than he does and he controls that decision and that is from this draft. >> we welcome your calls and comments. we are talking about the leak of that draft decision. here are the lines for democrats. it is (202) 748-8000, for republicans, (202) 748-8001, and for all others, it is (202) 748-8002. they did not waste any time after yesterday and they confirmed the decision, but also initiated the investigation of what that investigation would look like. some people are calling for the fbi to begin investigating and the chief would ask the marshal of the supreme court, somebody who basically charges security to do an investigation so that keep

mississippi asked the court to take up the case and after justice barrett was confirmed to the court, mississippi asked the court go even further and explicitly overturn roe. host: has the court ruled on any of the abortion cases it has heard? >> it has ruled on that texas case about whether abortion is a constitutional right's. whether this texas law, there was a way to challenge that and block it before it went into effect. the court dealt with that on an emergency basis and they essentially said there is not a way you can challenge that law. there was another kentucky case that was even more of the procedural question regarding whether the attorney general could take over the state's defense of its abortion law. host: could the justices decide to completely overturn roe v. wade? >> if all they do is uphold the mississippi law, at a minimum they're going to cut the basis of road which said up until the point of fetal viability, states can't restrict abortion or place an undue burden on abortion. there's really no way they can uphold the mississippi law without undercutting the basis

senate republicans then turned around and rushed the confirmation of justice amy coney barrett at the death of justice ruth bader ginsburg or even the early voting has begun and the 2020 presidential elections. overturning roe goes against public opinion. a recent poll of the washington post-abc showed 70% of americans believed that the court should uphold t roe and that decision regarding abortions should be left to a woman and her doctor. now more than ever it is essential for the senate to pass the women's health protection act which i am proud to be a cosponsor. the legislation would protect the right to abortion free from medically unnecessarynn restrictions and create a statutory right for providers to provide and patients to receive care. this would codify roe v. wade and prevent states from continuing to act restrictions on reproductive freedoms. despite the opinion just being a draft and abortion sylvain constitutional right, states already seizing on the momentum of this draft opinion and moving to limit a woman's constitutional rights. since the leak of this draft opinion,

i asked amy coney barrett if she thought roe v. wade was super precedent. she did not think that it was. and yet i believe, the american people are with us. so i'd like to focus here, on what is going to happen if they do issue this opinion, when all signs point to that they will. not just this leak, which is unfortunate, but also what they have said in the past. if this is issued, over 20 states, there's a trigger, where abortion will automatically be banned. so it's no longer going to be a decision between a woman and her doctor, basically i guess ted cruz has made this decision for people. the second thing that we're going to see happen is that you're going to have individual states considering laws banning it, and meanwhile, in washington, it's on us now to try to codify roe v. wade into law. and as you know, we have two republican senators who are with us, when it comes to choice, but the question is, with the filibuster in place, which i firmly believe we should reverse, could we ever get 260? so this is what we're dealing with right now. and i cannot

amy coney barrett was rushed through by mitch mcconnell.ourt from a 5-4 majority for the conservatives with chief justice roberts in the majority to a 6-3 conservative majority with roberts increasingly siding with the three liberals. but he is increasingly irre irrelevant. if the roe v. wade case stands in the draft opinion that we have seen, that will be the most vivid demonstration because that means that clarence thomas, alito, brett cav nugget, neil gorsuch and amy coney barrett, the three trump appointees plus alito and thomas, that makes a majority where chief justice roberts is irrelevant and doesn't get to assign opinions when that's the line up. that is an immense change in the court and it's all because justice barrett got promote d a the last days of the trump administration. >> the transformation here just in a matter of a few years is stunning. it's almost unrecognizable. thank you so much for taiking us through that. >>> the hardships of war are creating another test for teams. cnn is on the ground in ukraine as women and chi

chief justice roberts: justice barrett? justice barrett: so, as justice sotomayor was pointing out, one of the difficulties with this kind of claim is the ripeness concern if we were to say that it must proceed in habeas. and on page 50 of the state's brief, the state says that there would be an avenue for pursuing that kind of claim in state court and state post-conviction proceedings, and i just wondered if you had a reaction to that. mr. hellman: i -- i -- i do. with respect to my friends, method-of-execution cases cannot be brought in georgia post-conviction proceedings. what -- what the red brief talks about on page 50 is the notion that the second and successive bars under georgia post-conviction rules are less stringent than they are under what's enacted in aedpa, but there's -- it has to be the right kind of claim to be brought into habeas in the first place. and as i believe we point out in -- in our brief, i -- i can get you the page citation -- georgia, as a matter of georgia post-conviction law, a claim challeng

he appointed neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, and amy coney barrett, and you know, you quoted at the top of the hour, you know, just exactly how they had vowed, you know, to have an open mind on abortion rights but this draft document, it appears to be as i say in sync with what we had been hearing, shows that despite what they told senators, despite whatever vow they said about neutrally looking at this and showing regard for precedent, and this is a precedent that's a half century old, that they have gone in completely the opposite direction, and again, it just goes to show, donald trump promised something, and donald trump delivered, and one other thing, don, when you think back to 2016 of how many republicans were initially suspicious of donald trump and what got the republican establishment to accept donald trump as the gop nominee was the fact that the supreme court had a vacancy then, and they believed that he would deliver justices that would vote for, you know, socially conservative outcomes and this is exactly what we appear to be headed for, and i just want to add one caveat.

and in that time, amy coney barrett has been confirmed to the supreme court.rown and cracked 24 cell phone screens. not all of them mine. - hey, babe? have you seen my phone? - but you know what? we have decades to worry about that human chastity belt. right now, i want to talk about rbg. ruth bader ginsburg's death has hit a lot of people hard, especially women. - [bleep]! - and i think it's because-- - mommy? - i think it's because-- - mommy? - buddy, can mommy please just have two minutes to cry in a closet? - again? - i think it's because, as american women, ruth is a big reason why we've made it this far. long before she got to spend 27 years in the middle of this comb-over sandwich, rbg was already changing the world for women. in 1972, she cofounded the aclu's women's rights project. there, alongside pioneers like dorothy kenyon and pauli murray, she spent years carefully laying the groundwork to force u.s. law to acknowledge something radical. women are, like, full-on people. - nobody in our country did more for the advancement of women in terms of wom

all three of trump's antichoice supreme court picks -- neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. each of these nominees raised their right hand before the senate judiciary committee and swore under oath that they respected the weight of judicial precedent. in fact, when brett kavanaugh was asked about roe v. wade, he pointed to plan parenthood v. casey which affirmed the court holding in roe establishing a constitutional right to abortion, and he called the decision in casey precedent on precedent. a double precedent. but, madam president, let's be very clear, this draft opinion has no respect for judicial precedent. if the draft holds, all three of president trump's nominees to the supreme court, along with some others already on the bench, will have deliberately deceived and defrauded the american public. right wing ideologues set out to stack the court with justices ready and willing to overturn roe v. wade. now this right wing establishment, this machinery is on the verge of achieving their goal, even though their win will be a horrible loss for the reputation of the supreme

outside the home of this mother of seven and justice of the peace amy coney barrett.dible] shannon: and also, new information about the alabama corrections officer and the fugitives. we begin tonight with a financial well hitting your wallet and the president that continues to take any responsibility. we have trace gallagher with more. reporter: consumer prices went down to 8.3% and the bad news is that the prices were set to drop at 8.1% and the more bad news is the only reason inflation drops slightly is because of gas prices, now record highs, so the inflation numbers are outdated. what is to blame? well, listen to the president of the united states. >> the only we can tackle this is to see it go up and then come back on. >> we have price increases. >> the first cause is a once in a century pandemic, this year we have a second cause. a second cause. the war by vladimir putin in ukraine. >> that is for different explanations over the past 11 months, but now there could be a fifth reason for inflation. i mean, why blame vladimir putin when you could point the finger

four other conservative justices, clarence thomas, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, and amy comey barrett majority. it's not clear whether roberts would have aloud the mississippe mississippi law to stand without overturning roe over whether he joined the three liberals. if the draft holds, it would represent a triumph of the antiabortion movement which has marched for life every year since the court's landmark 1973 decision that abortion was a constitutional right that states could not ban. the court in 1992 was one vote away from overturning roe. over the next 30 years, that goal was a republican campaign promise. with justice clarence thomas on record opposing roe, from george w. bush nominated alito. a decade later after the death of justice antonin scalia, then- majority leader mitch mcconnell blocked president obama from filling the seat, giving former president trump the opportunity to nominate gorsuch, and later kavanaugh and barrett. like with every other supreme court confirmation hearing since roe, all were pressed for their view. >> "roe v wade" is an important precedent of th

she set the barrettes are scared.our prayers and our whole neighborhood is supportive of that in this show the hand maid's tale. they the women are barren they take the hand maids into the families. the men have their way with these women. the women get pregnant. as soon as they have the baby they give the baby who is barren, to the wife. >> steve: governor youngkin makes a great point. there is a law on the books that makes what they are doing with this group ruth sent us illegal. you cannot parade or picket in front of a judge or justice's home in hopes of intimidating. clearly that's what they're trying to do they are trying to scare them. he says the department of justice should help, he has called -- he called the fairfax police yesterday. and apparently, brian, you mentioned to expand the security perimeter around the houses because three live in the commonwealth of virginia and in fairfax county. the state police say they are ready to respond. the department of justice though, rather than enforces the law, they

it was true of roberts, alito, gorsuch, cavanaugh, barrett.haps one of the consequences of this decision if it holds is that confirmation hearings will be less about abortion. in theory it could be reversed again and we could make a different court, but i think if nothing else, this decision will make future confirmation hearings less about abortion and more about other things that are more insightful. host: let's go back to our phone lines and talk to mike, calling from indiana. good morning. caller: good morning. i am pro-life, but i think the guy should be punished just as much as any woman. they need to take and sterilize some of these guys, along with the women. in rape, they should just do away with the guy. that is just not right. host: all right. mike is advocating some very harsh laws. what anything mike said to be constitutional? i will start with you, danielle. danielle: why do you have to start with me first? to bring it back to a brilliant young scholar who asked the question of if we begin to go to a system where some states decl

it was true of roberts, alito, gorsuch, cavanaugh, barrett.erhaps one of the consequences of this decision if it holds is that confirmation hearings will be less about abortion. in theory it could be reversed again and we could make a different court, but i think if nothing else, this decision will make future confirmation hearings less about abortion and more about other things that are more insightful. host: let's go back to our phone lines and talk to mike, calling from indiana. good morning. caller: good morning. i am pro-life, but i think the guy should be punished just as much as any woman. they need to take and sterilize some of these guys, along with the women. in rape, they should just do away with the guy. that is just not right. host: all right. mike is advocating some very harsh laws. what anything mike said to be constitutional? i will start with you, danielle. danielle: why do you have to start with me first? to bring it back to a brilliant young scholar who asked the question of if we begin to go to a system where some states de

you mean amy coney barrett the biological mother of five children?eantime the baby formula shortage leaving parents across across the country scrambling and it may not get better for months grady trimble will have the full report after this. ♪ help me rhonda, help, help me rhonda ♪ ♪ ♪ i'm the latest hashtag challenge. and everyone on social media is trying me. i'm trending so hard that “hashtag common sense” can't keep up. this is going to get tens and tens of views. ♪ ♪ ( car crashing ) ♪ ♪ but if you don't have the right auto insurance coverage, you could be left to pay for this... yourself. call a local agent or 1-888-allstate for a quote today. lemons. lemons. lemons. the world is so full of lemons. when you become an expedia member, you can instantly start saving on your travels. so you can go and see all those lemons, for less. your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/

especially amy coney barrett. was cleared to say stare decisis means that the courts under us have to respect our decision is a supreme court, the highest court in the land. and thus it is super due process, unless it is like brown versus board of education where you cannot separate a white and black children then we can decide based on what comes before us. >> geraldo: five have three daughters in the state of ohio in the fetal heartbeat law that will now be in that place, it will not be the law of the state of ohio. what am i going to tell my daughters now? that they don't have control over their body? that they can't make those choices for themselves? that's old man scratching his belly and some other state is going to say that -- >> amy coney barrett is not an old man. >> let's listen to some media responses to all of this if we could. >> the founding fathers didn't recognized abortion is a fundamental right because the founding fathers were racist misogynistic jerk faces. >> i think we are all invited to ques

i think much more likely it would be kavanaugh than coney barrett. but could be either one of those. but the prospect of upholding the mississippi law but ending up with a concurrence -- a plurality opinion written by alito with three justices signing on to it. and then roberts writing a concurring opinion with two justices along the line, you're talking about, which would take away the force of alito's position. he would not have a majority opinion that was governing the case. and so you would validate the mississippi law. but overturn roe v. wade. that that's some conservative decided to do this from keep that from happening. to keep a fracturing from happening on the right. i think there's a very plausible theory. there are leaks in our business and maybe i've had benefits of it various times where people reacted in irrational and emotional ways, people just get mad. if that's the case it's more likely to be created on the left. if you're asking where i put my money, i'd put it on a cold calculated clerk than on a blindly enraged left wing clerk i

when barrett has been healthy 49ers consider him solid nfl cornerback and they are very glad to havehim back in the four. i bet they are excited for football. yes but i don't know it's kind of a year round thing. that's that's true . yeah thanks, jeff. always ready for a little football. goodnight everybody. thanks for goodnight everybody. thanks for joining us, mike. it's great what's with all the yogurt? shh! durkas has been breaking into my locker. ohh. but i've got a little revenge planned. sorry. i just remembered i don't really care. (taps key) where's mom? oh, my god, what is that outfit? are you going goth? you still sleep with a stuffed panda. don't you have a fraternity to pass out in? is there anything else you need for your procedure? um, i think i'm supposed to have ice cream. hmm. actually, i don't-- i'm sorry. is it a vasecto-you, or a vasectomy? you can have ice cream. thanks. today... (laughs) snip-a-dee-doo-dah! (chuckles) we-we've been talking about doing this for a while. yeah. yeah, ever since dad and gloria had their little accident, we don't need any surprises.

you mentioned your questioning of amy coney barrett and others. i want to play that. a trump supreme court nominee about that and this is how they answered. watch this. >> is roe a super precedent? >> how would you define super precedent? i'm answering a lot of questions about roe and scholars across the spectrum says that doesn't mean roe should be over while ever ruled but descriptively it not a case that everyone accepted and doesn't call for it over ruling. >> as a judge, it is an important precedent of the supreme court, by it, i mean row vark v wade, casey is precedent on priest dent, which itself is an important factor. senator, as the book explains, the supreme court of the united states has held in roe versus wade that a fetus is not a person for purposes of the 14th amendment and the book explains that. >> do you accept that? >> that's the law of the land. i accept the law of the land, senator, yes. >> so -- yeah. and you -- what do you think? what do you think of the responses? what do you think -- were they telling the truth in that moment? >> well, when t

you traced enormous sums of money that were plowed into building support for justice amy coney barrettbrett kavanaugh and how the network actually -- >> nearly $10 billion per pick. that group and its affiliates also then definitely donated some millions of dollars to other groups that were supporting gorsuch, cavanaugh, and amy coney barrett. they also spent around $10 million to blockarland's nomination in 2016. juan: this wasn't just money spent on the supreme court, right? in terms of the impact of leonard leo on many other lower federal court appointments by both president trump and president bush? >> definitely. they have been active, especially recently another court nominations and also been involved in the state supreme court fight like in wisconsin. i believe they also helped finance and effort in nebraska to basically reinstate the death penalty. amy: i would ask you about the primary and ohio, jd vance won after eating the back of donald trump, although he had attacked trump years ago. even though his opponents had aired months of ads highlighting his anti-trump statements

the revised nominee's list that included kavanaugh and barrett. the picks were made by advisors, said senator mcconnell, with trump's role merely signing off on them, but he never veered from the lists of candidates suggested by leo and others. and again, this was not about calling balls and strikes. if you want-- and i'm quoting here, to have the longest possible impact on the kind of america you want, said leader mcconnell, impact on the kind of america you want, you look at the courts. that's their goal, to change the kind of america we have. more accurately, the kind of america the far right mega doan donors is what i would say. and mitch mcconnell, judges, judges, judges, only things he wants is judges, and said so, trump's own white house counsel that he insourced the federalist society into the process. as one conservative explained, this was an enterprise, an enterprise of building a supreme court that will overturn roe versus wade. what's the anonymous donors behind the federalist society pecking operation got the nominees they wanted the

certainly, that's what amy coney barrett, not that specifically because she waffled on it. but certainly that's what gorsuch and kavanaugh said. >> if it stands, it's going to be an earthquake in american law. a lot of people have taken for granted their right to an abortion was enshrined in the constitution. it has been debated by a lot of people. conservatives have been fighting against roe from the day it was decided. we recognize that the court's conservative majority has gotten to the point where they have the votes to overturn it if they decide to do so. it looks clearly that that's what they have decided to do. we do have two months left in the term. things can change. but we do know now concretely that five justices voted to overturn roe without any caveats at all and to return the question to the states and to eliminate the constitutional right. >> mississippi is one of the states that could immediately ban abortions if this is the eventual ruling of the court. what are you hearing from talking to people there in jackson? >> i have been outside the jackson women's

my von or julian barrett again, the audit fortune pretty up in the be a lot about it more in search financial ah, a a with a line you go when you feel like you have a nice to way when you send me a board that you get back to me and i met up with you by. well, that will not allow, which is a good, [000:00:00;00] a house somewhere to watch or not, you know, they just hooked up with with, with, with, with that, with the piano being treated like him to call you after, when you get like you provided with miss only. so the thing is carol boshamp got it ashore. no grand choice of concept cortez just on a good year or she needs to pay out. and what is also has it on bus 11 a my a my a, a bowling each your on the me with it that is somewhat stuck with union with when do it for you? if you could give me a call or shoot me a question, as you only for the full i do in the whole universe with wishing to finish it yesterday. yeah, that would be a big question here. whenever you listen for your layout. exactly. it is my who are here with a national guy and say, oh j u b a r e. yes. lash it or just the recor

justices who sided with alito, justice clarence thomas, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. of course it is also possible that things changed between february and now. it's possible that things will change in the coming weeks. we're expecting that this court would issue an opinion on abortion sometime before it breaks for recess. that's typically the last week of june, right before july 1st, but if this is actually the opinion that comes out from the court, it could be a 5-4 decision overturning roe v. wade. this would have enormous implications for the entire country. in fact, it's estimated that about half of the states would act to immediately ban abortions. there are many states that have so-called trigger laws that say if roe v. wade is overturned, abortion in those states will immediately be banned. in fact, in recent weeks we've seen the democratic governor of michigan, she's actually filed a lawsuit to block that law in michigan that would automatically go into effect banning abortions if roe v. wade was overturned. and you know, jim and erica, we've seen a ground s

this was how amy coney barrett got on the short list.ald trump's short list was expressly people who would overturn roe v. wade, so the idea that your shock now is a little difficult, it does raise the question what are these senators prepared to do about it because there is federal legislation, it has been blocked in the senate. there are things that these shocked senators could do tomorrow if they genuinely believe they've been lied to and misled, in addition to a conversation we need to have about court reform that has not gotten much traction in the congress. rather than be shocked and awed, i think it's time to hear from the people who feel they have been betrayed, and like claire i also feel my blood pressure ticking up by the minute over the betrayal, but there are things to be done beyond just saying they lied to me. >> so josh, i want to come back to the reporting. i mean, the reporting in and of itself about the way that the court is ruling, i guess in hindsight is only half the shock. the shock is really, like you said, the al

justice barrett was talking ability to give children up for adoption. this shows -- >> laura: we can see where they're going. i would hope all the justices come out and condemn these terroristic acts on the part of activists and say this will not stand. they need to find this leaker or leakers, i should say, out of the supreme court. this can't be this difficult if it wants to be found out. carrie and make, great to see you. the left wants you to avert your eyes to the reality of what is happening around you. they were quick to celebrate the jobs numbers today. they forgot to mention that 363,000 americans left the work force at a time when we have a record high number of job openings. they forgot to mention that while wages went up 5.5%, inflation is up 8.5% wiping out your gains and then some. 28 republican senators and i've been warning you about this, they chose to sell out made in the u.s.a. by making it easier and more desirable for american companies to offshore operations meaning jobs overseas, especially in china because they're getting rid of

says she looked away for just a moment -- that's all it takes -- during which her 2-year-old son, barrettt a hold of her unlocked phone. >> she didn't realize what had happened until it was too late. meet a future mom, a first-time mom and a seasoned pro. this mom's one step closer to their new mini-van! yeah, you'll get used to it. this mom's depositing money with tools on-hand. cha ching. and this mom, well, she's setting an appointment here, so her son can get set up there and start his own financial journey. that's because these moms all have chase. smart bankers. convenient tools. one bank with the power of both. chase. make more of what's yours. >> announcer: it's "live with kelly and ryan!" today, "the office bffs"jenna fischer and angela kinsey. plus, from the trauma "the good doctor," freddie highmore appeared and summer travel tips as we continue our "bring on the heat week." also, jane krakowski takes a seat at the co-host desk. all next on "live!" and now, here are ryan seacrest and jane krakowski! [cheers and applause] >> ryan: the legend. deja, good morning. come around. >>

kavanaugh, amy coney barrett.f the federal society their positions on abortion were mel known before they had the conversation with the senator. before they went before the senate hearing. they have shown us what they would do. other republicans on the senate confirmation hearing and within the senate itself refuse to accept what they had demonstrated and they embrace them. for that very reason. because they had a commitment to over turning roe v wade and we're at the day a lot sooner than any of us thought we would be. as shocked as we are, we are not surprised. >> of course chief justice john roberts calls this egregious breech and will launch an investigation into who was behind the leaking of the draft opinion. what's your reaction to the actual leaking of the document and how extensive will the investigation likely be to find who is responsible for the leak? >> the response has been astonishment. to see something that should be kept in secret should be completely confidential until the decision is finalized a

but for more are now joined by political correspondence almost barrett here in berlin. thomas, another twist in this unpleasant on going diplomatic spats. why to the sent the foreign minister on the lena bear book now for that statement by mister shows probably came as a surprise to those who were expecting mister stein. my s o, the german president who is the german head of state, or chancellor shots was the head of government to be visiting kiev soon. but chancellor shorts clearly stressed that after talking to mr. stein, miles, they had both agreed that the person traveling to ukraine will be foreign minister in babylon. now this does not mean that shows or sign my i will not be traveling to ukraine soon. what it basically means is that they agreed at the 1st person to travel to ukraine. as a result of this conversation that have been taking place today will be germany's foreign minister. and then i babble further plans. we still don't know. so we don't know when an in a bad book will be traveling. and if so, when shine maya or shoulder could be doing something simil

genocide or ukraine on people, and the occupiers will be held accountable and brought to justice on barrett parallel should. meanwhile, the governor of the lou hand screech in which is still under ukrainian control has reported further attacks where more people have been killed. i spoke to our correspond with his bellinger, who is income at oscar city in the dumbass region, about 50 kilometers from the fighting. he gave me an update on their russian offensive in the region and the situation in the city of several don't yet. square russians shelling has killed at least 12 people over the past 24 hours. well, we're hearing that said today $20.00 pay some sources. 25 people have been evacuated from this from the city. many have left before, but there are still a considerable number of people left there and the conditions are more and more dire. the problem is that the road that leads out of similar than yours goes is within reach of the russian artillery. and often this road is shell, so it's a times very dangerous to leave the city. and that's the biggest problem. it isn't, we're not talking

four other conservative justices, clarence thomas, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrettortedly voted in the majority. it is not clear whether roberts would have allowed the mississippi law to stand without overturning roe, or whether he joined the three liberals. if the draft holds, it would represent a triumph for the anti-abortion movement which has marched for life every year since the court's landmark 1973 decision that abortion was a constitutional right that states could not ban. the court in 1992 was one vote away from overturning roe. over the next 30 years, that goal was a republican campaign promise. with just clarence thomas on record opposing roe, president george w. bush nominated alito. a decade later, after the death of justice antonin scalia, then majority leader mitch mcconnell blocked president obama from filling the seat, giving former president trump the opportunity to nominate gorsuch, and later kavanaugh and barrett. like with every supreme court confirmation hearing since roe, all were pressed for their views. >> roe v. wade is an important precede

if that case were to come up before this court, the amy coney barrett court, louisiana would have wonuld be one abortion clinic in the entire state. - so they will chip away at our reproductive rights, but only in states like alabama, texas, ohio, louisiana, missouri, kentucky, florida... - south and north carolina. - north and south dakota. - yeah. - oh, tennessee. - mm-hmm. - arizona. - mm-hmm. - ugh. no. why is this happening? what is the likelihood that expanding the court could actually happen? - it's not entirely impossible. it's gonna take a lot of all-caps tweets to people like chuck schumer. and the fact of the matter is, people are really tired right now, you know? it's been four years of this trauma. we've been locked in our homes for, going on, you know, eight months now. - these four years have been exhausting. i tried getting one of those sleep tracking apps, and the data showed that i died three years ago. - i really think that the baton needs to be passed to younger people, needs to be passed to non-white people. these are people that aren't going to kowtow to, like, m