barrett? justice barrett: i think initiatives like this are wonderful. people who disagree with you. republicans and democrats together. friendships across the aisle. speaking in reasonabled -- in reasoned and civilized way. those are things people do in their regular live, we do on the court, that you cando. that's an example we can set for the younger people in this country. thank you very much for having us today. [applause] >> thank you so much to our estreamed supreme court justices, to judge griffith, what an incredible presentation. i hope you all enjoyed that as much as i did. before you leave, just a couple of announcements we need to make. they asked us to hold here for a minute so the justices can leave. we'll ask you to stay for just a moment. i vals to give a very important update if not you're going to be very confused in just a moment because unfortunately there is a required mandatory test of the fire alarm system that is going to happen in this building in about 15 minutes. all right? so i don't want you to panic and run outside onto the

chief justice roberts: justice barrett. justice barrett: the road that abst re circumstances, state courts and federal courts share authority. there are certain limits to that , limits to which the constitution preempts the state's ability to resolve constitutional questions. you said earlier that once a president is elected, you accept a staging could not do ag about that. colorado cannot enact its own provision and use it to get the secretary of state out of office. i assume that is because of this principle of struc preemption? mr. murray: yes, your honor. justice barrett: i want to clarify what that means. that mea your aches are in the basket of the electorate clause. you a saying that even though all of the questions have suggested there is a problem with giving a single state the authority to render a decision that would he y effect on a national election, you are saying those structural concerns which might otherwise lead to e kind of results you would accept after someone is in office, overcome by the electric cros

up." ♪♪ barrett and his brother joined bob marley and the wailers that year with barrett arranging and♪ we're jamming ♪ ♪ i want to jam with you ♪ >> the son of a blacksmith, barrett learned to play on instruments he built himself and kept the wailers going after marley's 1981 death from cancer at the age of 36. his nickname was family man or just fam. ♪ i shot the sheriff ♪ >> even through the occasional legal battle over rights to the iconic music, they were playing some 200 dates a year right up until barrett's retirement in 2016 when his son, ashton jr., took over the band. >> are you ready for bob marley? >> ashton jr. plays his father in the film "bob marley: one love." ♪ one love one heart ♪ >> in 2020 "rolling stone" named barrett to the list of the greatest bass player of all time. ashton barrett, the longtime musical right hand of bob marley who helped to spread reggae across the globe, died last weekend in miami. he was 77 years old. ♪ let's get together and feel all right ♪ y'all wayfair makes it so easy to create a home you'll love. it's the talk of the neighborhood. kelly

we also have kevin barrett editor. veterans today joining us from saidia over morocco. welcome to you both rick sterling, i'll start with you. um, there's a couple um real shocking, not that before we didn't hear shocking news coming out of the gaza strip. one of them is the fact that you have people uh in one particular incident that's uh now been broadcast that are eating cactus for food. the other is the massacer that took place where the military eight convoy comes uh, not the military but eight convoy comes, palestinians line up for food and then they get shot at by the regime forces and they killed over 100. these are gross violations, this particular one, the massacer uh that's a genocide that's taking place and it's a war crime, we're still we're still looking at this happening, what do you make of the fact that this is still continuing by the israeli regime? yeah, well i think israel is spitting in the face of the international court of justice, which uh ruled at the end of at the end of january that israel should should stop this, and uh they're just continuing um as before,

what processes, as justice barrett alluded to, what processes are appropriate for figuring out whether someone did engage in that? and that's all what chief justice chase focused on a year after the 14th amendment to say these are difficult questions and you look right at section five of the 14th amendment as the chief justice said and tells you congress has the primary role here. i think what's different is the processes, the definition who decides questions really jump out at you when you look at section three. your response to that. >> certainly there has to be some process for determining those questions. the question becomes does anything in the 14th amendment say that only congress can create that process? and section five very clearly is not an exclusive provision. it says congress shall have power. >> put most boldly i think the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to the president of the united states? in other words, the question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again is just say it, it sounds

. >> reporter: conservative amy coney barrett agreed. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: the colorado supreme court said trump should be removed from the state's ballots, nearly ruling he committed insurrection on january 6th, was disqualified under section three of the 14th amendment. it says no person shall be a senator or representative in congress or elector of president and vice president or hold any office who took an oath and then engage in insurrection. just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is,

barrett will be sentenced in may . he faces life in prison and a fine. thousands of drivers for uber, lyft and doordash will spend valentine day not driving. they're expected to go on strike across the country tomorrow to demand better pay, drivers say, despite recent concessions by their employers, they still can't make enough to live on once commissions and other charges are taken, the demonstrations are set to take place about a week after lyft said it would guarantee the weekly earnings for drivers, a first in the u.s. rideshare industry. all right, since we're talking valentine's day now to a sweet love story that blooms every valentine's day, john and diana mavor of danville were married for 47 years before john passed away in 2017, four months later, on valentine's day 2018, a bouquet of red roses and white lilies arrived on diana's doorstep. flowers. from her forever valentine. we spoke to the couple's daughter today through do whatever magic works in his. >> in his world, it's set up so that every year a bouquet of flowers shows up on her doorst

. >> reporter: justice amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: chief justice john roberts warning that if the court upholds colorado, a new weapon could be introduced into the country's polarized political life -- red states going after democrats, blue states after republicans. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: but looming over these arguments, the national trauma of the attack on the capitol. even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice kentanji brown jackson got trump's lawyer to acknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaoti

governor sotomayor and -- justice sotomayor and justice barrett. they will talk about how a disagree with each other and are still friends. we are talking about the rising cost of housing in our country, unsustainably, the lack of housing, affordability and attainability for many americans. that will be a top priority. we will have discussions around ai, growing very quickly and causing concern for a lot of americans, and certainly for policymakers. those are top issues we will be dealing with. lots of discussion with the executive committee last night around like immigration and federal regulations, things that are really hurting states. ho i need to me a little plug for that conversati y mentioned with the justices, sonysomayor and amy coney barrett. we will cor at here on c-span starting at 2:30 p.m. eastern and also c-span now whicisur app and online at c-span.org. you want to stick around and watch that as well. let's start taking calls. ben is in atlanta georgia, he is a democrat. caller: i did watch c-span yesterday. i am from maryland. can

sotomayor and barrett will be on stage. they will talk about that institution and how they disagree with each other and are still friends. were talking about the rising cost of housing. that will be a top priority in discussions around things like ai and causing concern for a lot of americans and policymakers. lots of discussion with the executive committee around things like immigration and federal regulation and things that are really hurting states. host: i want to make a little plug that conversation with justice sotay and amy coney barrett we will cover that on c-span srtg at 2:30.m eastern it will also be on c-span now and online at c-span.org. you will want to stick around and watch that as well. but start taking calls. the end is up first, a democrat. caller: hey governor i did watch a little bit of c-span with you and the governor from maryland. can you give me a quick answer. do you support donald trump? that's just a basic question. will you support him as president? guest: i get asked this question a lot. i have

me think we sterling investigative journalists there from walnot creek, california, and also kevin barrett, editor at veterans today spoke to us from saidia over in morocco. thank you to both. with that we come to an end for this news review. condemnations are pouring in from across the globe following the israeli massacre of over 100 palestinians who were waiting for lifesaving humanitarian aid in northern gaza. ivan's f ministry spokesman described the attack defenseless civilians as barbaric. nasa canani said the shame of supporting and remaining silent towards the israeli genocide will remain with the false champions of human rights in the us and europe. meanwhile the un. chief expressed shock at the incident. martin griffitz said he was appalled at the killing of hundreds of people during the transfer of eight supplies in gaza. the un secretary general antonio gutierres also denounced the deadly attack. the secretary general condemns the incident today in northern gaza in which more than 100 people were reportedly killed or injured while seeking life saving aid. the desperate civilian

we have devin barrett. devin, are you with us? >> i am, is this any better?ry. you talked about the competing interests inside the department of justice, and that's something that the attorney general must do. please continue. >> they have a lot of independents. at the same time, the justice department has a long-standing tradition to decide to not charge individuals, you don't dirtied them up on the way. out that is what you saw, which was so problematic about the way that they closed, for example, the hillary clinton email investigation. james comey, the fbi director at the time, announced that he would not pursue charges, but then proceeded to say negative things about her. here, you have a situation where the special counsel robert hur in explaining his decision, and in essentially a delegation memo, would the justice department called a degradation memo, goes through -- >> i think the snowstorm is getting the better of us. i am going to go a little bit early to my friend jonathan capehart in for lawrence o'donnell. actually, no, we are not going to do th

and they may have also wondered why justice barrett refused to answer such an obvious question with such a self-evident answer. wasn't it settled that ivf free trade agreement is not only legally protected -- ivf treatment is not only legally protected but also a scientific miracle. think of it for a moment. the science here that is now accessible to every american, everyone in the world. and wasn't ivf pro-family, having children, parents who wanted a child and they may have wondered as well, wasn't ivf the last best hope for so many people struggling with infertility desperately seeking to experience the miracle of childbirth for themselves? who could possibly object to that miracle in the lives of a family who would not only relish but raise a child to contribute to our great country? what has become devastatingly and tragically clear is that the republican party's animosity towards women's health and women's rights doesn't stop at abortion. it's why i asked that ivf question 20/20, and it's why i didn't get a clear answer from a republican nominee of the supreme court. the war on wom

a very technical argument and one that justice barrett is clearly grappling with.ntuitively sympathetic, that it is automatic and i've watched video how-tos and i've seen how this works and i'm struckling to get the mechanics down and the fate of this ban may come down to whether amy coney barrett understands how bump stocks work or whether she allows herself to be misled by obfuscation put out there. >> when the conservative justices are leaning toward overturning the ban, what is their position on having something that functionally acts as a machine gun out there in public use? >> so the conservative justices are concerns that the bureau of alcohol and tobacco and firearms, atf, did not ban bump stocks until 2018. they have been on the market for years before and individual manufacturers had sent in their products to atf and said could we sell these and they sent private letters thinking we think they're legal and we're not going to punish you if you sell them and then the las vegas shooting happened an now atf said we understand how these work and we need to ban

we saw amy coney barrett, and sonia sotomayor, she has been trying to win over amy barrett from day one. sonia sotomayor was the first to call barrett. the liberals are trying all that they can to try to get these conservatives to show a sign of moderation. i don't know that's it's succeeding. if i were sonia sotomayor, i would be considering retirement, we know she has medical issues. she's not a young person. if she wants the seat to remain in liberal hands, that's the way to do it. >> thank you very much. >>> the supreme court's decision that no doubt helps donald trump's legal strategy, delay, delay, delay, does a delay help him politically, and we are awaiting president biden at the southern border. trump is about to land too. i think he's probably just landed. there he is. what they're both saying on immigration. don't go anywhere. n. don't go anywhere. power e*trade's award-winning trading app makes trading easier. with its customizable options chain, easy-to-use tools and paper trading to help sharpen your skills, you can stay on top of the market from wherever you are. e*trade

kevin barrett. gentlemen, welcome to the program. let's start off with mr. shahabi uh, let's jump right in uh, mr. shahabi and give us your thoughts on the recent comments coming from the iranian president, president unice said that there will be a strong response to any possible bullying against tehran. thank you very much. of course, the situation in the middle east generally is very tense at this moment of time because of the israeli aggression on gaza, the killing, the maming, and of course it's extra territorial attacks on other countries, on syria, on some part of iraq sometimes, so all this has put israel in the lime light of of the crisis and it seems to me that the israelis believe that they can only survive in atmosphere of war, so as long as there is war they will survive, if there is peace they cannot survive peace situation, so they are. to hit and supported by america, but america also, america involvement in the region is destabilizing region, and as long as the americans extend their armed presence in the region and threaten to hit this and t

in fact, if they did what justice barrett just said, that would be fine, but they don't.hey have been setting policy for years, and they have upset well law, justified law, lecture voting rights, like for birthrates for children and all of that. they are awful. they're very opinionated and not with regard to law. there decisions are not justified by the law. host: that is jill in maryland. let's hear from kingsley in queens, new york, on our not sure line. caller: thank you for having me. i am of the opinion that the supreme court is a rogue court. some of the decisions they make go against common sense. for instance, medication for abortion, you know, planning the roadwork that it is not available, should not be available to women, and abortion, is ridiculous. i have not heard much about it, but i would love to hear about biden expanding the court. host: let's go back to the topic of hand, when it comes to the handling of cases concerning the former president. you are not sure. tell us why. caller: i think they're very political animals, very political people. i do not t

justice barrett wouldn't answer that barrett, but she was linked to a group that wanted to see this, and legally this is extreme. in public, it's what we call a fringe view. it's not some mainstream thing. ted rachel was reporting on this, this is who we are dealing with. take a look. >> she was a member of an organization, signed on to a document produced by an organization that does believe that in vitro fertilization is manslaughter and should be prosecuted as such, fertility. they want that outlawed too, they want you to go to jail for having fertility treatment. >> and in a solar am of time, it's -- some illegal experts say the nature of this civil ruling doesn't mean you can't prosecutor, but alabama wants to say they embryos are baby, they're human. if they're legally human, it comes with all those repercussions. >> the state legislature could decide to criminalize it. this is the point, and i think it's so important. amy cohen barrett we knew had some extreme views. the whole reason we have a process to make this decision is to determine how much in the mainstream, are they g

barrett comes on the court, it shifts. imagine without constitution loving justices. >> harris: a busy hour of breaking news. a couple things we'll be watching for, obviously as all the reaction on capitol hill to the announcement that the minority leader of the senate, leader of republicans is going to step down, mitch mcconnell, will stay on as senator and on the record under oath behind closed doors between the oversight committee in the house and the president's son hunter biden. all of it on fox news. stay glued. "america reports" now. >> i stand before you today, mr. president, and my colleagues

. >> justice barrett: what's the due process right? does the candidate have a due process right? what's the liberty interest? >> i think it's not very precisely defined in the case law, but i think there is a recognition that there is a liberty interest of a candidate and there is some due process interest and being able to access the ballot. >> justice barrett: i thought that was for voters. you think for the candidate, too, that it would be taking something away from the candidate? >> certainly, yes. i think a lot of times you see that in the first amendment context where candidates can have an issue about being on the ballot but it's a hybrid oftentimes first amendment, 14th amendment qualifications clause all discussed together. >> justice barrett: let me ask you a question follow up to justice alito. these decisions might be made in different ways different states. secretary of state makes in one state very little process or a process like colorado's could be followed by others. would our standard of review of the record vary depending on the procedure employed by the state?

speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. anon saturday, live coverage of a five hundred plus a group of pro-democracy antitrust conservatives and centrists serving as an alternative cpac. speakers include bill kristol, cassidy hutchinson, and former rnc chair and former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week live on the c-span networks, or c-span now, our free mobile video app. also head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand anytime. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. arguably because cabinet officials are often seen as carrying policies of the president so you are seeing more impeachments for presidents than for people that are part of his cabinet. >> how is he going to see this play out on capitol hill? what physically happens as a house moves the impeachment over to the senate? >> the physical movement of the impeachment articles of the senate which we are expecting to see in the last week of

thanks in part to the movie's breakout costar, aston barrett jr..'s bassist band leader right there there with his dad. how did he get cast to play his father when he never acted in his life in you have got to hears aston barrett jr.'s story. he's my guest on my brand new everyone talks to liz podcast episode. download it on amazon, apple, spotify, i harte radio, wherever you get your podcasts. >>> folks, we've got the closing bell 24 minutes away, and nvidia just won't stop. that's why we've got it on the lower right of your screen, up10 points -- 110 points or 167.33 -- 16.33%. making new record highs. and same with the dow, up 435 points. that too is a record. ♪ don't worry about a thing -- ♪ 'cuz every little thing's gonna be all right. ♪ singing don't worry, about a thing -- ♪ 'cuz every little thing's gonna be all right ♪ (marci) so, how long have you lived here? (opponent) over forty years. (marci) and how are the restaurants around here? are they good, bad, meh? what's the average household income? is there a mall? i don't know. a hair salon

i think elie is right, probably roberts and barrett were seen as the most gettable here. summer summary of ferments of the d.c. circuits -- or deny us day, the court could've denied a stay, allow the trial to move forward in the preliminary stages, and also heard arguments and render a decision to affirm that the trial could move forward in the summer. the court had other options. and i really do think that the justices on the left were struggling to find something, salvage something out of this over the last few weeks that would make it anything less than a disaster. but frankly, it appears that they have failed. and i cannot come up with any other justification for what the court has done here. delaying, delaying, over and over again, allowing trump to run out the clock. but only in cases that he wants the court to move slowly on. as you have said, when he's bumped off the ballot, he gets to the court the next month. when he raises a bogus immunity claim, he gets to push his trial back so many months, then it probably won't happen before the election. that is a disturbi

you have got to hear aston barrett jr.'s story.e talks to liz podcast episode. you can download it on apple, amazon, spotify, iheart radio, wherever you get your podcasts. it is an incredible story. [laughter] never acted in husband life are -- in his life and now he's the costar of a huge arely successful movie. >>> the dow down 91 points after having lost about 182. were coming right back. we're talking about the real problem behind the housing shortage. ♪ buffalo soldier ♪ jen x. jen y. and jen z. each planning their future through the chase mobile app. jen x is planning a summer in portugal with some help from j.p. morgan wealth plan. let's go whiskers. jen y is working with a banker to budget for her birthday. you only turn 30 once. and jen z? her credit's golden. hello new apartment. three jens getting ahead with chase. solutions that grow with you. one bank for now. for later. for life. chase. make more of what's yours. ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, but i manage it well ♪ ♪ jardiance! ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to t

speakers include supreme court justices sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. saturday, live coverage of a principles first group of anti-trump speakers serving as an alternative to cpac. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch this week, live on the c-span networks, or on c-span now our free mobile video app. head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand any time. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> a healthy democracy doesn't look like this. it looks like they sprayed where americans can see democracy at work. where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. get informed straight from the source on c-span. unfiltered, unbiased, word for word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are. to get the opinion that matters the most. your own. th i

and they must've had a fifth vote to come up that process so that most likely came from roberts or barrettboth. i doubt very highly that the liberals were in on it but what i will say is that we have talked about, dahlia was talking about colorado earlier, right? the liberals are going to allow trump back on the ballot and they got nothing for that. they traded away that for nothing because the deal, potentially, of letting trump the on the ballot but denying his immunity, that obviously did not happen. >> that seems to be up in smoke. i have to go back into the way back machine, to revisit the conversation we had, i don't remember when it was, two weeks ago. seven years ago in tv anchor time. you suggested that the supreme court may have had already decided to take up the immunity case, you suggested that they had sort of cleared their april calendar to take up a high- stakes case. can you talk a little bit more about what feels like a very prescient piece of analysis? >> is, i am saddened to learn that my educated guess was correct there. but what i noticed was that in december, shortly

it's a similar sentiment we heard from justice amy coney barrett >> right? well, i what they're referring to as the 1934 national firearms act and they're saying, well, you know, if it's a single trigger pole, you know, well, obviously bump stocks or only twenty-year-old technology, right? there's no way that congress in 1934 could have anticipated anything like that. so they're saying if there is a difference between the amount of effort that a user has to put into a device that makes it function like a machine gun versus the single trigger pull that was the standard at the time. was there any distinction can made and should there be now? and so that's really what dominated a lot of the talk today. but what's interesting is that ultimately this is not a second amendment argument. this is whether the atf exceeded its rulemaking authority. so while the second amendment argument kind of dominated today, and the features of the gun, could it be considered a machine gun? ultimately, that's not what this particular case is going to be decided on >> so if the just

first of all, the hypocrisy of him saying no to merrick gar land and pushing through amy coney barrett you knew the kavanaugh stuff would cause big problems for people like me and bill nelson because it turned into such a controversial thing for states that were not bright blue. >> senator blumenthal, you sort of sit at this full come of dealing with a lot of consequences of decisions that the court makes. what are your first thoughts today when you saw the announcement? >> my first thought was that no person in recent histories had had a more devastating malign effect on americans civil rights and liberties, whether it is gun violence or voting rights, or women's reproductive rights than mitch mcconnell. he has enabled far right capture of the supreme court. an not just of the nation's highest court, but all of the judiciary. one-third of all of the current judges sit on the judiciary by virtue of mitch mcconnell pushing them through. so it is not just the hypocrisy of holding merrick garland for nine months and then ramming amy coney barrett through this three weeks. it is a judiciar

think care most about the institutional integrity of the court are the chief justice and justice barrett. the chief justice shows he cares about perhaps his legacy but also institutional regularity of the court. justice barrett was a scholar in procedure in the federal court and i think cares very deeply about these issues. there has been a lot of procedural irregularity in the last several years in the court. you can't count on their commitment that way. they're the two members of the court on the conservative side that care the most making clear they're using their powers in an appropriate fashion. >> you agree with me despite all the attention just paid to colorado, that's a big case, i don't mean to minimize it, what you are discussing whether the supreme court enters a stay is li likely outcome determinative whether he gets a trial. >> it will determine whether this criminal trial happens before or after the election, absolutely right. >> thank you so much. appreciate your time and expertise. >> thank you. >>> checking in on your social media comments from the world of x. are there

i also in g barrett and a to symbol was taken away from them and therefore p t i candidates are running as independent. um. what is the pricing uh sofa is that the seat that bpi, in fact, independent candidates um are, are doing fairly well. and this selection, this is quite a surprising the size of that is actually shocked. how many people in buckets done? this was not what was not expected, but now the thing is a general perception among focused on these and also among a journalist that where they were, the results are focused on the state should accept those results except the mandate . i'll accept the will of the people in the opinion of the people here at the election commission office. we keep waiting for the final results. and that was dw reporter venus job head reporting from is lama bod. here's a look at some other stories making headlines. polish farmers have blocked the border crossings with ukraine to protest against you. policies. the demonstrators are taking off a month long nationwide strike. they are angry at cheap imports from neighboring ukraine, and government in acti

speakers include sonya sotomayor and amy coney barrett. on saturday, live coverage of principal first, a group of pro-democracy anti-trump conservatives and centrist serving as an alternative to cpac good speakers include bill kristol, former white house aide to mark meadows and former rnc had share in the former lieutenant governor of maryland. also on saturday, live coverage of the south carolina republican primary. watch next week, live on the c-span networks or on c-span now our free mobile video app. also, head over to c-span.org for scheduling information or to watch live or on-demand any time. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more. including cox. >> this syndrome is extremely rare. >> hi. >> but friends don't have to be. >> this is joe. >> when you are connected, you are not alone. >> cox supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy. >> next, vice pr

. >> and justice barrett? >> can w have a host of cannons, clear statement rules some are constitutional inspired. the last argument about whether chevron should be thought of as part of the package. she said chevron could be distinct that chevron was unique. can you address that? >> i thinkhe's right about that and it ss throughout in an island and that's aarof the reason to overrule it. ihink all the other cannons at could think of are fully consistent with the no vote statutory interpretation. i might be msing one. but the ones i think of when you're doing t construction, you take into account all of those canno. chevron is the only one i know that says in a certain point, you just stop thattuff and you sort of surrender even under circumstances w they would keep going. only chevron does th. >> one last qu. you said on our cket, we've had multiple cases in which they have come up. do you think that chevron is going to solvehat problem? in a lot of t cases, they have hung their hat on words like appropriate,

i'm sorry. >> she was the one who every connie barrett place. yeah. i'm sorry. what was what was the one? it was merrick garland's in the scalia using my justices who died at the end of obama. scalia died and they wanted to fill it >> anyway, what merrick garland >> merrick garland and he didn't get it. my, my point being, i apologize while jayson doing this all live here. my point being that mitch mcconnell really helped donald trump fill at least one, if not two, of those seats under circumstances, the democrats really hated democrats really hated. >> he also helped with kevin all too though when his, his nomination was on the brink, i mean, they helped hold it and make sure that that he did not withdraw his nomination and he obviously, in the moments where i've special coverage anyway, it's just remarkable to look at the big picture, what the day of that he's know i take your point. my point is and instead of disparaging mitch mcconnell, donald trump should be sending him a muffin mascot basket. >> and i don't even think he's commented on the fact that he's s

. >> and justice barrett? >> can we have a host of cannons, clear statement rules, so are constitutional inspired. the last argument about whether chro should be thought of as a part of the package. she said chevron coulde distinct that chevron was iq. can you address that? >> i think she's right about that and it sitshroughout in an island and that's a part of the reason to overrule it. i think all the other cannons that i could think o are fully conste with the no vot statutory interpretation. i might be missing o. but the ones i think of when you're doing the constctn, you take into account all of those cannons. evron is the only one i know that says in a certain point, you just stop that stuff a you sort of surrender even under circumstances wherehey would keep going. only chevron does that. >> one last question. you sd on our docket, we've had multiple cases in which they have come up. do you think that chevron is going to solve that prle in a lot of theases, they have heir hat on wds like prriate, you kn

i'm sorry >> she was the one who every 20 barrett replaced. yeah. yeah. i'm sorry. what was what was the one? it was merrick garland's and is scalia using my justices who died at the end of obama, scalia died and they wanted to fill it anyway, but merrick garland, when merrick garland did, he didn't get it. my my point being, i i'm doing this all live here. my point being that mitch mcconnell really helped donald trump fill at least one, if not two, of those seats under circumstances, the democrats really hated democrats really hated. >> he also helped with kevin all too though when his, his nomination was on the brink, i mean, they helped hold it and make sure that he did not withdraw his nomination and he obviously, in the moments we have special coverage anyway, it's just a remarkable to look at the big picture, what the day of that he's know i take your point. my point is and instead of disparaging mitch mcconnell, donald trump should be sending him a muffin mascot. >> and i don't even think he's commented on the fact that he's stepping down from republics i mea