>> why the heck don't iac interactive corp and its leader, chairman barry diller, get more respect?nk of it. here's a stock that's nearly doubled over the past year, including a 64 plus% gain just since the beginning of 2017. yet we hardly ever hear about the company, like iac doesn't exist. i'm changing that tonight. it's because iac is a confusing conglomerate of online businesses people don't understand. they don't know how iac is structured and can't keep track of what iac owns. tonight, i want to drill down and explain what it is iac actually does. when you take a closer look at your business you will finally get your head around how barry diller has been able to mic his stock word and specifically how much value he has created and in the future. let me lay out what this company actually does. it is an internet media company that owns 16 key brands and some includes multiple brands of their own. ask.com. dash, "the daily beast." f dictionary.com and match that also owns tinder. 500 million monthly users, 2.5 billion monthly page views. they have been around for decades, has had

there is concerned that these new billionaire givers, barry diller wants a park in the west village, a new park in the west village is coming along. the average citizens who want playgrounds out in east new york or something don't have the power. >> host: a fair amount of city money going into that. >> guest: exactly. the vividness in the area of education because you see a lot of school districts facing crunches with their financing because of state cuts or municipal level cuts and the billionaires stepped in and said we would be helping to help with financing your school district but we have a few conditions, more charters, more teacher accountability, other kinds of things these donors believe i needed to improve education. that is not how we think of democracy really working which is wealthy donors dictating how public systems work in order to keep those systems afloat. >> guest: another irony, between 2005, and 2014, you have 23,000 gifts of over $1 million to colleges, education, and the arts but you also point out the funding by some of these megarich to public information cam