but not barry goldwater.he ones that follow him in the 70s who basically come out of the nixon defeat should say the nixon resignation, they have a completely different although a lot of the same people, they have an entirely new organizing tactic. that's basically the take things people are angry about and use them as leverage to get them into the conservative coalition. it is very much a process. a lot of these issues are the 1960s social liberation issues. one of the guys said it's the achilles heel of the liberal democrats but he means gay rights, he means abortion, pornography, people in the grassroots in middle america really angry about the stuff. they don't really think of them as political issues. we are going to politicize them, we are going to organize a route them. it's a huge part of occult organizing discontent how they build a coalition that can basically do what goldwater failed to do but succeeded in 1980. >> now, people like me, i am a millennial socialist. a lot of us, people in the democra

barry goldwater, gives us some of the most colorful language that anyone has given us in criticizing richard nixon. >> let me offer a bonus president, bill clinton during the era of impeachment, obviously he was despised by his enemies during his presidency but once he was impeached, i think the senate democrats in particular, i wouldn't say they we want so far as to say they hated clinton for what he did but they certainly were disgusted by it. it's one of the those cases, not unlike our recent impeachments, that where the vote secret and were the vote, you know, less prescriptive by party, i think we would have gotten a much different vote in the end. this is our speed round, if you will. everybody has to answer this one but we don't have a lot of time. this is a question from david mond, which i'm going to reformulate. i love this question. in the final analysis, was it his person and style of governing or the policies that the president espoused that led them to be hated? we'll go in reverse chronological order, just to spin things up. so, nixon. >> really interesting question. i

butra there were certainly individuals who might be characterized as having hated nixon, barry goldwater gives us some of the most colorful language in criticizing richard nixon. >> let me offer if i may a bonus president. bill clinton during the era of impeachment. he was despised by his enemies, but once he was impeached, i think the senatet democrats in particular i won't say they went so far as to say they hated clinton for what he did but they were certainly disgusted by it and it is one of those cases not unlike our recent impeachments that were the votes secret, and were the vote less g prescribedy party, i think we would have gotten a much different vote in the end. let mee throw this one -- this s our speed round if you will. everybody has to answer this one but we don't have a lot of time. this is a question i'm'm going reformna late from david. in the final analysis, was it primarily the person and his style of governing or the policieses that the president espoused that led them to be so hated? we'll gopi in reverse chronological order to spin things up. so nixon. >> really i

barry goldwater gives us some of the most colorful language that anyone has given us and criticizingxon. >> let me offer if i may a bonus president bill clinton during the era of impeachment obviously he was justified by his enemies throughout his presidency. once he was impeached i think the senate democrats in particular wouldn't say they would go so far to say they hated clinton for what he did there recently disgusted by it. it's one of those cases not unlike our recent impeachments are the votes secret and were devote less scripted by party i think we would've gotten a much different vote in the end. this is our speed round if you will. everyone is got to answer. that question comes in from david long i love this question. in the final analysis, right person and his style of governing or the policies the president ex-spouse that led them to be so hated? we will go in reverse chronological order to spin things up. so nixon? >> really the same question. in the interest of the speed round i'm going to say mostly it is the person. but i think the policies have been underemphasized a

by the time lyndon johnson is up for election, he is running against barry goldwater, a true conservative, and someone who is against the policies that progressives are interested in. african americans are terrified of this and they come out and vote for lyndon johnson by about 95%. he wins by 95% of the african american vote which is unprecedented. i want to read a vote that indicates the trouble for lyndon johnson. one of the things, he gets this incredible percentage of the black vote. there is a poll taken in 1965, a year after passage of the civil rights act, and this poll basically says, look, we don't regret the almost incredible support they gave lyndon johnson over barry over barry goldwater. there is a logical -- their hearts belong to john f. kennedy. black voters made a choice, a pragmatic choice to vote for lyndon johnson, but their hearts aren't in it. i want to correct myself, public in 1966. two years after the civil rights act. a year after the voting rights act supported and passed and signed by lyndon johnson, african americans still ask which of the last five president

and with the economic proposals as 1964 lyndon johnson's landslide was huge 61 percent to the barry goldwaterhnston came in with a democratic senators and the one for the house majority this entire shambles of capitol hill with more to come but it is unconstitutional and illegitimate. i will need to say so clearly. tell us what you think at steve hilton and share this message. now let's bring in our guest never let a crisis go to waste fox news contributor tammy bruce. let's start with one of the two fundamental objections the legitimacy question. it is so brazen that pushing through the radical agenda after the results they got in the election. >> while there is never mandate with the left that's why they pretend which is why your monologue put it perfectly how joe biden presented himself. they knew he would never get elected unless they gave him and what this confirms to us is that it's never about what the american people wanted if it was they would be governing like senator sinema she one out of millions of votes with 55000 against senator make sally she knows her state is divided and she

barry goldwater, for example, gives us some of the most colorful language anyone has given us in criticizing richard nixon. >> let me offer if i may a bonus of a president. bill clinton obviously he was despised by his enemies during his presidency, but once he was impeached i think the senate democrats in particular i wouldn't say they went so far as to say they hated clinton for what he did, but they certainly were disgusted by it. and i think it's one of those cases not unlike our recent impeachments that where the votes secret and were the vote, you know, less prescripted by party i think we would have gotten a much different vote. in the final analysis was it primarily the person and his style of governing or the policies that the president espoused that led them to be so hated? we'll go in reverse chronological order just to spin things up. so nixon. >> i'd say mostly it's the policy but the reason has been emphasized as the reason for most of the hatred over time. >> i think it's a combination of both, and for example, johnson commissioned this group to look into the -- the reasons fo

nixon backed barry goldwater very strongly. he traveled with them for months but the rest of the rip on people leaned more towards nelson rockefeller who emerged as counterpoint to goldwater. big state digs governor big spender progressive wing of the party. >> the interesting thing that i hadn't thought of romney. >> he was the governor of michigan and his father -- george romney was a person who never finished college and he was born in mexico but he was someone who wore his heart on his sleeve. he was a very passionate person and he was a scrapper. wind he was running for governor he would wave at the opposition parties and jump into the trade union meeting or at the democratic board. his poll names or explosives. he appealed to the evangelicals. but he had a very strong appeal. for a while romney was riding high. there were extraordinary files of research but he always wanted the nomination. iraqis say he famously or infamously came back from vietnam from a trip to vietnam and observed -- but he changed his view because whe

and he was a strong proponent of conservative politics, of barry goldwater, of phyllis valvely and is of his close friend ronald reagan. he was quite racist and is very pro-law and order, anti-hippie, right? and so he embodies this ideology in so many ways, and that's the john wayne that evangelicals over time really held up. in eric metaxas' words, we all know john wayne is the icon of american masculinity. that's just taken for granted and then we go from there. >> thanks. you those that the vietnam war was a, quote, a pivotal moment in the formation of an emerging evangelical identity. could you say a little bit about that? >> yeah. i -- that was one of the surprises. first was reading these popular books on evangelical masculinity the. i discovered a whole lot -- [inaudible] in the 2000s and the remarkable success of his book, of course it would, and and then there was a whole literature from the 19903s, some of the promise keepers movement, so i looked at some of the most popular books there and was able to, i just kept running up against many of these books opened with themes fr

his potential rivals the potential republican nominees for president in 1964 he talked about barry goldwater's name was being mentioned significantly. he talked about nelson rockefeller. he thought about rockefeller and he could not really understand what rockefeller was doing. about a year earlier rockefeller had left his wife tamir a yet much younger woman. i woman it was said in the press she stole from her husband. he had seemingly sacrificed everything for the woman he loved. because of the scandal that ensued because he was marrying the woman he loved. thinking about this and declared no man would ever love love more than politics. i think john tyler probably would have understood exactly the sediment john f. kennedy mentioned at that time. i appreciate your attention today. if you have not bought my book , this is the title of the book, this is the cover of the book. and before i go i just wanted to make sure i give you an indication of coming attractions. my wife and i have a book a biography of under contract with the university press of kansas and her manuscript is due is in october

after the 1964 election were barry goldwater lost badly to lyndon johnson, the republican party was kind of in a rebuilding soul-searching mode. they were very explicit. nixon's campaign advisors new, as michael said after the 1964 election it had already been happening. the trend in service african-americans were fleeing the republican party in droves. and republican strategists after 1964 new they had to make up for that lost support somewhere. latinos were the prime candidates. there long business idea that latinos are natural republicans as reagan famously said a couple decades later tina's are natural republicans i just don't know it yet. there'd also been this logic among mexican american republicans primarily that the democratic party had ignored them over the course of decades. so their theory was that latinos had built up a lot of loyalty to the democratic party ever since the new deal. because fdr was helping them find jobs. was helping them put more food on the table, money in their pockets. they developed according to mexican american republicans this blind loyalty to the dem

it elected m barry goldwater. it elected john mccain. she is perfectly in that kind of tradition. the big government socialists are desperate, and that's what s you're seeing, desperation which i think the rest of the country is beginning to react to. that's why you're getting these chants at football stadiums and at talladega. the average american is fed up with being browbeaten by a bunch of crazy left-wing radicals. >> sean: mr. speaker, always great to have you. thank you, sir.t- also developing tonightys flip-flop fauci acting as a full-fledged card carrying member of this new radical extreme democratic socialistle party. not even trying to hide it. he is not only to ruin christmas once again and suggesting maybe you can together with your friends and family after all. he's also trying to claim that covid isn't spreading at the southern border. okay. that's a lie. by the way, also coming to the defense of gavin newsom on vaccine mandates and thinks that you need to give up your freedoms and just let him make the decision for you. because he's telling americans that we needri

and in a state that has a history of republicans, anderson, like barry goldwater, john mccain, they don'ta of the state. anderson? >> kyung lah, appreciate it. thank you, kyung. thanks. >>> coming up next. a look at where this all may lead and more with "new york times" columnist and best-selling author tom friedman. we'll be right back. from the very first touch, pampers, the #1 pediatrician recommended brand, helps keep baby's skin drier and healthier. so every touch will protect like the first. pampers this is wealth. ♪ ♪ this is worth. that takes wealth. but this is worth. and that - that's actually worth more than you think. don't open that. wealth is important, and we can help you build it. but it's what you do with it, that makes life worth living. principal. for all it's worth. and there you have it- woah. wireless on the most reliable network nationwide. wow. -big deal! ...we get unlimited for just 30 bucks. sweet, i get that too and mine has 5g included. that's cool, but ours save us serious clam-aroonies. relax people, my wireless is crushing it. that's because you all have xfi

that was because you had some h really leaders in barry goldwater, sam non-, joe nichols.people like that. and you've got to have the cooperation of the pentagon on these projects because they're exceedingly complex. these agencies do more business with the department of defense that are for-profit companies . you can't imagine how hard these organizations are so the will is there. it's just going to take the pentagonand congress but it's going to take us from the outside and is going to take the news media , both putting people on the nature of the problem and getting people willing to show alittle courage and backbone but these bullets . >> go ahead. >> thank you. >> i think one of the things that we should be careful about is not to overstate china's capabilities and russia's capabilities. russia has a gdp the size of new york state's. vladimir putin is more of a nuisance than he is a threat. they have nuclear weapons but that makes him a bigger threat. it boggles my mind as to why we the world supports him the respect that usually is reserved for statesmen when he real

and in a state that has a history of republicans, anderson, like barry goldwater, john mccain, they don'telieve this is the dna of the state. >> anderson. >> kyung lah, appreciate it. thank you. thanks. >>> coming up next. a look at where this all may lead and more with "new york times" columnist and best-selling author tom friedman. we'll be right back. age-related macular degeneration may lead to severe vision loss, so the national eye institute did 20 years of clinical studies on a formula found in preservision. if it were my vision, i'd ask my doctor about preservision. it's the most studied eye vitamin brand. if it were my vision, i'd look into preservision preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the nei to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. i have amd, it is my vision, so my plan includes preservision. i always protect my voice. it's how i make my living. and you and i make a country with our voices. your vote is your voice. but more than ever, our freedom to vote is under attack. so please: call congress. tell them to pass

in this essay from 1964, in the wake of barry goldwater and the idea of the john birch society, he's writing about this. but he's often going back and writes about conspiracy in the 18 fifties. this is from a texas newspaper in the 18 fifties. the monarchs of europe and the popes of rome are at this very moment plotting our destruction and the extinction of our political and religious institutions. we had the best reasons for believing that corruption has found its way into our chamber, and that our executive head is tainted with catholicism. in the 18 fifties, there is a worldwide conspiracy that it is from the pope, and it has already accepted the presidency. there are many things that you can probably say about franklin pierce. but i don't think he was upon of the pope. right? also, communists. this is joe mccarthy speaking in the 19 fifties. how can we account for our present situation unless we believe that men in the government are concerning to deliver us disaster? this must be a product of a gray conspiracy on a scale that it dwarfs any previous venture in the history of man.

in this essay from 1964, in the wake of barry goldwater and the idea of the john birch society, he's writing about this, but he's osgoing back in history and writes about conspiracy in the 1850s, from a texas newspaper in the 1850s. it's a notorious fact that the monarchs of europe and the pope of rome are at this very moment plotting our destruction and threatening the extinction of our political, civil, and religious institutions. we have the best reasons for believing corruption that found its way to our executive chamber and our executive head is tainted with the infectious venom of catholicism. in the 1850s there is a worldwide conspiracy against the united states but it is from the pope and it is already infected the presidency. there are many things you could probably say about franklin pierce but i don't think he was a pawn of the pope. right? also communist. joe mccarthy in the 1950s, which is how can we account for our present situation unless we believe that men high in this government are concerting to deliver us to disaster? this must be a product of a great conspiracy o

in this essay from 1964 in the wake of barry goldwater and the idea of the john burke society, he's writing about this and he's going back in history and conspiracy in the 1850s and this is from a texas newspaper in the 1950s, it is a notorious fact that the monarchs of europe and the pope of rome are at this very moment plotting our destruction and threatening the extinction of our political, civil and religious institutions. we have the best reason for finding its way into the executive chamber and they're painted with the infectious venom of catholicism. in the 1850s there is a worldwide conspiracy against the united states and it is from the pope and it's already affected the presidency. there are things you can say about franklin pierce, but i don't think he was a pawn of the pope, right? also, this was joe mccarthy speaking in the 1950s. how can we account for our present situation unless we believe that men high in this government are delivering us from disaster. this might be a product as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man. the biggest in the history of man and