barry lynn, if you want to start a short answer. guest: i agree with part of what she says, but i don't agree that -- for example, if you walk into a store with a rainbow colored shirt, you don't feel miserable if someone says, by the way, we won't serve you. that is an insult to the very dignity of who you characterize yourself to be. nothing, by the way, prevents in the case of a baker or photographer -- prevents a person from having to serve the service of what they are providing. to put on the law, and i think this is even said and one of the cases, we don't agree with marriage equality. you can express your own sentiments, but you still have to serve the person involved. to me, that is an accommodation that is proper under the religious freedom restoration act. guest: we have 20 years of rfra can you give me one example where someone underwent that process and went to court and one? when a religious person said, we will not serve a prison because they are gay, and one? guest: i can tell you the religious freedom restoration act