two baselines go because the baseline was estimated with the 22. that is a whole other change. makes it a bit difficult to have an apples to apples comparison. but i can discuss some of the key components in the biggest in the want is epa rule. an ep able to has so far been proposed that would take effect with the 2027 model year. in our baseline, that is in its with have strengths. that is the normal procedure for a rule that has been proposed but not yet finalized. that would lead to -- lead to two main things for the budget. one main driving force that would shift both producers and consumers more heavily toward electric vehicles and that would affect the cost of the tax credits for electric vehicles and that would affect the excess tax for fuel. that is the biggest single piece. >> there was 150 something billion? what was the figure? >> there are lots of things going on on the tv side. we will see if john mcclellan might jump in as well. on the ev side, the other thing that happened is the treasure implementation of the ev tax credit was different than what they expected t

two baselines ago just because the baseline was estimated on the 22. that is a whole set of changes. apples too apples comparison. but i can discuss some of the key components. the biggest single one was the epa rule. it would take affect with the 2027 model year. an hour baseline, that is have strengths. it is our normal procedure for rule but not yet finalized. that would do two main things. trying to shift producers and consumers more heavily towards electric vehicles. the costs for electric vehicles. that would affect the excise tax elfor fuel. that is the biggest single piece i will keep going and then circle back to the figures in my head. on the ev side, the other thing that happens the ev tax credit was different what they had expectedha. some of the leasing provisions where the limitations, the tax credit applied in the legislation for an individual buying vehicle. in a way someone leads to that those limitations did not apply. it is a greater use of the eb tax credit. market development. the battery industry and the solar industry expanding m

the updated baseline now is 41 -- 4.1%. this affects not only how much the federal government spends to service the national debt, but it also ripples throughout the economy. can you seek to how increasing interest rates affect the economy writ large, particularly families and job creators? >> yes, i can. and you put your finger on it, families, higher interest rates make it more expensive for families to spend, do the things they want to do, and higher interest rates affect businesses that are looking to invest and create jobs. and both of those affect the economy and, therefore, the federal budget. >> and the inflationary pressure in the nation right now, with republicans winning back the majority, we were able to put a clamp on trillions and trillions of dollars that president biden enacted and was continuing to push. and that simply controls our monetary policy. and our monetary policy now under control than it has been in the last couple of years, we're seeing inflation, but prices are unfortunately here to stay becaus

because i'm, um, this question of baseline of service just to be clear, we provide the same baseline of service everywhere. what 311 does is just it's just a batch system. it's logistics. it's getting to that place. but if anyone calls and they need anything from our department, we're going to show up. rain, sleet, snow 24 hours a day. so i think that this is almost a misnomer. the way it's coming off. and so i think that we need to clarify that. the second thing, and given the amount of work we've done on public works workforce development, which we're going to get for get to the thing that we cannot forget is public works is the backbone of the city. we are the collaborator. so many things are essential and necessary, but because of that, it makes it very difficult sometimes to track things, particularly matrix. and so in this particular instance where i'm, i guess, and i think there needs to be maybe a different conversation, it is not necessarily about baseline, but what is our jurisdiction, what is the cbd's jurisdiction. and so when something goes into 311, all they're doing is

within the farm bill, you have baseline. governor polis knows about this. within the farm bill programs, the baseline is x basically defines the amount of money you can invest in a new farm bill. there are some who want to change the reference prices that are applied to certain commodities so when we do the plc program it would adjust the price farmers would get because commodity prices have increased since the last farm bill in 2018. if you do it for all the key commodities it will cost $20 billion over 10 years which means you have to find within the baseline $2 billion a year or $20 billion. the only place you can find that kind of cash without destroying a lot of programs is in the snap program. well, the deal was cut on snap during the debt ceiling and adjustments were made to the work requirements. the age limit was extended. certain populations were exempted. a deal was made. handshake did snap off the tape. the other alternative would be to take money from the inflation reduction act which is designed for conservation which basically is a fund and r

within the farm bill, you have baseline. governor polis knows about this. within the farm bill programs, the baseline is x basically defines the amount of money you can invest in a new farm bill. there are some who want to change the reference prices that are applied to certain commodities so when we do the plc program it would adjust the price farmers would get because commodity prices have increased since the last farm bill in 2018. if you do it for all the key commodities it will cost $20 billion over 10 years which means you have to find within the baseline $2 billion a year or $20 billion. the only place you can find that kind of cash without destroying a lot of programs is in the snap program. well, the deal was cut on snap during the debt ceiling and adjustments were made to the work requirements. the age limit was extended. certain populations were exempted. a deal was made. handshake did snap off the tape. the other alternative would be to take money from the inflation reduction act which is designed for conservation which basically is a fund and r

not just the base cut, baseline. mentioned navigating from here until may will not be an easy journey. at least that is our baseline, more of a midyear type of, kind of june timeframe. sonali: there is a lot of discussion about cuts and a question about the fed's own balance sheet and what it looks like, the impact on the markets. how much will the fed be able to take their gas off the quantitative easing cycle into the quantitative tightening before you would see a taper or tantrum, rather. -- rather? >> i'm not sure it would be considered quantitative tightening to reduce the amount. if you look at when the process began, they kind of ramped it up over the course of six months. there is, you know, the likely potential and possibility that they do the same thing on the downside. i think the fact that it was emphasized that they really have not had the discussion on qt yet, that they would be looking at the march meeting for a more fulsome overview of how it was impacting the market and whether or not it truly was ha

is again of originally by g etn well to baselines ago, just because the baseline was estimated was the 22, so there is also the changes so makes it will be difficult to apple to apple comparison but i can discuss some of the key components and the biggest single one. mr. schumer: mr. president, i'm glad the senate took the next step tonight towards passing the supplemental. the senate will convene tomorrow at noon. as i've said, i hope our republican colleagues can work with us to reach an agreement on amendments so that we can move this bill more quickly. if no agreement is reached under the rule, the next vote will be approximately 1:00 p.m. on sunday. i yield the floor. no, i don't yield the floor. i ask unanimous consent that the commission on health, education -- committee on health, education, labor and pensions be discharged from further consideration of s. 1147 and the senate proceed to its immediate consideration. the presiding officer: the clerk will report. the clerk: s. 1147, a bill to amend the child abuse prevention and treatment act and so forth. the presiding officer: i

now you have a baseline. now we have 3%. like i said i just want to be clear, is not the six or 7% but that doesn't mean the eight, 9% we have accumulated as gone away. jerome powell, his 1970 strategy is not working. not cutting interest rates, people can't buy homes. forget about it. it. his stop working. you are not pushing down labor. none of that stuff is going to work. tell me what you think. guest: thank you so much there is a lot there and i hope i do it justice. about credit card debt. i read a book called hamilton's blessing about national debt. one of the things i thought about with the history of debt is that our approach to debt is change. i think a lot has to do with credit cards in the 70's and 80's. before that, people would say for things. you couldn't buy a car or a refrigerator without saving first. credit cards has changed that. we don't take the need to save as seriously as we do. there are huge problems with affordability. wages have not grown enough to where people can save efficiently. and that has co

as we spoke earlier in terms of baselining early. it has been stated several times, when you know better you do better. one of the most important things we can do is baseline our members the moment they come in the military. that means before they start the military training. and, that allows us to follow them over time. i admit we have to find the right baselining tool, right now we use anam and it focuses on cognitive and that is appropriate but we can do more, we can do better and our goal is to, again, start early to continue to monitor. >> thank you. so, proud home of the kings special warfare center and school at fort liberty, research suggest high blast in training and combat and other military personnel and has a elevated risk of blast exposure related to brain injury. does it track with your research? >> absolutely. >> all three of you? >> good. okay. thank you. >> we certainly need to conduct more research we have to do a better job protecting our service members with what we know today. that lines up with, dr. williams, wi

use of the baseline that is the biden baseline.er. i don't usually care about that myself but even that is a wake-up call. they are arguing more of the same the 2021 bill works, you know the story. what is your response to them? >> a bunch of logical problems with if you create a problem effects are you going to take credit for fixing it? on the supply side they create the problem with regulations and then say let's spend lots of government money on infrastructure to fix the problem. and then let's take credit for even though the national debt is going to be way through the roof. so that it is a problem from the logic side. and then from the actual how do you do it how you get government growing? they are making the old arguments that more spending always works you spent on ships, but at the same time with the other hand you are doing lng constraint on all of the middle of the country that europe needs there's many problems of cutting off the exports from the u.s. europe needs it and it hurts them at a time when they need help beca

two baselines go because the baseline was estimated with the 22. that is a whole other change.pples to apples comparison. but i can discuss some of the key components in the biggest in the want is epa rule. an ep able to has so far been proposed that would take effect with the 2027 model year. in our baseline, that is in its with have strengths. that is the normal procedure for a rule that has been proposed but not yet finalized. that would lead to -- lead to two main things for the budget. one main driving force that would shift both producers and consumers more heavily toward electric vehicles and that would affect the cost of the tax credits for electric vehicles and that would affect the excess tax for fuel. that is the biggest single piece. >> there was 150 something billion? what was the figure? >> there are lots of things going on on the tv side. we will see if john mcclellan might jump in as well. on the ev side, the other thing that happened is the treasure implementation of the ev tax credit was different than what they expected them what was embodied in the original

we're not at 6% or 7% year over year but now you've got a baseline that. baseline, now we go 3%, 3%, 3%, instead of over three year talk about a 25% increase, weir going to be at about 40. i want to make sure we're clear. it's not 6% or 7%, but that doesn't mean the 8% we already accumulated goes away. jerome powell, his 1970's treasury hit ain't working. you're trying to drive down, all you're doing shirting the american people. not cutting interest rates. people can't buy homes. forget about it. what've you're doing it isn't working. you're not patients' bill of righting down labor. there's so many jobs available out there that people getting jobs. you've got an influx of immigrants. none of that stuff is going to work. tell me what you think. host: all right. guest: there's a lot there, i hope i do it justice and get to all of it. starting with the point about investment and credit card debt. i read a book "hamilton's blessing," a whole book about the national debt. other parls -- o'articles and books about it. one thing i thought about for the history

you saw the cbo baseline. that is the biden baseline. to almost 120% of gdp i don't even usually care about that but that is remarkable. you know the story. what is your response to them? >> a bunch of logic problems with it. if you create a problem, you fix it, will you take credit for fixing it? on the supply side they create the problem with regulations. well let's spend lots of government money on infrastructure to fix the problem. let's take credit for it even though the national debt is going to be way through the roof. so that's a problem from the logic side and actually how do you do it, how do you get government growing, they're making the old keynesian argument, more spending always works. you spend on chips, but at the same time with the other hand you're doing lng constraint on all the middle of the country that europe needs -- there are many problems with cutting off the lng exports from the u.s. europe needs it. it hurts them at a time they ned help because they're socialist and people around the world will be burning wood

guest: you are right, the cbo's coming out with the new baseline projection for the next 10 years tomorrow. the director previewed some of the numbers at a testimony last week before the house budget committee. one of the headlines that will be coming out about that is that the fiscal responsibility act help reduce the deficits relative to the previous baseline they came out with last summer. unfortunately, that's not going to totally tell the total picture. we are going to see potentially up to 300 billion dollars in higher deficits this year based on policies congress is considering right now that's not going to be incorporated into the cbo numbers coming out tomorrow. the johnson-schumer deal to increase spending above the fiscal responsibility levels that are signed into law, we've got the tax deal that just past the house recently and of course, the 118 billion dollars supplemental appropriations bill under consideration in the senate. that could extrapolate that over 10 years and that could add between one and $1.5 trillion that will not be incorporated in the cbo numbers. we also th

we're talking about prior 1948, we're talking about when the bowful declaration was the kind of baseline so to speak, and he emphasized that you know this... project is a project that's just not limited to palestine, by their own admission, it's from the nile to the euphretes, every single one of the arabs has to see it as an existential issue because the idea is that they want to expand this beyond and expansionist, so if i can just quote one of shahit hassanna's quotes regarding palestine, um, he says in 1939, the blood that stained the land of palestine, the thousands of marters who sacrificed their lives for the sake of the highest islamic ideal, and the alaqsa mosk, the sanctity of which was violated. all of these call upon you, oh muslim brother and sister, sacrifice for the sake of god, the soul and money he gave you, so that you may be worthy of the name of islam. essentially, so this is no difference calling today, what the islamic republic is calling for, what other movements calling for, and how relevant it is today in 2024, that we see the exact same or even worse oppression

and might baseline optimism about the economy i expect places to migrate a little higher i don't know if you've noticed they have been very low. the big surprise here is how significant the pickup and oil production. they are producing 13 million barrels a day that's as substantive pickup from a year or two ago. that is more than offset off oil production by the saudi's and the russian oil exports because of the sanctions which was quite modest today. that kept the oil prices down. and i do expect oil prices to migrate higher here a little bit. i expect the economy should be fine. a good chinese economy should improve and continue to improve in 2024. if push comes to shove they will have more for production. tougher for u.s. producers to keep ramping it up because of the way they ramped it up it's not a sustainable run they're not investing to the same degree for obvious reasons. i do think prices will move higher from somewhere in the mid 70s to the mid- 80s. which means the cost of a gallon of regular unleaded is going to go from a low almost $2 which is where we were a few weeks ag

actually the future of met, that we, my opinion, belongs to the women of the loud guitars, aggressive baselines and guttural vocals. heavy metal is tough, music for tough guy is who head bang and drink beer. heavy metal is for real men. men who go at each other in the mosh pit. and the women, they have no place here. or tuesday. the metal scene has long since opened up and become more diverse. women now play important roles in the middle community. that's fans. and as musicians we went to germany's biggest heavy metal festival to take a closer look. in the 1st bucket, open air festival took place and 1990 with just 800 visitors and 6 pounds. what began as an idea to combat rural boredom, developed into one of the biggest metal festivals in the world, attracting more than $80000.00 visitors within just a few years. in 1991 band with a female lead singer took to the stage here acts and the band from cute came back again and again in the following years. a few years later they were joined by middle icon. the whole push who performed is locked in for the 1st time in 1993. yes, the learned that many

if we look at the evidence on the science, the - evidence on the science, the baseline of what wouldhormones. there's actually not of physiological difference in of people who are assigned mail at birth and assigned a female, so there are things that happened during puberty. a lot of these concerns actually aren't in the evidence itself within the empirical studies. ~ . , ., , studies. what exactly are these dru . s studies. what exactly are these drugs doing _ studies. what exactly are these drugs doing biologically - studies. what exactly are these drugs doing biologically to - studies. what exactly are these i drugs doing biologically to ensure, as you are saying, the milk is effectively the same?- as you are saying, the milk is effectively the same? what happens is the way that _ effectively the same? what happens is the way that breast _ effectively the same? what happens is the way that breast tissue - is the way that breast tissue develops over time is that the ability to produce milk actually happens during pregnancy. so, the protocol is used under the direction of medical ca

, increase teacher baseline pay to $40,000 per year. this represents a $15,000 increase for teacher pay during our administration. [applause] we are also recommending $6 million for career ladder. together, these programs have benefited tens of thousands of teachers in every corner across our state. we have also a made historic investments in missouri's higher education. we've increased higher education core funding by 24% and invested $1.2 billion in state of the art capital improvements and upgrades on our college campuses. and this year's budget we included another 3% core increase for our 4-year institutions and community colleges and $54 million for work force training program on our college campuses. ms. -- [applause] when i graduated high school, i went straight into the work force and joined the united states army. and for me, there was no turning back. my path is similar to many missourians'. as nearly 60% of our work force don't have college degrees. and that's okay, because we all know it doesn't take a college education to b

if and to baseline to go to baseline against estimated wasn't 2022. that's a whole set of changes. what makes it difficult in an apples-to-apples comparison, i can discuss some of the key components in some of the biggest is the epa rule. this is an epa rule that so far has been opposed that would take effect in the 2027 model year. in our baseline that's in at half strength. it's our normal procedure for robust than imposed. that would do two main things. one main driving force is this shifts producers and consumers more heavily and then that would affect the cost of the tax credits for electric vehicles and that would affect the exit tax for fuel. so that's the biggest, the biggest single piece. >> there were 150-somethings though he and? >> on the ev side there's lots of things going on. i'll keep going and circle back to this and i want to see if john cronin might want to jump in as well. rks six months sincee through lahaina and our country, maui. we continue to see the heart and resilience of our communities as we recover and remember the lives lost. as roifrp efforts continu

those are the behaviors we pick up and we are looking at a lift above the normal baseline. so these new films, cars, and products like temu, those are the things that we are seeing large lift above those baseline levels. something that is more ubiquitous you will see lower left, but those still are interesting numbers when you are trying to drive people into our product. ed: what you do not expect is to wake up and think about probiotic healthy sodas. it was so present. i want to use them as a case study because they ranked super high on the list but that must have been some expensive real estate for them to be so positioned. what does the data tell you about what they get out of it? how do we know that people flood to the shops thinking about drinking healthy soda? kevin: we had poppi number four on our rankings, huge lift above his normal levels of engagement. there ad talked about the benefits and differences between their soda and atypical sugary soda and it is a high price product. i did not realize until i saw that ad that it is a two dollar it can soda if you are buy

framework, a good baseline of what ai governance looks like.t is emerging technical standards, as i will always say. they are still nascent. but when it comes to putting in a governance program that manages, measures, and governs the risk of ai, carrying an impact assessment pre-deployment or presale so you understand the potential impacts on protected classes or algorithmic discrimination, being able to provide some baseline of notice to folks that would be impacted by these consequential decisions, i think there is a lot more agreement there around those basic building blocks then sometimes we give people credit for. adam: just a brief comment -- i've given away my claim that we need to break ai policy if we get anything done. but if we go high-level, some of the things evangelos spoke about, and endorsement from congress on the nist framework, great. i think everybody's behind that. i think the trickier thing is the one i already mentioned about national framework and what are we going to do about state and local activities. that is going to

uh, and then you see the baseline budget for fy 25 and 26. so currently we have 7 million, uh, approved with uh funded positions, 30 uh, 30.5. and then the point, the decimals there represent the specific funding amounts in the in the budget allocated. um, if you look at our org chart, you will see the 34 positions. however the, um, the way in which city's budgeting process works departments are required to keep a certain number of funds aside to account for attrition. so the understanding is that, you know, as a part of normal, um, attrition, employees may move to other departments or move out of the city, and there could be salary savings during those types of vacancies. so that's why you see the total position shows 34. but then the funded position shows 30.5, because we are accounting for that. um in the next few years, you'll see that the budget, the starting point, which is a baseline budget, goes down a little bit. um, in specifically, you will see that there are two positions. we are down by two positions. that's because, um, as a par

he passes under the basket, along the baseline. the ball goes out of bounds and charles saves it inbounds and now the sixers are going back the other way. but now he's face to face with mike tyson. and he stopped and shakes tyson's hand and talk to him. >> on the court? >> no, not on the court. but on the other end of the basket. >> he just enjoying himself. >> i'm a big boxing, fan gayle. >> oh, my god. >> you see? >> there are 2 other people do that. >> and there's a reason for that. when you just said he -- >> 56, in that game. >> lately, we've been seeing all these guys scoring, lucas, and -- joel embiid, 73 points, giannis, 64. devin booker, 62. carl anthony towns in, 62. what you guys make of these high scoring games? >> their lines down the 3 pointer, which used to be a punctuation, and now it's a strategy. a disappointed disproportionate -- are threes and the mid-range jumper you don't see as much anymore and defenses are different now. michael jordan's last game, the epic closing shot against utah, the final score in that

the agency expects these revenues to consistently exceed the baseline in the coming months. at the same time , income not related to the export of oil and gas has increased significantly. rub. federal income the budget in january increased quite impressively by 7.7% compared to last year. and here the main driver was the so-called non -oil and gas revenues, that is, related to non-resource taxes, for example, including such a fairly large-scale item as vat, where revenues increased by almost 40% year on year. total budget expenditures. january amounted to 2.7 trillion, which is 13% lower than the previous year. thus, taking into account high incomes, the budget deficit decreased more than five times, to 308 billion rubles, which is 2% of gdp. eat if this dynamic continues, then this year the budget, contrary to previous forecasts, may become surplus, experts believe. well, this week the russian ministry of finance is returning to purchasing foreign currency and gold under the fiscal rule. total. russia - traditional, modern, technological, original, open, great, so different

the stable part of inflation are already noticeable, they may proceed unevenly. but according to baselineecasts, tight monetary policy will lead to inflation of 4-4% by the end of this year. the second is the economy: last year gdp growth was 3.6%, which is significantly higher than our forecast. the main driver was domestic demand. investments have increased especially strongly, which is due to the structural transformation of the economy. current data indicates continued investment activity, but at a slower pace. consumer demand, supported by rising wages and lending, made a major contribution to economic growth. consumption grew at a high rate until the end of last year. there is no complete information for the beginning of the year yet, but our regional divisions note signs of a slowdown in consumer activity in january. differences in consumer, business activity, lending and inflation are discussed in detail in our report regional economy. strong gdp growth may also reflect a more significant recovery in the economy's potential. the need to switch in-house production stimulated invest

um, and, and as marie said, that annual allocation is added to das baseline. so when we lose the funding, the effect is cumulative. we think of it often in terms of this $3 million a year, but it when it gets added into that baseline, it is a much greater impact. so the loss of the dignity fund allocation in this current fiscal year isn't just the $3 million now. it's an actual loss of $39 million over multiple years. that would continue to support funds for services for older adults and adults with disabilities, along with the loss of the dignity fund when it was suspended in fiscal year 2122. if funding were to be lost next year, as well as in the following fiscal year, the total cumulative impact would be $123 million over the course of the dignity fund legislation, um, we will be meeting with the board of supervisors. hopefully with the mayor's budget office as well. and we just appreciate any support from the commission in this advocacy, um, to ensure that really the funds within the city are delivered equitably and that we don't lose the funding for serv

with that as the baseline, and you add politics on most of that.s cause stress. they lose sleep over it. it breaks up families. you're also at a new trauma because of the baseline distress that people go through. then you're not arming folks with the sort of evidence that there's a reason to hope for something different or better. even if it's not trump, it might be a president who is making foreign policy decisions right now that are against your ideals. so what is this -- where is the hope, where is the this can be better, where is the, if i take my energy out of what i'm doing right now, my own family and go out and protest or go out and rally, what i going to get from it in. >> what you're saying, and it's interesting because we don't have the solutions. rachel has been on the program before. i don't do solutions, right? i just talk about stuff. sometimes i do think that understanding something is a first step. there's a famous quote from dewey, a problem well stated is half solved. what you just did is remind us that the hopelessness and that

and it's raising that baseline expectation. it is for what's happening in the classroom. and we know that will meaningfully impact, uh, the students who we haven't served. and so yeah, it is i mean, it's ultimately, you know, our students spend 1000 hours in the classroom. it's how well those 1000 hours are being used. and what we're trying to do that i do feel, is building on what we learned from the school sites. but then that's different than we've done district wide, is to define clearly, like, what does that look like in terms of having good practice, where students are really engaged. and that's the key for me about it. going back to the core rubric, which gives us that common, uh, under it starts to build that common understanding of what kids are doing in the classroom that really leads to learning. and so even though i don't know that sanchez and muir are like, you know, the they're, um, using the core rubric to assess what's happening in the classroom, but they are looking at what their classroom practice and studying what's happening in the classroom. and that'

when you have baselines that are predicated in the idea of inherent differences and inequalities betweenhe races, no amount of inequality in society, no amount of accommodation of that inequality is seen as illegitimate and unconstitutional. we are challenged today to attack and address some of the ways in which science is using contemporary society to say there are inherent differences between races and therefore inequality is just there. that is a lot of what critical race theory is about, challenging these baselines, challenging other ways their institutions tell us stories that make us think that racial inequality is just there and its natural we can't do anything about it. a lot of times, it's based on specious ideas of science with the test of time. everything people thought about the 19th century, in the 19th century has turned out not to be true. much about what we think about inequality today and what's in -- and what makes it make sense in a century will be recognized as just not true from standardized tests to the idea that colorblindness treats people equally. that's an ideol