abolfaz bazargan, an international security researcher, on the line. hello, mr. bazargan.iteness and respect to you and the honorable guest of your program, mr. bazargan , we were just talking with mr. izadi. iran's reaction, you said that there were many things at that time, for example, israel. and the americans try to mediate and message they should at least dissuade iran from responding to the occupied territories from within its own territory, so that iran will react in a different way, but iran did exactly what they did not want . what do you think iran's response was? the reason is that for the first time since 1945 , a fake state now has a nuclear deterrent to a nuclear state actor that has nuclear weapons . there was a direct attack from a state actor, not from a foreign actor. this is an unprecedented incident in the science of international relations, the definition that we are saying is nuclear deterrence, which means that no government can attack a nuclear country. this event collapsed for the first time tonight. this is a big event. i directly attribute this

bazargan , you are still with us.did a lot of operations last night iran did it, but let's talk a little about what iran didn't do but could have done. iran limited its target to the air bases that were involved in the attack on the consular section of the iranian embassy in damascus, while when talking about iran's response scenarios. many options are being listed. now, mr. izadi, we are referring to the regional actors to the case of asab. and placing certain points of all these options in these two weeks in the international media and analysis , how do you interpret showing off these options but not using them, what is the message? for tel aviv rulers, as i said, last night's operation was a clear warning message before it was actually an attack. and that clear warning message was that we will reach the occupied land, our repairs will arrive, we can stop it and we have the will to do this , even you who have a superpower like america behind you, even you who have nuclear weapons, well this message when we have conf

bazargan , i bid you farewell, mr. doctor, new equation, small answer. the worst aggression against the islamic republic of iran will be met with harsh responses. you see, part of the consequences are in the rules of war, it is in the game of war, that in fact , the islamic republic has imposed its new rules on the opposite side, which means both the zionist regime and the western parties, with the action it took in the sadaq promise. this new rule is when that these are rajsakhani. we will respond, we will hit iran , what will we do? inside iran or outside iran, every action will not take 12 days, but it is within seconds that certain buttons must be pressed, and the response will be many times greater, and this means a new rule, a new war equation. the fact that the zionist regime accepted this as a valid threat and that the american side also accepted it is the reason why the americans are sending a message that you allow someone from your allies outside of iran to carry out an israeli action in order to preserve its reputation. for the zionist regime

bazargan, stay with us, if you have a chance, i will ask another question. dr. mohammad has a point . i would like to add one very important point that is an indicator of deadlock in this regime, and that is that when the zionists declare, we want to actually operate alone. sadiq's answer is that on sunday morning, mr. biden returns from his vacation and talks with mr. netanyahu for 25 minutes and says, "you have no new measures." independence of voting and decision-making from the zionist regime has been taken and israel must implement collective policies as a protectorate. this is the most important issue that cannot be tolerated for mr. netanyahu, that is, for many extreme right-wing currents, and if this regime is supposed to be the center of the plan. abraham or plans to normalize relations, and the arab countries that are puppets of the second world war and british projects are put under the umbrella of this regime and supported by it, now it cannot defend itself first and decide for itself. take these conditions, in fact, baqranji for the factions the cur

bazargan, i bid you farewell , mr. doctor, the new equation of the answer. the smallest violation the islamic republic of iran will face tough answers. you see, part of the consequences are in the rules of war, it is in the game of war, that in fact, the islamic republic has imposed its new rules on the opposite side, which means both the zionist regime and the western parties, with the action it took in the sadiq promise . this is a new rule. when these are insulting that we will respond, we will hit iran, what will we do? is that certain buttons must be pressed and the answer will be multiple times. this means a new rule, a new equation. the war that the zionist regime accepted this as a valid threat and the american side also accepted it is the reason why the americans are sending a message that you allow one of your allies to take action against israel outside of iran. glory be to the zionist regime, but in fact, by establishing this new rule, the islamic republic has also managed the behavior of the enemy, and basically, the rules of war are for managin

bazargan a question . which one do you choose?s is the same picture as the beginning unscheduled.

bazargan on the line. let me start from the beginning of the war against gaza until just before the attack of the zionist regime, we had a comprehensive analysis that the zionist regime is trying to expand the war, but after the attack on the consular section of the iranian embassy in syria and now that it has been decided, the answer iran, zionist and american authorities are repeatedly trying to dissuade iran from reacting through the foreign ministers of other countries with iran. they are calling , what does this mediating and actions like this have to do with the very famous analysis that says israel is seeking to expand the war, if they are really ready to expand the war, then what are these behaviors? unfortunately , unfortunately, an analysis now mainly from a government official. israel seeks to incite iran to war and drag america's feet into war with iran if you do a little calculation of two or two to four strategic sciences and military sciences, geography sciences and cost-benefit calculations

bazargan, are you still with us? i have another one from you. we mentioned the half of operations last night , the things that iran did, but let's talk a little about what iran did not do, but could have done. iran is playing a role in damascus that when talking about iran's responsive scenarios , many options were listed. now, mr. eizdi, from mentioning regional actors to highlighting certain points, all these options have been discussed in the international media and analyzes in these two weeks. it has a message for the rulers of tel aviv . as i said, last night's operation was a clear and clear warning message before it was actually an attack, and that clear warning message was that we will reach the occupied land, our weapons will arrive. we can use iron bombs and we have the will to do this, even you who are backed by a superpower like america, even you who have nuclear weapons, so this message is timely. unused sour cream. our hypersonics are not used. as dr. eizdi said, we used a one-dimensional attack from the soil of the islamic republi

bazargan a question. as the most important point, which one do you choose, this is the same picture that you showed at the beginning of the program. among the palestinians, who were shocked by the missiles that came from iran and i don't know, he paid attention. one of them, or hussein , said that these are mostly sunnis. it was interesting. this is what you said, hussein, because we check the images that come here and we carefully check what is going on, for example, we said maybe we checked after the lebanese language, we checked it, no, at all, he says that i am hebron, yes, the point that is there, the place that is there, it was inside palestine, yes. the environments that are tied to the system of imam hussein (peace be upon him ) will find a bright future, and one of the reasons for the resistance of the palestinian people is the understanding of this issue, it is not a design anymore. for example, the previous scenario and the reaction. the people of palestine last night while watching the rockets

alireza bazargan , university professor, one of the most fundamental problems in waste management is the short-term contracts . short-term contracts of one or two years are not profitable for the private sector, which wants to make the necessary investments. the length of the contracts should be 10 20 may it be years for the private sector in the fields of investment and culture. be economical. mohammad ali abdoli, university professor. all stages of waste management from beginning to end should be left to the private sector. the performance of municipalities in monitoring waste management is not acceptable. municipalities should determine the criteria and leave the supervision to the fourth agent. saeed muradikia, expert in waste management , assigning the executive management process of waste to the private sector. it should be done by taking advantage of the successful experiences of other countries of the world and localizing it in our country based on social and cultural appropriateness. masoud ahmadi, director of the environment office of the municipalities organization. in the

abolfazl bazargan, a researcher. we will discuss international security at the beginning, but according to the routine of the world program today on the 18th of the war against gaza , we present to you the last pictures of this barricade and palestine, in the name of allah, the most merciful , the most merciful, the most merciful, the most merciful. come back , laura, or shabab, come back, laura kois, come back, laura kois, come back , laura kois, or dr. turkeba, khalis, hat ras, warkba , cairo, al-ada. peace be upon you. peace be upon you. peace be upon you and my soul, with ahedna . the straight path . israel by attacking the sector. the consular office of the iranian embassy in damascus and the assassination of the children of the head of the hamas movement have reached the end of the line. this is the analysis of the zionist hart newspaper about the situation in these days of the regime by zioniste hart, israel tried to destroy the chance of any ceasefire agreement in gaza with these two attacks . damascus was ta

bazargan is still my voice yes, we have at your service the analysis that we saw today. it wanted to show a new and different reaction after iran's attack. we made a fundamental mistake in understanding the situation and conditions, what do you think caused it? the zionists started questioning their attack on iran in syria. in my opinion , their speech and tone started right after the speech of the supreme leader in the day of eid became completely different from eid al-fitr to this , that is, his speech, which clearly declared an attack on censorship, which is an attack on iran's soil, is another beautiful position. it is completely official of the islamic republic of iran, that is, in fact, it became clear that this leadership pointed out an interesting point in the previous days, not saying that iran's interpretation of the attack on the consulate is that iran's territory has been attacked, of course its defense will be an aggressor it was exactly the same. it is exactly the same. you see , israel is not the first time that acts against our country are either terroris