and if we have to go down to the 420 that the active component would be directed toward under the bca, we have to know exactly where this structure and force lies to make the best structure we can. the requirements and the determinations, the inputs we used the first time seem to work pretty well. we'll remain flexible, but those are pretty much the tracks that we remain on. >> again, not to pre-judge anything, but the basic analysis, the basic metrics, the basic test you used the first time will continue? >> basically. but, again, you come to different conclusions as your numbers change. >> yeah. i'm not saying where that leads, i'm just saying the basic criteria and metric should be the same. is that fair to say? >> it's fair to say. it's also fair to say at that point should we make additions or deletions or whatever, that obviously would be part of the public record and we allow the people to make comment on it. >> okay. just the last question. the dsc clearly states that risks should not be taken in the capability to rapidly respond with ready forces but rather risks should only