-- would the lease agreement be amended once bcdc weighs in? >> it could be amended if it affects the economics. >> supervisor safai: would that come back to us again? >> it would come back to you again. [please stand by] >> supervisor tang: i just called the first ten cards, but i do have more after that, so if the first ten speakers could come up after that, that would be great. >> good afternoon. my name is robby dean, robert dean. i'm a former executive director of the civic center sailing center. i just wanted to come here and express to you further how important the center is to the san francisco. the sailing center has thousands of kids who come through the program. you know this, and that access to the beach is very important. i'm also an international race -- being able to adapt to the new marina plan is not -- the access up into the cove where the slips are proposed to be is the windward area where we train and do our racing, practicing for racing as well as the four or five events for the year that are major events for that racing. s

the board that in fact, beyond the board of supervisors, on the marina issue, it also has to go to bcdc, so it is not through with the regulatory process. so it may be several iterations before it comes back. >> director samaha: thank you, chair. yes, you know, what we approved was a maximum envelope with the expectation that as they went through the permit process with bcdc, that through the analysis there as well as weighing the two charters of the bcdc, which is bay conservation and development and other uses, that the size of the marina might change. so again, if those changes were material and affected other terms of the lease, we would also bring it back again at that point. >> president tsen: good. >> director moss: thank you. bob, i guess i sort of have whiplash on the clipper cove thing, because i understood a while back that that supervisor peskin and supervisor kim actually worked out an agreement between the actually effected parties, so it seemed like things were moving forward in a positive direction. so maybe you could explain why then the stoppage, just a little more inf

but bcdc is really the big one for us. the adf. ambulance deployment facility. there's been plenty of talk about that. determinelation and abatement -- determinelation and abatement has begun behind station nine that were filled with asbestos and some other things. but that has begun and dpw, bless their little hearts, has already pulled all the construction permits for adf. which is great and they're currently preparing the contract proposal to go out to bid. so that's great news. station 16, again, seeing president cleaveland a lot, we did a walk through a week or so ago on that. and we are meeting chief rivera and olivia and myself will be meeting with the contractor who is working on the station 16 project tomorrow and we will have further updates after that. station five, now comes time for the show and tell. [laughter] >> show and tell portion. you all have a photo of that that i brought for you. this was taken last week by chief rivera at station five. you can see they are doing the framing and you can see what a large building it is. the framing is going

we need to obtain a permit from bcdc brb, and we scheduled our second presentation to drb on june 11, so we are in middle of preparations for that presentation. but the project is still on track, there are no major issues with the project at this point. and pier 26, a temporary electrical work has been installed and one boat is able to moor at pier 26, and we are proceeding with security electrical and perimeter fencing which we anticipate to finish at end of june, beginning of july. and i will now turn it over to emergency -- to. [inaudible] >> david myers. >> -- to david myers, yeah. >> david myers, sfpuc, project manager. we are currently waiting for an air quality monitoring panel to arrive for pump station one so we can install that and do some subsequent control panel programming so we can close that project out. we have four new diesel engines to drive the sea water pumps at pump station one, which also happens to be fire department headquarters. so we hope to wrap that up in the -- roughly in the july time frame. pump station two is our other major sea w

these participants included staff from weta, the water emergency transit authority, bcdc, our own port staff, city planning, san francisco department of the environment, san francisco department of emergency management, the san francisco neighborhood empowerment network, and the city office of resilience and recovery. the resilience sub committee's work differed from that of the other sub committees because instead of undertaking an update of existing waterfront land use plan sections, the resilience sub committee was tasked with creating new policy recommendations on two subjects that the 1997 waterfront land use planned ahad touched on lightly or not at all. those were environmental sustainability and resilience. on the subject of the port's environment cal policies, the sub committee began its work with a plan of what the city and county are already doing to enhance and protect the environment. i'm sure you all are aware that the city is committed to making the city a leader in environmental sustainability. as a city department subject to those regulations and requirements, the port

it pretty dry and discuss what would occur if this were to be taken to -- well, when it does go to bcdc, i just went ahead and jotted down a few policies in their bay plan. i urge you to look at the rec lati ration policies, specifically policy number one. i think a number of the speakers here have spoken to that, as well. in terms of the impacts on the eel grass, i urge you to look at the sections on title marshes and title flats, specifically policy one in the bay plan. it says that filling, diking and dredging projects that would substantially harm title mars that includes the eel grass should be allowed for purposes that provide substantial public benefits and only if there is no feasible alternative. and finally, i would urge you to look at the policies in the bay plan regarding access. there's an entire section on public access, an entire section on appearance, design and scenic views. i don't think we've discussed how this would impact the views. thank you. >> supervisor tang: thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. alex lansburg with the san francisco construction industry wh