we also spoke to this woman who met beau, calyx and mr.enecker at an al-anon family for families coping with drug and alcohol abuse and asked us not to use her face or name. >> i think it was kind of hidden and they played it well. >> reporter: in that meeting she says calyx spoke first. >> she started crying, as soon as she tried to speak she started bawling there were no other words but my mom. >> reporter: she said mr. schenecker then took over. >> as he was speaking he didn't cry. he didn't sound depressed. he just sounded like he was there to tell a story. >> reporter: and what was that story? >> that his wife had a drug and alcohol problem and that they were there to talk about it and cope with it. >> reporter: that cry for help came just a few weeks ago. there is little to take comfort in this horrific case but perhaps one small solace is beau and calyx probably had no idea what their mother was planning. >> from what we understand of what occurred, we don't think the children ever saw it coming. she came up from behind and shot her

and it's my great pleasure to present beau. . >> this is called lesson. trying to pull yourself back along the words, trying to get close to what holds the flesh to them. so you talk over the words. you shout to the words and the words sometimes begin, just begin to drag you along like a bad leg, to carry you to a place where they can turn and knife-like skin you into other words and move you closer, try to kill you, keep you there or let you hear, however briefly, their deadly harmony. this is called markings and it's in two parts. one, the last is leveled. the eye witnesses are moved to a yard, a street. the road is made smooth. two, we have the ability to not regret, not one death and then exactly two even before another. and in this approximate silence we have felt that not regreting has spared us loneliness. called at the door. you did not tell me about these hours, how thick they were and wounded. i hear myself telling someone to punch me just to figure the order of my beliefs. someone else in my clothes who would view this and move on. explain agai

network, those who are opposed to giving every competitor equal access with the biggest broadband beau heemolingt, that's what this bede-bait is about. they're covering it as though the government is really trying to control the internet. not so. they are siding with the broadband barons against the thousands of companies who are out there, who have reinvented telecommunications and information delivery in our country and across the planet just in 14 years, after the bell system had 100 years to do so and had invented every single technology. they had invented them all but they had had no incentive to deploy those new technologies because they had a monopoly. that's what the debate is about. you vote for this amendment, to give control by the broadband barons over the internet once again, then you will see an inevitable decline in innovation , in investment, in the private sector, in the new products, the new technology, the new application, these new devices which are basically invented by hundreds and thousands of smaller companies in our country. that's the choice you have. the chai

maloney: the republicans are chipping away at the independence of this very important beau roe. we put it in the fed to have financial independence for regulation. they're putting it back urn the appropriation system and cutting it cramatically. dodd-frank did a lot of good things and one of them was to try to level the playing field with -- for the consumer with the creation of the consumer financial protection bureau. for far too long in our financial system and its products, any concerns about consumer protection came in a distant second, a third, or not at all. now, any american who opens a checking or savings account, anyone who takes out a student loan or mortgage, anyone who opens a credit card or takes out a payday loan will have a federal agency on their side to protect them. for the first time consumer protection authority will be housed in one place and the democrats funded it. the republicans are taking away that funding and that independence. this is a critically important amendment for the financial independence, security, and well being of the consumer in our coun

network, those who are opposed to giving every competitor equal access with the biggest broadband beaueemolingt, that's what this bede-bait is about. they're covering it as though the government is really trying to control the internet. not so. they are siding with the broadband barons against the thousands of companies who are out there, who have reinvented telecommunications and information delivery in our country and across the planet just in 14 years, after the bell system had 100 years to do so and had invented every single technology. they had invented them all but they had had no incentive to deploy those new technologies because they had a monopoly. that's what the debate is about. you vote for this amendment, to give control by the broadband barons over the internet once again, then you will see an inevitable decline in innovation , in investment, in the private sector, in the new products, the new technology, the new application, these new devices which are basically invented by hundreds and thousands of smaller companies in our country. that's the choice you have. the chair: