it's that behaviour that had the biggest economic impact before s.a.r.s., h1 n 1, that it wasn't the lives lost, but the behaviour that accompanied it that led to the economic shock. we need to, as a doctor, think about the people suffering. it's powerful if we can say, and not only is it the right thing to do. but if you care about the stability of the global economy, prepare better and we'll jump on this so it doesn't spread further. the recent data is if we do nothing, and don't speed up the response, 550 cases is responsible. we pulled in all the stots. what the u.s. d was fnts. they'll be focussed on building -- what the u.s. did was they'll be focus on building hospital beds. >> we worry that our response is not right. are we getting better? we seem to have a similar conversation. you understand the nuances of pan dem ics. are we better with s.a.r.s. and similar threats. >> a lot of things are better. we have better penalty for fundraising and treatment. what is not better is a coordinated response. we have one, but they need to find a way to get everything in place. ebola is a