behavior. so what is the harm? denial of the victim -- the delinquent believes that come even if other people are being hurt by his deviant behavior, they somehow deserve it. they were asking for it. fourth, condemnation of the contenders -- in this technique, the delinquent shifts technique from his own axe to those who disapprove of the acts, blaming them for the situation. and finally, the appeal to higher loyalty -- in this situation, the building would feels justified in ignoring the rules of society at large in order to meet the demands of a smaller social group to whom he feels loyal, friends or siblings, for example. the delinquent may recognize that society's rules are reasonable, but his higher lotis compel him to break the rules anyway -- is higher of loyalties compel him to break the rules anyway. i am not suggesting that college students hoochy are comparable to delinquent, stealing hubcaps and shoplifting the bbs at the shopping mall. but college cheaters use most of the same neut

, we do change -- we can change that behavior. i would like to put the call out to some of the more artsie types, the call for the better bike rack. i think if you go to denmark and all of the other countries in the netnetherland, they love design. that's why all of the fancy cars are so great from there, but they have yet to figure out bike racks. so let's get on them and beat them. i'm sure we have the creativity here in san francisco, and we'll be creating some sort of a bike-sharing system that will have them yearning for it. thank you so much. i look forward to doing more of this. >> thank you for the presentation. always great working with you. at the risk of being discuffing the parish picnic, i'm far more interested in the diversion and enforcement. i like to think that all of the positive reenforcement is totally worthwhile, and it is totally worthwhile for us to keep pursuing infrastructure changes, but the behavior has got to change. maybe we're focusing on a very small group that you mentioned, but they cause an awful

so i think that is a really strong behavioral

if he behavior you're using is prone to c aids, change your behavior. the next thing i know, one of the act-up groups says bush should change his behavior. you can't talk about it rationally. to go into a catholic mass in a beautiful cathedral in new rk in a cause of aids and they start condoms, it sets back the cause. wove got to care. we've got to continue everything we at the federal and local level. barbara, i think, is doing 5 superb job in destroying the myth about aids and all of us are in this fight together. all of us care. do not go to the extreme.

they also said, we are looking at wrongful behavior, not unlawful behavior.his includes things like the decency clause. it shows that the voters wanted this to be a broad provisions of that we could hold our elected officials to a higher standard, including being able to deal with situations like this where you have conduct that relates to $:@the duties of8n clearly, there's on the effectiveness -- bears on the effectiveness of that office where you have consequences that are going forward. they wanted to be able to capture that, and i think this language does. i think that our brief discusses the differences between wrongful behavior and unlawful behavior closely enough and what that signifies. i will not dwell on these elements. i will turn to the relationship test and talk about how that relationship test is satisfied here. >> may i interrupt? going back to the definition, in your hand out on the broad definition where you broke it down to inaction and the conflict klas, are you reading the charter to say that when you look at the concept klas, conduct in

behavior. why you choose that word? why that fought why that move? why is that important? this is fascinating stuff. there is no end to it. every year that i get older, i learn more about my age and other people of my age. until i cannot walk and talk and think, i intend to be doing this. [applause] >> what do you think that margaret sanger would say about the backsliding of women's health taxes and family planning? >> i don't know if you know the beginning of margaret sanger and the beginning of planned parenthood. she opened a clinic in brooklyn and what that clinic did was it taught women the rhythm method. it taught women when they were ovulating and when they were not. when it was said to have intercourse and when it was probable that they would get pregnant. the response was the comstock laws, which was to make any such teaching illegal. and margaret sanger was arrested simply for this. she was not passing out any contraception. she was teaching women about their own menstrual cycle and t

much less attractive behavior. nan'fussing her, and that hurt her feelings. child: uuh. hendrick: youngsters know from their own firsthand experiences that words can hurt and th their verbal behavior, be it name-calling, teasing, excluding another, affects how other people feel. teachers should discourage these kinds of hurtfulss, too. all children want to be tread fairly, but they don't always understand how to treat others the same way. how do you maintain fairness in your classroom? what do you say? what do you do? one way to teach fairness is to explain what a particular rule is to a child and how it applies to him as well as to others, emphasizing that his rights will be respected, too. for example, rather than simply saying, "there's no hitting," we can explain, "i won't let anyone hurt you, and i won't let you hurt anyone, either." we can also help children learn to respect others' personal privacy by insisting that children and teachers, too, have the child's permission before taking or handling a personal

is this normal adolescent developmental behavior? or is this a real problem that we need to address? justin, what are the consequences of all that we talked about? of the issues that are facing youth and young adults? what are the potential consequences to society? i would have to say to begin with the consequences -they could be fatal. it isn't just "i got in trouble" or "i got kicked off the tennis team" or something of that nature. to tie it back to what jonathan had mentioned, i was a captain of the tennis team. i was on the rotary. i had scholarships for leadership. i was in student council. and not only were those going to be consequences of my behavior but also the loss of family. i mean, i had been to seven programs by the time i was 19 years old and was homeless, living in downtown denver. well, when we come back we'll take a look further into the issues of youth and young adults. we'll be right back. [music playing] the prevention field has really changed in the last 20 years since samhsa has been in existence. we understan

their behavior today and tomorrow. but if you use, if you basically define lack of volitional control as past bad acts, then you're back in the realm of essentially punishing them a second time for their original act which by definition is a violation of the clauses. so part of the problem that i see is our inability to define a legal construct that we consider, if you think about it, not too deeply, as a factual concern, but the scientists say, well, i don't understand that as as a factual matter and i can't define or measure it, then the law is just sort of set free to use normative value-based considerations in making decisions about civil commitment. >> professor. >> i'm going to add, do this a little bit shorter, i think, which is let's start with a question to everybody in the audience. all right, so if you like chocolate cake, raise your left hand. if you do not like chocolate cake, raise your right hand. all people who like chocolate cake left hand, don't like chocolate cake right hand. all right, hands down. h

>> diet certainly plays a role in controlling and behavior. you know, i'm not that familiar with all of the different science associated with different dietary restrictions and other types of things. you can certainly reduce the instance of aggression in animal models by putting them on different diets. you can make them more likely to be aggressive, for example, by changing diets. i have a sister who is a nutritionist around the corner. she would kill me if i didn't tell you to eat right, you know. [laughter] >> that being said, i do believe that deficits in certain essential aminnow acids and other types of things can certainly increase people's impulsivity. they can increase people's chances of not -- of those types of things, yeah. >> and one final question and i'm going to rephrase it a little bit, but why is it that we treat people who have, say, traumatic brain injuries or other diagnosed mental illnesses in the criminal justice system rather than in the mental health system? [applause] >> so what i showed you today was to give you that

because that's not going to deal with the problem and not going to change the behavior. i think that's what we've learned to focus on is what can we do, what kind of intervention to create a strength-based approach to where we're providing rewards, also when someone is doing good and recognizing their progress, not just sanctioning them when in fact they relapse because relapse is a fact, and it's part and parcel to addiction recovery. >> george, let me ask you, marty raisesed the point that the reason that we need felony possibilities with drug possession offenses is that we need an incentive for people to choose treatment when they are charged with a crime. do you agree with them [ >> i don't. i understand where marty is coming from. i think we have to make sure when we're treating this as a misdemeanor we do have a tool to ensure that people who need treatment are going to be afforded the opportunity and are going to have treatment. i also agree with tal, not necessarily everybody that uses drugs is an addict, and not necessarily everybody who uses drugs needs to have

today we'll be talking about behavioral health issues among military families. joining us in our panel today are kathryn power, director, center for mental health services, substance abuse and mental health services administration, u.s. department of health and human services, rockville, md; captain joan hunter, director of psychological health, u.s. public health service, detailed with the national guard bureau, arlington, va; hector zayas, recovery coach and consultant, orlando, fl; dr. bradley karlin, national mental health director for psychotherapy and psychogeriatrics, office of mental health services, department of veterans affairs headquarters, washington, dc. kathryn, more than 2 million troops deployed to afghanistan and iraq. what are some of the behavioral health issues related to the returning vets that are there, the vets that are there, and the returning vets? i think all of us are paying great attention to the behavioral health issues of anyone who has been in combat. and, first of all, when we use the term "behavioral health," we generally are t

>> diet certainly plays a role in controlling and behavior. you know, i'm not that familiar with all of the different science associated with different dietary restrictions and other types of things. you can certainly reduce the instance of aggression in animal models by putting them on different diets. you can make them more likely to be aggressive, for example, by changing diets. i have a sister who is a nutritionist around the corner. she would kill me if i didn't tell you to eat right, you know. [laughter] >> that being said,

>> diet certainly plays a role in controlling and behavior. you know, i'm not that familiar with all of the different science associated with different dietary restrictions and other types of things. you can certainly reduce the you can certainly reduce the instance of aggression in

it is a very ugly behavior. how can you, in order to obtain four or five additional votes or to make a party more popular than the other, how can you give -- but when i say freedom -- allow me, sir. >> do you believe that homosexual people, are they born homosexual or do they become homosexual? what do you believe? >> translator: they become at the end of the day, they do become that way. i'm not seeking the root causes of it, though. you see, the problems that are facing humanity today are much deeper than whether a single lady goes skiing or not. there are many reforms yet to take place, many reforms, as of yet to be realized. in the united states, 50 million people live in poverty. is america a poor country? they're human beings, too. each one of them is a complete human being with many hopes and aspirations and dreams. throughout the world, 1.2 billion people live in utter poverty. dictatorships do exist. oppressions exist. denying human dignity exists, unfortunately. all of this must be reformed. humans mus

wrongful behavior that is not official misconduct? >> yes. chairperson hur: what would be an example of such a thing? >> i promised my husband i will be home, this time, by 7:00. i am not. that is personal misconduct. i have broken a promise to a family member. i do not think it is actionable at work, just to get the ball started. >> do you mean conduct that is unlawful that would not constitute official misconduct? is that what you mean? chairperson hur: what is conduct that would fall below the standard of decency that would not relate to the duties of a share of -- of sheriff? perhaps commissioner studley's example is a good one. >> breaking a promise to a friend or family member. it is not unlawful. if you want unlawful, you will have to search for another. >> perhaps misconduct that does not end up being unlawful if there is no criminal conviction. but it is something that was tasteless. >> there are all sorts of speech acts that might not be appropriate or tasteful or respectful, that are wrongful behavior but not official misconduct. >

if you look at the kind of distribution of behavior, right, if we think the people at the high end of the distribution have perfect control of their impulses and perfect control over acting on their preferences. i like chocolate cake but it gives me migraines. i try not to have it because it tends to trigger if. maybe i end up on the normal distribution on the higher end. at this end we have people who have complete lack of control over their impulses. what the law currently does it draws a bright line. it says normatively, as a matter of who we think we should hold responsible, only people who are at this end of the line are going to be held to not be responsible agents, people who we will not held hold accountable for their actions. we deal with that with the insanity defense. do i think that's perfect? no. do we want to shift the line a little bit further over on the normal curve as we understand that a great degree more people have difficulty controlling their impulses or controlling their behavior or being able to act in a manner that is consistent with a higher level desire to a

behavior. so what is the harm? denial of the victim -- the delinquent believes that come even if other people are being hurt by his deviant behavior, they somehow deserve it. they were asking for it. fourth, condemnation of the contenders -- in this technique, the delinquent shifts technique from his own axe to those who disapprove of the acts, blaming them for the situation. and finally, the appeal to higher loyalty -- in this situation, the building would feels justified in ignoring the rules of society at large in order to meet the demands of a smaller social group to whom he feels loyal, friends or siblings, for example. the delinquent may recognize that society's rules are reasonable, but his higher lotis compel him to break the rules anyway -- is higher of loyalties compel him to break the rules anyway. i am not suggesting that college students hoochy are comparable to delinquent, stealing hubcaps and shoplifting the bbs at the shopping mall. but college cheaters use most of the same neut