this is the final form in this series, 2630, major behested payments -- oh, yes, commissioner lee. >> so if the planning commissioner also sits on the red cross board, that's a financial interest, right, conflict of interest? >> the planning commission as a body in the red cross? >> if the planning commissioner also sits on the red cross board and the donation was made in the behalf to go to the red cross, so that -- >> ok, i understand. >> that would be a recusal in. >> the commissione commission sn both, would it trigger a recusal? >> a conflict of interest. >> or a conflict of interest. i don't know if that would constitute a financial interest but i'm not sure. >> i'll jump in. i think it would be relevant as to whether or not that person was paid by the red cross. they were serving and unpaid capacity, likely no financial interest. >> form 3630, this is, again, the final form in that series and that is applicable to the recipients of behested payments. the difference here in addition to the filer being the recipient in this case, is that the qualifying threshold is $100,000 or mo

unhappy with the statements from giuliani who says he was working with ukrainian officials at the behestment. here's giuliani's response. >> in fact, i'm a legitimate whistle-blower. i have uncovered corruption that this washington swamp has been covering up effectively for years. and his state department asked me to do this. if you're unhappy with me, i accomplished my mission. i have no idea if he is unhappy with me or not. i frankly don't care. i'm the president's lawyer. >> you heard giuliani say he is the real whistle-blower. he said it is impossible that the whistleblower is a hero and i'm not. and i will be the hero. these morons -- when this is over, i will be the hero. >> rudy giuliani's name is mentioned 31 times across the nine-page document. once a federal prosecutor and new york city mayor, a very different seeming giuliani is embedded deeply in this controversy, not just as the president's personal attorney but as the man who has met with ukrainian officials to among other things push for them to focus on the bidens. here is randi kaye with the story. >> in that july 25th p

unhappy with the statements from giuliani who says he was working with ukrainian officials at the beheste department. here's giuliani's response. >> in fact, i'm a legitimate whistleblower. i have uncovered corruption that this washington swamp has been covering up effectively for years. and his state department asked me to do this. if you're unhappy with me, i accomplished my mission. i have no idea if he is unhappy with me or not. i frankly don't care. i'm the president's lawyer. >> you heard giuliani say he is the real whistleblower. he said it is impossible that the whistleblower is a hero and i'm not. and i will be the hero. these morones -- when this is over, i will be the hero. >> rudy giuliani's name is mentioned 31 times across the nine-page document. once a federal prosecutor and new york city mayor, a very different seeming giuliani is embedded deeply in this controversy, not just as the president's personal attorney but as the man who has met with ukrainian officials to among other things push for them to focus on the bidens. here is randi kaye with the story. >> in that july

at whose behest? >> it was clear he was trying to get dirt on joe biden, his son hunter biden, the democrats, hillary clinton. he was trying to collect as much negative information as he possibly could. >> i assume that's at the president's behest. but he should testify to that. and as to the state department's involvement in all of that, we would like to know what's going on there. there's a lot more to be uncovered. that's why the house committees have to go forward. i think for us to contemplate that we have a president who actually would shake down the leader of another country for his own personal political gain using our money, taxpayer money, as leverage, is just totally beyond the pale. >> you're a member of the judiciary committee. what questions do you have for bill barr and his involvement or lack of involvement during all this? >> he seems to have been involved before he even found out what was going on. of course when the matter was brought to him by the dni, director of national intellig

immediately puts the marketability into the hands of a bureaucracy which typically will work at the behest of a mindset that is primarily status quo driven the big players don't like competition. so if colluding with the government regulators can keep innovation out of the marketplace, then of course that helps. >> host: you've written two books coming you can farm and your successful farm business. what you just told us doesn't sound like it is an easy day. >> guest: there are lots of workarounds. are we in a straitjacket whatever tierney in many ways, yes but we still have plenty of opportunities. so, rather than dwelling on the problems, these books are about dwelling on the opportunities coming into the opportunities are we can either find ways around whether it is to build a little commercial kitchen, collaborate with somebody that already had one, work with a processor that already licensed. more and more people around the country are creating direct farmer to consumer transactional models that are not in commerce. i can give you a glass of raw milk. that's great but i can't sell it

that immediately puts marketability into the hands of a bureaucracy which typically will work at the behest of a mind set that's primarily status quo driven. the marketplace, you know, the big players don't like competition and so if they can, you know, if colluding with the government regulators can keep innovation out of the marketplace, then, of course, that helps. >> you've written two books, you can farm and successful farm business, what you just told us that doesn't sound like an easy gigs? >> it's not an easy gig and there's lots of workarounds, do we live in a straight jacket tyranny, in many ways, yes, we still have plenty of -- of opportunities and rather than dwelling on the -- on the problems, these books are about dwelling on the opportunities and the opportunities are that -- that we can either, you know find ways around to build commercial kitchen. collaborate somebody who has one, work with process that's already licensed, you can elect to not comply and there are more and more people around the country who are creating direct farmer to consumer transactional models that ar

so rudy giuliani is out there, maybe at the behest of the state department.ce i kn-- as far as i know w no national security clearance. he is supposed to be doing the president's private business and he is talking to and we know this from the president, at the president's behest, to foreign governments. >> he seems to be doing that. he doesn't seem to be a lawyer or a fact finder, he seems to be on his own working somehow with the president, but i think this is a moment where secretary state hom bay opompeo needs to . >> are you expecting that to happen? >> i'm not sitting on the stove waiting, but we have a problem here. we have to protect the institutions of our country and the state department is one of them. >> it seems like he is playing the role of some sort of ambassador. he says this is why he was so involved in this. take a listen. >> why not work with the doj like we said before -- >> what did i tell you about the fbi. the turning them back. they even hired a lawyer in america. they even gave it to several u.s. attorneys. when i first got this i sai

the role of rudy giuliani who is inserting himself into this process probably at the president's behest, going outside of all the national security lanes, the state department and other national security officials. what about the inspector general himself, because in that case that's a really a rebuttal to the partisan charges about all of this because this is an independent figure, and the whistle-blower him or herself becomes very important. so there is a lot to learn and this is a political process. speaker pelosi was also judging the fact that her caucus which has been certainly the progressives moving toward impeachment based on everything that's happened, now you have more moderates and tougher districts moving for it as well. so there's a broader context, no limit, no boundaries. that's how donald trump has lived his life in business, his personal life, and it is how he's behaved as president and i think that's what has pushed the democrats here. >> clearly that op-ed yesterday by those seven freshman democrats that have the national security background that are in these dangerou

he was doing this at the behest of the state department. we will have more on the impeachment inquiry after headlines. the united nations-backed intetergovernmental l panel on climate change is warning the world must quickly cut greenhouse gas emissions or face catastrophic sea level rise that could threaten hundreds of millions of people. earlier today, the ipcc released a landmark study on how the climate crisis is impacting the world's oceans, from rising sea levels to collapsing marine life. ko barrett is the vice chair of the ipcc and head of research at the national oceanic and atmospheric administration. >> the consequences for nature and humanity are e sweeping and severe. this report highlights also the , ambitious,imely coordinated, and enduring action. what is at stake is the health of ecosystems, wildlife, and importantly, the world we leave for our children. amy: in news from the united nations general assembly, brazilian president jair bolsonaro is facing widespread condemnation after using u.n. address to defenend the defofor

i don't know if i believed it then, but i believe it now. >> we're acting at the behest of the state department and now seblts pompeo is being subpoenaed to testify -- >> he shouldn't. his staff didn't do a darn thing wrong. >> and kurt volker set up this meeting -- >> i assume the secretary knew and when i spoke to the secretary afterwards, he said he had some knowledge of it. >> minutes ago giuliani responded to the subpoena he was served today by the house intelligence committee saying, i have received a subpoena signed only by democrat chairs who have prejudged this case. it raises significant issues concerning legitimacy and constitutional and legal issues, including inter-allah, love the legal language there, and attorney/client privileges. it will be given appropriate consideration. excuse me, charlie, i never heard of a guy saying this subpoena has the wrong signature on it, a democrat's name on it. i thought the subpoena from a chair of an investigative committee, especially now that they're under an inquiry for impeachment, should be honored, not dismissed. >> yes, but expe

of staff mick mulvaney withheld 400000000 in military aid from the ukraine from ukraine at trump's behest from intelligence whistleblowers thwarted to attempting to collude with a foreign power for potential dirt on election opponent to a who's who of the administration as rogues gallery electroboy rudy giuliani and secretary of state mike palm pale this impeachment beecher's all all of the bell wastepaper political figures topics and places and has energized the democrats in the mainstream news media but you know all of this begs a very important question why did it take a threat to the election chances of joe biden to invigorate democratic party bosses to find the grounds to finally impeach president donald trump i guess putting immigrant children in cages instituting a ban on muslims at our borders or the dropping of bombs on civilians in syria and afghanistan just just aren't really considered impeachable offenses these days and what my friends.

they want to know more about, you know, giuliani is arguing that he thisll at the behest of the statetment. and so dememrats have been asking for an enormous cache of document from the sta department. they haven't gotten anything so far. so they took t next stehisp week. they now say that the secretary state has a wk to turn the documents over. let's see if the administration is more receptive to this tactic w than it has been in the past. grappling with the substance of the complaint. there' also the politics. acti dni joseph maguire testified before congress thursday to address questions t about whistle-blower complaint and why he and the white hse delayed handing it over.er. political battle lines were quickly drawn. the chairman of the house intelligence committee, adam schiff, laid out the democratic argument. >> the president of the united states has betra bd his oat office, betyed his oat to defend our national securit and betrayed his oath tour defend constitution for his personal political benefit. >> ranking repnglican devin >> the democrats' mania tocase. overturn the 2016

the backstop device has been put there by the european government at the behest of the dublin government to try and carve off northern ireland from the rest of the united kingdom my 3 certainly from the who the. lead information receive you know ireland but also in britain and also emanating from the union is that there will be some attempt to draw the heart of the border and in a sense to move to march towards a march some of the bricks and that we're going to remove some some of you know some of that political pressure will not work and the prime minister has said that a northern ireland backstop is not acceptable they do you have said a northern ireland backstop is not acceptable so it's just so it's that simple as this the very idea that brussels would seek to divide the united kingdom shows how little good well there is towards the united kingdom and northern ireland particular by the european union. and the the irish parents will be softened considerably but in a sense the there will be. we know unionists i think will retreat from their heart of position the johnson government migh

from ukraine at trump's behest from intelligence whistleblowers thwarted to attempting to collude with a foreign power for potential dirt on election opponent to a who's who of the administration's rogues gallery electroboy rudy giuliani and secretary of state my pompei.

at the company's behest, we divided executive, legislative and judicial power between the authority of the governor, the council and this new representative assembly made up of colonists living here in virginia. this elected assembly is now the voice of the people here. this assembly is also going to serve as a check on the power and a balance to the power of myself and my counsel. -- my council. is my believe that the citizens of virginia have certainly welcomed this method of establishing laws, grounded in english common law and click cleanse to two, including this newly formed representative assembly that will certainly continue to take and to the affairs of virginia for some time to come. -- to tend to the affairs of virginia for some time to come. today as we mark the first meeting of that general sla that took place on the same date is few years past, some would say that as near as may be, we have wrought virginia to the laudable form of justice and government that we all knew in england. i call upon my good friend and counselor, the man i pointed speaker for that first meeting o

i remember the old uk backstop was at the behest of the british government because originally it wasckstop for northern ireland. but theresa may said the whole of the uk had to be in it. now it seems possible that the dup faced with the prospect ofjeremy corbyn in government, might, it says here, that they are prepared to be flexible, but the dup are not known for their flexibility. they don't wa nt for their flexibility. they don't want northern ireland to be treated any differently from the rest of the country. the democratic unionist party don't want any difference of treatment at all, but we are very stuck. another attempt from the government tomorrow to try to trigger an election, likely to fail. that seems to be the case in the lot of the stories, reporting on the kind of noises as katherine says we are hearing from all sides. it is difficult to identify exactly what it is that is the truth behind this. how much of this is bluster, how much is a negotiating tactic and how much is a negotiating tactic and how much is a negotiating tactic and how much is simply made up. it is rea

from ukraine at trump's behest from intelligence whistleblowers thwarted to attempting to collude with a foreign power for potential bird on election opponent to a who's who of the administration's rogues gallery electroboy rudy giuliani and secretary of state mike pompei oh this impeachment beecher's all all of the bell waves behavior of political figures topics and places and as energize the democrats in the mainstream news media but you know all of this begs a very important question why did it take a threat to the election chances of joe biden to invigorate democratic party bosses to find the grounds to finally impeach president donald trump i guess you know putting immigrant children in cages instituting a ban on muslims at our borders or.

on monday. it, even though it was at the behest of the vote of mp5 on monday. light of day. their argument is that they do not want people to see this asa they do not want people to see this as a government prediction. they think things will not be as bad as this, but nonetheless, they've had to scope out the range of possible outcomes, and clearly this falls within the range, albeit at the more negative end of the spectrum. one other document we've received tonight is an exchange of letters between michael gove, the cabinet minister, the duchy of lancaster, in exchange he has had with dominic g reve, exchange he has had with dominic greve, the former conservative mp who was speaking in parliament the other night private communications of civil servants in downing street and elsewhere about the question of provoking parliament. the comments back that idea of the publication of these whatsapp messages and what have you. the government is saying tonight that this won't touch it will not publish them, it would be illegitimate to publish them and put them ina illeg

times they smeared me and then the fed opened up the regulations they just created new laws at the behest of jamie dimon to make it possible to shore more out of silver and that is to create counterfeit cells and they were bailed out that was another huge bailout of jamie dimon jamie dimon became a billionaire by nickel and dime in people to death and by getting a perpetual bailout and living above the law the law doesn't apply to him for 25 years and again i'm going to read the charges the department of justice is alleging that j.p. morgan was engaged and these are the charges i remember this is from may 2008 in august of 2016 so that's the whole obama era when obama insisted we must look forward we must not ever look back we must not charge any of these bankers eric holder his attorney general said he he was likes he couldn't sleep at night thinking that he might have to arrest some of these bankers his his guy lenny brauer with said that each of the 3 j.p. morgan employees was hit with charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud affecting a financial institution bank for. commodities fr

particularly let's say for example when we had the minsk agreements that was largely done at the behest of russia ukraine france and germany they excluded for example the u.k. and the u.s. from those negotiations and from that process and a peace agreement or cease fire not perfect but one was able to be achieved and we've got a similar situation here where russia and ukraine together have got their differences put aside on this particular issue and have produced some progress which is sunny's producing humanitarian progress i suspect both sides will use this as. a negotiation point they will pretend that they are going to make further concessions but i think both sides particular with the new ukraine process president after he's got a election commitment to this want to put the ukraine situation to bed and resolve it one way or another of course that isn't necessarily what many countries in the west want and some of the interest groups within those and we're talking about the u.s. for example where there are so many interest groups that want to stoke this conflict the arms industry and

from ukraine at trump's behest from intelligence whistleblowers thwarted to attempting to collude with a foreign power for potential dirt on election opponent to a who's who of the administration's rogues gallery electroboy rudy giuliani and secretary of state my pompei oh this impeachment beecher's all all of the bell waves behavior of political figures topics and places and as energize the democrats in the mainstream news media but you know all of this begs a very important question why did it take a threat to the election chances of joe biden to invigorate democratic party bosses to find the grounds to finally impeach president donald trump i guess you know putting immigrant children in cages instituting a ban on muslims at our borders or the dropping of bombs on civilians in syria in afghanistan just to start really considered impeachable offenses these days. and what my friends those that say about us now let's start watching the hawks. the. real that would. like you but i got. with. the. local i'm on the watching i robot and i'm tabitha lawless joining us to discuss the impeachme

possibilities if they decide this is unlawful the first could see parliament being recalled at the behest of the speaker. that is an argument made by one of the lawyers the other alternative that boris johnson might be relatively happy with, if this is an unlawful action but within power, if he decides to suspend for better reasons, less controversial motives, he has not ruled out the possibility he would suspend for the second time it could be that the court was unlawful and requests the prime minister himself that current date it is scheduled to return. that will make it difficult for the prime minister and lawmakers across for maniembers for his on party. check out the rulings on the piece on our website at cnbc.com >> a lot to parse through when that decision comes out in an hour's time. we'll speak to you when it does. >>> later mp hillary benn joins us i want to talk to you about the supreme court decision the prime minister has said he would not resign what should be the response of the government >> i think we have to weight for the judgement at half past 10:00 this morning this i

opportunity that might not come again for some 50 years however he did put this all at the at the behest of what happens after the election saying that he needed the mandate from israeli voters to make the most of the opportunity and that he was the man to do it not his political opponents nonetheless if this were to go through that remains a big if if it were to it would be an enormous upset of the current status quo the entire international community just about says that whatever happens in the occupied west bank must happen as part of a negotiated settlement any vestige of the hopes of a viable palestinian state with such a huge area unilaterally annexed by israel really would would die in the fires of that and that is the message that we're getting from the palestinian leadership we've heard from one and a shrug we see a member of the p.l.o. saying that this is done in coordination with trump and with erratic. any hopes of a peace plan barack at the secretary general of the p.l.o. saying that this would be burying of any hopes of peace between the palestinians and the israelis so it'

there is an extreme distraction play here, to try and conflate what biden did at obama's behest for transparent policy objectives, pushing back on corruption in a country with -- a country where the united states and its allies were providing millions of dollars of economic assistance and trying , to bolster this nascent democracy in ukraine. vice president biden made phone calls and took trips in support of that u.s. policy objective. it was transparent, it was stated openly, it was backed by our western partners and the imf. there was no secrecy about it. there was no hiding of the records and transcripts. it was all the basic work of diplomacy. to suggest that there is some equivalence between the president of the united states, this president, tromp, extorting a foreign leader to advance his partisan, personal interests and the vice president or president of the united states, in biden or obama, pursuing a policy that is open and transparent and backed by congress that was pursuant to our interests is , completely apples and oranges. host: before this past week, speaking about the book, i h

he sent a man acting at his behest to pressure the government to investigate joe biden. we already know that, and his son. so the question is how explicitly, perhaps, did he link this millions and millions of dollars in u.s. aide. this is something that is really without precedence. you can say he's openly solicited the campaign interfere ant in the 2020 election. >> how speckifically did he lin this much needed aide to russia for this investigation? certainly, scott, the ukranian president believed there was a link. that is what we are hearing from people who have spoken with him. >> and he's holding $250,000 to fight the russians. i do white collar criminal defense work, all right? >> right, it doesn't have to be. tell me a conversation, if you can imagine, where you're holding um $250,000. you bring up biden and his sornz in the company they want if exaggerated. you don't need to have a written agreement to have a conspiracy in criminal law in the u.s. all you have to do is, i got this 250 million. we want fight corruption. we want to be better. that little thing with

judge jeanine: you are acting at the behest of the state department.ow secretary pompeo is being called to testify. >> his staff didn't do a thing wrong. kurt volcker who is at ambassador levels. judge jeanine: and kurt volcker set up the meeting. he sets up the meeting and suddenly resigns. could he be the one leaking the information? >> i would seriously doubt it. i feel sorry for what's happening kurt. judge jeanine: why did he resign? >> i don't know, maybe they got angry he brought me in. judge jeanine: the leaks in the white house. >> a lot of them want to undermine the president of the united states. and they are from the obama days. judge jeanine: why can't the white house control the leaks. >> white houses haven't been able to control leaks. i had leaks when i was mayor. mayors -- weak people do it. we have an anonymous witch hunter -- we have an anonymous whistleblower who has no direct evidence, noing. it should be thrown out. it's all hearsay. i have that much direct evidence and they don't want to hear from me. they want to investigate how

biden is acting at the behest of the international community.leblower, i am a whistleblower -- excuse me, congressman, i am speaking now. i'm a whistleblower lawyer. it is routine for was a blue is to come forward with information to the second or third hand. shannon: it didn't used to be the policy -- >> then you have to assess the evidence but the notion that it is secondhand, that is a routine fact that was a lower activity. shannon: come back, more to discuss on the topic, thank you. a social media pass, that reporter's post cost him his job. trace gallagher is on the case next. odors in a flowery fog. but febreze air effects eliminates odors. with a 100% natural propellent. it leaves behind a pleasant scent you'll love. [ deep inhale] freshen up. don't cover up. febreze. stop dancing around the pain that keeps you up again, and again. advil pm silences pain, and you sleep the whole night. advil pm like very high triglycerides, can be tough. you diet. exercise. but if you're also taking fish oil supplements, you should know, they are not fda

moved the early that they knew was false to the fbi and the justice department officials and all the behest of hilary clinton and the democratic national committee. lou: yeah, the co funders of the dossier -- the christopher steele efforts in that fraudulent dossier. as you say, no accountability. we have financier bill browder and an activist going to the courts as is devin nunes. at least there's some life within some elements of the republican party that could be -- you could construe as defense of the president. in general, this president has simply to rely on his own devices to defend himself. i have never seen a circumstance where a president -- there's never been a president so besieged as this one who has accomplished as much as this one, whose party is mute. they are absolutely passive instead of standing strong for their party leader. >> yeah, you have this harassment of the president going on, at the house of representatives, and i think the impeachment portion is going to accelerate or intensify when they come back next week because the lunatic left unfortunately is taking contr

they had their offices for many years but they came across america at the behest of mark e. de la vega at which his friend established the lawyers and clarice was part of the new york 400. by now he was a wealthy man by 1902 when he married her he was earning about $40,000 a year. the only person in america earning more at that time was theodore roosevelt as president. he earned 50,000. so, she decided to she loved collier that he didn't love her so she was a great second for the point of view he wasn't after her money. he understood she held the handle as far as society was concerned. the only problem is that the society was chained thing. when men were changing, they wanted to become an. after two years of marriage where she had two children, she decided she was going to go off to paris and become a soprano. her three sisters lived there as well. one of them had been supported the artist as a moneymaker. that isn't very good for a marriage obviously. in 1904 he decided he was going to set up on his own. yes, bob collier was paying him 40,000 a year in those days was close