i believe system that impulse is itself by force it's not an innocent i believe system that at bulis is the women and go instead of them mentally unfit to take a charge of their own lives it's not an illusion believe system that my girl manages your money life to the point that you'll come up to scratch your head without it is just odd that it's not ok listen ok what are you going to say this is where it's very interesting abraham i mean i'll try to go back to the foreign policy of this because i think it is important but it was a brought up an interesting point how much in in your perception of the way least the western world looks at islam how much is that religion versus tradition because there's a lot of things will be said in the court on the tradition has been added on to it because i have very many muslim friends that say well peter that's not that's a tradition that's not in our holy book and on and on and on like driving a car or something like that it's certainly not in the code on how much of it how much is that western society in your in your opinion conflated the two tra

we believe it should be approved. amongst those approvals are made, the industry will move very quickly. the companies will move quickly to provide those opportunities to create the 340,000 new jobs that are estimated as a result of the handed oil sales coming from canada. >> hi, jack mccarry chen field. next week the national oil spill commission is going to come out with their finding the recommendations on the muck on the oil spill. almost certainly come one of their recommendations is going to be the creation of some kind of an independent, separate safe upon the answer but the nuclear energy has its intel. and you know, during their hearing, they made it clear that they don't think the transport sugar could go back because of the lobbying act dignity. what do you think about that kind of recommendation? do you support it? >> well, let me tell you where we've been. in the prepared text earlier, immediately following spill cover the industry put together the best known experts in the world and develop taskforces to

whether he will or not i believe depends on us. >> but you think he believes. >> i think he believesy have that shot, that there may be a wray back. exactly how, i don't know. what did f. scotts fitzgerald say, there are no second acts? >> rose: take a look at this. it's a remarkable story of one of the players in this draum, eliot spitzer's wife, qhuz whose dignity was rather remarkable. here it is. >> did you learn something about your wife that you didn't know in this-- as a result of this experience. >> i wish i hadn't needed to learn it but the learned that the depths of forgiveness are deeper than ourp effort to be powerful. >> rose: that says it all, doesn't it? >> it does. that's a very moving moment. a lot of people were very hostile towards silda at that moment. >> a lot of women said why didn't you let him-- >> that decision happened very much on the spur of the moment. and i give her a tremendous amount of credit. you know, -- marriages are complicated. marriages are personal. and they decided to stay together for very personal reasons but she's shown a lot of dignity, an

i believe that this year we will have a chance to do that. i mentioned tax reform. he has talked about the issue of tax reform and i believe that is a fertile ground for us to work together on. regulatory relief -- his peace in the "wall street journal" has him talking about that. we are going to enthusiastically pursued those things with the president. >> will you come back and talk with us again? >> you bet. thank you. >> david dreier was our guest. the republican majority came in saying they understood the elections did not give them a mandate. the tea party at mr. dreier talked about their goals. what are their impediment to achieving it? >> the big impediment is the senate for house republicans. they're going to run into a democratic-led senate that is not going to agree with them on the size or scope of spending cuts that have promised to the two-party folks. almost any major initiative house republicans have, they will have to find negotiating room with said that democrats to get anything done. piecemeal, you will see health- care proposals move forward. you

these myths are probably the left and right and we would like to believe them because to believe otherwise would suggest we have enemies to seek destruction on the marginalization and subjugation to read but we see transparently the unfashionable thing we have enemies in the islamic world in russia and communist china. they operate abroad and here in the united states, we know from aristotle and ron common sense everything is done for a purpose. the office in their interest. when we got real leverage planning to spend enormous pressure, materials and organize them for a purpose, then we know the statecraft is at work. we must understand who our enemies are and take the necessary steps to defend the united states or we will suffer the consequences. these consequences may be the end of the american way of life on the constitutional government with a very lives of the american people it would be easier to tell you all to listen to your ipod or facebook and watch 300 channels of cable tv i can't, that wouldn't be right. you are all too important for that. you have a responsibility to know bett

i believe in the mission. i believe -- i am a true believer. i think those images influence children. we have one here in the front row. some to serve as prosecutors first and then become criminal defense attorneys, but many of us want to defend the constitution and those rights from the very beginning, from jump. i think we do not just me to believe it in our hearts, we need to profess it publicly. i do believe, though, that jerry is right. it is not enough to talk about it amongst ourselves. it is a larger public dialogue that needs to happen in terms of the resources, the jury pool, and that means talking to people who identify more with victims. we now there are one in 100 people behind bars. that means one in 100 people knows somebody connected to the criminal justice system. that is a tremendous opportunity for us. that means there are people in every sector of society who identify with our cause. that is when people start to understand the import of the public defender. i know very well not mind me saying this, but for the last 20 years,

(applause) they believed and i believe that we can be better. those who died here, those who saved lives here, they help me believe. we may not be able to stop all evil in the world but i know that how we treat one another, that's entirely up to us. (applause) and i believe that for all our imperfections we are full of decency and goodness and that the forces that divide us are not as strong as those that unite us. (applause) that's what i believe. in part because that's what a child like christina taylor green believed. (applause) imagine for a moment here was a young girl who was just becoming aware of our democracy. just beginning to understand the obligations of citizenship. just starting to glimpse the fact that someday she, too might play a part in shaping her nation's future. she had been elected to her student council. she saw public service as something exciting and hopeful. she was off to meet her congresswoman, someone she was sure was good and important and might be a role model. she saw all this through the eyes of a child, undimmed

i believe the majority of the criminal offenders, given the opportunity -- but i also believe there are people who cannot be rehabilitated. i do not believe that the district attorney's office can do so without the help of the public defender's office. i consider this a wonderful opportunity. i really look forward to it going forward. in closing, i want to say, again, that i am taken aback by this awesome honor that has been given to me. i pledge to you that we will do everything that we can to make sure that i earned the right to be in this office. thank you so much. [applause] [applause] mayor newsom: to out treasurer, thank you. our

i believe we have the courage. i believe we have conviction. after all, we're not good at being last in anything. i believe in our hearts we are willing to make sacrifices if, if we understand where we are going and the shared sacrifice and there is a fairness factor applied. [applause] [applause] this is not sacrifice without payoff. this is sacrifice with a purpose. this is the kind of sacrifice i think my mother was talking about that will leave the world a better place with our having been here. it is a time of historic proportions when we as a people must ask ourselves who we collectively want to be and what separates us as a people. do we believe in every woman, man, and child for himselfs or believe that a rising tide floats all -- floats all boats? [applause] do we believe that we can be a mighty economic force? do we believe in the education of our children? do we believe in the social safety net for our most vulnerable citizens? that it should be a hand up instead of a hand out. [applause] it's going to be tough to finally address our

we do not believe it is consistent with proposition j. we urge you to not recommend this qualification. >> my name is vincent marsh, and i served in the landmarks part of the city. it is essential to have qualified people serve on the board. in my present capacity, i serve as the co-share of the presentation consortium. we believe that the candidate does not meet the qualifications of the historian pursuant to the secretary of interior's standards for qualifications. because in san francisco is a certified government, it is important that members of the board meet the specific criteria for the individual positions. we would recommend that you continue your search. there are many good candidates out there. thank you for your time. >> i am here to oppose the nomination. i served on the landmarks board. we were all political appointees. one reason prop j was passed was to give professionalism. we don't believe he has -- he would be a good at-large member. to be on the professional commission, we need to reconsider it. thank you. >> howard wo

will freeze its debts to china meanwhile twenty percent believe in a fragile alliance between the us and china while nobody thinks that china will ever own half of america's territory will be as have been the results so far if you think they're wrong why do you log on to our web site auntie dot com and have your say on the ashi. now media freedom in the european union is in decline that's the finding of an international organization defending the rights of journalists its annual review suggest that in some countries reporters are under pressure from their governments and are often forced to reveal their sources one such country in fear and fear cesky met some journalists in the baltic state. with professional persistence latvian t.v. reporter. interviews a local politician in twenty years as a journalist she has done hundreds but one of them got her in serious trouble an expose on a security breach in latvia state revenue body and it with police in her apartment was forced they opened the doors and went into my flat and then they showed that they had a security search they had a sear

i believe the majority of the criminal offenders, given the opportunity -- but i also believe there are people who cannot be rehabilitated. i do not believe that the district attorney's office can do so without the help of the public defender's office. i consider this a wonderful opportunity. i really look forward to it going forward. in closing, i want to say, again, that i am taken aback by this awesome honor that has been given to me. i pledge to you that we will do everything that we can to make sure that i earned the right to be in this office. thank you so much. [applause] [applause] mayor newsom: to out treasurer, thank you. our new acting police chief in san francisco will be serving in that capacity until the police commission will be quickly forwarding to the new mayor recommendations for a permanent selection. that process is, i assure you, already under way. thank you very much for being thank you very much for being with us. >> i work with the department of environment and we are recycling oil. thank you. we can go into a refinery and we can use it again. they do oil change

i believe the majority of the criminal offenders, given the opportunity -- but i also believe there areo cannot be rehabilitated. i do not believe that the district attorney's office can do so without the help of the public defender's office. i consider this a wonderful opportunity. i really look forward to it going forward.

my name is laurence fishburne and i believe... i believe... believe... i believe... believe... my name is liam neeson, and i believe that number should be zero. believe in zero. join the effort. visit unicefusa.org. >>> dense fog around the bay area, i think by the afternoon we are looking good hazy sunshine temperatures in the 60s. places like mountain view and morgan hill how much longer for fog coming up. >> thank you. dozens of businesses could be forced to relocate to make way for the america's cup yacht race in 2013. about 80 businesses are on the list of tenants on the port of san francisco that could be forced out seafood, wine companya local theatre, larry olsen's yacht team plans to build a racing village and may use other land on the northern waterfront. >>> officials in walnut creek considering new restrictions on businesses that serve alcohol late at night. the goal is to cut down on rowdiness downtown a 2004 law already requires new establishments to get a permit to serve alcohol and must obey cut off times and restrictions on live music but dozens of long standin

young, the first of all when you what we really believe, what we really believe is in this report. we have a lot of authority and documentation behind the recommendations and findings in here. so i actually would suggest a method of interpreting comments made by commissioners perhaps in an earlier time without this mission, you look at this as the definitive record of where we really stand and we are for offshore oil and development. we think it can be done safely we also specifically recommend moratoria and alaska. >> that means you want us to go forth? >> what you express that in your report? >> this commission believes we can go forward to drill in the offshore and sees, but it recommends a series of scientific analyses of coast guard search and rescue movement, of the range of activities that will have to be supplied either by government or the industry to ensure over the long-term it would be done safely. but we don't recommend that you specifically say that would not be a barrier to moving forward. >> it does say you're supporting arctic drilling in the report? >> yes, sir. y

we believe if should never hold you back. if should be managed with a plan that builds on what you already have. together we can create a personal safety net, a launching pad, for all those brilliant ifs in the middle of life. you can call on our expertise and get guarantees for the if in life. after all, we're metlife. >> doctor, how common is prostate cancer? >> prostate cancer is actually the most common silent killer in humans. there are estimated to be about 180,000 new cases diagnosed in coming year and 9 million people in the united states that have prostate cancer in various stages. >> does it correlate with age? >> yes, as you get older being even more serious? >> well, yes. the issue is that we cannot -- absolutely prostate cancer is relatively slow growing but sometimes it's very rapidly growing and we cannot always tell which of those -- the particular cancer's going to be. so if, in older men, if this is diagnosed and there's not a large amount of the cancer or it appears to be an early stage, then i'm sorry you

believe that everyone understands that we are not immune we are not we have no insurance against the emergence of new such while the right to risk is part all of a free economy but that right should be balanced by relevant responsible me the right troops are surprised that it is something that interpreter knows should have citizens should have them. no doubt scientists should have that right within reasonable limits of course we live with but. states cannot have their sort of right or the world as a whole the right to excessively written research because the present day realities in the many developed country has decided that they face the problems offshoring their budget deficits and despite all of their unwillingness to reduce to. a limited social situation is fraught with new economic and political crises for the work that by the way implies very indicative in that regard is the annual address by the president of the united states first to the nation as a matter really for the quick vote called the freeze five year freeze on budget expenditures this is a serious measure of the glo

who would tend to believe that there are some problems inside that order therefore i believe it is necessary for us to improve legislation retaining to the monitoring of the status of our judiciary system as. is being done and i cherish no illusions so that we'll be in position to do all of that within it one or two years but i'm glad we haven't been back on that path and i'm positive we'll be able to defeat corruption is the president mentioned soon start treaty how do you see so next stage of development to lobel c.e.o. nuclear free world and insist respect how do you ever low a relationship of your country. but i'm also glad. that we have completed this negotiation process will. start treaty to its logical conclusion almost finalized it when i come back from to horse some time later there will be a text of the already fide treaty on my table. i have had a word. very recently with the president obama and we agreed even how we can. carry out exchange of these documents but we should go further from here i believe and this was a very optimistic. yes my comment is the most recent history even

that's what i believe. [applause] but i do believe that we have no choice now but to try to focus on the american economy. >> we are having a session during this meeting with the prime minister of the scandinavian countries and if you look at our own and competitiveness the most socially inclusive countries also in terms of gender equality are the most competitive once. >> absolutely. >> this is a lesson in which every country should learn. it is inclusive as we say. >> it goes back to the point that you say that there are no externalities' and economics anymore. the most effective political philosophy when it comes to economics is communitarian as some, not necessarily right or left or the government has to do this, the private sector has to do that, but that we are all in this together and have to create an environment of shared benefits, shared opportunities, shared responsibilities and, in progress. if you have too much in the call the the id is going to limit your growth potential. you are absolutely r

that's why they believe in china. and someone the other day told me when president obama went to asia last year, he made a speech or a statement saying we are going to asia. now you and i know that it was done with sort of a standard campaign speech. and also it was something that was said to the europeans where they believed that europeans had felt neglected. but the ancients didn't fell neglected or they didn't know we left. when they say we returned a number of seemly people in china took this is a challenge. that we were coming back to confront them. which wasn't the intention at all. but this is how miss understandings can arise. >> charlie: is this an opportunity and can you accomplish this in a washington state visit where these two people hu jintao barack obama does it better so you can -- >> no you can't do it in a one day visit. when nixon went to china he went five days and he spent six hours a day talking. but what you can do and what we have done is to convey the intention and the seriousness of the inten

but we believe they are about the best that we can give you. first i will focus on the draft pro-forma review and public benefits analysis. again, our goal was to provide you, the decision makers and policy makers, with an informed an independent third party perspective. we're not relying on the developer's numbers but our own analysis. a second, we wanted to verify the economic feasibility of the project to assist us in our negotiations. we also wanted to quantify for all of you and for the board the greater public benefits than what could be achieved through application of existing ordinances and regulations. that is one of the prerequisites for economic agreement and california, that we're getting more than we could have gotten under other existing regulations. we also wanted to assess the risks resulting from altering the negotiated public benefits package or from changed market conditions. we want to provide you with some of the trade office, if you will. and finally we wanted to understand the projects impact for the city's long-term and

>> the kentucky's first test, i believe it's in our petition appendix on page 26. [papers shuffling] >> i'm sorry. it's -- their discussion starts on page 44a and carries over to 46a. the first question of their test is whether or not the officers acted in bad faith and attempt to purposely evade the warrant requirement. >> that didn't apply in this case. >> this that is correct. the second prong of the test is whether or not the actions of the respondent would have been foreseeable by the police officers before they knocked and announced their presence. the problem with the forseability -- >> why is that subjective? why wouldn't it equal both to a reasonable police officer similarly situated? >> well, justice ginsburg, it isn't directly subjective. however, police officer are trained to expect and foresee illegal activity so that they may carry out the duties of their job, and protecting the citizens. so under a foreseeability test, the reasonable officer won't always foresee the illegal activity, in response to his actions walking down the street or knocking on t

president obama about economics trade and human rights have already started most believe it will help clarify whether the countries are partners or rivals let's talk more about that joined by economist max wolf. from new york a very good evening cheering a lot of media focus on this visit of course is it do you think to redefine relations between the two countries what's riding on it. well these visits have a heavy public relations element in which the various leaders do what they think they need to do to stay popular stay relevant stay important with various don't mess to cooperate and general public constituencies but there certainly are a lot of major issues on the plate here from the chinese currency to american military activity in the in the asia pacific region to china the chinese unveiling rather maybe with poor timing a new stealth fighter and all kinds of economic tensions that have bubbled up with increasing intensity over the last ten to fifteen years you know one of the big bones of contention china officially keeping its currency low to make its products cheaper in the u

diffidently not and they believe that the major mistake in each. of the georgia. friends and they will use this word the george inference you are doing is they continue to call these countries or territories has occupied territories because in this case as soon as you use this definition of occupation you just throw out of this dialogue people who live there because they are not occupiers and they are not occupied and this is obvious for everybody as soon as you call these territories occupied territories you have nothing but to continue to speak about the us here in russia because of them there in washington or in the brussels or anywhere else if you will not lead georgia anywhere this is their deadlock and mr saakashvili personally is responsible for that they'd look there's a will not to speak about the previous tragedy in august two thousand and eight the hearing in straws when in paris the seventeenth of january yes the title of this hearing is still completely wrong this title is based on the previous resolutions of the parliamentary assembly of the council

they are pushing the lower end of that hai believe. commissioner caen: thank you for the information. president vietor: what did you see the current amount is? >> the target is not exact, but slightly less than 1 part per million. president vietor: thank you. commissioner caen: you will not believe me when i bring this up. but when we run off on our pursuit of bottled water, i recalled that was something that we could not do certain things. i thought it might be an interesting opportunity to go back and look at this with america's cup coming here. i thought it would be a good way of promoting san francisco as well as our water. >> as long as they are compostable. it doesn't affect the ethanol debate. president vietor: any other items? next item. >> the report of the general manager. >> i wanted to mention that we have been doing operational statistics for the last couple of months. there is the general knowledge about how the business is running and we sent a copy of that to you. we will be putting it up on the main web site. i wanted

i believe the majority of the

and i'm not saying i believe that.t chinese aggression against japan in the east china sea and their open assistance of the athenian nuclear program as well as sale of arms to the taliban in afghanistan to the chinese. they would suggest the chinese martial is the immense states in play the role the soviet union once played a sponsor of global resolution against the west. which brings us finally to russia and the degradation of strategic thinking during and after the cold war and in this age of nuclear weapons. we used to be guided by the principle that the central strategic objective of the united states is the prevention of direct attack upon the united states. that is simple and straightforward. for the past 50 years, we've been taught something different, that great power politics is beyond the grasp of ordinary policymakers or even generals. we must understand the balance power between nations such as the united states and russia, especially since we possess nuclear ballistic missiles, then america cannot seek sup

[applause] that is what i believe. but i do believe that we have no choice now but to try to focus on the american economy. >> we will have a session -- we are having a session during this meeting with the prime minister's of the countries and if you look at our own competitiveness report the most socially inclusive countries and also in terms of the gender equity are the most competitive ones. >> absolutely. >> this is a lesson which every country should learn. it is inclusive as we say. >> goes back to the point you say there are no externalities' and economics any more. the most effective political philosophy when it comes to economics is communitarian as some, not mrs. early right or left or the government has to do this, the private-sector has to do that but the sense that we are all in this together and have to create a retirement a share the benefits, shared opportunities, shared responsibilities and, in progress. if you have too much inequality it's going to limit your potential. you're absolutely right. with t

i believe that i do. i believe that my undergraduate degree in english with a history of elizabethan theater qualifies for that. and then it says plus one of the following. two years in experience of research, writing, teaching your interpretation or other demonstrable professional activity for an academic institution, agency, museum more so forth. -- museum for so forth. i believe that i have established my credentials in that area. under the language of the charter it says that under the secretary for with demonstrable experience in north american are bay area history, i believe that the decades i have been involved in the history of the city of san francisco is a demonstrable experience in bay area history. i was reading from section 4.135, qualification no. 3. supervisor campos: thank you. that was helpful. supervisors democrats supervisor alioto-pier: -- supervisors? supervisor alioto-pier: i wanted to ask the city attorney to approach. the question of the appropriateness of the seat seems to be the

therefore, we believe it was in on permit encroachment. vice president garcia: would usf have to pay for the privilege -- one wonders if there are other sources of revenue for dpw out there -- >> that is a question, commissioner, i cannot speak to that. >> thank you. is there any public comment on this item? please step forward. president goh: you can submit a card after you speak. >> after you speak. president goh: how many speakers? show of hands? >> somebody please step forward and speak? >> my name is jenny, and i am the next-door neighbor of richard rabbitt. there has been a lot said about the fact the fence has been there 50 years and why didn't somebody speak ups and art. -- speak up sooner. i think we have asked citizens to walk more. actually, i have never walked in that area until i started to be a tree hugger. that is why i think it is a board to look at the issue now.

in case you do all these or that and this is for for me this is a fair play and they believe that this is really important for our american friends to know for sure what will happen and kids they will continue to do will their strategic plan to missile defense system when the two presidents were just about to sign the treaty we were talking and we were talking about the future ratification we all talked about about the fact that it should have been ratified simultaneously by the two parliaments now the synchronicity is broken i mean the americans are already ratified the russians are still considering the ratification well well as far as i understand this have this bill because of these these amendments these resolutions that are attached to the treaty by the why do we need do they add self-esteem to you to your colleagues across the oceans what you are completely right the way the two presidents agreed or on the. british occasion was more aboard of the original the original format of the certification yes we are ready for the treaty in point and this is of the way both presidents pres