radical branch of the movement, they were taking the white house, they were directly criticizing beltonshe really hated that come the nastiness about her husband. but i think that there was just kind of a lot of women who were anti-suffrage, and what they said was we race the families and we run the household and that is vitally important, and if we insist on mucking around in the public sphere, the men's sphere, we not only feed our moral high ground by getting our hands dirty, but we somehow imply that our world is less important and not more. and we start to see echoes of that generations later against the e.r.a. and so i think she was raised in reconstruction era virginia and she was getting this cult of true women suffrage and i think there is something a little not nice about being out there. host: you've written two books about the suffrage movement. what are some takeaways from your research and from your books that people need to know and understand about that movement? guest: i think the essential thing, and i think this is true of all history, because what makes it turn the c

israel so we have the the plan that the united states is signed to as kind of alternative to china's belton road initiative which will involve kind of a big uh structure project you know going from india and then through uh the gulf states and into israel and then on into the mediterranean and then onto uh greece um this is this is the way they're thinking w this is fantastic you know we can we can make lot of money and this is obviously also the way netanyahu is thinking if you recall when netanyahu was uh stood before the um general assembly last september basically just few days before the 7th of october. and he pointed to map of the new middle east in which there was no room for palestine, um, that's what he was thinking about, he was thinking about, hey, this is fantastic, we're going to have this great infrastructure project, you linking israel to the to the wealthy gulf states and into the mediterranean, no room there for palestinians, but unfortunately, and this is why netanyahu thought, hey, i don't have to worry about the palestinians, he has the support of these arab states, all

i spoke to catherine belton who is the author of putin's people and asked her why this election is soportant to vladimir putin. he: knows he will win it and everybody will come up with the result he wants otherwise they will face punishment as well. on the other hand he is a lawyer and he likes to keep a veneer of legitimacy and he wants a good victory. he is expecting 80% of the vote to persuade everyone else in the elite that the nation is behind them. so any kind of glimpse of protest, anything that is happening that is outside of that victory parade for him kind of impinges a little on his authority which is why he has gone to such great lengths to eradicate the field of any opposition at all. other candidates are standing other candidates are standing against him. why do they make the effort to take part when they have no chance of succeeding? the? effort to take part when they have no chance of succeeding? they aren't really given — no chance of succeeding? they aren't really given a — no chance of succeeding? they aren't really given a choice. _ no chance of succeeding? they ar

i spoke to catherine belton, the author of putin's people, and asked why this election is so important result that he wants. otherwise they will face punishment as well. but on the other hand, he also he's a lawyer. he likes to keep a veneer of legitimacy and he wants a good victory. he's expecting 80% of the vote to persuade everyone else in the elite that the nation is behind him. so any kind of glimpse of protests, anything that's happening that's outside of that kind of victory parade for him kind of impinges a little on his authority, which is why he's gone to such great lengths to eradicate the field of any opposition at all. there are other candidates standing against him. why do they make the effort to take part when they have no chance of succeeding? it sounds to me like they're forced to. they're not really given a choice. you know, russia is a democracy in name only. it certainly doesn't exist. everyone in the lower house of parliament basically rubber stamps the kremlin's every decision. so you've got the communist party candidate, he already lost to putin last time round w

dollars of infrastructure projects in these 2 countries together because you know, this is part of the belton road, an issue. now there's also a lot of in the direct investments, whether it's, you know, exports or in ports for factories, whether they're new energy vehicles or whether they're logistical chains that are opening up in these parts of the world in southeast asia. this is hard to determine how big this figure is because it's growing so fast and it is really connecting these countries all along the way. so to put a figure on how much china has invested, or vice versa, how much as malaysian welcome investment is a really hard figure, but i would say that it is definitely growing day today. meanwhile, tie ones, foreign ministry has been left to red faced and having to issue a ruffling apology himself to the labor minister. during a discussion on the possible recruitment of indian migrants paid particular attention to the skin color. i'm not eating habits. the government expresses, sincere apologies. for the situation, it will earnestly review its actions and make needed improvements g

together to point out that when you bring all this together, i'm sure we will talk about the border, beltonon, all of these togethet doesn't look very good. rebeccah: i think it's really important that the republicans of the committee are tracking this concept that china is really a key part of how china things about technology, civil military fusion. that's why your bill goes in these different sectors. commercial or inter-commercial purposes. it's directly applicable to the military. that distinction between private and civil versus military is not there. rep. hern: i think it's important for people to understand what that means. in the united states we have a complete delineation by our constitution that our commander-in-chief is a civili delineation that our military is our military. we develop products and technology for military and for civilian use. china is different. they are one in the same. any time they develop something for civilians, it's with the military in mind. for military, maybe the civilians get to use it. but a perfect example of this is, there's a lot made about how d

. >> brian: belton road was developed and he was doing a deal with a company to up end america's influence dealt with private business people. does he not know they are directly affiliated with the federal government. rob walker says he met with him, there is a problem here. they want to bring this case to the public. get to something else, you are passionate about, israel. the person getting off the israeli train and pushing them, number one, giving them forms to sign before they get our weapons, number one. number two, pushing them to ceasefire. what do your sources tell you? >> mark: my source is right here, my brain. i want to say this, fact of matter is joe biden is throwing lifeline to hamas nazi terrorists, they are getting motivation out of them, they are prolonging this war because of him. the fact is joe biden paid for october 7. got that? he paid for october 7. iran was behind it, he paid for it. he is putting sanctions on israel, israeli citizens, including iron dome and going to china and russia at the un to sanction israel meanwhile, he lifts all sanctions on iran and iran ki

let's speak to catherine belton, the author of putin's people.andidates? yes, he knows he's auoin credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to _ credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to win — credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to win it, _ credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to win it, he _ credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to win it, he knows i credible candidates? yes, he knows he's going to win it, he knows that. he's going to win it, he knows that everyone is going to come up with the result but he wants, otherwise they will face punishment. but on they will face punishment. but on the other hand, he is a lawyer, he likes to keep a veneer of legitimacy, and he wants a good victory, he is expecting 80% of the vote, to persuade everyone else in the elite that the nation is behind him. so any kind of glimpse of protest, anything that's happening thatis protest, anything that's happening that is outside of that kind of victory parade for him kind of impinges a little on his authority, which is why he's

. >> the belton road initiative with infrastructure development. i would not dispute it.. i am pretty sure it's 10. >> yes, so is also fair to say since china is the economic within that region we are challenged in terms of our own national i in meeting the economic force with one that can compete with it. >> senator, i would agree with that but i would say having engaged extensively with her island friends of the last couple of the demand signal for u.s. engagement is probably as strong as i've ever seen in any region. certainly there economic engagements with china that ared we are not asking countries to choose. but it is clear to of our pacific island friends to have options. they hav a desire to part of the united states we are doing everything we can be quick so i agree with you they would like to have options. the problem is, we provide them no option in terms of economic trade agenda. there is no trade agenda of consequence with the pacific island countries. and, they therefore do not have an option for the economic vitality and well-being of their citizens they a

concern as a combat and commander for the region 22 of 31 countries in the region have signed onto the beltonad initiative. it is all investment and critical infrastructure were the big muddy projects are.ep water ports 5g, smart cities technology to spy on the with the state owned enterprises from the prc and use those military application is required it is in all of the critical infrastructure. >> thankre you. thank you both for being here today. general i have appreciated our discussions on the challenges of detectg, characterizing and tracking potential threats to our homeland. most americans are fully aware of the incident with the chinese north calm has other responsibilities as well especially with protecting the homeland from the more advanced threats that are out which includes ballistic and cruise missiles. why as is having that improve domain awareness detect and track and provide a clear threat picture of what is out there and to be able to discriminate what you are seeing. why is that so important to defending our >> it's important it gives us time. time to inform leaders. make a

radical branch of the movement, they were taking the white house, they were directly criticizing belton, she really hated that come the nastiness about her husband. but i think that there was just kind of a lot of women who were anti-suffrage, and what they said was we race the families and we run the household and that is vitally important, and if we insist on mucking around in the public sphere, the men's sphere, we not only feed our moral high ground by getting our hands dirty, but we somehow imply that our world is less important and not more. and we start to see echoes of that generations later against the e.r.a. and so i think she was raised in reconstruction era virginia and she was getting this cult of true women suffrage and i think there is something a little not nice about being out there. host: you've written two books about the suffrage movement. what are some takeaways from your research and from your books that people need to know and understand about that movement? guest: i think the essential thing, and i think this is true of all history, because what makes it turn the