. >> benghazi. >> benghazi. >> benghazi. >> benghazi!s basically 2016's wazaaaa! republicans put the claim black male of benghazi on hillary and wanted her to take responsibility. donald trump ordered to raid yemen which went sideways and led to the death of one of our navy seals. buck stops with trump, right? >> this is a mission that started before i got here. this is something they just, you know, they wanted to do. they came to see me, explained what they wanted to do, the generals, and they lost ryan. >> they lost him? dude, you're the commander-in-chief of the military, not the manager of a laundromat. you have to be presidential. f.d.r. didn't say december 7, 1941, a day which will live in infamy as a day those boat guys lost pearl harbor. ( laughter ) republicans, again, how is this your guy? how are you fine with yemen? no investigations, no hearing, no bumper stickers? yemen lends itself to bumper stickers. here's one. ye-men there's not going to be an investigation? ( laughter ) that's right off the dome. trump is everything c

is were not, such as the benghazi select committee. it was my hope that our investigation could be conducted properly. it's still my hope that this investigation should be conducted properly, but unfortunately the actions of the chair throw that very much in doubt. and i would be happy to respond to your questions. yes? >> two questions. one, what are the democrats' next step? are you planning to pull out of the investigation like you did in the benghazi query? and number two, did the chairman reveal any classified information by disclosures to the press today. >> we actually stayed on the benghazi select committee, though we knew from the outset that it was essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. and, of course, we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we're able to do a credible investigati

, she lied to the mother of a fallen hero of benghazi, not one, not one democrat elected official said this is a bridge too far. i can't support this candidate. not one. brought this up in discussing the communist party because that is where the communist party was effective in political warfare. everybody in lockstep. that is the way the left behaves today. political correctness is like a zipper with a lock over everybody's lips, you just don't say things, you don't say to a woman, you are a liar and a crook. a former first lady, former secretaries of state, you do it to a male but women are protected species. this baloney about being strong. strong women. elizabeth warren assassinating a decent human being, 40 years in public life, dedicated public servant, champion of civil rights, calling him a racist, a letter that was repudiated by caretta scott king, violating senate rules and when mitch mcconnell says you can't say that, they are silencing another woman. that cripples conservatives, cripples anybody opposing that nonsense. intellectual you look at it, it is ridiculous and laugh

the thing is this is the democrats benghazi. them a chance to get back at the republicans for all they did with benghazi hearings. the thing that troubles me is where were the democrats for the last two years when the russians computers allng over the place in america and they didn't do anything. it seems like a convenient time when they awaited to see what the results of the election would be. >> the leader of the democrats was at a politico breakfast. here is what she had to say about attorney general jeff sessions yesterday recusing himself and possible investigation. >> you have called for him to did -- to resign. let me just say we talked about a bunch of things and then we moved into the leadership of our country. we had the talk not only about the authority of the person's position that the moral and what we see as a very narrow recusal, i will recuse myself on the investigation and the election. there is a whole russian of personal, political, and financial connection of trump and his administration and his cams -- his c

you planning on pulling out of the investigation the way of the benghazi inquiry. the chair mending as -- did chairman devin nunes reveal any? we stayed on the benghazi select committee, though we knew from the outset that it is essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. we will have to analyze with the development means. i do think that if there is any chance remains for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we are able to a credible investigation and at the end of the day provide a report to the american people that if democrats and republicans on the same page. if you have a chairman who is interacting with the white house and sharing information in the white house and people around the white house or the subject of investigation and doing so before sharing up at the committee for is a profound doubt over whether that can be done credibly. >> to the chairman reveal any classified information? >> well, it certainly -- and c

not, such as the benghazi select committee. it was our hope that our investigation could be conducted properly. it's still my hope that this investigation should be conducted properly but unfortunately the actions of the chair throw that very much in doubt. and i'd be happy to respond to your questions. yes? >> reporter: two questions, one, what is the democrats' next step? are you planning on pulling out of this investigation the way that the benghazi inquiry, and two, did chairman nunes reveal any classified information by speaking to the press? >> we stayed on the benghazi select committee, though we knew from the outset that it was essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. and, of course, we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we're able to do a credible investigation, and at the

, and i have been part of investigations that were not such as the benghazi select committee. it was my hope that our investigation could be conducted properly. it's still my hope that this investigation should be conducted properly, but unfortunately the actions of the chair throw that very much in doubt. and i would be happy to respond to your questions. yes. >> what are the democrats' next step? are you planning on pulling out of this investigation the way that you did during the benghazi inquiry? and, two, did chairman nunes reveal any classified information today by disclosures to the press? >> well, on the first point, we actually stayed on the benghazi select committee, though we knew from the outset that it was essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. and, of course, we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we're able to do a

when they first aired the enter vau, they didn't get into any details about benghazi. now fast forward about a month during a debate with mitt romney while president obama was challenged on whether or not he had called the benghazi attack a terror attack from the very beginning. president said he did. romneigh said he did not. three days later, cbs came to the rescue and aired a previously unaired clip from their interview with the president where he said this. watch. >> you're right that this is not a situation that was exactly the same as what happened in egypt, and my suspicion is there are folks involved in this that were looking to target americans from the start. >> sean: didn't say it's a terror attack and appears to back up the president's claim he called the terrorism from day one even though he really didn't. why didn't cbs include that in the original reporting? then a few weeks later right before the 2012 election, cbs quietly posted an extended clip of the benghazi conversation on their web site. watch this. >> mr. president, this morning, you went out of

we cannot allow this to become another benghazi committee. if you think back to benghazi, the house intelligence committee did its own investigation. it was bipartisan. we reached a common conclusion. it was only the committee thereafter became a partisan exercise. i remember at at the beginning of the select committee thing quite publicly that the only way that committee could add value to the other eight investigations i have gone on before is if it was done in a strictly nonpartisan fashion. that is not what it was designed to do. at the end of the day if we end up with two reports we will have added no value and it exactly that happened. the same is true here. the only way our investigation will have credibility is if we can reach a common conclusion at the end of the day on the core issues. that ought to be our objective. if we get to the point at any time where i feel we can do that, where there are legitimate lines of investigation that have been walled off, then i will say so. it is my intention to do this in a nonpartisan way. as man

>> well, on the first one, we actually stayed on the benghazi select committee. though we knew from the outset that it was a, essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. of course we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation we need to do it as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we're able to do a credible investigation and at the end of the day provide a report to the american people that has democrats and republicans on the same page. but if you have a chairman who is interacting with e white house and sharing information with the white house when people around the white house are the subject of the investigation, and doing so before sharing it with the committee, it throws a profound doubt over whether that can be done credibly. >> did chairman nunes reveal classified information today? >> well it certainly inappropriate for us to be discuss i discussing people were the subject of

do we remember benghazi, operation fast and furious and leaks of classified medical on targeted terrorist and the internal revenue service targeting conservative and conservative groups. we know what the dems are. their conduct today entirely in keeping. but to watch a dozen republicans craven and awful as the left to attack attorney general sessions is unfathomable. even in these times that without question try our soulses. our quotation of the evening on the mob that the dems became under the head clown leadership. from wilpen. passion is the mob of a man that commits riot on their reason. what a spectacle the dems as they sought to bring down to the lowly lechl. we'll come right back. >> in the president's rousing speech he affirmed that his administration will always put america first. >> america must put its own citizen ises first, because only then can we truly make america great again. my job is not to represent the world. my job is to represent the united states of america. with the chairman of the house freedom caus. congressman mark meadows. (announcer) at boll and branch, we be

day after benghazi happened i acknowledged this was act of terrorism. he did not. talk the islamic state the jv team. this was barack obama. over the past few years no -- executed attack on our homeland directed from overseas. >> that is in the course of eight years. >> major lies. >> but course of eight weeks and i've not fact checked those. may be right on some of those. did he believe in conspiracy theories? that ted cruz's dad had something to do with jfk or president not born in the united states? did he believe -- >> i guess this is where -- i think what happens is republicans are willing to defend their guy. my guy. and democrats are defend their guy. >> hold on. whoa. no. i want to just go over what you said. republicans willing to defend their guy. down he's telling the truth or just defending him? >> combination. depends on what he's saying. i think on the wiretapping his word got ahead of him. i think there was surveillance and what he intended to say. >> that's what nunes said. didn't say surveillance of trump tower but of foreign agents that might have

i hate to get into benghazi again. we stayed on benghazi for four years. >> kennedy: there is an innate distrust of so many people in the intelligence communities in so many people that would be on such a committee. it's absolutely ridiculous and quite frankly it scares me that so many have this distrust. i don't think it's something to make light off. you're talking about national security secrets and people trying to undermine the president. >> greg: i think we need an independent investigation to find out if it is nun-ez or nun-yez. nunes gave the tweet cpr. we had just moved past that story. he had to come back and do it. it was two weeks old. >> eric: i called his office and the voice said congressmen nun-ez. leave it there. tune in tonight. "o'reilly factor" ." bill's one-on-one interview with congressman nunes. >> bob: don't want to miss that. >> eric: shifting the blame on the g.o.p. health care plan. the latest follow next ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ sfx: engine revving ♪ (silence) ♪ then you're a couple. think of all you'll sh

in benghazi our fprofessional staff didn't have access. they had too figure out who the interview. so i'm not going to tell you this one is easier. this is one of the biggest investigations that the hill has seen in my tenure here. >> just to add, the challenge is you go to a footnote and you to go back and get a document that supports that footnote. wae wa we have got to get our -- we have to know what the right questions are to ask. to do that you have to have the underlying documentdocuments. >>. [ inaudible question ] >> i knew you were going to ask that but i want to make sure intelligence community knows some have been very responsive. to do our jab ob we have to hav this. >> not every document an agency holds is the product of that agency. it is impossible from a legal standpoint for one agency to provide us another agency's document. the faster we can work through who has ownership rights the quick are we can ask for a particular document. >> will you seek to review white house visitor logs? >> we are not asking the house to play any role in our investigation. we don't plan

conducted properly with the house intelligence committee and apart of investigations as part of the benghazi select committee i still hope this be conducted properly but unfortunately the actions clef that endowed and i am happy to respond to questions. >> are looking to pull out of this investigation? did chairman nunes reveal the new formation? and so we knew from the outset is essentially would be a political instrument to teardown to have to analyze this developments means is there any chance remaining to with this investigation we need to do a. to provide a report to the american people that has democrats and republicans on the same page if you have a chairman interacting with the white house and doing so with the committee with a profound out if that can be done. >> did he reveal any classified information? >> one -- it certainly is an appropriate for us to be discussing this subject to any degree that can divulge that target so i am not prepared yet to say but is classified or unclassified but it is beyond regular to receive any in the evidence beyond the scope of the investigation wh

and i've been part of investigations that were not, such as the benghazi select committee. it was my hope that our investigation could be conducted properly. it is still my hope this investigation should be conducted properly, but unfortunately the actions of the chair throw that very much in doubt. i would be happy to respond to your questions. >> reporter: are you planning on pulling out of the investigation, chairman nunes feels any classified information. >> we stayed on the benghazi select committee, though we knew from the outset it was essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's number numbers. and of course we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we are able to do a credible investigation. at the end of the day, provide a report of the american people that has democrats and republicans on the same page. but if you have a chairman who

the day after benghazi happened, i acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism. that. i did not call the islamic state the j.v. team. this is barack obama. over the past eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully executed an attack on our homeland that was directed from overseas. >> so that's in the course of eight years. we're talking about in the course of -- >> these are pretty major lies though. >> this is in the course of eight weeks, and i have not fact checked those. you may be right on some of those. did he believe in conspiracy theories? did he believe that ted cruz's dad had something to do with jfk or that the president wasn't born in the united states? all of these conspiracy theories, did he believe that -- >> i guess this is where -- i think what happens is the republicans are willing to defend their guy, my guy, and democrats are willing to defend their guy. >> hold on, hold on. whoa, whoa, whoa. no, no, no. i want to just -- what you just said. you said the republicans are willing to defend their guy. >> yeah. >> do you believ

benghazi was a farce. there whople over needed military help, but our president wouldn't even allow our military to go over there. when i was in yugoslavia, we had backup force. but of course, president clinton said we could not even add a bullet to our rifle without his personal permission. wet: running out of time -- want to give commerce meant banks a chance to respond. guest: i'm fairly bipartisan in my blame of why the military is at the weakened state it is that today. apply the reasons i would bipartisan blame is because of the budget control act, the sequestration, the effects of that over the past seven years that have weakened the military. that was brought about by president obama, but democrats and republicans, that put us in the perilous state that we have been in and preventing funding from going to the military to build it back up and make it strong again. to your larger point, i'm not the commander in chief. i'm a number of congress. my role on the armed services committee is to debate an a

remember, benghazi was a partisan endeavor from the beginning. this in the senate at least has been largely bipartisan. >> senator chris murphy, thank you for your time tonight. >> thank you. >>> still ahead, a member of the house intelligence committee reacts to the breaking news on michael flynn. but first the latest twist on who it was that gave chairman nunes his secret surveillance information. two white house aides named and now implicated. that extraordinary story in just two minutes. >>> we continue to follow tonight's breaking news. "the wall street journal" reporting that former trump national security adviser michael flynn has offered to be interviewed by investigators probing possible ties between the trump campaign and russia in exchange for immunity from prosecution. much more on that shortly. >>> we turn now to one of those three ongoing investigations into trump and russia, the one in the house, which today descended even further into farce. you'll recall that last wednesday, the republican leading that investigation, house intell

trey gowdy led the effort to get a select committee on benghazi. i think americans can agree the russian interference is serious as any issue in congress. >> bill: adam schiff can go to the white house grounds and look at the same evidence. marie harf thank you. twenty minutes past the hour. >> shannon: the father of a teenage rape suspect arrested himself and the latest developments and the measures the town is take as the story unfolds in the national spotlight. plus. >> bill: this is that time of year and the turn of the south to get the violate wind and hail passing through and good size too and show you the damage left behind and who might be in the path next. ( ♪ ) upstate new york is a good place to pursue your dreams. at vicarious visions, i get to be creative, work with awesome people, and we get to make great games. ( ♪ ) what i like about the area, feels like everybody knows each other. and i can go to my local coffee shop and they know who i am. it's really cool. new york state is filled with bright minds like lisa's. to find the compan

remember, benghazi was a partisan endeavor from the beginning. this in the senate at least has been largely bipartisan. >> senator chris murphy, thank you for your time tonight. >> thank you. >>> still ahead, a member of the house intelligence committee reacts to the breaking news on michael flynn. but first the latest twist on who it was that gave chairman nunes his secret surveillance information. two white house aides named and now implicated. that extraordinary story in just two minutes. (vo) what if this didn't have to happen? i didn't see it. (vo) what if we could go back? what if our car... could stop itself? in iihs front-end crash prevention testing, nobody beats the subaru impreza. not toyota. not honda. not ford. the all-new subaru impreza. more than a car, it's a subaru. at crowne plaza we know business travel isn't just business. there's this. 'a bit of this. why not? your hotel should make it easy to do all the things you do. which is what we do. crowne plaza. we're all business, mostly. (singsong) budget meeting. sweet. if you comp

you realize i was an extremely harsh critic of hillary clinton over benghazi and the lies. you do any research. jesse: i did and i found you to be a trump hater and i think you should be ashamed of yourself for putting down this widow and saying the entire country is out of bounds for applauding this beautiful moment. everybody in america thought this was a beautiful moment except you. >> yeah, sure, whatever. you want to throw in with michael moore and bill, but the the rest of this country thought that was a powerful moment and it was about her. it was an about your political agenda. i will give you the last word. >> maybe if you had served he would have a better perspective. not having served, you don't. that's cool. god bless america. jesse: president trump with a call for unity this week. the democrats come completely unglued and left a powerful waters word is up next. waters word is up next. later, a sex offender scandal z282sz zwtz y282sy ywty jesse: welcome back. democrat identity crisis is the subject of tonight's waters world. president trump delivered a patriotic

, let me remind you, the last public investigation that we did was the senate investigation into benghazi. we devoted three professional staff to that investigation. it took one year. and in comparison to the public hearings that happened in the house, our report and findings were out much quicker than what they were. and i think are consistent with in fact what the house process looked like at the end. so, let me share with you what we've accomplished to date. we have devoted seven professional staff positions to this investigation. these are staffers who already had the clearance and already had the knowledge of the materials that they were going to look at that started on day one. now, what was day one? day one was the first public hearing that the committee held with director clapper, director comey, admiral rogers, and director brennan. when they came to the united states senate to testify on the completion of the i.c.a. the report of the last administration on russia's involvement in the elections. the full committee had an opportunity to ask every one of the four i.c. members initi

republicans did it with benghazi. but benghazi was real. it was.>> juan: you should be embarrassed. >> dana: it was real. one thing i thought was surprising, to greg's point, senator warner was asked a question he said i do think we'll be able to get this done before the 2018 midterm elections. another year and a half from now. >> lisa: i think the difference between what we've seen in the senate and house is reflected of the various bodies of congress. senate is a more deliberative body. i think it's important regarding the gorsuch stuff to keep the senate rules in place but it's important the senate is different than the house and keeping the deliberation and being a more thoughtful body of congress. there are so many questions. i think this is going to go on for a long time because there has not been any hard evidence of collusion but the fact that you have an fbi investigation, you can't outrun it. you can't ignore it. it's difficult to turn a blind eye to information based on the fact that we know there's an ongoing fbi investigation. i think

do we remember benghazi, operation fast and furious.the leaks of classified material on targeted terrorists in the internal revenue service targeting conservatives and conservative groups. we know who and what the dems are, they are so little. the conduct today entirely in keeping. to watch a dozen republicans just as craven and awful as the left attack attorney general jeff sessions is unfathomable. even in these times that without question try our souls. >>> our quotation of the evening on the mob the dems today became under their head clown's leadership. this from william penn who said -- what a sorry spectacle the dems orchestrated today who they sought to exploit for political gain and sought to bring down to their lowly level. we're coming right back. >>> president trump promises to rebuild our depleted military. >> after years of endless budget cuts that have impaired our defenses, i am calling for one of the largest defense spending increases in history. lou: it's time to make our military strong once again, and we take up the t

against his confirmation because he was at the homeland security -- state department during the benghazi issue. these guys are political players and they are making a political statement and these opinions, anyone who cares to look at this fairly will conclude that. >> sean: let me go to the issue, one of the strategies, outlined by david brock -- one of the strategies is to tie the trump administration up in the cords. clearly, not only the judge who issued the ban in hawaii is a former classmate of obama, they also want to go to the ninth circuit. they are overturned what, about 80% of the time? it makes it harder -- they have this ability to tie it up. i think it goes to the supreme court, i can't imagine they would go along with this reasoning. what you think? >> i think you're right. judge shopping, donald trump doesn't like it but neither did obama when the d.a. ca case came up. to stop those work permits from going forward. it goes to the question of the judiciary, sean. we focus on the executive and legislative branch but right now, there are 90 key vacancies on the federal bench

we needed an independent special prosecutor or a special committee, like trey gowdy ran on benghazi. >> martha: very briefly, is there anything that you have seen so far that there is anything to ward about jared kushner? >> no, he is cooperating completely. he is not acting like someone who has a secret. what you see, a normal process of accountability. i will say this clearly. the congressman did what he did bait based on his obligation to protect the nation. >> martha: good to see you. coming up at 8:00 on "the o'reilly factor" ," devin nunes, clearly the man of the hour, who will we have been talking about for the last 11 minutes will be on the hot seat. he will talk to bill o'reilly, who no doubt will give him some good questions. stick around for that. stick around, the white house trying to move on from health care and on this monday pursuing action, action, action, and the words of strategist steve bannon. can the gang that fumbled health care get back to the mat on tax reform? who will their friends be on that one, by the way? chris stirewalt, charlie hurt join us. plus, as

this guy beat the crab out of us on benghazi.guy raised real questions about our integrity with regard to benghazi. this guy was a major critic of secretary clinton on the emails. so there was a question, would he bring that partisanship into the c.i.a.? charlie: and the answer is so far? michael: he has not. he knew going in he would have to deal with that problem. i think he has dealt with it effectively. i don't think there's anybody in c.i.a. -- charlie: he is the best person to bring respect between the intelligence community overall and the trump administration so that they trust each other, and so that if the intelligence community makes a recommendation, the president believes it. michael: that relationship is very important for that reason. produced by dossier the former british intelligence operative. michael: it is still out there. i am sure it is input into the f.b.i. investigation. the f.b.i. is probably looking at it for leads. when that came out, i read it three times. charlie: all 28 pages? michael: i don't know h

that they expose all the benghazi lives of hillary clinton? we did on this program. did cbs cover in great detail how members of the media colluded with the clinton campaign in this election cycle? we did here. how much time did cbs devote to this phony russian conspiracy story even though after eight months there is not a shred of evidence? that is the difference ted, between me and you. i'm honest with my audience. i don't pretend that i am fair and balanced and objective. you do. if you really cared about truth and journalism, how can you work for a network that only tells one side of the story? how can i be bad for america when i'm offering the american people news and information lately that it your own network will not touch because they have an agenda? now, ted, i happen to be very proud of the work i do. i am proud of the teams we have built here that work really hard every day to bring this audience news and information that well, frankly, the rest of the media ignores. i hope you enjoyed your press coverage this weekend and covering how proud i am for ameri

people made jokes out of benghazi. say never move on and left the other side expend all their energy and purpose on it. when you say "don't move on and investigate," that makes them question their own efforts long term. if they are not worried about it, maybe there's nothing there but if you say move on, that tells people something is going on. >> kimberly: reverse psychology. >> greg: or reverse reverse psychology. >> kimberly: or reverse reverse reverse. dana. >> dana: i was reminded of something that president george h.w. bush told me years ago pretty was doing an interview in china and i was staffing it for him at the olympics. they were asking about his time at the rnc. he used to get calls from donors saying you've got to make the story go away. in reference to watergate. he told them this story is like making love to a gorilla. it is not going to stop until the guerrilla wanted to. i figured i could tell that story. >> greg: that is filthy, dana. >> kimberly: it's funny. >> dana: meaning that the media is the go

>> we stayed on the benghazi select committee but we knew from the outset it was essentially going to be a political instrument to tear down secretary clinton's numbers. and, of course, we will have to analyze what this development means. i do think that if there is any chance remaining for us to conduct this investigation, we need to do it. as i said earlier in the week, we could do a tremendous service to the country if we're able to do a credible investigation and at the end of the day provide a report to the american people that has democrats and republicans on the same page. but if you have a chairman who is interacting with the white house and sharing information with the white house when people around the white house are the subject of the investigation, and doing so before sharing it with the committee, it may -- it throws a profound doubt over whether that can be done credibly. >> did chairman nunes reveal any classified information today? >> well, it certainly -- it certainly inappropriate for us to be discussing whether specific people were the subject of collection or inci

a lot of the bad details of benghazi were out before the election and the voters reelected president have dropped it after that. a lot of the allegations we're hearing about russia's meddling in the election and trump's ties to russia were out before the election. so voters were aware of this when they elected donald trump as president. so democrats are going to continue to beat on this dead horse. i don't think it's going to do them any favors electorally. >> one bone of contention, though, my friend. a lot of this stuff with russia coming out was not known before the election, hence why it's news now. >> exactly. >> but i digress. alex, it's either a good bad week or a bad good week. let's talk about obamacare and rand paul's treasure hunt that he took throughout capitol hill with a copier, as i failed to point out earlier. house republicans are preparing to move things forward next week. rand paul doesn't like it. some other conservatives don't like what they've seen so far. how is this going to play out? >> the only honest answer, kate, is we don't know. obviously the russia stuf

you know, look, benghazi, you talk about benghazi and libya, such a disaster, the al qaeda flag was flyingthe capital in a war that i tried to stop and why were they listening to my conversation? they wanted to find a way to strategize, to defeat the resolution that i had that would have -- the administration. >> bill: the obama administration wanted to derail your efforts to keep the usa from participating in the demise of qaddafi. okay. that is your take on it. so, you want more information, but a lot of that is redacted, you would like to see the whole thing, right? >> absolutely. >> bill: you have to go to judicial watch, that is one who can get you that. then, when you heard about trump saying that president obama tap to the trump tower, what went through your mind? >> i heard a lot of people laughing about it and i said, wait a minute. i had something happen to me, i have never talked about it before, but i thought, this is the time to explain to people that if a member of congress can have his phone tapped, on a policy matter, hey, this could happen to anybody. >> bill: certainly, f

somehow, they weren't complaining about the length of the benghazi investigation. oftentimes they don't have the results that either side wants. or a special prosecutor. >> you had an exchange here with the fbi director. let's take a listen and talk to you about that. >> is russia our adversary, mr. comey? >> yes. >> mr. rogers. >> yes. do they intend to do us harm? >> they intend to ensure, i believe, that they gain advantage at our expense. >> director comey. >> yes. i want to be -- harm can have meanings. they're an adversary, they want to undermine us in lots of different ways. >> congresswoman, i think listening to that exchange and thought back to the 2012 when it was mitt romney who said during that campaign he considered russia or top geopolitical faux, and the response from democrats was ridicule, quite frankly to the notion it seemed even of an adversarial relationship with russia. obviously a lot has happened since then, there was the russian invasion of ukraine all of the issues with rooumpb interference there. looking back, were democrats guilty of bei

, she lied to the mother of a fallen hero of benghazi. not one, not one democrat elected said this is a bridge too far, i can't support this candidate. not one. i bright this up in discussing the communist party, because that's the way the communist party was really effective in political warfare, everybody in lockstep. and that's the way the left behaves today. political correctness is like a zipper with a lock on it over everybody's lips. you just don't say things. you don't say to a woman you're a liar and a crook who is a former first lady, a former senator, a secretary of state. you do it to a male, but women are a protected species. all this baloney about being strong, they're strong women. elizabeth warren, character assassinating a decent human being who spent 40 years in public life, a dedicated public servant, a champion of civil rights, calling him a racist, reading a letter that was, in essence, repudiated by coretta scott king, violating the senate rules. when mcconnell says you can't say that, oh, they're silencing another w