i am bernard shaw of cnn, cable

george bernard shaw and a whole list of those people. the idea that work is full time, full employment is a new idea and the desperate efforts that we make as a government to assure everyone a full time job has been the center of politics since roosevelt's administration. that, i think is meaningful job, i think is a utopian dream that is not going to stand the test of time. it's going to be hard to sustain. craig vansandt: i ran across a quote that a hungarian she said, "the problem is not the problem. the problem is your attitude towards the problem." we're talking here about the threats that automation pose to employment. what if we look at this as an opportunity to explore ways to expand our humanity? bob sessions: suggestions for what that might what's your- craig vansandt: well, i'm an educator, i would make the argument that we should make much greater use of liberal education, liberal arts education, trying to help students explore the question of how they should live and what they love. university education has in large part bec

achael dukakis opened with bad question from bernard shaw, if your wife were raped and murdered, would you still oppose the death penalty. that hurt them a great deal. when you talk about a third and in 2000, al gore and george w. bush having their final debate. there was a point during the debate where gore moved into bush's space and before commenting about that. i thought it was induced into think about that in connection with the last debate when it was a lot of talk about donald trump moving around the stage near hillary clinton. 2012 betweenate in barack obama and mitt romney was important, not necessarily memorable, but important because obama really had done badly in the first debate, made a comeback in the second one. the third debate with the rubber match. who was going to win or come out ahead. president obama turned out to have a very good third debate. third debate can have an impact. there might be some memorable lines now and then, but at the same time we are used to what we are seeing and now it is a question of whether we see more of the same. host: as a history profes

all of a sudden whichever network we were watching, you know, i think it was cnn, and it was bernard shaw think, broke in and said -- >> george bush, governor of texas, will become the 43rd president of the united states. >> i actually get a chill when i say it right now. i said i've got to go to see al. >> what lieberman didn't know was that gore had already decided to concede. he placed the call. >> just said, governor, you know, i put up a fight or whatever he said, i forget the exact rights, conceded, it was a very short call. i think governor bush just thanked him. there was no love lost between either one of these guys. they didn't like each other, period, so it was probably a ten second call at most, and that was it. >> at the time he conceded, jeb bush was still over there on his computer and he's like i don't know what they're seeing. i don't know what numbers they're seeing. i think it's still too close. >> were you guys kind of surprised? it sounds like jeb was -- >> i think jeb was surprised -- when vice president gore called to concede. >> jeb bush was the governor of florida

bernard shaw's "saint joan," and i played dunois' page. and i said, "look, a king fisher." [ light laughter ] i still know it. >> jimmy: you got the bug there. >> yeah, i got the bug. >> jimmy: how did you convince your parents? did you say, "look, i feel like i'm 13 and i want to be an actor." >> my dad, i remember him saying, "wait, do you -- you're going to be clint eastwood?" [ laughter ] and i was like, "dad, it's not like clint eastwood or nothing, you know?" it's like -- >> [ laughter ] >> jimmy: "in a valley of violence." how would you explain this? 'cause it's a -- >> well, to my father, it's my clint eastwood movie. >> jimmy: it's your clint eastwood movie. >> yes, it really is. it's no joke. it's a spaghetti western, and it's -- which means it's kind of low budget. you know, i did "magnificent seven" earlier this year, which is -- >> jimmy: congratulations on that. that was unbelievable. that's a giant one. >> really fun. it's a giant, like -- [ applause ] hollywood western. you know? but this is kind of an underground spaghetti

i am bernard shaw of cnn, cable news network. my colleagues on the panel are ann compton of abc news, margaret warner of newsweek magazine, and andrea mitchell of nbc news. the candidates are vice president george bush, the republican nominee, and governor michael dukakis, the democratic nominee. [applause] bernard: for the next 90 minutes we will be questioning the candidates following a format designed and agreed to by representatives of the two campaigns. however, there are no restrictions on the questions that my colleagues and i can ask this evening, and the candidates have no prior knowledge of our questions. by agreement between the candidates, the first question goes to governor dukakis. you have two minutes to respond. governor, if kitty dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the killer? gov. dukakis: no, i don't, bernard. and i think you know that i've opposed the death penalty during all of my life. i don't see any evidence that it's a deterrent, and i think there are better a

walter cronkite's who are individuals in the barbara walters, whether you want to call them or the bernard shaw's, these were men and women who, by the way could argue and discuss both sides of the issue. i miss the old tv show that they used to have, counterpoint -- i really do miss that. >> what is it better? my debating justice breyer's as i did for two hours in my studio or you interviewing two smart lawyers? >> i would hope that i when interview to dumb lawyers but only two small boys. >> why would you change lawyers? i would want to interview you and justice breyer. >> that's what i would. >> were better served with the posing art. >> but again, how about justice breyer and clarence thomas in the same studio. >> and then that means that you and i, or whoever's doing it, we have to be able to address both sides. i'm just saying that's one of the things. i would add one other thing and that is, this argument of what is going to happen after the election, if the election, if you listen to donald trump, he says what is going to happen if he doesn't win, it's a conspiracy, and and he has already

george bernard shaw said of his beloved dublin, he said, dublin is a malodorous outhouse. that looks to me like what we have. we have people in there when we have people starving and can't by shoes for their kids and they're talking about who played hide the weenie with somebody 20 years ago. i don't give a -- >> well, it's not just playing hide the weenie. it's like it's like doing it without consent, which is kind of different, larry. >> much different, yeah. >> still to come, the catalog with kat, that's pretty much how it works. if you don't get it, i can't help you. >>> if you'll be in the new york area and would like to be part of our studio audience, e-mail gregtix@foxnews.com. with three types of good bacteria. 400 likes? wow! phillips. be good to your gut. i usand it's the #1 brand. one can beat it for regularity. it's also my... secret weapon. because metamucil gives you more health benefits than the competition. no wonder it's the #1 doctor recommended fiber brand. i have to tell you something. dad, one second i was driving and then the next... they just didn't

i am bernard i am bernard shaw of cnn news network. from abc news, -- margaret warner of newsweek magazine and andrea mitchell of nbc news. the candidates are vice theident george bush, republican nominee, and governor michael dukakis. [applause] bernard: for the next 90 minutes we will question the candidates in a format agreed to by the two campaigns. however there are no restrictions on the questions that my colleagues and i can ask this evening, and the candidates have no prior knowledge of our questions. agreement between the candidates, the first question goes to governor dukakis. you have to minutes to respond. governor, if kitty dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor in irrevocable death penalty for the killer? gov. dukakis: no i don't bernard. you know that i opposed the death penalty all of my life. i don't see evidence that it is a deterrent. i think there are better and more effective ways to deal with violent crime. we have done so in my own state. we have had the biggest drop in crime and industrial state america

i am bernard i am bernard shaw of cnn news network. from abc news, -- margaret warner of newsweek magazine and andrea mitchell of nbc news. the candidates are vice theident george bush, republican nominee, and governor michael dukakis. [applause] bernard: for the next 90 minutes we will question the candidates in a format agreed to by the two campaigns. however there are no restrictions on the questions that my colleagues and i can ask this evening, and the candidates have no prior knowledge of our questions. agreement between the candidates, the first question goes to governor dukakis. you have to minutes to respond. governor, if kitty dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor in irrevocable death penalty for the killer? gov. dukakis: no i don't bernard. you know that i opposed the death penalty all of my life. i don't see evidence that it is a deterrent. i think there are better and more effective ways to deal with violent crime. we have done so in my own state. we have had the biggest drop in crime and industrial state america

when i named -- if i was reminded of a george bernard shaw quote that robert kennedy used a lot. they're those who look at things the way they are and they ask why. i dream of things that never were and i ask why not. when i became secretary of the navy in 2009 there were a lot of things i encountered that day the question, why not? at that time openly americans were not allowed to serve in the military. why not? in the navy women were permitted to serve aboard submarines or in the river reefs or in the seals. why not? in the marines, women were not exempted in the ground combat roles. why not? on the campuses of harvard columbia gail princeton in our rotc has been gone for decades. why? why not? bring it back. in every case as is always the case or nearly always the case with these kinds of questions there wasn't a good answer. so i strongly support the repeal of "don't ask don't tell" that led the implementation of the navy and the marine corps. also in 2010 openserver some submarines and riverine squadrons to women. i called for an increase in female midshipmen at the naval ac

when i named that ship i was reminded of a george bernard shaw quote that robert kennedy used a lot. there are those who look at things the way they are and ask why. i dream of things that never were and ask -- why not. when i became secretary of the navy in 2009, there were a lot of things that i encountered that egg to the question -- why not? at that time openly gay americans were not allowed to serve in the military. why not? in the navy, women were not permitted to serve aboard submarines or in the seals. why not? women were not accepted into the ground combat roles. why not? campuses of harvard, columbia, yale, princeton, the rotc had been gone for decades. why? why not? why not bring it back? , as is always the case, or nearly always the case with these kinds of questions, there wasn't a good answer. reported --ly supported the repeal of don't ask a hotel and lead the implementation in the navy in the marine corps. in 2010i opened service on squadrons and river to women, calling for an increase in female midshipmen at academy-- at the naval across the navy and marine corps , w

walter cronkite's and individuals in the barbara walters, whatever you want to call them or the bernard shaw, these are men and women who by the way argued both sides of the issue. i miss the old tv show that they used to have point, counterpoint. >> i really do miss that. >> i have a question. my debating justice prior to this was in my studio that you are interviewing to smart lawyers. >> i would interview to dump lawyers let alone smart lawyers. >> i would want to interview you and justice prior. that's what i would do. >> i believe were asking him on the opposing viewpoint. >> but again, justice breyer and tomlinson used to tell andthen that means that you and i or whoever , we've got to create to address both sides, i'm just saying that's one of the things that i miss and i would add one other thing and that is after the election, if you listen to donald trump, he says what's going to happen if he doesn't win is a conspiracy. and he's already sold and wanted and the folks earlier, he's already condensed all the views. what if you are part of the corporate media and he said yesterday, yo

michael opened with that question from bernard shaw cnn, if your wife were raped and murdered, wouldou still oppose the death penalty. that hurt him a great deal. when you talk about the final debate, it was interesting that in 2000, al gore and george w. bush, having their final debate, there was a point during that debate where al gore moved into bush posse space and people were commenting on that. i thought it was interesting to think about that in connection with the last debate when there was a lot of talk about donald trump moving around the stage near hillary clinton. the third debate in 2012 between barack obama and mitt romney was important not necessarily important because remember obama really had done badly in the first debate and made a comeback in the second one. you might say the third debate was the rubber match, who would win and who would come out ahead. president obama had a very good third debate. debates can have an impact and there might be some memorable lines now and then. at the same time, we are used to what we are seeing. it is now a question of whether we

shaw and saint augustine's both following. second verse same as the first for bernard langer. through two rounds. day one leader doug garwood and larry mice both to strokes back. final round tomorrow afternoon. >>> unc's own andrew miller in straight terminator mode this postseason. five outs last night in game one of the alcs. how about five more today? miller yet to allow a run in the playoffs as his tribe take game two, 2-1. cleveland to canada. >>> could we really be headed for a cubs and indians world series? is the world ready? chicago up on los angeles 3-1 as they open the nlcs. that one in the sixth inning at last check. we go way back, '48 the last time for the indians. the cubs 1908. one of those streets is getting broken. after 20 years in washington, we're learning lots about richard burr. first, he opposed a bill prohibiting insider trading by members of congress. now we learn burr had over $100,000 in oil and gas stocks while he backed legislation giving tax credits benefitting gas companies. and oil and gas companies donated over half a million dollars to burr's

shaw threw a grenade. >> governor, if kitty dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the killer? >> no, i don't, bernard death penalty during all of my life. i don't see any evidence that it is a deterrent. i think there are better and more effective ways to deal with violent crime. >> the candidate treated it like a policy question. not a personal one. >> you didn't seem to have a natural human impulse. >> and i've been asked that question about a thousand times. and unfortunately i answered it it as if i'd been asked it a thousand times. >> the answer is i'd like to kill the guy. >> i don't think there's any doubt about how i feel about my wife. >> there will be other stuff like it -- >> finally, at the end of the campaign, he started to punch back. >> friends, this is garbage. this is political garbage. >> but it was too late. >> think you'll win it? >> we've got a good chance at it. >> the man who had once been up by 18 points lost 40 states. >> nbc news now projects that george bush is president-elect of the united states. >> how do you get over it? >> to be blunt about it, losing sucks. i've had b