from 2004, the consolidated case jose sosa and the united states, petitioners, versus up berta alvarez mashea and others, respondents. >> the arrest of the convicted killer in the cia shootings. this is an individual who's arrested by fbi agents in pakistan, in 1997. under the ninth circuit's approach, obviously, this individual could not be arrested by fbi agents as a categorical matter. but under the approach of respondent, the federal courts would have to inquire into the circumstances surrounding the arrest and to inquire specifically into whether the government of pakistan consented to the arrest by fbi agents in pakistan in 1997. >> what the government and petitioner sosa can the court to believe is that having gone to the trouble of expressing to the world, to the people, in terms of the -- that we would as a nation enforce the law of fwhagss, that then the congress just didn't do it. because basically, congress didn't do anything else to enforce the torts and violation of the law of nations clause of the judiciary act of 1789. >> sosa and the u.s. versus alvarez mashane et al. >> c-sp