assume things have to be the way they've always been and what i am trying and to do is what bertrand russell recommended that once in awhile you have to hang a question on things you've come to believe for a long time. >> what is the difference between a conservative and libertarian? >> this is a tricky one. my heart is on the table because i feel like i have sympathy in both camps but i identify myself as a libertarian. the libertarian has a basic principle which is non-aggression. you cannot initiate force against anybody else. i think a lot of people would agree with that instinctively we know it's wrong to what your neighbor over the head but libertarians would take that to the logical consequence which is you get the things the government does they typically involve the violence against people who themselves have not initiated violence so it's considered to be legitimate. a conservative is less i guess it the logical, deliberately or a least in the classical sense bonds systematic and i say that not as an insult because they have good reason for being on systematic that life is too comp

what i'm trying to do is to a bertrand russell recommended. once in a while you've got to hang a question mark on things you've come to billy for a long time. >> host: thomas woods, what's the difference between a conservative and libertarian? >> guest: well, this is a tricky one in my heart is very much on the table here because i feel like i have sympathies in both camps. i identify myself as a libertarian. the libertarian has one basic principle which is nonaggression. you cannot initiate force against anyone else. i think a lot of people would agree that instinctively. of course you know it's wrong to clock your neighbor over the head, the libertarians take that to the logical consequence, which is the look at the initiation of violence against people who themselves have not initiated. so we consider it to be legitimate. a conservative is life, guest ideological. the conservatives deliberately released in the classical sense like edmund burke is deliberately non-systematic. and i say that not as an insult because they have good reasons for

what he does is signs the bertrand russell lubber neinstein manifesto to say we have to control these atomic weapons. but even as he's dollying that still 17-year-old, 6-year-old come curious how does that force field work. he asked his assistant to bring nine pages of the patients he was working on in his office and he sat in his deathbed writing equations making mistakes and crossing them out, trying to figure out a unified theory that would help explain the electromagnetism, gravity, the force fields and just to look at them and see the story he would see the last line where it dribbles off and saw as his body he's writing one last line of equations he thought would get him and the rest of us one step closer to the spirit manifest in the law of the universe. as for dr. franklin, that tolerance carries with him a larger thing, being part of something larger. during his lifetime he donated the building front of each and every church built in philadelphia. at one point they were building a new hall and it's still there and called the new hall left of independence hall and he wrote the